# data[].attributes.body
Technology and the internet have made us simple-minded because people are overly dependent on the products of the two resources to stay without them. Opposing the notion that technology is making us dumb. Going against this notion can be that there are so many different ways that technology has been beneficial to us. Technological advancements have played a significant role in increasing our knowledge and expanding our skills and proficiencies.There is a need to appreciate the improvements and look at a way that they have improved our living. An example would be that technology can help a person understand more, technology allows us to live smarter, and finally, technology gives us easy ways of life.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it hasn’t changed much, at first, I said our society's idea of therapy is a misconception, then I changed it to why therapy is good/ needed today. But to be able to take therapy people have to understand "therapy". Some people think that therapies are trying to manipulate people's mindset. In my opinion therapy is like a suggestion, you can choose to follow them but know that it is the best solution to your problems. I think that the negative mindset of what psychology really is a great counterargument.

# data[].attributes.body
My thesis is about how people have become less motivated over time, especially with the abundance of technology. However, there are also many who claim that technology increases productivity in work. The claim idea is that technology can bring more people together and makes things convenient to help one another perform efficiently. it can simplify the work plan and make goals seem more obtainable for when strategizing one's work. This exercise has made me think more on how to look at both aspects of the argument to create a more valid essay.

# data[].attributes.body
While researching for my counter side I looked up why it's hard for people to buy fresh foods instead of fast foods. I think researching the counter side like seeing how low income families fin it very hard to purchase even the cheapest foods. The article I was reading was saying that junk food is a lot cheaper so it makes those in low income families go towards those foods more. Seeing it in that perspective changes how it can be hard for other to come across a decent eating lifestyle. Which goes back to my original thesis on how these things exactly should start being changed.

# data[].attributes.body
The American healthcare system needs to be reworked to allow every individual access to healthcare. The best way to tackle this issue is to rework the way insurance policies work. One may argue that there are systems that help aid those get healthcare, but these systems are simply not accessible to everyone. Many individuals are just outside of the qualification range for those policies and are still too poor to afford healthcare. I imagine that this point would be brought up a lot as well as the fact that it would increase the price of insurance. If taxes are also increased for the alternative solution, then everything would be more expensive. However, the increased price to material goods would ensure that the money collected gets used for the benefit of society.

# data[].attributes.body
As fake news continues to become an increasing problem steps to call out fake news should be taken. The government, people, and organizations should call out fake news and disinformation and should be able to prove their information is correct by listing their sources. One important step in stopping fake news is by educating people to find what is true and to make sure that their sources are legit with nothing being altered.

I did not revise my thesis as I feel that fake news and misinformation is a huge issue in today’s society. I think most people would agree that fake news is a problem; however many people are not able to distinguish what is true from what is fake. A direct opposite to my thesis might be that fake news is also freedom of speech, so it should be allowed.

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis: A lack of social interaction spurred by Covid-19, distracted parenting, and reckless consumption of technology may be irreversibly damaging the development of the next generation raising the question: Is there a way to recover lost time?

The antithesis of my argument would be “Although COVID-19 did undeniable damage, it also altered our society to become more virtual, which may be the way we continue to grow. Not to mention, technology does have plenty of benefits in the development of youth such as access to information and entertainment.

Antithesis Reasons:

We are moving more virtual with the concept of the metaverse, digital currency, and an increase in demand for computer science jobs. Our media is almost all virtual

Technology is extremely useful for access to information and as a tool for teaching. For as many kids who get distracted by it, the same amount use it to get ahead

Parenting with technology is just how parenting may work for the majority moving forward. If it works for them it works for them. Parenting is very personal and there is no one right way to do it.

Mental illnesses and rises in anxiety and depression cases may just be a result of less stigma around diagnosis in today’s age compared to yesteryear. COVID-19 may have simply spurred more check-ups and concerns about health which had alternative side effects.

I learners and reaffirmed that counter arguments are what make a writing truly solid and that it’s hard to leave readers without a shadow of a doubt, but is necessary. With that being said, write carefully because you are attempting to change someone’s thinking, and that can’t work out if everything you write is defensive, insulting, and very “I have all the answers”. I would say that my thesis may not be good simply because the argue meant is a change of thought rather than a solution through tax dollars or something.

# data[].attributes.body
My thesis has changed topic completely, as I thought I would be more interested in writing about my second topic. With this exercise I'm finding that my thesis isn't very debatable/I personally can't think of a good "direct opposite" to my argument. This exercise was good for me because in realizing I might not have a strong foundation for an argument, I'm considering changing my topic to something I can from a better thesis/antithesis with

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think i have shifted my thesis, but now that i have a interest in doing a satirical paper, i think i will have to change it a little. I think I would still talk about the issues of cars and infrastructure. but my solution would be much more ludicrous, so something like; "cars are bad for our infrastructure so we should start to *ludicrous solution*"

The direct opposite of my thesis would probably be against public transportation and for greater roads to support cars. I think it would sound like; "public transportation is a useless waste of tax payer money that should be put towards better road infrastructure.

i imagine counter points that the audience would bring up is how they would have less freedom of going where ever they want and not be able to bring as much stuff as they want with mass transportation. and i would argue that we don't need to complexity get rid of cars but just have public transportation a better method of daily commuting

# data[].attributes.body
Reflected thesis:

I am motivated by a strong community that comes together to support each other in life's ambitions. For example, when politics affect the overall lifestyles of the community, they come together to either fight for change or in support of these circumstances. I think when people are independent they can accomplish many obstacles personally. However, when it comes to government or politics it is necessary for people to have a shared belief, empathy, and motivation to create the best outcome for the community. A strong community brings forth the idea that someone does not have to fight alone for equality and justice. When someone receives the support it builds confidence for both the individual and the group altogether. Subsequently, having an individual fight for justice also does not have as much of an impact on society as a collective of people fighting for change. Instances like race equality protests show how a strong community can enforce change nonviolently and impact society's perspective. In 2020, the Black Lives Matter protests had many violent outcomes, but their overall goal was to come together to fight for recognition and equality. If it were just individuals the effect would not have been taken into consideration. As a result of these protests, our society has made some proper changes to represent more POC businesses, organizations, and political figures as well as have a new perspective on how to treat people humanely. These protests opened society's eyes to other cultures than the majority White culture and were inclusive of the minorities lifestyles. My solution to creating unity within our society is to raise awareness on subjects such as racism and inequality. I would also like to show examples of how you can raise awareness and nonviolently take action. In opposition to my view, one can make an impact alone. When someone is dedicated and has perseverance, they can prove to a group that they truly believe and want to fight for change which causes others to join in. However, it takes a lot more effort for that individual and some do not have the stamina to fight alone. Those specific people that do have that resilience create a significant impression on society. For example, Cesar Chavez was an individual that took a stand for union worker’s rights and made an impression on the community with non-violent protest. He during the grape strikes planned to do a fast like Ghandi to prove his devotion to the cause. It left him weakened from starving, but caused others to join to fight for change. Others took his fasting as a god complex situation and felt his intention was wrong while others saw his true idea behind this decision. They fought for justice alongside him and those who were in opposition were also motivated to fight for their beliefs. Overall, his decision and impact inspired change from the community and created a ripple effect of fighting for justice. My view on an individual fighting for change is that it is possible, but it still inspires others to form a strong community with a shared purpose.