# data[].attributes.body
Greece has lower ecological footprint than Slovakia as it appears to be 3.78 and in the same time Slovakia has 4.16. Slovakia has lower impact by fishing grounds and grazing land.

# data[].attributes.headline
Greece has a lower footprint than Slovakia in the year of 2022 the built up land in Slovakia is 0.07 but in the other hand on Greece is 0.12

# data[].attributes.subject
Greece has a lower footprint than Slovakia in the year of 2022 the built up land in Slovakia is 0.07 but in the other hand on Greece is 0.12

# data[].attributes.body
Mirza A (USGGED), Konstantina P (Nafpaktos)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Open Data Platform - Google Chrome 10_3_2025 6_47_00 μμ

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Slovkia has worse results in all categories.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mustafa K. (Samsun)- Aspasia P. (Nafpaktos)- Vivi L (Acharnes)

# data[].attributes.subject
Mustafa K. (Samsun)- Aspasia P. (Nafpaktos)- Vivi L (Acharnes)

# data[].attributes.body
Greece has higher ecological footprint compare to Turkey.

# data[].attributes.headline
Zuzana M., Juliana T., GCD & Christoforos B (Acharnes)

# data[].attributes.subject
Zuzana M., Juliana T., GCD & Christoforos B (Acharnes)

# data[].attributes.body
In the year 2022 Turkey's ecological footprint was 3.39, which is lower than Slovakia's total of 4.16.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Στιγμιότυπο οθόνης (1)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Open Data Platform - Google Chrome 10_3_2025 6_50_14 μμ

# data[].attributes.body
It is clear that Slovakia has higher ecological footprint than Turkiye because we can see that Slovakia has 4.16 and Turkiye 3.39 .

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Slovakia has more built up lands and more forest products thats why the ecological footprint is better

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Open Data Platform - Google Chrome 10_3_2025 6_49_00 μμ

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Slovakias karbon footprint is bigger than the Turkiye

# data[].attributes.body
Slovakia - Turkiye

# data[].attributes.headline
Vagelis P/Acharnes and Panagiotis P/Nafpaktos

# data[].attributes.subject
Vagelis P/Acharnes and Panagiotis P/Nafpaktos

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at Greece’s footprint, we see carbon emissions are our biggest problem at 1.27 Earths. This means we are using more resources than our planet can regenerate. Our cropland footprint is also quite high at 0.66 Earths, likely due to intensive agriculture.

# data[].attributes.body
Slovakia has a higher total footprint (2.75 Earths) than Greece (2.50 Earths), probably because forest products footprint is higher (0.41 Earths), likely because of deforestation and logging activities. While cropland use is slightly lower than Greece, Slovakia must focus on sustainable forestry management and reducing carbon output to balance resource use

# data[].attributes.body
Greece has a significantly higher fishing grounds footprint (0.076 Earths) than Slovakia (0.025 Earths), which makes sense because of our strong fishing industry. Overfishing is a serious problem, so we should implement stricter regulations and support sustainable fishing methods to ensure marine biodiversity remains intact.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the data, Slovakia has a bigger ecological footprint (4.16 Earths) compared to Greece (3.78 Earths). This means that if everyone lived like the average person in Slovakia, we would need more than four Earths to sustain that level of resource use, which is not sustainable.

The biggest contributor in both countries is the carbon footprint, with Slovakia’s being higher (2.38 Earths vs. 1.92 Earths in Greece). This suggests Slovakia relies more on fossil fuels or energy-intensive industries. Greece, on the other hand, has a larger cropland footprint (0.998 Earths), probably due to its strong agricultural sector.

# data[].attributes.headline
Nikos S (Acharnes) & Kagan K (USGGED), Stamatis (Nafpaktos)

# data[].attributes.subject
Nikos S (Acharnes) & Kagan K (USGGED), Stamatis (Nafpaktos)

# data[].attributes.body
Slovakia has a total footprint of 2.75 Earths, mostly from carbon emissions and cropland use. Turkey has a smaller footprint of 2.25 Earths but it uses more cropland than Slovakia. Both countries rely heavily on carbon, which shows how important it is to reduce emissions. By these data we realize how much we impact the planet and that we need to find better ways to use resources.

# data[].attributes.headline
Martha A *Acharnes, Alexis M * Nafpapktos

# data[].attributes.subject
Martha A *Acharnes, Alexis M * Nafpapktos

# data[].attributes.body
The data shows that Slovakia has a total footprint of 4.16 Earths, while Turkey has 3.39 Earths. Both countries have the biggest impact from carbon emissions, but Turkey uses more cropland than Slovakia. Slovakia also has a higher forest product footprint, meaning it consumes more wood-related resources. This makes me realize how different countries use resources in their own ways, and that reducing carbon and managing land better could really help the planet.

# data[].attributes.headline
Burak B (USGGED), Paraskevas K (2o Esperino EPAL Acharnon)

# data[].attributes.subject
Burak B (USGGED), Paraskevas K (2o Esperino EPAL Acharnon)

# data[].attributes.body
These data show that Greece has a total footprint of 2.50 Earths, while Turkey has 2.25 Earths. Both countries have their biggest impact from carbon emissions but Greece uses more cropland and fishing grounds than Turkey. On the other hand, Turkey has a lower grazing land footprint.

# data[].attributes.headline
Antonia A-Antonis P (Acharnes), Agathi S (1st EPAL Nafpaktou)

# data[].attributes.subject
Antonia A-Antonis P (Acharnes), Agathi S (1st EPAL Nafpaktou)

# data[].attributes.body
The data shows that Turkey has a much bigger total footprint (289.72 million global hectares) compared to Greece (39.26 million global hectares). This makes sense because Turkey has a larger population. Both countries have their biggest impact from carbon emissions, but Turkey also uses way more cropland, forest products, and grazing land than Greece.

# data[].attributes.body
The chart and the data show show that Turkey has a much larger total ecological footprint (289.72 million global hectares) compared to Greece (39.26 million global hectares). This is expected since Turkey has a significantly bigger population and more resources ate consumed.

Both countries have the highest impact from carbon emissions but Turkey also uses a lot more cropland, forest products, and grazing land than Greece. This suggests that Turkey depends more on agriculture and forestry to support its population.

We think that even though larger countries naturally use more resources, they can still take steps to reduce carbon emissions, manage forests responsibly, and use land more efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
Turkey has a significantly larger ecological footprint than Slovakia, mainly due to its higher carbon emissions and extensive agricultural activities. With a much larger cropland and carbon footprint, Turkey's environmental impact is far greater, reflecting its larger population, industry, and energy consumption. In contrast, Slovakia, with its smaller size and lower resource consumption, has a much smaller ecological footprint. While both countries rely on natural resources, Turkey’s impact is more pronounced across all categories, from cropland and forest products to carbon emissions.