# data[].attributes.body
1. The story is told in the third person. Yes

1. How can you tell? Fx. “He pulled the blanket from the Indians head”, S. 15

1. Why do you think the story is told this way? How would it work in the first person? The affect would be, that the story would be personal and follow his experiences.

1. Is the narrator omniscient or non-omniscient? How can you tell? The narrator is omniscient, fx. “Nick did not watch. His curiosity had…”. “He was feeling…” (father), page 15.

1. Are there descriptive passages in the story? Where? With what effect? When the father is washing his hands, page 14. The outcome is more excitement. However, it also leaves a feeling that you have to read between lines.

1. Does the narration use direct speech or not? What is the effect of this? Find examples. Fx. “I am terribly sorry I brought you along Nickie”. The effect would be a more personal story, but a more connected story to the characters for the reader

1. How would you characterize the language? Simple/complex? Parataxis/hypotaxis? Many adjectives? Metaphors or similies (sammenligninger)? The language is pretty simple and consist of many parataxis sentences. However, the father uses some hypotaxis sentences when speaking as a doctor. Also there are not many adjectives, but some metaphors occur. Due to the fact you have to read between lines.

1. Look up the terms ‘rite of passage’ and ‘initiation story’. In what way might these terms apply to the story? The story is much about the term rite of passage, because Nick is going through that exact stage in his life, but also the term initiation story exists, since Nick is an innocent child when entering the adult world.

1. Compare Nick’s position in the boat going over the camp with his position as they leave the camp. Do you see any significance here?

When Nick and his father are arriving he is seated in the back of the boat, however when leaving he is sitting in the stern.

1. What is the main theme of the story?

Rite, birth, family and father and son relationship.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The story is told in the third person.

True

1. How can you tell?

You can see it by that the person that tells the story doesn’t feature in the story.

1. Why do you think the story is told this way? How would it work in the first person?

So we can see it from different perspective when its told in third person compared to if it was told in first person storyteller.

1. Is the narrator omniscient or non-omniscient? How can you tell?

The narrator is omniscient, because he knows what the characters feel.

1. Are there descriptive passages in the story? Where? With what effect? The story is descriptive, but secretive at the same time, for example the theory with uncle George being the father.

2. Does the narration use direct speech or not? What is the effect of this? Find examples. Yes there is a lot of direct speech, and it makes us feel that we are seeing what is being told “Do many men kill themselves, Daddy?” “Not very many, Nick”

3. How would you characterize the language? Simple/complex? Parataxis/hypotaxis? Many adjectives? Metaphors or similies (sammenligninger)? There aint a lot of adjectives, but very complex with a lot of hard words, like “stern” and so on.

4. Look up the terms ‘rite of passage’ and ‘initiation story’. In what way might these terms apply to the story?

5. Compare Nick’s position in the boat going over the camp with his position as they leave the camp. Do you see any significance here?

6. What is the main theme of the story?

# data[].attributes.headline
Jeppe AB, Jeppe Holm, Emilie, Anna & Esra

# data[].attributes.subject
Jeppe AB, Jeppe Holm, Emilie, Anna & Esra

# data[].attributes.body
ANLYSIS OF INDIAN CAMP

1. The story is told in the third person. True. But the narrator is bound to Nick most of the time

2. How can you tell? You can tell by reading the text. For example it says “”I see” Nick said”. Here you can tell that it is being told in third person

3. Why do you think the story is told this way? How would it work in the first person? Because it makes it easier to see what really happened. If we had a nine year old as a narrator it would maybe affect the way we were told the story. If we were reading it in first person, we would get a more childish view on the story compared to what we are getting when we hear it in third person.

4. Is the narrator omniscient or non-omniscient? How can you tell? Well the narrator knows what Nick is thinking and he also knows what the father is feeling. For example “In the early morning on the lake sitting in the stern of the boat with his father rowing he felt quite sure that he would never die” and “He was feeling exalted and talkative as football players are in the dressing room after a game” But the narrator is again bound to Nick, so he mostly knows things about Nick.

5. Are there descriptive passages in the story? Where? With what effect? Yes there are descriptions. It is not very long descriptions but they are there. For example at the beginning “They walked from the beach through a meadow that was soaking wet with dew…” We would say that it is mostly in the beginning of the text and at the end the language is descriptive. There are not as many descriptions in the middle of the story, it is more action packed there. The effect is that the text becomes more idyllic in the beginning and the end where the descriptions are and it becomes more raw in the middle where there are more verb

6. Does the narration use direct speech or not? What is the effect of this? Find examples. Yes it uses direct speech. It gives a feeling of action and that it is happening right now instead of looking back at the event.

7. How would you characterize the language? Simple/complex? Parataxis/hypotaxis? Many adjectives? Metaphors or similies (sammenligninger)? The language is pretty simple, and it uses parataxis. The sentences are short and there are not many adjectives.

8. Look up the terms ‘rite of passage’ and ‘initiation story’. In what way might these terms apply to the story?

9. Compare Nick’s position in the boat going over the camp with his position as they leave the camp. Do you see any significance here?

10. What is the main theme of the story?

# data[].attributes.headline
Indian Camp: Louise, Frederikke, Bartlo, Marcus

# data[].attributes.subject
Indian Camp: Louise, Frederikke, Bartlo, Marcus

# data[].attributes.body
ANLYSIS OF INDIAN CAMP

ANLYSIS OF INDIAN CAMP

1. The story is told in the third person. = Yes, the story is told in third person.

2. How can you tell? He never says I. They only use Nick, Nick´s father and Uncle George.

3. Why do you think the story is told this way? How would it work in the first person? So we get a objectively view.

4. Is the narrator omniscient or non-omniscient? How can you tell? It´s a non-omniscientstoryteller, because Nick dosen´t know everything.

5. Are there descriptive passages in the story? Where? With what effect? Not really, it´s very minimalistic. The part on the boat is, but the rest is not.

6. Does the narration use direct speech or not? What is the effect of this? Find examples. = he uses it a lot. “You don’t know” said his father

7. How would you characterize the language? Simple/complex? Parataxis/hypotaxis? Many  adjectives? Metaphors or similies (sammenligninger)? It´s quite a simple language. He does use adjectives, but it´s not a lot.

8. Look up the terms ‘rite of passage’ and ‘initiation story’. In what way might these terms apply to the story? Rite of passage, means that a person leave one group to enter another. Initiation story, means that the overall plot is concerned about putting the character through a particular sort of experience.

9. Compare Nick’s position in the boat going over the camp with his position as they leave the camp. Do you see any significance here? At the beginning of the story Nick is seated in the stern, and when they eventually go back, he is seated in the back of the boat.

10.

What is the main theme of the story? Birth, Death, Going from child to adult, The relationship between a son and a father,