# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: Post the incident
The only incident that occurred within my team is rather than working together as one unit, we each worked on our own parts. This meant we were unaware what each others slides meant and information shown.

Step 2: Student should think about this incident
What
The issue is little interaction between members leading to uncertainty as what each member was producing for the presentation.
Why
The team only had a couple of short meetings together
When
First couple of weeks
Where

Who
The team
How
little communication

# data[].attributes.headline
JakubStep 1: No major issues took place. However some areas could be easily improved...these include the groups attitude towards the task as well as the relaxed atmospheres which is affecting the overall work ethic.  

# data[].attributes.subject
JakubStep 1: No major issues took place. However some areas could be easily improved...these include the groups attitude towards the task as well as the relaxed atmospheres which is affecting the overall work ethic.  

# data[].attributes.body
Step 2:

# data[].attributes.body
1)The incident that occurred happened occurred to myself over last weekend . This occurred where I felt that I failed to manage my time in producing enough work . Although it was not a massive issue , it still lead to me having to loose sleep over work which could be done at a more appropriate time concluding to a point that if I were to be more responsible ; this issue might have not been apparent . This also could affect communications in the team such as them having to wait for me. Therefore in the future I should be more aware of these issues as it would not be a good trait to have especially when this is and will affect my work ethic in the future.

For the case of the group work overall , we were very cohesive with our work and have no issues between one and another . However there are always ways to improve and in this case it could be team chemistry . Having a better chemistry would help work be run more efficiently , because of this the group could try to get to know each other outside university and work environments to “break the ice” between individuals . As for an example there can be a shy student within the group . Because of this sort of personality , it can be very hard to get that member to contribute as they may be less vocal towards presenting their opinion . Therefore getting to know one another to be more comfortable around one another can help in team chemistry .

# data[].attributes.body
Step1: one of the team member decided to leave our
Step2: it was a new guy in a group among people who I already worked with. He had another pace of work and got stressed because he thought it wasn’t enough done for the mock presentation and he left us. He got scared that in the future he won’t score the best grade with us, I guess. Next time we need to adapt to diffferent people’s pace of work and try to explain that there is no need to rush and put pressure.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: No major issues took place. However, areas which could have b

# data[].attributes.body
The  arises issues regarding forming a group for the presentation
Step 1 what
Group did not turn up when there was an agreement to meet and discuss the presentation .
Step 2 why
There was lack of communication amongst us because two people in the group refuse to communicate
to us the reason why they did not show up.
Step 3  when
This happen last week when we have to divide the work and so that each of us can work on the group project .
Step 4 where
We the group supposed to meet at the
library to discuss the group  presentation and how far we have progress
Step 5 who
The said name cannot be mention  due to confidentiality  in the data protection act  policy
step 6 how
This is to protect the identity of the person .
However, there has been the recent feedback from our seminar leader regarding the point point we did us the group and needed to ne amends

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: incident (essence of the issue)

The issue was... we are all strong characters and all took on our own roles within the group and not working as a cohesive team.

We thought it was going well, but when we had the meeting with our seminar teacher we were given a shock as we realised we were all acting on our own and she pointed out our presentation was not linking.

Step 2: who, what, when, where, why and how?

Who: the 'group and i' not working as a team 🤫

What: the non correlating presentation we made 🤦🏻‍♂️

When: week 5 seminar📆

Where: meeting to go over the work (draft)📝

Why: the issue was misunderstanding the communication and efficiency as working together.😅

How:

We ended up like this?🤨

We only had a couple of meetings since the initial contract and first seminar and we all focused upon the parts/ roles we decided to partake in the group.

We are overcoming this?🤔

We have over come this by having a meeting directly after the session in week 5 and using the constructive critism to sit down and discuss how we are going to set out the presentation. How we are going to link it into a story almost for the audience and to cut out any unnecessary information.

Conclusion:
From having seen what direction we were headed towards, we can now work much more efficiently. I believe it is a team effort so by not noticing this attention to detail and knowing where we are going I will be reading along the lines here. We were lucky enough to receive the critical criticisms rather than a sugar coated you're doing it wrong 😁

# data[].attributes.body
No issues
Maybe could have identified what areas in the Rubrik are given most marks before we start our research so we knew where to focus most of our time.

Why?

- Because we didn't look at the Rubrik early enough in the planning process.
We should have spent more time looking at how we were going to approach the assignment as well as the content.

When?

- During week 5 because now we are going back at our older research.

Where?

- In our Group Meeting

Who?

- A collective mistake - We focused very much on the amount/depth of research

How?

- It happened because we focused very much on the amount/depth of research over looking at the Rubrik and looking at where our attention was needed the most.

# data[].attributes.body
Part 1 --- step 1:

the lack of commitment and timing t within the group members.

Step 2:
what?

some members are not participating so actively, for example they don't take initiative.

why?
I don't know

when?
week 4, before having the feedback

where?
the preparation of the presentation

how?
maybe missed communication of who was going to do what.

part 2:

group work -> taking initiative ->everyone already knowing what we are doing ->working towards a goal of delivering a good presentation, with the datas