# data[].attributes.headline
1st Amendment case challenges precedent: 17 books removed from public library in Texas

# data[].attributes.subject
1st Amendment case challenges precedent: 17 books removed from public library in Texas

# data[].attributes.body
In the state of Texas, 17 books containing adult content and topics were banned from public libraries.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
These books are examples of freedom of speech and banning them would go against the 1st Amendment.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
I think that the Supreme Court would protect the book-banning due to the images and topics. This is an example of limiting the 1st Amendment rights.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Log In - U.S. Newsstream Collection - ProQuest

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform.

# data[].attributes.body
2 students at Tufts University co-wrote an opinion piece published in the school’s student newspaper about Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza. one was handcuffed outside her apartment and taken into custody by masked federal agents. The other student was held in federal custody for around two weeks before being freed by a judge, who compared the current case. The Trump administration argued that the student's presence in the United States harms its foreign policy goals and could “potentially undermine” the Middle East peace process.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
They students were expressing their opions, Which is protected by the 1st amendment. But students were arrested. 

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
The supreme court would probably revoke the students detention and possible deportation, if the case was based on their right to free speech. 

# data[].attributes.headline
First amendment rights of colleges and Universities

# data[].attributes.subject
First amendment rights of colleges and Universities

# data[].attributes.body
Trump has been changing things and wants to suppress the free speech of these schools and try to deport foreign people, and change everything about how the education system works.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
They are removing the free speech of the Colleges and Universities and forcing these schools to listen to him, and remove freedom of assembly not allowing these people to be with these others even if they are documented.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
They would determine that this violates the First Amendment and try to revert everything back to normal, giving people their rights back.

# data[].attributes.headline
Was First Amendment Violated in Student Arrests? Trump Lawyer Won’t Say.

# data[].attributes.subject
Was First Amendment Violated in Student Arrests? Trump Lawyer Won’t Say.

# data[].attributes.body
Trump officials have said publicly that they are scrutinizing and seeking to remove noncitizen students who have been involved in campus unrest related to the war in Gaza.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
this connect to the first amendment because they kept moving them without anyone knowing they had no freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
the supreme court decided that they violated the first amendment. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Was the first amendment violated in the student arrest? Trump lawyer wont say. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Was the first amendment violated in the student arrest? Trump lawyer wont say. 

# data[].attributes.body
Ms. Ozturk, a Turkish student seeking her doctorate in child development at Tufts University, co-wrote an opinion piece published in the school’s student newspaper critical of Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza. She was handcuffed outside her apartment and taken into custody by masked federal agents on March 25. She has been in detention in Louisiana for six weeks, her lawyers say she is facing medical harm because of her untreated asthma.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
The first amendment is about protecting freedom of speech and Ms. Ozturk was not protected by this.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
whether the supreme court agrees or disagree with her opinion in her article they would allow her to be free with no consequences because of freedom of speech..

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
By Jonah E. Bromwich, Anemona Hartocollis and Ana Ley

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Was First Amendment Violated in Student Arrests? Trump Lawyer Won’t Say.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Trump administration is focusing on logistical issues, not constitutional ones, in its efforts to keep several international students in detention. The tactic has effectively slowed some high-profile cases.

# data[].attributes.headline
Judges block Trump push to cut funding to public schools over diversity programs

# data[].attributes.subject
Judges block Trump push to cut funding to public schools over diversity programs

# data[].attributes.body
A federal judge on Thursday blocked Trump administration directives that threatened to cut federal funding for public schools with diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
Diversity and equity is apart of the first amendment because its the right to be yourself. 

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by the National Education Association and the American Civil Liberties Union, which accused the Republican administration of giving “unconstitutionally vague” guidance and violating teachers’ First Amendment rights

# data[].attributes.headline
TikTok ban violates Americans' First Amendment rights (THEFIRE.ORG)

# data[].attributes.subject
TikTok ban violates Americans' First Amendment rights (THEFIRE.ORG)

# data[].attributes.body
Many argue that the recent upbringing of the TikTok ban takes away one's freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
Part of the first amendment is a persons freedom of speech, people argue that taking away this popular social media app would be taking away American citizens' freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
I believe the supreme court would ban TikTok, because, yes you do have free speech on TikTok, however there were speculations that the company that owns TikTok was stealing data and selling it, so it would make sense for them to ban them even if it results in backlash.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
FIRE to SCOTUS: TikTok ban violates Americans’ First Amendment rights

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Never before has Congress banned an entire platform, much less one used by half the country.

# data[].attributes.headline
A second Amazon boycott is happening May 6 to 12. Find out why. (USA TODAY)

# data[].attributes.subject
A second Amazon boycott is happening May 6 to 12. Find out why. (USA TODAY)

# data[].attributes.body
From May 6th to May 12th there was a second Amazon boycott, which was a result of a shopping protest. Amazon and many other companies have taken back their diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts (DEI) following the Trump administration.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
This occurrence is freedom of assembly, since the shoppers are rallying together to boycott companies like Amazon, because of their efforts to get rid of DEI.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
I think that the supreme court would rule for the citizens, because it is the people's first amendment rights to protest whatever they please should it not bring a disturbance. The boycott of Amazon is peaceful and does not include violence or anything. Overall, the supreme court would decide to protect their first amendment rights should this go to court. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Harvard sues Trump administration over ‘arbitrary and capricious’ freeze of $2 billion in grants

# data[].attributes.subject
Harvard sues Trump administration over ‘arbitrary and capricious’ freeze of $2 billion in grants

# data[].attributes.body
Harvard University filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after it froze over $2.2 billion in federal grants in response to Harvard's refusal to comply with demands to limit activism on campus, curb antisemitism, and enforce broader leadership and policy reforms. Harvard argued that the freeze violated its First Amendment rights and the Civil Rights Act, while the administration criticized the university for not meeting conditions to access taxpayer-funded support.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
 Harvard argued that the administration's actions constitute viewpoint discrimination and infringe upon academic freedom, a core tenet of the First Amendment.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
They would probably rule unanimously with Harvard University since the Trump Administration has no evidence that Harvard is displaying any sort of antisemitism.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Harvard University announced Wednesday it will turn down $8.7 million in federal coronavirus relief, a day after President Donald Trump criticized the wealthy Ivy League school over taxpayer money it stood to receive.

# data[].attributes.headline
Banning TikTok is Unconstitutional. The Supreme Court Must Step In.

# data[].attributes.subject
Banning TikTok is Unconstitutional. The Supreme Court Must Step In.

# data[].attributes.body
The United States believes TikTok is harming citizens; however, TikTok users believe this is a violation of freedom of speech. Eventually, users convinced people that they would only be able to ban the app if they had proof Tiktok is dangerous to U.S. citizens.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
They believe it violates freedom of speech

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Banning TikTok is Unconstitutional. The Supreme Court Must Step In. | ACLU

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Our First Amendment right to express ourselves must be protected.

# data[].attributes.headline
Court Orders Release of Tufts Foreign Student Detained For Her Speech

# data[].attributes.subject
Court Orders Release of Tufts Foreign Student Detained For Her Speech

# data[].attributes.body
Court Orders Release of Tufts Foreign Student Detained For Her Speech

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
Öztürk was expressing her opinion, which is protected by the First Amendment, even for noncitizens. The government isn’t allowed to punish someone—like by deporting them—just because they said something it disagrees with.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
The Supreme Court would probably strike down Öztürk’s detention and possible deportation if it were based solely on her protected political speech, affirming that the First Amendment applies to noncitizens and that speech alone isn't valid grounds for removal.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Court Orders Release of Tufts Foreign Student Detained For Her Speech

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Yesterday, federal District Judge William K. Sessions, III, of the District of Vermont ordered the immediate release of Tufts graduate student

# data[].attributes.headline
Student From Tufts Returns After a Six-Week Detention (New York Times)

# data[].attributes.subject
Student From Tufts Returns After a Six-Week Detention (New York Times)

# data[].attributes.body
A Turkish woman wrote an opinion criticizing her school's pro-Palestinian opinions. She wrote her views in the student newspaper and was then arrested and did time in jail.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
This connects to the First Amendment because it is taking away her freedom of speech. Also, even though she's a non-citizen, she should still have the right to free speech.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
They would most likely be in the woman's favor because it was her freedom of speech that she could use to say whatever she wanted.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Log In - U.S. Newsstream Collection - ProQuest

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform.

# data[].attributes.headline
1st Amendment case challenges precedent: 17 books removed from public library in Texas

# data[].attributes.subject
1st Amendment case challenges precedent: 17 books removed from public library in Texas

# data[].attributes.body
In Texas, 17 books were banned in a school. Some think this decision controls thoughts and ideas and turns places to learn and read into political institutions. O

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
Banning books connects to freedom of speech because it limits ideas brought in by the books.

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
I believe that the Supreme Court would protect the book banning. This would limit the 1st amendment right.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Log In - U.S. Newsstream Collection - ProQuest

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform.

# data[].attributes.body
Summary of article: (3-4 sentences summarizing the article)

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.0C2m2kC0
(1-2 sentences explaining the connection to the 1st amendment)

# data[].attributes.custom_properties.selk-HbU
(2-3 sentences explaining if you think SCOTUS would protect or limit people's 1st amendment rights)