# data[].attributes.body
Plan to be customized by CHDI team after SHAPE Results Review.

# data[].attributes.body
Infographic to be shared with staff and families

# data[].attributes.body
Worksheet to be completed as a team after SHAPE Results Review.

# data[].attributes.body
See Onboarding Overview document for SHAPE Registration tips (*Teams SHAPE Report and Profile are also housed here for easy reference)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Alternatives to Exclusionary Discipline

Exclusionary discipline policies, such as suspensions or expulsions, can have long-term negative consequences on youth (e.g. school dropout and involvement in the juvenile justice system) and school climate ( White House Report: The Continuing Need To Rethink Discipline; HHS and U.S. DoE Policy Statement on Exclusionary Discipline). Although federal data demonstrate steady declines in suspensions and expulsions, data indicate that students of color and students with disabilities continue to be disproportionately suspended or expelled.

Several states have addressed the negative consequences and disparities related to exclusionary discipline by enacting policies that direct schools and districts to eliminate or reduce punitive discipline practices and/or implement restorative practices.

Sources: Data retrieved via an extensive independent review by the NCSMH and supplemented by additional sources, including:

National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE). (2020). State Policy Database: Alternatives to Exclusionary Discipline. Retrieved from: https://statepolicies.nasbe.org/health/categories/social-and-emotional-climate/alternatives-exclusionary-discipline

Education Commission of the States. (2018). School Discipline: Are there non-punitive approaches outlined as alternatives to suspension or expulsion? Retrieved from: http://ecs.force.com/mbdata/MBQuest2RTanw?rep=SD1804

All 50 states and the District of Columbia have either anti-bullying laws, regulations, model policies, or a combination of all three. These require districts to engage in bullying prevention and to respond when bullying occurs. Although it is necessary to address bullying, there is concern regarding the reliance on punitive responses to bullying. Punitive discipline practices do not reduce incidents of bullying and do not address harm.

The links in the map lead to state pages on stopbullying.gov, a site hosted by the US Department of Health and Human Services. In addition to describing the laws, policies, and common components, each state page provides link to the policy itself.

The information in the map was originally collected and compiled by several federal government agencies, including U.S. Department of Education (DoE), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Department of Justice (DOJ).

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Laws, Policies, & Regulations | StopBullying.gov. https://www.stopbullying.gov/resources/laws

Culturally Responsive Teaching

Students, their families, and their communities thrive when school staff celebrate and integrate the societal contributions of people from different cultures in the classroom. According to the National Childhood Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN), multicultural recognition in education increases personal meaning of classroom content, elevates student-teacher relationships, improves academic success, and enhances students' sense of belonging at school. Recognizing and honoring the experiences of diverse people reduces disenfranchisement among communities that are marginalized. The New America's report on culturally responsive teaching (CRT) notes that "the majority of states do not yet provide a description of CRT that is clear or comprehensive enough to support teachers in developing and strengthening their CRT practice throughout their careers." The map below provides access to state professional teaching standards that incorporate aspects of CRT.

The information in this map was originally compiled New America.

Muñiz, J. Culturally responsive teaching: A 50-state survey of teaching standards. New America. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/reports/culturally-responsive-teaching/

Every Student Succeeds Act (Chronic Absenteeism and School Climate)

One of the most significant components of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) is the requirement that states include multiple measures in their accountability systems. In addition to academic indicators (academic achievement, academic growth, graduation rate, and progress in achieving English language proficiency (ELP)), states must select at least one indicator of "school quality or student success" such as:

Rates of chronic absenteeism

College and career readiness

Student or educator engagement

Student access to and completion of advanced coursework

School climate

States have the flexibility to select multiple "school quality or student success" indicators and to use multiple measures within each indicator.

Expanded Medicaid Coverage in Schools

In 2014, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reversed the Free Care Rule, which restricted schools from getting reimbursement for services provided to Medicaid-enrolled students without an Individualized Education Plan (IEP). The reversal permits states to allow school districts to bill Medicaid for school-based health services, including mental health services, provided to all Medicaid-enrolled children, not just those with an IEP. To expand this eligibility, states need to take action, typically through modification of state Medicaid plans. For more information on school Medicaid, please visit the Healthy Students, Promising Futures webpage, a Healthy Schools Campaign program.

The map below displays states that have leveraged the policy reversal by expanding Medicaid coverage in schools, states that are in the process, and states that have not yet taken action.

This information was originally compiled by the Healthy Schools Campaign through their Healthy Students, Promising Futures program.

Partnering with and effectively engaging families is critical to the success of comprehensive school mental health systems. The map below displays states that have a policy directing districts to develop or implement plans, policies, or programs related to family engagement in schools.

The information in this map was compiled by the National Association of State Boards of Education.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SHAPE - School Health Assessment and Performance Evaluation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Alternatives to Exclusionary Discipline Exclusionary discipline policies, such as suspensions or expulsions, can have long-term negative consequences on youth (e.g. school dropout and involvement in the juvenile justice system) and school climate ( White House Report: The Continuing Need To Rethink Discipline; HHS and U.S. DoE Policy Statement on Exclusionary Discipline).

# data[].attributes.body
Document includes project expectations, goals, SHAPE tips, timeline and contact information.

# data[].attributes.body
Template teams may use as they identify a behavioral health data collection method.

# data[].attributes.body
Document to help your school develop and implement a systematic data collection process as part of your CSMH work.

# data[].attributes.body
Required lessons include: MTSS, Trauma and its Impact on Behavior, Mobile Crisis, Positive School Climate

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Welcome to Educate-SMART! Educate-SMART (School Mental Health Awareness and Response Training) is a one-stop training portal designed for school staff members, caregivers, and students to learn about trauma-informed behavioral health topics. Educate-SMART aims to increase school staff members’, care…