# data[].attributes.body
There are three reading I am interested in. First article is "How do I write a text for college? Making the transition from high school writing". Second reading is "How to read like a writer". The third one is "write before writing". There is one thing in common, that is, thinking. Real-world is there will be difference in thinking between different stage of people when writing and reading. The current problem is the difference in thinking will make them face different problems like the way they solve will be not good enough. The gap will be many people will have the wrong understanding of when they see writers and when they write. There will be a need for the improvement in thinking. Why I chose those three article is because I met the situation before. They make me surprise. The way of reading, the way of writing, and what true writer or professional writers will do. There is not only a connection between those three articles, but me and those three articles. (I post the same article in the comments area)

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the most interesting article is "Literacy and Politics of Education" since the article makes a deeper explanation to "literacy" which shows how different thoughts of literacy affect society. Especially when the author emphasizes how people's thoughts are controlled by the author. The article that surprised me is "The 32 million word gap". The article illustrates the importance of getting earlier education. The 32 million words gap makes me feel unbelievable about such a big gap. The article that is important to me is "Strong writing and writers don’t need revision" because the author explain the importance of doing revision and introduces several helpful methods while doing revision

# data[].attributes.body
Carillo' s Reading And Writing Are Not Connected”, Edward and Paz's "Only Geniuses Can Be Writers" and LaMott's "Shitty First Drafts" are most interested me. For Carillo, she believes that the concept that reading and writing are closely connected with each other and that the ideal approach to teach college writing and other writing courses at the postsecondary level is to offer "simultaneous training in reading and writing." I really agree with her idea because when we are reading, we are connected with the writer. When we are writing, we are writing for others to read.

For Edward and Paz, they believe that not only geniuses can be writers. All of us can do it. Writing needs collaboration and practice. Writing is a step-by-step process. Writers want to be sociable, not isolated.

For LaMott, she exposes the phenomenon of the majority of authors, who all begin with a sloppy first draft, regardless matter how brilliant they are at writing. That's true to me. Each time I want to start writing an essay, I always have a really messy first draft. For the first draft, I only write down my ideas. The shitty first draft is really helpful for the following second draft.

# data[].attributes.body
I learn from Lamott's "Shitty First Draft" that I can only improve my writing by creating first drafts, second drafts, third drafts, and possibly further. It may enable us to produce an almost flawless final draft. Let me also understand that the goal of a draft is to produce a flawless final version. Also, I understand that reading and writing complement each other through reading Carillo's article. In addition, Wardle's "You Can Learn to Write in General" make me get his idea that "There is no writing in general". The general writing will mislead the audience to understand the true meaning you want to express in the article. Because the purpose of writing is to arouse readers' thinking and get the truth narrated by readers through good words and grammar.

# data[].attributes.body
These are the articles that I could still remembered without reread, since it's too impressive. I like Mike Bunn's How to read like a writer, which is also called RLW. It made me think a lot about my reading habit and skills, in real life we generally do not read like a writer. The problem of reading normally is that we miss a lot of writer's opinions when we read like an audience. And the idea Wardle suggested about not write in general shocked me, since we were doing a lot of writing practices from middle school, and we were told to follow certain structures and patterns to write. It was wrong for us to write special things during the exam, so Wardle's article definitely points out my writing problem. Besides that, Giovanelli's article also counts as one of my favorite. It indicates the importance of revision which is part of writing, I like that idea because sometimes people just ignore revision after they finished essay.

# data[].attributes.body
The first interesting relation in those article is that they excerpt from the book Bad Ideas About Writing. Each article introduces an idea about writing, but those idea are related to each other some how. In Miller and Schulz's passage they introduce a framework of literacy that helps students to improve their writing skill. In Wardle's article he states that people can not learn writing in general, when people writing they have to consider the audience and other factors. So there is no single model that suites for every writing. Those two article both agree that writing is comprehensive and various. In Giovanelli claims in the article that writing is highly bound with revision. Moreover, the revision should be clear and effective. Three articles have a common point that writing is about practice.

# data[].attributes.body
I will say "University Literacy: A Multi-Literacies Model" written by Miller & Schulz is the most impressive for me. The authors mentions a problem about the instructors in college did not provide different kind of help for students who do not have experience in   university. Due to some of the students do not have any friend in college, they may feel a huge barrier with others, and they need to pay even twice or three times efforts than people who are already know about college from their friends and parents. In David Shenk’s “The 32-million Word Gap”, the author mentions that there exists a huge  difference between children from different families in knowing words. And the earlier they talk to the kids, the better oral skills the kids will have in the future.  Besides, in C.H. Knoblauch claims that people do not have enough motivation to learn literacy in "Literacy and the Politics of Education". It is unreasonable that educated people are powerful due to they are educated. Everyone should have the same opportunity to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
Thinking about all the sources we've read about so far in UWP 7Y as part of the scholarly conversation about literacy, consider and then write a post that responds to the following questions. (You may want to return to the readings themselves, your HRCs, etc. for inspiration!)

What readings (3 minimum) are most interesting, surprising, important to you and why?

What real-world, current problem, gap, or need are the sources addressing?