# data[].attributes.body
1. Title

The essay has a clear and appropriate title: Academic Reading Reflection. The title reflects the topic of the paper and helps the reader understand that the essay will discuss the student’s reflections on the readings.

2. Type of Paper

It is clear that this paper is a reflection essay. The author uses personal responses such as “I realized,” “This made me think,” and “I began to notice.” These expressions show that the writer is not only summarizing the articles but also reflecting on their meaning and impact.

3. Research Question

The essay does not present a specific research question. However, the central idea of the essay is clear. The author reflects on how George Monbiot’s articles helped them understand the connections between environmental issues, economic inequality, and political power.

4. Use of Sources and Quotes

The essay refers to several articles by George Monbiot, such as “Everything is Connected,” “Billionaires Are Bad for Us,” “Fantasy Farming,” and “Shitshow.” The author refers to these sources when explaining the main ideas. However, the essay does not include direct quotations from the articles. Adding one or two short quotes could strengthen the academic quality of the paper.

5. Structure

The essay has a clear structure. It includes an introduction, several body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The introduction presents the main topic, the body paragraphs discuss different articles, and the conclusion summarizes the main reflections of the author.

6. Thesis Statement

The essay contains a thesis statement in the introduction. The author explains that Monbiot’s articles helped them realize that environmental, economic, and political problems are interconnected. This idea becomes the central argument that guides the entire essay.

7. Paragraph Structure

The paragraphs are generally well structured. Most paragraphs begin with a topic sentence that introduces the main idea. The writer then explains examples from the articles and adds personal reflections. The paragraphs are developed logically, and the ideas are clearly explained.

8. Presentation and Logical Flow

The information and ideas are presented clearly. Each paragraph focuses on one article and explains the main idea from that text. After explaining the example, the writer adds personal reflections. This structure helps create a logical flow throughout the essay.

9. Connection Between Thesis and Conclusion

The conclusion is connected to the thesis statement. In the introduction, the author explains that the articles helped them understand the connections between different global issues. In the conclusion, the writer returns to this idea and explains why understanding these connections is important, especially for students of international relations.

10. Grammar, Spelling, and Style

Overall, the grammar and spelling are correct. The language level is appropriate for an academic reflection essay. The sentences are clear and easy to understand. The writing style is simple but effective, and it supports the reflective nature of the paper.

Overall Evaluation

the essay is well organized and clearly written. The author successfully combines summaries of the articles with personal reflections. With the suggested improvements, the essay could reach the highest academic standards and receive a top grade. This peer review demonstrates that the writer has a strong understanding of both the content and the reflective style required for this assignment.

# data[].attributes.body
Improving clarity

“Here is a paragraph from my essay. Please help me make the sentences clearer and more precise while keeping the academic tone.”

Why I use this prompt:

Clear language is essential in academic writing. This prompt helps me simplify complex sentences and express my ideas more clearly.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Laura Roselle honored by Church Women United | Today at Elon ...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Laura Roselle honored by Church Women United | Today at Elon…

# data[].attributes.body
“Theory provides a way of seeing.”

— Laura Roselle, Sharon Spray, and Joel T. Shelton, Research and Writing in International Relations, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2020), p. 10

I used to think theory was abstract and disconnected from reality. Now I see it as a lens that shapes how researchers view a topic. Different theories highlight different aspects of international politics, so being aware of my theoretical perspective is important.

# data[].attributes.body
“Expanding knowledge is like putting together a puzzle. The outcomes of multiple studies are the pieces that collectively provide a larger picture of our political landscape.”

Laura Roselle, Sharon Spray, and Joel T. Shelton, Research and Writing in International Relations, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2020), p. 2

This metaphor reduces the pressure of research. I used to think my study had to be revolutionary, but this quote shows that even small studies matter. Each project adds one piece to a larger puzzle of knowledge about international politics.

# data[].attributes.body
“Think of a literature review as a description of a conversation taking place among scholars. If you invited scholars writing about women and guerilla war to attend a meeting, you could probably fit all the scholars in a relatively small room… Yet if everyone writing on the topic of ethnic conflict were to attend such a meeting, there would be so many scholars present that… scholars would self-divide into groups.”

Laura Roselle, Sharon Spray, and Joel T. Shelton, Research and Writing in International Relations, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2020), p. 58

This helps to understand the purpose of a literature review. Instead of simply summarizing sources, the goal is to identify the main scholarly discussion and show how my research contributes to it.

# data[].attributes.body
“One cannot see the social world ‘as it is’—our view of things is mediated by concepts, categories, and powerful assumptions about what is important.”

Laura Roselle, Sharon Spray, and Joel T. Shelton, Research and Writing in International Relations, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2020), p. 12

This quote shows that research is never completely neutral. Our background, assumptions, and choices influence how we study the world. Good research requires being aware of these perspectives and explaining them clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
“Political scientists refer to the circumstances, topics, policies, or other phenomena that they want to understand as dependent variables. The factors believed to influence the project’s dependent variable are referred to as independent variables.”

Laura Roselle, Sharon Spray, and Joel T. Shelton, Research and Writing in International Relations, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2020), p. 40

This concept explains how researchers analyze causes and outcomes. The dependent variable is what we want to explain, while independent variables are the factors that may influence it. This structure helps organize research questions and evidence.

# data[].attributes.headline
Laura Roselle, Sharon Spray               Research and Writing in International Relations, 3rd ed.

# data[].attributes.subject
Laura Roselle, Sharon Spray               Research and Writing in International Relations, 3rd ed.

# data[].attributes.headline
Stephen Bailey,                         Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed.

# data[].attributes.subject
Stephen Bailey,                         Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed.

# data[].attributes.headline
Kate L. Turabian                                      A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations

# data[].attributes.subject
Kate L. Turabian                                      A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations

# data[].attributes.headline
Kate L. Turabian                                      

# data[].attributes.subject
Kate L. Turabian                                      

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
LibraryThingKate L. Turabian | Author | LibraryThing

# data[].attributes.body
"Your success as a researcher thus depends not just on how well you gather and analyze data, but on how clearly you report your reasoning so that your readers can test and judge it."

Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers, 7th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 6.

I used to think that finding the "right" facts was the hardest part of research. But this quote shifts the focus entirely. Data is meaningless if I cannot explain how I got from point A to point B. The real challenge is transparency laying out my thought process so clearly that readers can follow every step. It turns research from a private discovery into a public conversation built on trust.

# data[].attributes.body
"The most successful researchers know that readers care about a question only when they think that its answer might encourage them to say not 'So what?' but 'That's worth knowing!'"

Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers, 7th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 9.

This is both the hardest and most important lesson in the book. I can find answers to countless questions, but if no one cares about the question itself, my work will be ignored. This forces me to be brutally honest: Why does this matter? Answering that "why" becomes my compass. It gives my project purpose before I even start gathering evidence, and it reminds me that good research serves a curious audience, not just myself.

# data[].attributes.body
"You can't plunge into a project blindly; you must plan it, then keep the whole process in mind as you take each step. So think big, but break the process down into small goals that you can meet one at a time."

Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers, 7th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 12.

I am the type of person who wants to see the finished product immediately, and this impatience usually leads to chaos. This quote is a reality check. It tells me that a massive project is just a series of small, manageable steps. If I plan ahead and keep the big picture in mind, I won't get lost in the details. Breaking things down makes the work feel less intimidating and keeps me from freezing up when things get complicated. It is a reminder that patience and structure are not the enemies of creativity—they are what make creativity possible.

# data[].attributes.body
"A working hypothesis is a risk only if it blinds you to a better one or if you can't give it up when the evidence says you should. So as in all relationships, don't fall too hard for your first hypothesis."

Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers, 7th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 20.

I often get attached to my first idea and defend it even when the evidence starts to crack. This quote feels personal. It warns me that the biggest danger in research is falling in love with my own assumptions. A good researcher holds ideas lightly and is ready to let go when the facts say otherwise. It is not a sign of failure to change my mind—it is a sign of honesty. This mindset keeps me flexible and open to discovery, which is the whole point of research anyway.

# data[].attributes.body
"Even the most systematic researcher has unexpected insights that send her off in a new direction. Work from a plan, but be ready to depart from it, even to discard it for a new one."

Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers, 7th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 12.

This concept captures the tension between structure and discovery. A plan is necessary—it keeps us focused and organized. But rigidly sticking to a plan can blind us to new possibilities. The best research is flexible. It follows the evidence, even when it leads somewhere unexpected. For me, this is both scary and exciting. It means I have to trust myself enough to let go of control when something interesting appears. A plan is not a cage; it is a starting point. True discovery happens when we are brave enough to wander.

# data[].attributes.body
"Applied research is what we do when we know we must solve a practical problem, but before we can act, we need to understand the problem better."

Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers, 7th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 10.

Applied research sits between pure curiosity and direct action. It is the bridge. Before we can fix something, we have to know why it is broken. This kind of research does not just describe the world—it prepares us to change it. The focus is on gathering insight that will later guide decisions. I see this as the most strategic type of research. It acknowledges that good intentions are not enough; we need understanding first. Acting without it is just guessing. Applied research gives us the confidence to move forward wisely.

# data[].attributes.body
"Academic writing is clearly different from the written style of newspapers or novels. For example, it is generally agreed that academic writing attempts to be accurate, so that instead of 'the metal was very hot' it is better to write 'the metal was heated to 65°C'."

Stephen Bailey, Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2018), p. 4

I used to think academic writing meant using fancy words to sound smart. But this quote shows the opposite: precision matters more than style. Vague phrases like “very hot” are not acceptable,I need to be exact. Academic writing is not about showing off; it is about making ideas clear and trustworthy. If I am not accurate, the reader has no reason to believe me.

# data[].attributes.body
"Students are expected to take a critical approach to sources, which means to challenge what they read rather than accepting it as reliable."

Stephen Bailey, Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2018), p. 1

This quote changed how I read. I used to think that if something was published, it must be true. But scholarship is a conversation, so my job is to question it: Who wrote it? What is their bias? Is the evidence strong? This makes me an active reader, not a passive one. It is challenging but empowering, because I can disagree if I have good reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
“Plagiarism basically means taking ideas or words from a source without giving credit to the author. It is seen as a kind of theft and is considered to be an academic crime.”

Stephen Bailey, Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2018), p. 26

I used to think plagiarism meant copying whole paragraphs. This quote shows it is broader and more serious. Ideas are intellectual property, so presenting someone else’s idea as my own is stealing. Citation is not only about avoiding punishment; it is about giving credit and keeping academic work honest.

# data[].attributes.body
“A paragraph is a group of sentences which deal with a single topic. Dividing up the text into paragraphs helps both writer and reader to follow the argument more clearly.”

Stephen Bailey, Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2018), p. 72

Before I used to think paragraphs were just text breaks. Now I see they organize ideas. Each paragraph should focus on one main point, and a new idea needs a new paragraph. This helps structure my argument and makes my writing clearer.

# data[].attributes.body
“There are two main ways of organising a discussion essay: either by grouping the benefits in one section and the disadvantages in another (vertical), or by examining the subject from different viewpoints (horizontal).”

Stephen Bailey, Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2018), p. 92

This concept shows two ways to structure a discussion essay. The vertical method lists advantages and disadvantages separately, which works well for shorter essays. The horizontal method looks at different perspectives and discusses pros and cons within each. Knowing both helps me choose the best structure for my argument.

# data[].attributes.body
“In academic writing, the passive voice is more common than in other genres, making it more impersonal and formal. But the passive should not be overused.”

Stephen Bailey, Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students, 5th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2018), p. 148

Passive voice focuses on the action rather than the person, which suits academic writing. For example, “The experiment was conducted.” However, too much passive voice makes writing unclear. The key is balance between passive and active forms.