# data[].attributes.body
Eden Weingart has multiple publications through the New York Times. Weingart is also currently a Senior Staff Editor for the NYT and has been working with them since 2017.

# data[].attributes.body
While from what I skimmed, the article seemed to have some good information. While the author of this source was not a scientist or expert in the field, it seems that they did research to investigate carbon and CO2 plants. I thought it was really interesting that she wrote this article, but wasn't an expert in the field.

# data[].attributes.body
Eden Weingart is a visual editor for the NYT. She got a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Communication Design at Carnegie Mellon University. She has published more artistic journals and creative pieces.

She references a study about carbon capture and includes evidence from professors at MIT, health and climate institutes, and government agencies.

# data[].attributes.body
Authority:

What is the author's expertise (education, professional experience), which particularly qualifies him or her to write on this topic?

Eden Weingart has a Bachelors of Fine Arts at Carnegie Mellon University. She has experience as an art director and graphics editor in the New York Times. The article includes many graphics to simplify the explanations, which she has experience creating.

What, if any, institutional affiliation does the author have? Has the author published widely on this specific topic?

Weingart is affiliated with the New York Times. On her website, she frequently makes infographics about topics relating to climate change such as transportation and carbon capture.

Objectivity:

Does the author, publication, or institution have a particular point of view in relation to this topic?

The author approves of the use of carbon capture technology through the use of growing trees or storing CO2 underground. She gets quotes from directors of environmental groups to support her claims.

Does the author make an effort to present a balanced point of view in order to account for bias?

The author agrees that the transportation of CO2 through pipelines can be dangerous if it leaks. She also includes specialists who disagree with the emphasis on carbon capture because people should focus more on decreasing carbon emissions.

Are there data or statistics used in the article? Where did the data/stats come from?

There is data about how isolating CO2 in fossil fuel plants can reduce total emissions by 10-11%. This is from a published paper from the Royal Society of Chemistry

# data[].attributes.body
The author Eden Weingart does not have science experience but the sources that she has in her paper are from science publishing websites. She does not have a particular view. I think she makes an effort to present a balance point of view.

# data[].attributes.body
While the NYT does follow the ethical guidelines of journalism and is generally viewed as reliable, it is not an academic source. The author of this article does not have a background in science. As pictured above, Eden Weingart is an art director and journalist. She has many publications for the NYT ranging from pop culture to politics to science. Within the article she provides links to numerous studies.

# data[].attributes.body
Eden Weingart is a graphics reporter for The New York Times who specializes in data visualization rather than scientific research. While she is not a carbon capture expert she has a reputable institution and relies on data from scientific and government sources which strengthens the article’s credibility.The article presents carbon capture within the context of climate urgency which includes both benefits and limitations of the technology. It uses data and visuals from credible sources to inform readers