# data[].attributes.body
I think it was a reasonable decision since the boy was already dying. If one person needed to be sacrificed in order to save 3 others, it was justified

# data[].attributes.body
not guilty- the cabin boy was already not feel well and the other people needed to eat something under a big  necessity of hunger and thirst

# data[].attributes.body
I value 3 lifes over 1

# data[].attributes.body
the boy was already dying

# data[].attributes.body
I'm actually not super sure because it is hard to think about but I'm leaning towards not guilty. It's hard for me to decide because we don't know what their mission was, if it was something super important I would probably say not guilty but I'm not sure how I would feel if their mission only benefitted them or something. -Abby

# data[].attributes.body
he was already dying

# data[].attributes.body
Murder bad death good. Should’ve waited until one of them died naturally to use them for resources.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes killing is morally wrong, but in that situation there isn't really anything else you could do.

# data[].attributes.body
Not guilty, one death is better than four deaths

# data[].attributes.body
They were desperate for survival, and they had few choices. It is always better to save three lives at the cost of one, instead of all 4 failing to survive eventually.

# data[].attributes.body
I just kinda have this feeling that it is guilty im not sure how to explain it.

# data[].attributes.body
This comes down to the question of if sacrificing one person is okay if everyone else was going to die if the sacrifice had not been made. The child was already going to die, but even if that was not the case the sacrifice still would have been ok, in my eyes.

# data[].attributes.body
Whether he was going to die or not is not in question. Rather, It is the question of whether their murder of a seventeen year old boy was reasonable. Life's value is subjective and undefined, therefore murdering this person was unjustified. Existence's only constant is suffering, so really they were just delaying their own death. It would've only been fair if they all just stabbed themselves

# data[].attributes.body
they sacrificed one person so that 3 others can live - luke

# data[].attributes.body
It makes sense to save three lives and sacrifice one then wait for all of them to eventually starve. Surviving is better then dying.

# data[].attributes.body
I would vote not guilty, this is because if they hadn't killed the boy then that would have also been murder, since they killed the rest of the crew members. They had a chance to survive so they took it, 3 lives would outweigh one.

# data[].attributes.body
It was okay for them to sacrifice the cabin boy. It was necessary for 1 life to be sacrificed for 3 others to survive. Plus, the boy was already dying. They allowed him to die quickly rather than slowly and painfully. - Alice

# data[].attributes.body
not guilty because I think if the kid was already ill, it was necessary that the boy got killed because its 3 over 1

# data[].attributes.body
I would rather die than eat my friend.

# data[].attributes.body
the cabin boy was already dying because he drank sea water, the kid had no biological family to go back to, and it is 1 death vs. 4 deaths so their action was to save more lives.