# data[].attributes.body
"crimes are more difficult to itigate online."-Fact
"and yet online harassment goes unchecked, and not only in the cases that make headlines."- Fact
"online harassment prevalent and serious problem."-Value

# data[].attributes.body
for each claim the author uses creditable peoples words/writings as well as using research to prove his claims are truthfull

# data[].attributes.body
the author uses real world texts from credible people to connect the reader that he is right as well as a connection to the real world.

# data[].attributes.body
On page 3 the quote ¨And yet online harassment largely goes unchecked¨ is an example of claim of policy.¨Harassment stalking...aggressors are actually doing is illegal." would be claim of fact. On page 4 ¨would be to allow victims... that is intended to embarrass them¨ is an example of claim of value.

# data[].attributes.body
¨The ruling will make it more difficult than ever to prosecute the authors of online death and 🤬 threats¨ - claim of policy

¨When crimes like stalking ... committed in a physical, offline place.¨ - claim of fact

¨And yet online harassment ... cases make the headline¨ - claim of fact

# data[].attributes.body
For almost every claim in the article the author uses details and examples or research and expert opinions to support his claims

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses real world examples and statements from books and living people to support his claims. It is effective because it is words coming from people that are living or were once living that connect to the world

# data[].attributes.body
I´ve noticed that personal experience and anecdotes are used a lot to support the claims. This is effective because these people have experienced things related to the issue the article was talking about.

# data[].attributes.body
With each claim made in the article, there was almost always an expert opinion or anecdote to support it. When talking about online harassment, hearing from people with knowledge and that have experienced it would serve as the best support.

# data[].attributes.body
¨Arguing with someone online, which is what many aggressors are doing, is not illegal. Neither is calling someone names. ¨ - Fact
¨Social Media companies do not want to implement technologies that censor their platforms...reluctant to automatically suspend user accounts.¨- Fact
¨anectdotally, many women admit they don't participate on platforms like Twitter as much as they might otherwise, for fear of harassment.¨ - Fact

# data[].attributes.body
It appears that all of these statements were followed up immediately by anecdotes or expert opinions which i would say is the best way to tackle online harassment (mainly anecdotes) because it gives you an idea of what an experience could be like, this is accentuated in the last claim which gives you many anecdotes of women who have been harassed online

# data[].attributes.body
The author mostly uses anecdotes of people who have experienced online harassment or share their stories of being online. I would say that this is effective because the main topic is online harassment, so, the best way to tackle it would be with people

# data[].attributes.body
"The ruling will make it more difficult than ever to prosecute the authors of online death and 🤬 threats." claim of policy
"Social Media companies do not want to implement... companies are reluctant to automatically suspend user accounts." claim of fact
"Having a reputation as a place where women receive death threats...But it's an even bigger threat to society." claims of value

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses all the types of evidences to support each of his claims. For example one of their claims, they used an example of the court overruling a decision, "The Supreme Court voided that conviction... "true threats' was not sufficient." to show that it would be harder to prosecute those that make online threats. Another example is when they an expert opinion by Mary Anne Frank saying, "This is the equivalent... putting on blindfolds and earplugs." to give an idea of how much Social Media companies aren't trying to censor their platforms.

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses a lot of examples and personal anecdotes to back up their claims and sort of give the reader an example of why something is bad and should be addressed. I believe it is effective in persuading the reader with all the stories of bad things happening with online media.

# data[].attributes.body
1-¨Harassment stalking...aggressors are actually doing is illegal." claim of fact.
2-¨Arguing with someone online, which is what many aggressors are doing, is not illegal. Neither is calling someone names. ¨ claim of Fact.
3- "Having a reputation as a place where women receive death threats...But it's an even bigger threat to society." claim of value.

# data[].attributes.body
All of these statements appear to be immediately followed up by anecdotes or expert opinions, which I believe is the best way to combat online harassment (especially anecdotes) because it gives you a sense of what an experience might be like. This is emphasized in the last claim, which provides many anecdotes of women who have been harassed online.

# data[].attributes.body
The author mostly relies on accounts from persons who have been harassed online or who have shared their online experiences. This is successful, in my opinion, because the major theme is online abuse, and the best way to address it is with people.

# data[].attributes.body
Nonconsensual 🤬 has also yet to be criminalized in 34 states. Claim of policy

Tweeting someone’s nude photo at her boss is harassment, but because it’s not directed to the target specifically, it often doesn’t fall under the legal definition. claim of value

In some cases, crimes are more difficult to litigate online. Claim of fact

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout the whole article each claim was expressed with an anecdote with expert research and opinions to combate each claim these can serve as an excellent sources to combat and help create better solutions and laws regulating any form of online harassment.

# data[].attributes.body
The author combines their writing by listing real world situations and research as well as her personal experience to show to readers that online harassment is a huge problem and something obviously has to be done about this issue. Her method of writing this article was not effective because there was still no solution to online harassment by the end of the article there was only warnings for the things that could happen on the ethernet and what to be cautious with. I think more evidence would have been great.

# data[].attributes.body
1) "online harassment largely goes unchecked" - Fact
2) "Online harassment is a prevalent, serious problem that even the Supreme Court (albeit implicitly) agrees should be treated in cyberspace in the same way that it's treated in real life." - Fact
3) "crimes are more difficult to litigate online" - Fact

# data[].attributes.body
The authors uses mostly anecdotal evidence with providing real life examples that are relevant to the claim and topic by stating an expert's opinion and research to add small amounts of statistics to prove how issues with online harassment has not been improved and there's not much action could be done to solve it.

# data[].attributes.body
The author generally used a little bit of everything but mostly supported their claims heavily with details and examples. This would not be as effective if the other types of evidence such as statistics and expert opinions and research did not further support the details and examples.

# data[].attributes.body
" The district court has asked jurors to consider only whether the threats would cause a reasonable person to be afraid." - Value
"..., Danielle Citron, a law professor at the University of Maryland who has studied online harassment since 2007, told Fast Company." - Fact
" Social Media companies do not want to implement technologies that censor their platforms by mistaking healthy debate for malicious harassment, for the same reason, companies reluctant to automatically suspend user accounts." - Policy

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses very useful and factual evidence to support these claims of his. The facts and opinions support the claims very well. For instance, when he quotes what Danielle Citron says, then gives us a little background info to let us know that what she said was factual.

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses quotes from different important people. He also uses real world experiences and examples. He gets many different expert opinions as well that helps to support the evidence

# data[].attributes.body
" online harassment prevalent and serious problems"- claim of value
'would be to allow victims that is intended to embarrass them." - claim of value
"the ruling will make it more difficult than ever to prosecute the authors of online death and threats."- claim of policy

# data[].attributes.body
the author is very detailed with the examples and uses expert opinions or anecdotes to support the claim. the best supporting evidence is people who know about the topic or have been in that same situation.

# data[].attributes.body
the author uses examples from the real world and uses personal anecdotes to support the claim. this is effective because it is coming from who can connect to it and persuade the reader with the stores of bad things happening on the media.