# data[].attributes.body
I think Cargill will win, because the information Cargill provides are persuasive enough to prove that they are not the worst company in the world.  We can see the progress they've made in order to become more sustainable from their official website as well.

# data[].attributes.body
Skills practiced:
-Communication
-Language
-Research
-Critical thinking
-Organization
-Teamwork
-Reflection
-Analysis

# data[].attributes.body
I think Cargill will win because not only are they a very powerful company with one of the best money and resources in the country, but through our investigation they are also finding ways to improve some of the dark stuff, such as child labor.

# data[].attributes.body
I suppose large companies/corporations like Cargill control the current topic/public's views about those negative news and media as well, cuz they have more financial supports and resources to keep their statement on the top of people's views. And they can might affect the environment in any ways and those supervision departments might be bribed somehow😕.

# data[].attributes.body
Search skills, in this task, we found a lot of evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Cargill will win. The problems that have been found are not so serious to them, they can solve them. But no one knows that if there are any others serious problems that haven't been found.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the cargill will win this court because mighty earth is just a organization that can't pull the cargill down from the international stage.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Cargill will be won, because Cargill has a step by step plan, and start taking action to improve. On the other hand, the statement of Mightyearth is too absolute, it's hard to defend their views.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Cargil will win because big companies have a lot of useful resources, such as money, a strong PR team, and government interests.

# data[].attributes.body
I think cargill will win. Because from their official website we can see cargill already put a lot of affords and money to improve the company comprehensively such as the gender equality, reduce child labor so it might not be the best but at least not the worst.

# data[].attributes.body
Cargill build up defense cases rather completely. The case was presented with certain evidences, and the content sorting while presenting is clear.

# data[].attributes.body
I think team Cargill will win because the information is more comprehensive and we defined the "worst". It will be a support for this statement.

# data[].attributes.body
The argument about environment are strong, uses effective evidence including picture, documents, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Their redefinition was quite clear, showing their understanding of the worst company and there must be a reason supporting their statement and making them reasonable.