# data[].attributes.body
-Millions would be saved from lack of floods
-Millions were and are employed by massive project
-All of China will have cleaner air
-Millions will have clean power
-The kids will live in a cleaner China

# data[].attributes.body
-Will generate as much power as 18 nuclear power plants
-Millions of people are employed
-All debts would be payed off in three years time of the dam running

# data[].attributes.body
-China needs power anyways, better a dam than coal which has worse ecological side effects
-prevents disastrous floods
-It is a very large source for clean renewable power
-Cleaner air

# data[].attributes.body
- Around one to two million people forced to move from their homes
-All their farmland destroyed
-Archaeological sites lost

# data[].attributes.body
-Project will cost billions ($3.6 billion)
-Lots of local agriculture and fish markets sent out of business
-Have to pay for the reallocation of the million citizens living there

# data[].attributes.body
Http://greengarageblog.org/author/greengarageblogadmin. "List of Top 16 Three Gorges Dam Pros and Cons." Green Garage. N.p., 30 July 2015. Web. 08 Feb. 2017.

Http://nyln.org/author/nylnadmin. "Three Gorges Dam Pros and Cons List." NYLN.org. N.p., 23 June 2015. Web. 07 Feb. 2017.

Hua, Dan, Brian R. Murphey, and Michelle D. Klopfer. "A Struggle for Power in China." The Three Gorges Dam (n.d.): 1-2. Web.

"The Three Gorges Dam Project." The Three Gorges Dam Project. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Feb. 2017.

# data[].attributes.body
-Decline of native populations and river populations downstream
-Causes water pollution and land erosion
-Increase disease and toxic substances
-Towns and forest will be demolished

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/a/hartdistrict.org/document/d/1aO3n3YDlak_cXn8Smi_hLhkVDNqVx_xKp1xveSLOhGs/edit?usp=sharing