# data[].attributes.headline
Mohd Faizzul Affif Bin Osman (BA20160935)

# data[].attributes.subject
Mohd Faizzul Affif Bin Osman (BA20160935)

# data[].attributes.body
Pada pendapat saya, saya lebih ke arah kepada ekologi sosial. Ini kerana ekologi sosial mampu untuk mewujudkan masyarakat di mana manusia berhubung dengan alam sekitar dan boleh hidup dengan harmoni. Ekologi sosial mengkaji interaksi dan tindak balas antara individu terhadap persekitaran di sekeliling mereka dan bagaimana interaksi ini mempengaruhi masyarakat dan persekitaran secara keseluruhannya. Ekologi sosial juga melihat kepada hubungan yang sentiasa berubah antara semua bahagian masyarakat yang mempunyai peranan penting untuk memastikan sistem sihat dan stabil.

# data[].attributes.headline
NURUL HUDAH BINTI ABDUL GAIS (BA20160918)

# data[].attributes.subject
NURUL HUDAH BINTI ABDUL GAIS (BA20160918)

# data[].attributes.body
Pada pendapat saya, saya lebih memilih Deep Ecology berbanding Social Ecology . Hal ini dikatakan demikian kerana, Deep Ecology lebih memihak kepada alam sekitar dan manusia manakala Social Ecology pula lebih mementingkan organisasi sosial manusia. Ini bermakna, manusia lebih mendominasikan dan menggalakkan autonomi manusia secara maksimum terhadap alam sekitar. Perkara ini dapat menyebabkan kemusnahan alam sekitar kerana pembangunan negara itu lebih menjadi keutamaan kepada manusia. Tambahan pula , Deep Ecology mengenalpasti bahawa Anthropocentric dianggap sebagai suatu masalah namun ianya merupakan sifat yang diamalkan oleh Social Ecology . Oleh hal yang demikian , Deep Ecology lebih menghargai kualiti kehidupan kerana kehendak untuk menggunakan sumber alam bagi memastikan kepentingan manusia terjaga ataupun berada pada kedudukan yang lebik baik daripada alam sekitar hendaklah diketepikan agar dapat menghargai sesuatu spesies kehidupan di dunia ini .

# data[].attributes.body
Social ecology is concerned with the domination in the human world and its leads to the domination of nature when it emphasizes the solution to humans destruction of non-human nature. Meanwhile, the deep ecology is more concerned with changing human consciousness as it give less consideration on human by limiting the resources of the earth. Considering to all, I believe that social ecology is a part of all living beings which human and non-humans are connected and play the important role to emphasize peaceful cooperation with nature.

# data[].attributes.headline
Nama: Nur Nazihah Binti Jusli  No matrik: BA20160901   

# data[].attributes.subject
Nama: Nur Nazihah Binti Jusli  No matrik: BA20160901   

# data[].attributes.body
Deep Ecology merupakan salah satu pendekatan yang menekankan hubungan timbal-balik secara rasional antara manusia dan juga alam sekitar. Malah, deep ecology ini juga memberi fokus kepada mengetepikan kehendak bagi memastikan sumber alam dapat digunakan agar kepentingan manusia terjamin. Social ecology merupakan kritikan keatas deep ecology dimana  social ecology menekankan bahawa organisasi sosial lebih penting dan dominasi manusia dalam social ecology keatas alam semula jadi. Oleh itu, saya memilih deep ecology disebabkan kerana manusia dianggap sebagai salah satu daripada bahagian alam sekitar dimana alam sekitar sama dengan spesis semula jadi yang lain. Tambahan pula, deep ecology juga lebih memihak kepada alam sekitar dan kurang memberi pertimbangan kepada manusia disebabkan kerana campur tangan manusia keatas alam sekitar yang sudah melebihi batas dan boleh memberi impak yang buruk.

# data[].attributes.headline
Would you prefer Deep Ecology or Social Ecology? Give reasons for your preference. - Zurainah binti Kanit (BA20160921)

# data[].attributes.subject
Would you prefer Deep Ecology or Social Ecology? Give reasons for your preference. - Zurainah binti Kanit (BA20160921)

# data[].attributes.body
Both philosophies have their own distinct approaches with a similar goal in mind, which is to safeguard the environment from destruction. Social Ecology philosophical ideas are prone to making a connection between humans and nature, whereas Deep Ecology view human beings are of equal value to all other parts of nature. In my opinion, I think that Social Ecology could manage to protect our nature resources seeing how the connection between humans and nature affected humans' understanding on the consequences of their actions. From this, we can see that certain groups in our society are now openly trying to make people realize the importance of protecting the environment by the means of education, cooperation, as well as regulations. Hence, I believed that this method could guide us, especially the younger generations, to keep our environment from facing the destruction.

# data[].attributes.body
In order to create an ethical and environmentally conscious society, social ecology seeks to reintegrate human social development with biological development and human communities with ecocommunities. The type of society formed by human is not predetermined by their mere biological presence in huge numbers. Even a vast population of people is capable of structuring society in ways to improve the natural world. Deep ecology, on the other hand, does not seek to reintegrate humans with the first nature. It even considers that the biological presence of humans in any significant numbers to be detrimental to thhe first nature. Therefore, I prefer the social ecology better than deep ecology.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the perspective between deep ecology and social ecology each has its pros and cons. deep ecology puts the principle of equality between human and non-human entities are capable to bringing a positive impact on the environmental ecosystem, but we need to being realistic just like Bookchin and Foreman who put aside their ideological differences by accepting that human dominance against the ecosystem is indeed a normal because of social development itself, but it will be leading to the destruction of the ecosystem. So to prevent this problem from continuing to happen we also needs control the consumption of the natural resource to protect our ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.headline
Would you prefer Deep Ecology or Social Ecology? Give reasons for your preference. - Feinny Khoo (BA20160977)

# data[].attributes.subject
Would you prefer Deep Ecology or Social Ecology? Give reasons for your preference. - Feinny Khoo (BA20160977)

# data[].attributes.body
Deep ecologists emphasise the value of all parts of the ecosystem, including humans, animals, and inorganic matter, while social ecologists blame unjust social hierarchies and relationships for the current climate catastrophe and the ongoing destruction of the environment. When it comes to the fundamental relationship between humans and the natural world, I believe that deep ecology is better able to paint a simplified and straightforward conceptual argument than social ecology.

# data[].attributes.headline
Would you prefer Deep Ecology or Social Ecology? Give reasons for your preference. By: DAPHNE CORE ROBERT (BA20160949)

# data[].attributes.subject
Would you prefer Deep Ecology or Social Ecology? Give reasons for your preference. By: DAPHNE CORE ROBERT (BA20160949)

# data[].attributes.body
Social Ecology argues that the idea of dominating nature resulted from the domination of human by human, rather than the reverse. Meanwhile, Deep Ecology locates the origin of the ecological crisis in belief-systems, be it religions or philosophies. From my perspective, as long as it is useful for us in developing our comprehensive environmental protection, I do not think there is anything Deep Ecology has to offer that is not good or better when looked at through a Social Ecology lens.

# data[].attributes.headline
Deep ecology or Social Ecology? It should be both? By: ALNADZRI LUDDIN (BA20160951)

# data[].attributes.subject
Deep ecology or Social Ecology? It should be both? By: ALNADZRI LUDDIN (BA20160951)

# data[].attributes.body
I love how the 2 scholar of the ecology (Bookchin and Foreman) were a contrast of one another at first however they managed to put aside their differences and agreed that to conserve the survival of forest and wilderness are necessary but also the importance of minimizing 'anti-human' in the certain aspects of the ecology. My opinion still stands that having the positive side from both ecology are the key to a successful environmental conservation.