# data[].attributes.body
Were there any loopholes that allowed citizens to abuse the Espionage and Sedition Act?

# data[].attributes.body
What was the public's thoughts on the passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts?

# data[].attributes.body
How did these acts even get passed?

# data[].attributes.body
How did Wilson justify the passing of these acts?

# data[].attributes.body
How many persecuted by these acts were actually spies ?

# data[].attributes.body
When were the acts created?

# data[].attributes.body
How were some people suspected of being spies?

# data[].attributes.body
How did these acts not get shut down by the supreme court because they were violating 1st amendment rights?

# data[].attributes.body
What were the punishments for violating the Sedition act?

# data[].attributes.body
Would Americans fight these Acts?

# data[].attributes.body
What if someone who wasnt a spy got kicked out? :(

# data[].attributes.body
The only job the supreme court has is to discern whether or not a law or act is constitutional. With this in mind, how in the world did a law that directly disobeys the ideals of the Constitution be allowed to pass solely to support the war effort? How does this show that the judicial branch can bend the law to their will if they felt like it? Pretty scary stuff.

# data[].attributes.body
How would the Sedition Act impact the public's education of WWI

# data[].attributes.body
Did the Espionage Act allow government officials to investigate individuals or property without warrant?

# data[].attributes.body
What caused the Espionage and Sedition acts to be passed?

# data[].attributes.body
Did everyone in the government agree with these rules?

# data[].attributes.body
How was the government propaganda like?

# data[].attributes.body
Was the public fully educated on the situation of the war, or was their knowledge mostly from rumors?

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of these acts was not justified because it violated freedom of speech, freedom of expression, as well as freedom of the press.

# data[].attributes.body
Was the first amendment overlooked or ignored by politicians for the sake of boosting Americans' morale and support for the war?

# data[].attributes.body
Why weren't these laws ever questioned by the public during that time period?

# data[].attributes.body
What caused President Wilson to make up these acts and what allowed them to the Espionage and Sedition Act?

# data[].attributes.body
Was there any backlash to the Espionage and Sedition Acts?

# data[].attributes.body
What were the major instances of criticism of the war that caused President Wilson to pass these acts?

# data[].attributes.body
If the Sedition act was violating our freedom of speech rights and is considered justified can other rights be broken as long as they are justified?

# data[].attributes.body
When was the act that allows the president to limit personal freedoms during time of war passed? It would make the Sedition and Espionage Act constitutional if passed prior to them.

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage act is justified because it was beneficial to the greater good of the country, by which American secrets would not be shared to other countries. The Sedition Acts were not justified because it violates the first amendment by limiting the freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.body
Were there any lawsuits against the acts for being unconstitutional?

# data[].attributes.body
How did the American citizens respond to the passing and implementation of these acts?

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition act was not justified because it violated the freedom of speech. It violated the rights of the citizens that were important to their personal selves. The United States agrees to these rights of liberty and freedom, but they violate the first amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
While the Sedition Act passing Congress makes some sense, how was it not quickly struck down by the Supreme Court? The Act was clearly unconstitutional, and such a case would have been easy to argue.

# data[].attributes.body
How were these acts received within the U.S.?

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage and the Sedition Acts were not justified because they completely contradicted the most important amendment in the US constitution, the first amendment. Censoring the media was not necessary as it would not have affected the war going on in Europe

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts was not justified as it generalized people who were against the war as being spies going against America. The Sedition Acts also were in violation of their rights.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Act by President Woodrow Wilson was unconstitutional due to it limiting many forms of speech that went against the message the government was trying to put out.

This was justified as a necessity for the bettering of the United States' chances in the war and anyone who went against this, was against the U.S., and therefore they are going to be denied the rights given by the constitution and prosecuted.

Question: How was the passing of these Acts received by the United States public? (Both in general and different minority groups)

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the espionage and sedition acts were not justified because it violated the rights of citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage Act did seem like a justified attempt to remove spies from America. Because they had to protect the national liberty

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts by President Woodrow Wilson were not justified as it violated the First Amendment, particularly freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Sedition Act was not justified. Even though it was a time of war, which might have made some think that it was justified, it was against our constitutional rights, which cannot be taken away by the government even in times of war.

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage and Sedition Act was not justified as it violated amendment rights. Freedom of speech is a an important aspect of living in America and being arrested for a statement of one's beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
Due to the basis that the U.S. was built on, the passing of the Espionage and Sedition act was not justified. This is due to the U.S. being considered a country that provided everyone with liberty and essential rights. The Espionage and Sedition act violated the rights of the citizens in the U.S. which contradicts the foundation the U.S. was created on.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the espionage and sedition act by President Woodrow Wilson was not justified. These acts violated the first amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Sedition acts was not justified since it goes directly against the First Amendment and punished a person simply for speaking about their beliefs. On the other hand, the Espionage acts were justified since a person who intrudes in war efforts via unlawful methods should not have the same freedom as other lawful citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts by President Woodrow Wilson were not justified because it restricted what people were allowed to say about WWI. This repression of speech directly violates the First Amendment and goes against the ideas and concepts America was founded on.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts by President Woodrow Wilson were not justified because it goes against the first amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage and Sedition acts by president Woodrow Wilson were not justified because they violated the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and press given by the first amendment. People should have been able to freely voice their concerns about the war without being punished by the government.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts by President Woodrow Wilson was not justified because it stopped people from letting them have their freedom of speech (the first amendment)

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Act by President Wilson were not justified because it violated the 1st amendment which restricted the citizens to not be able to express their feelings against the war.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the sedition and espionage acts were not justified because they violated the first amendment. They violated freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.body
the passing of these acts was not justified because it violated the first amendment. saying what you want and getting punished for it just because the government doesn't approve is a violation of freedom of speech

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage Act was justified, however the Sedition Act violated the rights of the First Amendment

# data[].attributes.body
I do not believe the Sedition Act was justified. Americans have a right to freedom of speech. I do believe the Espionage Act was justified to protect America and its people.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Sedition and Espionage acts were justified because they reduced the amount of spies in America. These acts also promoted nationalism which in turn helped support military forces.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the passing of these acts was justified. It heavily eliminated the presence of spies that could be assisting enemies of the U.S. Though it goes against the right of free speech, this could be seen as a "shouting fire" situation; people who voiced their beliefs could truly have had ill intent toward the U.S. in support of other countries.

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts were not both justified. While it was probably a beneficial move to witch-hunt international spies, the Sedition Act was basically watered-down censorship, and close to if not easily violating the first amendment. Even if it would be ruled constitutional, the act still would be forcing, rather than persuading Americans to always be pro-war.

Query: Was the Sedition Act meant to be used in conjunction with the Espionage Act to forcibly uncover spies? And if so, did they expect espionage agents to openly spout anti-war politics?

# data[].attributes.body
No, the passing of the Espionage and Sedition Acts by Wilson were not justified. Despite some opposition to the war, the frequency of this opposition was insignificant compared to it's support. In addition, the institution of propaganda further persuaded US citizens to join the support for the war.  Although it could be argued that these acts reduced the frequency of spies, while to a small extent true, no spy would vocally spread anti-war propaganda in the press and most persecuted by this act had no significant malicious power or intent over the US. Therefore,
the Sedition Act as an amendment to the Espionage Act was unnecessary. Furthermore, the Act was unconstitutional and violated the rights of free speech and press.

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage Act and the Sedition Act that were passed by President Wilson were not justified. This is because it violated the first amendment which gave people the ability to have the freedom of speech. With this, people were not allowed to provide their personal opinions about WWI because the government believed it would interfere with military operations.

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage Act seems like a justified attempt to remove spies for foreign powers from America. Meanwhile, the Sedition Act was a clear violation of First Amendment rights, and was an overreaction. Additionally, the Sedition Act, along with the American propaganda effort, broke with the principles that America was founded upon.

# data[].attributes.body
The Espionage and Sedition Acts were not justified, because America stands for the liberty and freedom, and the acts are directly against the freedom and speech and expression. As long as the protests were not violent, they should have been allowed, for the citizens of the US to provide different perspectives on the war.

# data[].attributes.body
The and Sedition Act that was passed by Congress was a direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, specifically the 1st Amendment. Despite this the justifications could be seen as valid to the many Americans who wanted to support Nationalism of the United States in this war. The Espionage Act was significantly more constitutional and also helped to benefit nationalism and the war efforts.

# data[].attributes.body
They were justified as unity within a country is required to protect national liberty. Outliers can bring upon internal revolutions which make the country as a whole weak.

# data[].attributes.body
The Sedition Acts, although unconstitutional, were justified as maintaining a positive public outlook towards the war was necessary for success. Support from suppliers and their laborers was needed, and few would choose to register for the draft if our position in the war was not respected by the majority population.