# data[].attributes.headline
Most teachers' answers were short and  choppy. There was little use of end marks.

# data[].attributes.subject
Most teachers' answers were short and  choppy. There was little use of end marks.

# data[].attributes.body
2c-Students were engaged with information teacher relayed to them about deliberation within a discussion.  Students has the obvious knowledge, but teacher also was able to see the students’ understanding of information.

# data[].attributes.headline
Tables are numbered. Students have sides (A&B)

# data[].attributes.subject
Tables are numbered. Students have sides (A&B)

# data[].attributes.headline
Tables are numbered. Students have sides 3

# data[].attributes.subject
Tables are numbered. Students have sides 3

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher provided students with clear instructions and students were engaged in the discussion. The students were grouped.

# data[].attributes.body
student engagement

# data[].attributes.headline
Students engaged but do not have a choice of activities.

# data[].attributes.subject
Students engaged but do not have a choice of activities.

# data[].attributes.headline
2C Proficient Procedures in place no lost of instructional time 

# data[].attributes.subject
2C Proficient Procedures in place no lost of instructional time 

# data[].attributes.body
3C-  100% engagement

-NELSON

# data[].attributes.body
Class did not have a routine. Students are not self guided

# data[].attributes.body
Students were effectively working in groups. However, most of the guidance was on the part of the teacher.

# data[].attributes.headline
student engagement is noted , transition throughout, 

# data[].attributes.subject
student engagement is noted , transition throughout, 

# data[].attributes.body
Marc Hebert EE
3c Students were engaged--majority were
EP

# data[].attributes.body
Lemoine: Transitions throughout the class function smoothly. Group work and peer to peer interaction require little guidance from teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
Routines are unclear
Some students were not engaged.

# data[].attributes.headline
3C - students are intellectually engaged and there are more than one correct responses/evidence to pull for student work.

# data[].attributes.subject
3C - students are intellectually engaged and there are more than one correct responses/evidence to pull for student work.

# data[].attributes.headline
3c:  pacing seems adequate; not HE because there is no real student choice.

# data[].attributes.subject
3c:  pacing seems adequate; not HE because there is no real student choice.

# data[].attributes.body
2C: Transitions seemed smooth

# data[].attributes.body
Due to students seemed to be discussion while instructions where being said

# data[].attributes.headline
2c - EE, not enough evidence shown in videos to get proficient 

# data[].attributes.subject
2c - EE, not enough evidence shown in videos to get proficient 

# data[].attributes.body
3c - EP, students seem very engaged in lesson material and activities. Students seemed very interested

# data[].attributes.headline
2c- students are productively engaged during small group work. 

# data[].attributes.subject
2c- students are productively engaged during small group work. 

# data[].attributes.body
Proficient

# data[].attributes.body
the learning tasks and activities are aligned with the instructional outcomes.
the pacing of the lesson is appropriate and provides students with time needed to intellectually engage.

# data[].attributes.body
*Materials and resources
support the learning goals
and require intellectual
engagement, as appropriate.
• The pacing of the lesson
provides students the time
needed to be intellectually
engaged.
Most students are
intellectually engaged in
the lesson.
• Learning tasks have multiple
correct responses or
approaches and/or demand
higher order thinking.
• The students have some
choice in how they
complete learning tasks.
• There is a mix of different
types of groupings,suitable
to the lesson objectives.

# data[].attributes.headline
very engaging class ,small group discussion was effective

# data[].attributes.subject
very engaging class ,small group discussion was effective

# data[].attributes.body
teacher management of instructional groups
minimal guidance and prompting.

# data[].attributes.body
Learning task and activities are aligned. Pacing is appropriate.

# data[].attributes.body
There was little of instructional time because of classroom procedures and routines. The teacher management was consistent.

3c
The learning task aligned and challenged students thinking. The pacing was appropriate.

# data[].attributes.body
The students are productively engaged in during small group work.

The pacing of the lesson provides students the time needed to be intellectually engaged.

# data[].attributes.body
2c(EP) Routines and procedures run smoothly
3c(EP) Most students are intellectually engaged in the lesson. Student deliberation

# data[].attributes.body
students were productively engaged during small groups.
routines were clear and could see they were present prior to this lesson.
classroom routines transition smoothly.
transitions were smooth between large to small group.

# data[].attributes.body
P

# data[].attributes.body
2C - The students are engaged during the classroom.  Teacher paces lessons, allowing time management for students to respond and be intellectually engaged.

# data[].attributes.body
2C- EP-The students are productively engaged in during small group work.
3C-EP-The pacing of the lesson provides students the time needed to be intellectually engaged.

# data[].attributes.body
2c- EP
The students are productively engaged during small group work.

Classroom routines function smoothly.

3c-EP

The pacing of the the lesson is appropriate, providing most students the time needed to be intellectually engaged.