# data[].attributes.body
See: [What stood out to you in the video?]

Think: [What might it say about the student experience? What did it make you consider or connect to?]

Wonder: [What are you curious about now? How might this relate to your context or teaching practice?]

# data[].attributes.body
Tech provides interactive activities, such as game element, that engage students in learning

# data[].attributes.body
While the transmission of knowledge is equal, low tech classes lack the engagement factor and activities to draw students attention and keep them attentive

# data[].attributes.body
In students opinion, notes are boring

# data[].attributes.body
Students are more engaged and motivated to learn

# data[].attributes.body
Tech makes lessons less boring and more interesting using quizzes

# data[].attributes.body
Quiziz allowed students to respond through activities

# data[].attributes.body
Tech makes them look forward to learn deeper.

# data[].attributes.body
Quizzes make it more engaging

# data[].attributes.body
Use tech to help students engage in learning, and also collaboration.

# data[].attributes.body
See:

Collaboration

Self paced learning

Self assessment

More engaged with tech and interactive tools

Think:

Tech is a useful tool for diverse learners

Wonder:

Reflect on own teaching: How to reach out to all learners thru tech.

# data[].attributes.body
Students are more engaged in their learning and the application allow them to work on thinking about what they have read and consolidate their learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Students were motivated and more keen to become competitve

# data[].attributes.body
See: the students provided positive feedback with regards to the use of tech-infused lesson.

Think: the students were engaged

Wonder: tech-infused lessons does engage students more

# data[].attributes.body
Increase level of motivation through varied activities and competitions

Deepen Learning

# data[].attributes.body
See: Students are sharing that with technology, they feel more engaged

Think: students shared that they are able to follow the lessons

wonder: tech allows different activities to take place, but does it promote self-directedness

# data[].attributes.body
With tech, students are more engaged as it is gamified which gives them the motivation to want to take part.

# data[].attributes.body
Less boring

# data[].attributes.body
See:Students more engaged,

Think: student agency more apparent

Wonder: Similar

# data[].attributes.body
See: Students enjoy using the platform Quizizz.

Think: Naturally, the interactive/engaging/competitive nature of the tool makes learning more enjoyable.

Wonder: Does student enjoyment necessarily mean better learning? Is there a place for students learning to 'be bored' and still focus?

# data[].attributes.body
Using quizzes instead of notes to increase engagement esp with the leaderboard aspect

The leaderboard aspect creates good healthy competition and the urge to want to do their best and listen

# data[].attributes.body
More engagement, more interactive as it involves all students to be on task

# data[].attributes.body
With tech, it makes learning more exciting and engaging for students. Depending on the platforms, using tech can create a competitive environment and that can motivate students to participate.

# data[].attributes.body
More engaging, interactive. allows for radial thinking rather than lateral thinking

# data[].attributes.body
Ed Tech lessons are able to engage students and enable them to focus better

With this engagement, learning can become deeper as it also enables discussion and collaboration

I think as ed-tech lessons are pre-planned, more careful and thoughtful planning takes place although this might also be true for pen and paper lessons

# data[].attributes.body
Student are more engaged with the use of technology compared to traditional read only activity.

# data[].attributes.body
See: tech is a good tool for active learning

Think: students are more engaged, challenged and attentive when tech is used in class

Wonder: same experience in class as a teacher. Students are very engaged when we use competitive platfoms

# data[].attributes.body
With the support of technology, the lesson can be gamified to actively engage students, helping them stay focused and aligned with the learning objectives and intended outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Students are clearly more excited to talk about their experience with tech.

Gamifying the lesson appeals to these boys.

# data[].attributes.body
co-construction of knowledge with a partner ensures a deeper understanding of the content, they could clarify their doubts in a non-threatening environment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The quizziz increases student motivation. Students enjoy the interactive nature of tech tools.

2. Student experience is made engaging when the quizzes provide competitive games for students to self-assess what they see in the notes.

3. Question: what types of questions can be created in Quizziz to make students think after getting the answer wrong in multiple-choice quiz?

# data[].attributes.body
Technology provides a means of increasing engagement, but I’m wondering if we’re looking at a predisposition towards tech-based lessons. Is there a loss that the inquiry process doesn’t concern itself with the students’ understanding for the need and relevance of non-tech aspects like notes?

# data[].attributes.body
Students participate through actions facilitated by tech.

# data[].attributes.body
Use of tech needs to structured and purposeful in order to make learning engaging as well meaningful in encouraging deep learning

# data[].attributes.headline
I wonder if the lesson plan was a function of the teacher, i.e., the teachers who plan engaging lessons with tech might also plan engaging lessons with no tech.

# data[].attributes.subject
I wonder if the lesson plan was a function of the teacher, i.e., the teachers who plan engaging lessons with tech might also plan engaging lessons with no tech.

# data[].attributes.body
See: Students understanding the difference in teaching methods with tech and without tech

Think: Students remember how they feel “competitive feeling”, perhaps more immersive that results in greater engagement.

Wonder: wonder if there’s quantitative ways to measure if such engagement translate into achievement or learning, beyond student experience or feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
with the use of quizizz, students are retrieving information from their memory and this is more effective learning than just mere reading the notes.

# data[].attributes.body
See: Students are able to voice out their opinions on tech with enthusiasm.

Think: Students find tech interactive and more engaging.

Wonder: How tech promote collboration among shy/ quiet students?

# data[].attributes.body
See: Students are building on each others knowledge.

Think: Students feel empowered.

Wonder: Will certain students take advantage of such structure to disconnect? What if there is a gap that is class-wide left undetected? Will there be a different in accessibility for those who are less well-versed in technology?

# data[].attributes.body
1. Students find lesson with tech more engaging

2. Students are more motivated to do

3. Definitely, dispel thoughts that tech is not superior to lessons without tech .

# data[].attributes.body
See: students seem to be able to receive the contents of the lesson better with the help of Quizizz or other tech tools.

Think: students need more prompts to help them to stay engaged throughout the lessons. The tool like Quizizz forced students to activate what they have learnt through the notes in the process of answering the questions. It created a competitive ambience as they are competing among each other as they think it is fair when they are using the same set of notes (starts from the same starting line)

Wonder: if we will be able to conduct lessons that achieve the same effects without tech.

# data[].attributes.body
Understanding the content does not equate to applying the content.

Importance of teachers’ questions. How the content is facilitated and teaching is done (with or without tech)

# data[].attributes.body
With or without tech, questioning is important to help students deepen learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Does not focus on application of concept to different scenarios

# data[].attributes.headline
Students may have the knowledge and understanding the content but they may not know how to apply their knowledge 

# data[].attributes.subject
Students may have the knowledge and understanding the content but they may not know how to apply their knowledge 

# data[].attributes.body
The students do recognise that it’s not about the technology but the depth of questioning and how the lesson differentiates and applies the information from the notes.

# data[].attributes.body
Understanding the content doesn’t mean students can apply the content to solve the questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Students are more engaged and have more motivation to complete their tasks.

# data[].attributes.body
Students can self learn from textbooks but unable to apply the content. They are frustrated.

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher signposting is vital to helping students identify the scenarios to apply content and contextual knowledge.

# data[].attributes.headline
Tech or no tech, it’s the type of questioning done in class 

# data[].attributes.subject
Tech or no tech, it’s the type of questioning done in class 

# data[].attributes.body
Students expect a useful practice where they try to apply what they have learnt from the textbook or notes.

# data[].attributes.body
This student shows good understanding of the importance of applying his knowledge in new context / in assessment context.

# data[].attributes.body
Students tend to read up last minute, understand but lack skill of application.

How will technology bridge this aspect where context are brought to application phase?

# data[].attributes.body
Understanding the content is not the same as knowing how to apply the knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Gamifying the lesson with tech is very appealing for students, but sometimes they focus more on the game than on the context. So, sometime we have to design carefully so we can achieve the goals.

I wonder if there are any guides on using ed-tech for effective learning?

# data[].attributes.body
See: Students are generally more active and inclined towards tech driven lesson.

Think: Students emphasised that Quizziz is competitive and it allows real time learning that is more engaging and not boring as compared to notes.

Wonder: if the use of such platforms can transferred learning and translates into results.

# data[].attributes.body
See: effectiveness of questions and how to apply the content

Think: teachers must be able to ask questions effectively to stimulate students' thinking process

wonder: asking questions is important to elicit responses from students

# data[].attributes.body
Students learn better through teacher questioning.

# data[].attributes.headline
Tech or no tech, there are human interactions eg activities, rewards that interest students 

# data[].attributes.subject
Tech or no tech, there are human interactions eg activities, rewards that interest students 

# data[].attributes.body
Extrinsic motivation can increase students’ engagement in the classroom.

Teachers play an important part in the classroom (teacher-students relationship)

# data[].attributes.body
Some are able to engage without technology if grounded in strong pedagogy

# data[].attributes.body
See: lessons can be engaging too. but depends on good and proper lesson planning.

Think: students know that they can do it independently (last minute work) but not sure how to apply understanding

Wonder: If we have lower tech use in class, it would mean proper lesson planning to ensure key inquiry questions are specifically included in class.

# data[].attributes.body
To understand does not equate application.

Absence of real life experience when focused only on knowledge content

# data[].attributes.body
How does a teacher teach and engage the students may not just depend on technology. Motivational (extrictic) really helps

# data[].attributes.body
See: Students don't like when teachers just repeat content they can read in textbooks.

Think: Students want more than just 'understanding the content'. They want to be able to apply the knowledge.

Wonder: Do students simply assume that 'teacher talk' = low level of learning? Or is it their attention that needs to be trained to truly understand what teachers are saying (even if there's no tech)?

# data[].attributes.body
Even with pen and paper, a teacher made the lesson exciting with real objects / things students are interested in.

# data[].attributes.body
The teachers just need to be more creative, with low tech, the teachers can make the lesson more meaningful & engaging by dialogic, role play and include activities to relate what they have learned to world context

# data[].attributes.body
Good lesson planning is the most important in ensuring lessons are engaging be it with or without technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher must be very skilful in questioning skills to dig deeper to help students understand. Again, like mentioned in the video, understanding a concept does not equate to correct application of it.

# data[].attributes.body
This positions the teacher as a facilitator, guiding deeper inquiry-based learning (IBL) through meaningful and engaging classroom discussions that allow students to make connections.

Formative assessment (FA) would also need to be embedded to ensure all students are aligned with the lesson objectives.

# data[].attributes.body
Life influences life- the power of affirmation of the teacher versus the 'rewards' from technology

# data[].attributes.body
Students mentioned actual learning in class does not translates to application in exam success.

# data[].attributes.body
The questioning technic to deepen the learning, collaborative learning, more knowledgeable others etc. The effective use of extrinsic motivation. I believe the teacher has done something else that makes me want to sit in his lesson as well.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology can provide instant feedback to students - help to identify mistakes and correct them immediately, improving learning efficiency.

Digital platforms like Quizziz and Nearpod can provide personalized learning paths for students.

# data[].attributes.body
Ultimately seems to still be dependent on teachers’ competency and pedagogy. May not be about the tech or no tech.

I do wonder if tech can help to increase equity and consistency, esp. with teacher shortage, and differences in teacher capacity and competency.

# data[].attributes.body
A big factor at play will be the teacher, no doubt. Tech enhances and complements the teacher's ability in delivering something effectively. An uninspiring teacher with the best of techs, may fail to deliver, too.

# data[].attributes.body
It seems like infusing technology into lessons is just a catalyst for teachers to design more engaging lessons, not necessarily that it actually engaged students more.

# data[].attributes.body
It's the external motivation that pushes the students to learn enough to clear the exams, instead of the intrinsic desire to want to learn more or find out more about a subject.

# data[].attributes.body
In real classroom, real life context, tech or low tech should not be the focus. Students' deep learning and students' learning experiences should be key.

The use of tech should depend on the situation. Honestly in the classroom, after the students use the tech for lesson, they will immediately drift off to surf the internet and be totally distracted. The use of tech is momentary, but the use of the device leads them to remember they have a tik tok video, or whatsapp conversation. Just walk into a class and you will see that.