# data[].attributes.body
We think that people who live in the same area of the world are more similar. The reason why is because there could be a mutation that would only occur in one part of the world, they would all be the same. They could be more different from us.

# data[].attributes.body
by: Caitlin Zakkour and Brianna Siguenza

People who live in the same area would show more similarity than people who live far apart because if we live in the same area, we develop to our environment and become similar to the people around us. When families continue to grow in the same area, they pass down the same traits to newer generations.

# data[].attributes.body
By Briana L. and Nelson G.
We think that people who live n the same region will look alike because everyone in that area came from one group of people who first began there who were most likely the same race and looked alike.

# data[].attributes.body
#1overall we think that

# data[].attributes.body
Yes people around our area would show more similarities because we live in the same environment and conditions so most of our traits shouldn't differ. Someone who lived in Nigeria would have different traits.

# data[].attributes.body
The B form of any trait was more frequent for the class because we all live in the same area, and people who live in the same area share similar, particular recessive gene traits.

# data[].attributes.body
no we do not think that the class population is the typical of the global population because one trait can be dominant. For example people have brown eyes in here but in some places the more frequent trait might be blue eyes. Frank D. and Damian C.

# data[].attributes.body
We think people in the same are must share some similarities. For example, people in

# data[].attributes.body
by Cesar Solis, Jeremiah Sanchez
The recessive trait was more common in the classroom. There is always a clear dominant trait winning as it overpowers the recessive gene.

# data[].attributes.body
We believe that people in the same area share the same traits because they all would have had to adapt to that area's weather, climate, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because people need to adapt to their surroundings.

# data[].attributes.body
By: Liliana Santillan and Porschea Miranda
Yes, because our bodies need to adapt to our climate or the surroundings.

# data[].attributes.body
BY:Andy Ramirez
Yes, B trait was more frequent in chins and it might've been higher percentage in the class, because it might be a higher percentage in the general population.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the people who live together live in the same environment so they have similar environments then people who live farther.
~Ashlee & Antonella

# data[].attributes.body
By: Elwin and Angelina
Our class population would not be the same as the global population because we only represent 30 people in our data and there are billions of people in the world. Plus we live in a world where people have different unique traits that differentiate from ours.

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer Vidal and Jose G.

Our class population is not typical of the global population because the world is filled with varied  people that have different dominant or recessive traits depending on where you live. People that live around the same area populate children with the same traits as them, and then they adapt the specific characteristics of the parents.

# data[].attributes.body
By: Kimberly Jimenez & Loralynn Gutierrez

No because global wise there is a bigger population with more races that have specific traits or just traits in general, then in our classroom where there is one common race and similar traits.

# data[].attributes.body
By: Angelica Rodriguez and Andy Ni
We don't think that the class population is typical of the global population  because our class doesn't represent the whole world. Our data might increase or decrease since some parts of the world might possess more of the certain trait. For example, there are more people in Scotland with redhead while other parts of the world might not possess that trait.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes we think that people who live closer are more similar. The reason why is because there would be a mutation common in one area of the world that is far away from us. That could only affect the people living in that area. They would be different from us.

# data[].attributes.body
By: Nicole & Marilyn

People who live in the same area have the same traits because if you live in the same area you get the same adaptations that are related to that specific area you live in. For example, people usually live in the same town as their relatives, it's not the same as not sharing any similarities in DNA from China.

# data[].attributes.headline
#3 Do you think people who live in the same area would show more similarity than people who live far apart? 

# data[].attributes.subject
#3 Do you think people who live in the same area would show more similarity than people who live far apart? 

# data[].attributes.body
By: Caitlin Zakkour and Brianna SIguenza

People who live in the same area would have more of the

# data[].attributes.body
BY: Andres Cardenas Isiaha Rodriguez

We do not believe that our class share the same traits as the majority of the global population. We are around 30 kids compared to the 7 billion people in our world. On another note, majority of the people are mating with people inside the Coachella Valley, this would mean the recessive traits would become more dominate in a small controlled area.

# data[].attributes.headline
#5: Why would it be better to use everyone’s data and not just our period’s?

# data[].attributes.subject
#5: Why would it be better to use everyone’s data and not just our period’s?

# data[].attributes.body
By: Christine Hodge & Michelle Hilario

We should use all 5 classes' data because the more participants you have, the more accurate your data.  Having a large "sample size" also helps balance out and coincidences, like there being 2 blue eyed students in 3rd period but 15 in 4th period.