# data[].attributes.body
by not letting the public explore philosophy and psychology it keeps them from using the thinking about how things function. It is almost seen that being them entertained is all that matters to most people to the point they made books illegal simply because there not entertaining.
-joshua Arjona

# data[].attributes.body
"Don’t give them any slippery stuff like philosophy or sociology to tie things up with. That way lies melancholy."
(Bradbury)
- Joshua Arjona

# data[].attributes.body
By taking away books the people don't have complex things to think about so people are simple-minded. this could also contribute to people not thinking of using things that are found in fictional books. People should be permitted to think freely about t any topic, it almost seems that the firemen don't want you knowing about certain things that are in books.

-joshua

# data[].attributes.body
By giving useless and unaspiring entertainment, it avoids the ability for others to think and have opinions because all people care about is being entertained.

# data[].attributes.body
“If the drama is bad, if the film says nothing, if the play is hollow, sting me with the theremin, loudly. I’ll think I’m responding to the play, when it’s only a tactile reaction to vibration. But I don’t care. I just like solid entertainment”.
(Bradbury)
-Joceline Carrillo

# data[].attributes.body
By taking away critical thinking, people are “happier” and feel more alike. A man who is unknowledgeable is “happier” than one who can analyze and brainstorm when in reality, society is depressed and feel useless.

# data[].attributes.body
“Any man who can take a TV wall apart and put it back together again, and most men can nowadays, is happier than any man who tries to slide-rule, measure, and equate the universe, which just won’t be measured or equated without making man feel 🤬 and lonely”. (Bradbury)
-Joceline Carrillo

# data[].attributes.body
"Cram them full of non-combustible data, chock them so damned full of ‘facts’ they feel stuffed, but absolutely `brilliant’ with information. Then they’ll feel they’re thinking, they’ll get a sense of motion without moving . And they’ll be happy because facts of that sort don’t change."
(Bradbury)
-Joshua Arjona

# data[].attributes.body
a very bad or unfair society in which there is a lot of suffering, especially an imaginary society in the future, after something terrible has happened; a description of such a society