# data[].attributes.body
Different projects have different levels of permission for potential future users. Users can apply for authorization on particular datasets.

# data[].attributes.body
Must fill in a form before download is possible

# data[].attributes.body
Link: https://data.research.cornell.edu/content/intellectual-property

# data[].attributes.body
A data archive contains specific information about licensing and re-use which is asserted in text or logo at the data storage site.

Good bits:
• There is a clear declaration about future reuse
• Many 'standard' licenses or templates exist
• Users can often choose or assert a license that suits their particular needs.
Less good bits:
• License information may or may not be visible in the section of the website where the download button is located
• A future user needs to know about and actively look for license info
• License info may or may not be embedded in downloaded data objects.

# data[].attributes.body
Before you can perform a download the license info is presented and you have to actively agree to the license for reuse before you’re download can begin

Good Bits
• Don’t have to look for it
• Active agreement (not passive/tacit)
Less good bits
• Few ’standard examples’ exist
• Not possible on many platforms

Examples:
Hacked Dataverse 'Guestbook' feature

# data[].attributes.body
• Only 'registered' members of a specific community can reuse
• To become a member, you must create a log-in/account and agree to the terms of use at account creation
• Additional qualifications for membership can also exist (e.g., affiliated with an academic research institution; Ethics training)

Good bits:
• Often clearer than most data use agreements between informal collaborators
• Precise wording can be incorporated into consent forms to allow/enable this kind of protected future reuse
Less good bits
• Participants unlikely to be able to access their own data
• Depending on implementation, data reuse agreements can be forgotten at time of download

Examples:
Databrary

# data[].attributes.body
• Only one license type exists as a default (the most open)
• Any other license info can be hard to find in a supplementary file
• A future user can skip/miss the relevant details

# data[].attributes.body
• A number of 'standards' exist
• GitHub retains other permissions over data stored on their site
• Users don't necessarily see/check the license

# data[].attributes.body
Origin:
• Some states have laws allowing a person autonomy over the use of their images for profit, but they can enter a contract that specifies certain uses.

Good things:
• Release often sought after a shoot
•This is fully informed
• Templates for contracts are available
• Completely editable
Less good things:
• Not required in law in all places
• Not always suitable for research data

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Ultimate Guide To Photo Release Forms

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Do media release forms have you scratching your head? We'll show you how easy they are, and why those photo consent forms are so important for your business!

# data[].attributes.body
Link:  https://www.stateofopendata.od4d.net/chapters/issues/indigenous-data.html

# data[].attributes.body
Helping participants understand what happens to their data and why.

# data[].attributes.body
Fine print for each of the items is presented on the back of the form so a participant can find out more, but a plain language summary is sufficient for most participants.

# data[].attributes.body
Fine print for each of the items is presented on the back of the form so a participant can find out more, but a plain language summary is sufficient for most participants.

# data[].attributes.body
Fine print for each of the items is presented on the back of the form so a participant can find out more, but a plain language summary is sufficient for most participants.

# data[].attributes.body
Fine print for each of the items is presented on the back of the form so a participant can find out more, but a plain language summary is sufficient for most participants.

# data[].attributes.body
Link: https://doi.org/10.21979/N9/I6KXC6

# data[].attributes.body
Identifiable/reidentifiable data
From: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734936

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Page from "Ethics in Practice: A Workbook for Junior Researchers". Email if you would like to review a draft of the Workbook 😉

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
@deevybee @mcxfrank Lurking under that wording is a key question - who owns the data? Researchers, institutions, funding agencies, public tax payers, the participants themselves...all have a stake in this

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
@deevybee @mcxfrank Lurking under that wording is a key question - who owns the data? Researchers, institutions, funding agencies, public tax payers, the participants themselves...all have a stake in this

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.referenced_tweets[].text
@mcxfrank I think you are not critical enough! ''not every researcher has the ability, permission, or desire to share sensitive, labor-intensive information' is basically saying don't share unless you want to.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Something went wrong, but don’t fret — let’s give it another shot.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
Lurking under that wording is a key question - who owns the data? Researchers, institutions, funding agencies, public tax payers, the participants themselves...all have a stake in this
— Dr. Leslie Blaha (@leslieblaha) April 8, 2019

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
@deevybee @mcxfrank Lurking under that wording is a key question - who owns the data? Researchers, institutions, funding agencies, public tax payers, the participants themselves...all have a stake in this

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.includes.tweets[].text
@mcxfrank I think you are not critical enough! ''not every researcher has the ability, permission, or desire to share sensitive, labor-intensive information' is basically saying don't share unless you want to.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
@deevybee @mcxfrank Lurking under that wording is a key question - who owns the data? Researchers, institutions, funding agencies, public tax payers, the participants themselves...all have a stake in this

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
@deevybee @mcxfrank Lurking under that wording is a key question - who owns the data? Researchers, institutions, funding agencies, public tax payers, the participants themselves...all have a stake in this

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.referenced_tweets[].text
@mcxfrank I think you are not critical enough! ''not every researcher has the ability, permission, or desire to share sensitive, labor-intensive information' is basically saying don't share unless you want to.

# data[].attributes.body
Origin:
• Basic copyright is held by a creator (e.g., artist, musician) unless the work was created under contract (e.g., a commission). In general, some time after the death of a creator, their works will be passed into the public domain (different rules for different jurisdictions), after which time their work can be used freely without payment. A creator can assert that they want their work to be used freely before this time period is open by stating a license for use. This is called applying a license, or asserting a license.

Good things
• Clear guidelines on reuse
• Different types available
• Now considered an international standard
Less good things
• Not designed for participant data
• Not editable for special reuse circumstances (e.g., no way to add 'assurance of respect')

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Creative Commons licenses give everyone from individual creators to large institutions a standardized way to grant the public permission to use their creative work under copyright law. From the reuser’s perspective, the presence of a Creative Commons license on a copyrighted work answers the questio…