# data[].attributes.body
4 topics (1 writing) Eng I
*3 weeks
Pipkins
Gladden
McDaniel
Tally (APEX)
5 topics (1 writing) Eng II
*2 weeks
Richard
Jewkes
Peiskee
Seago (APEX)
Whittaker

# data[].attributes.body
I will be willing to do this either way. I usually revise or end up doing my own lesson plans because it is something I am familiar with.

# data[].attributes.body
The SE's I am most concerned with are inferencing, and figurative language. The writing scores were very low as well. This is for the Eng. I students.

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to work with Eng. I.

# data[].attributes.body
Melanie is blue

# data[].attributes.body
Is Purple (lavender)

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because we have the data and know their needs, we should do our own lesson plans.

# data[].attributes.body
Eng I-Expository

Eng II- Persuasive

# data[].attributes.body
I'd rather focus on Engl II

# data[].attributes.body
Student Expectation

E2.13C: Revise drafts to improve style, word choice, figurative language, sentence variety, and subtlety of meaning after rethinking how well questions of purpose, audience, and genre have been addressed.

E2.2C- Relate the figurative language of a literary work to its historical and cultural setting

E2.18 B- Use correct punctuation marks

# data[].attributes.body
What are the key words for those SEs?

# data[].attributes.body
I am not well versed in either test as I have not taught them. I can go either way, I can teach the skills needed.

# data[].attributes.body
Didn't we choose a specific area within the content, then created lesson plans for only that area before sharing? I'm not opposed to doing it that way for this year's RTI, but I'm also open to brainstorming on what is effective.

# data[].attributes.body
Mine are E2.13c; E2.2c; and E2.18b

# data[].attributes.body
I'm definitely more comfortable with the English 1 test.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe last year's way of getting the plans done worked out well. We won't want to reinvent the wheel. (Practicing my alliteration

# data[].attributes.body
I'd like to focus on Eng. 1 since I'm more familiar with it.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel most familiar with the Engl II test

# data[].attributes.body
Do you mean that each teacher should do all their plans?

If we split the plans it would be like last year where we each developed lessons for specific SEs and shared those plans with each other so we were all doing different things.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel much more comfortable with English 2 test.

# data[].attributes.body
I think each English teacher should develop their own lesson plans to share out with support staff.

# data[].attributes.body
There are so many basic pieces to the essay writing that pertains to both. For this reason, I feel we should mix it up.

# data[].attributes.body
Do you want lesson plans to be divided up and shared, or would you rather each teacher be in charge of developing their own RtI?

# data[].attributes.headline
If you chose to work with which test, which test do you feel most familiar with?

# data[].attributes.subject
If you chose to work with which test, which test do you feel most familiar with?

# data[].attributes.headline
Would you rather focus on one test (ENG 1 or ENG 2) OR mix it up and cover both?

# data[].attributes.subject
Would you rather focus on one test (ENG 1 or ENG 2) OR mix it up and cover both?