# data[].attributes.headline
"Universities should be accountable for the experiences that contribute to racial battle fatigue in their very own STEM students of color."

# data[].attributes.subject
"Universities should be accountable for the experiences that contribute to racial battle fatigue in their very own STEM students of color."

# data[].attributes.body
Diversity is key to excellence

# data[].attributes.body
How might we encourage our new EVCAA to put some new guidance on hiring to support diversity?

# data[].attributes.headline
A shout out to Dr. Aguirre on Page 132 :)

# data[].attributes.subject
A shout out to Dr. Aguirre on Page 132 :)

# data[].attributes.body
collaboration not competition

# data[].attributes.body
Author gives comprehensive points on how to improve the situation. I am glad STEM education scholars were mentioned. Woodson, Moses and Anderson are scholars I build my work around.

# data[].attributes.headline
"Power concedes nothing without a demand, and usually a fight." At UWT it seems like energy is used up on things that have more to do with a lack of communication/awareness, with the larger fights being unaddressed.

# data[].attributes.subject
"Power concedes nothing without a demand, and usually a fight." At UWT it seems like energy is used up on things that have more to do with a lack of communication/awareness, with the larger fights being unaddressed.

# data[].attributes.body
It mentions a "policy audit" at the very end. What would that look like? Are there resources to help guide that work?

# data[].attributes.headline
(About S.E. Anderson) "Anderson's work contrasts with traditional schools of thought that valorize STEM careers...while privately despising and sabotaging the efforts of underrepresented STEM scholars" 

# data[].attributes.subject
(About S.E. Anderson) "Anderson's work contrasts with traditional schools of thought that valorize STEM careers...while privately despising and sabotaging the efforts of underrepresented STEM scholars" 

# data[].attributes.body
I hadn't thought about STEM promotion efforts in this way, but it makes sense.

# data[].attributes.body
"Power concedes nothing without a demand, and usually a fight."

# data[].attributes.headline
Faculty need mentorship training that serves our BIPOC students.

# data[].attributes.subject
Faculty need mentorship training that serves our BIPOC students.

# data[].attributes.body
"the entirety of STEM higher education needs to be dismantled, period"

# data[].attributes.body
"STEM teachers of Indigenous students can honor the observational skills of their forebears in various ways, including cultivating curiosity. Being curious about the world is characteristic of all children–and is the fundamental scientific quality–but schools often discourage that, especially in the era of standardized testing (p.124)."

# data[].attributes.body
While I agree that it is crucial for non-BIPOC faculty to have training to mentor our BIPOC students, I think the value of representation in mentors is so high. Are there other ways to support and compensate BIPOC faculty mentors for this important work?

# data[].attributes.body
How useful can non-BIPOC faculty be for mentoring BIPOC students and faculty?

# data[].attributes.body
Advisors play such an important role in the success of BIPOC students, and we have few mechanisms for campus-level training and assessment.

# data[].attributes.body
"Recognizing the time-intensive nature of mentoring and its associated workload, institutional leaders should reward this critical aspect of education through compensation, tenure, and promotion" - I'd love to see this valued in T&P discussions as highly as, say, publications.

# data[].attributes.body
how can we at UWT actually implement changes to STEM higher education that will make a difference and create a more inclusive environment for learning

# data[].attributes.body
How do we ensure that all faculty go through antiracism professional development? Making it mandatory does not seem to be effective based on what I have seen for other "mandatory" trainings.

# data[].attributes.body
"It's safe to say that POC have not in any significant way contributed to the human development that is causing climate change..." page 116.
On first reading I wanted to counter that claim.  Like, I wanted POC to share in the guilt I felt about the climate change.  I felt threatened by the statement.
But the statement isn't a threat to me, it isn't about me.  I was surprised by my own strong reaction and it took me some time to realize my reaction seemed to be to ideas that weren't even in the quote.

# data[].attributes.body
How do we get from this high-level thinking to action and process creation?

# data[].attributes.body
The idea about retraining faculty was challenging - how to get people to recognize that the perspectives and epistemologies wrapped up in their own disciplines are part of the problem? There is a lot of work there (but necessary).