# data[].attributes.body
I think first cv and third cv are good examples. They include a good structure and seems proffesional. The second and fourth are bad examples. They try to support with photos but it is not professional.

# data[].attributes.body
the second and fourth look pretty good. but the first and third are very bad. they need to be well prepared and organized.

# data[].attributes.body
The best CV is the second one for me, it effectively showcases skills, experiences, and qualifications in a clear and concise manner but the 3rd one is diffucult to read its not clear

# data[].attributes.body
I think second cv was a very good CV. First, I think the CV was not very descriptive. I liked the second CV much more than the first one in terms of being explanatory and informative.

# data[].attributes.body
1st cv is better than others

# data[].attributes.body
In CV 1, there are so many misspellings, and I don’t understand which position he is applying for. I can only see his hobbies that are not relevant the job which I do not know which position he is applying for, irrelevant pictures, and so many misspellings.

I would hire the employee who has CV 2.

In CV 3, the font she chose is unreadable. I’d prefer a readable font.

About CV 4, it is a quite well-prepared CV, but I am not sure that there is a mail address which is ended with gmailing.com.

# data[].attributes.body
The fourth CV looks really interesting. However, the first CV is not fully sufficient.

# data[].attributes.body
The second CV is very nice and equipped.
But I can't say the same about the first CV. I think there is not enough information in the first CV.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the 4th CV is the best one. It is highly effective and professional. I believe this CV ha a better chance to hearing back from the application. The first and the third CV examples are so bad that they can't even taken seriously.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second cv is the best in terms of being goal oriented and well crafted. The first and the third one are not as good as the second one.

# data[].attributes.body
Which CV is better depends on your personal needs and goals for a particular job position or industry. It is important to create a regular CV that highlights your own qualifications, experience and achievements, and is tailored to the employer's needs.

# data[].attributes.body
I think first Cv is problematic beacuse It contains things like lack of information, visual problems, typos.The second CV is a good CV as it contains everything it should be. The 3rd cv example is also a bad example because it was written in an unreadable spelling format.

# data[].attributes.body
I think 1st and 3rd CV are bad CVs. Because the pictures for the 1st are too childish and not professional at all, and the font for the 3rd is too eye-catching and unprofessional. But the 2nd and 4th CVs are well-prepared CVs.

# data[].attributes.body
second CV is the best. But first and third cv is not formal. Probably they cannot found any job with these cv's

# data[].attributes.body
Examples 1 and 3 were CVs that failed to inspire me. I am of the opinion that there is no information that satisfies me in terms of content. But the second example is the kind of CV example that can inspire me

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second CV is better prepared than the others,looks a professional,in a formal and obey the rules.

# data[].attributes.body
According to me, the 1st and 3rd CVs are not successful.

# data[].attributes.body
i think 2.cv is more professional and therefore better than others

# data[].attributes.body
3rd one is better than the others

# data[].attributes.body
From my perspective, CV1 and CV3 are examples of bad CVs because they include unrelevant items for a professional CV. On the other and, CV2 and CV4 are well-prepared and include necessary informations.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, CVs #1 and #3 are not well-crafted. On the other hand, CVs #2 and #4 appear to be well-structured and informative.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second CV looks better and more professional because it has a proper organization and includes all the necessary informations.

# data[].attributes.body
I think fourth example is the best prepared because it is include everything that should be. The first is the worst, it looks kids´stuff. The third example should be different format.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the 2nd and 4th CVs are well and regularly prepared. But the 1st and 3rd CVs look frivolous and irregular.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second cv is better than the others

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first CV is not good enough. The second CV is good enough. The third CV again not good. Lastly, Forth one is best CV

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at sample CVs 1 and 3 are examples of bad CVs. The use of unnecessary images in CV 1 is particularly noticeable. In CV 3, the font errors made look very bad. The best and neat looking example is CV 2. Because by paying attention to the rules of CV writing, it will be prepared seriously.

# data[].attributes.body
The first and second examples are the best among them, the others contain mistakes, unfortunately professional life does not accept mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second CV is better prepared than the others in a formal and clear language.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second CV is better than the others. but the first and third CVs are almost mediocre.

# data[].attributes.body
I think, the font of the 3rd CV is quite disturbing and there are more images than text in the 1st CV. So the 1st and the 3rd CV are bad examples. The 2nd and the 4th CV is good and in line with the format.

# data[].attributes.body
The first and the third CV examples are good because they don't have enough information and the format is confusing. The second and fourth examples are good. They included everything necessary and in a good format.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first CV looks unprofessional. Spelling mistakes and excessive use of images seen.

The second CV looks pretty well done. Work experience and education are mentioned. This CV's  layout is suitable for a CV. Details that should be included in the CV are included.

The third CV looks unprofessional. It is written in informal language and font.

The fourth CV is a very good example of a CV, because this CV includes experiences, their key skills, contact information, and work expericences.

# data[].attributes.body
CV 1: It is a poor example of a CV because of the spelling mistakes, unnecessary use of several fonts and images, and casual language.

CV 2: It is a good example of a CV because it is written in formal language, it looks neat and it includes all of the necessary information.

CV 3: It is a poor example of a CV, although it is better than CV 1, it is written in a font that makes it harder to read, it is written in informal language and there is no contact information.

CV 4: It is a very good example of a CV as it includes contact information, the abstract and highlighted version of their skills and experiences at the first page, their key skills, very brief and sufficient amount of information about their academic achievements, their work experiences and interests in a very neat way.

# data[].attributes.body
I think first and third examples are bad because their formats are not correct.

# data[].attributes.body
1 and 3 is a bad CV example If such a CV comes, I will not accept the job. Good CV examples are in 2 and 4. If I were an employer, I would hire a person who gives such a CV. especially the 2nd CV was very good, I would hire especially 2.

# data[].attributes.body
The second and fourth CVs look good. but the first and third CVs don't look professional. Images were used as if it was prepared by a child.

# data[].attributes.body
I think first and third CVs are not good examples but second and fourth CVs are more proffessional.

# data[].attributes.body
the firs one is just OK, the second one seems more professional than others, the last one is the least successful in my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the 1st and 3rd examples are not prepared in accordance with a good CV format. However, the 2nd and 4th examples are more successful CV examples.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second and fourth examples are the same about being good. But the first and third are not even taken seriously.

# data[].attributes.body
I think first and third could be better because its not seem professional but second and fourth looks good.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second CV sample is the best. It could be better if the format of 1st and 3rd cv's is edited

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, first example is bad because it is very short. Other examples are good.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first and third CVs are bad examples, but the second and fourth CVs look sufficient.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think that the first and third CVs are negative examples and their owners will fail. If the owner of the second and fourth instances, they can be successful. They are professionally prepared.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion 1st and 3rd CV examples are bad CV examples. Examples of 2nd and 4th CVs are also examples of good CVs.

# data[].attributes.body
I think 1st and 3rd could be better. It is not written in the format CV's should be written. But I think 2nd one is prepared well.

# data[].attributes.body
The first cv is a good one because it was never written professionally, but the second and fourth cvs are beautifully written, I think

# data[].attributes.body
1st CV is bad in my opinion because it was not taken care of and did not conform to the CV format. I think the 2nd CV was nice because it touched on every point that should be included in the CV. I think the third CV is bad because the writing format is not suitable. The fourth CV is also suitable.

# data[].attributes.body
CV2-CV4 are valid formats for a job application. However, CV1-CV3 is not suitable for professional use due to the use of fonts and images.

# data[].attributes.body
CV Number 2 and 4 are good examples in my opinion. Even though there is something I am missing in them, they are clearly cut and well executed. In the other hand, CV Number 1 is practically like a prank being pulled on an employer whereas CV Number 3 is "unorthodoxly written", requiring a "very skilled employer" in order to read what is written.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1st and 3rd CVs are pretty basic and not even worth sending to a company but 2nd and 4th CVs are fine.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think the 1st and 3rd CVs are a good example for any application. The 2nd and 4th example CVs are also relatively better when compared, although not enough.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1st and 3rd CVs are bad examples; they contain unnecessary information and have spelling errors. Other CV samples are acceptable and carefully prepared.

# data[].attributes.body
The first and third examples look bad. They contain a lot of errors

# data[].attributes.body
I think 1 and 3 are bad examples because they contain most of the mistakes mentioned in the video. 2 and 4 are good examples because they are professionally written. I think the 2nd one is the best

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first and third examples are bad and absurd. It's really hard to focus because the structure is bad.

# data[].attributes.body
CV 1 and 3 are not good examples, as the first CV includes pictures which appear unprofessional and lacking in seriousness. Additionally, CV 3 has a poor writing style which creates a format that is tiring for the reader.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think the first and third résumés are a valid solution. The first resume looks too casual and simple. The second and fourth resumes are not very good in my opinion, but they are much better than the other examples.

# data[].attributes.body
The first and third examples look unprofessional because there was a formatting error. The first example looks like an elementary school student's homework. In the third example, the writings are not very readable. The second and fourth examples look more professional and accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
The first and third CVs are very childish in terms of used pictures and not enough information. but the second and fourth CV are much more professional.

# data[].attributes.body
Among the CVs we reviewed, the first and third were really bad and difficult to understand. The second and fourth CVs are much better and more understandable than the others.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first and third CVs are not professional enough. The second and fourth CVs are good examples of the correct format.

# data[].attributes.body
The preparation of the first and third CV is bad. The first CV is sloppy with very simple images, the third CV contains too much text and unnecessary information, and the writing style is not professional. The second and fourth CVs can be considered well-prepared.

# data[].attributes.body
The first CV looks very childish and is not prepared in a serious way. In the third CV, the format was chosen incorrectly. But even without reading it, it is clear that the 2nd and 4th CVs are prepared in a very professional way.

# data[].attributes.body
I think first and third Cvs are bad. Like they dont have a good facility.  2nd and 4th Cv is better then other. It's seeing professional.

# data[].attributes.body
ı think 1st and 3rd cvs are very bad.Bad pictures are used and they are not written professionally.2nd and 4th cv are corret.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the 1st and 3rd CVs are not good.Unnecessary pictures are used and far from formal. I think 2nd and 4th cv's are better prepared.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1st and 3rd CVs look bad, they are not written very professionally. Looking at 2 and 4, they look professional and good.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first cv example and the 3rd cv example are bad. I think the 2nd and 4th examples are correct

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the 1st and the 3rd CVs are bad examples. In contrast, the 2nd and 4th CVs are good examples in terms of the format.

# data[].attributes.body
When I looked at the CVs, the first thing I saw was the formats. The first CV is definitely not accepted, it is tried to be explained only with visuals. The second CV is exactly as it should be, I think it looks pretty good. The third is wrong in writing style and format. The fourth CV looks good in my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
The first resume is clumsy, with a poor structure, mismatched sources, missing information, unnecessary images and numerous typos. It resembles a primary academy design. On the other hand, the alternative CV is good and acceptable. The last CV looks better than the others but I think it is complicated for the recruiter to understand

# data[].attributes.body
I think the 1st and 3rd CVs are very poorly prepared. Especially in the first one, the format, structure and visuals are very bad. In the third, it is very difficult to read the information. The 3rd and 4th CVs are much better prepared compared to the other two.

# data[].attributes.body
I think 1st and 3rd CVs are bad examples. They don't look very professionally written because the content is not strong, not enough information is given and spelling is not good. The 2nd and 4th examples are good, especially the second is a good professionally prepared CV. The fourth is a bit more complicated but still good.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, resumes 1 and 3 are not successful, but more successful than resumes 2 and 4

# data[].attributes.body
The first and third CVs were not prepared professionally. They have a bad structure. It is very simple and incorrectly prepared due to unnecessary images and fonts. The second CV is prepared very good.

# data[].attributes.body
The first CV is not professional. Hobbies are too classic and irrelevant. The second CV looks professional and straight  forward. The format of the third CV is bad. The font style is chosen incorrectly, it looks too complex. The expressions in the content are not suitable for the CV.  I think the best CV example is second. Then the fourth. The worst is the first CV.

# data[].attributes.body
first a bad CV is not a professional. but three and four are very successful.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1st and 3rd examples were bad because I don't think they were suitable for a CV and were missing, but I liked the 2nd and 4th examples

# data[].attributes.body
A good resume clearly and concisely outlines an applicant's education, work experience, skills, and accomplishments. The layout is easy to read, with appropriate section headers and bullet points. It should also include keywords relevant to the industry or job position. For example, a good resume for a marketing position might emphasize experience in social media, SEO, and data analysis. On the other hand, a bad resume may be cluttered or difficult to read, lacking essential information such as dates of employment or job titles. It may be too long or too short, missing important details or including irrelevant information. The use of slang or spelling errors can also make a bad impression on an employer. A good resume highlights strengths and qualifications, while a bad resume can hinder a candidate's chances of getting an interview.

# data[].attributes.body
The first example contains very insufficient information and this information is very irrelevant to the job he wants to apply for. It is not carefully prepared and not professional at all. The second example provides the necessary and appropriate information and is professionally prepared. In the last example, I don't think there is an informational error, but it is very difficult to read because the writing style is very complex.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1st and 3rd CV samples are poorly prepared because they are not professional. Examples 2 and 4 are very well written in my opinion. I think 2 and 4 CV samples were prepared correctly. Because it is detailed and written as it should be.

# data[].attributes.body
Elif fındıkoğlu
First cv example is not professional because its’ information content is poor we can not get enough information for job application.
Second cv is better than first one it seens quite okey.
Third one is not good like first one because  it is unreadable due to font. There is no organization
Fourth one is also good but in my opinion best one is second cv

# data[].attributes.body
first cv is not professional at all. It has a bad structure. fonts do not match. information is missing. He used unnecessary images. It looks like a primary school project. spelling mistake. worst one. second one is okey. good one. third one has bad font. not easy to read.  There is unnecessary information as she learned to read and write in primary school. unprofessional. forth one is better but it's a bit complicated.

# data[].attributes.body
The first example is not a good example because it is not prepared carefully and properly, but the second is a good example because it is prepared professionally and properly.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1st and 3rd CV examples are poorly formed, but the others are in the correct format.

# data[].attributes.body
The first and the third CVs are bad because there is no related information and spelling mistakes.However,the second CV is better,because it is written in a more fluent way and the required information is supplied

# data[].attributes.body
Kübra Kaya

The first CV is not good because it is not professional, the third CV is not correct either. other CVs are successful and professional

# data[].attributes.body
the first example is a bad example that was not professionally prepared.
we can say that the second and fourth are good examples.
in the third place, I think the font choice was not correct.

# data[].attributes.body
The second is a good example. format is appropriate. The first is a bad example. not professionally prepared

# data[].attributes.body
The first Cv looks very unprofessional and example of a bad one because it includes personal interest but not related to work life and have insufficent information about his skills. Also, his work experiences do not refer that he can be a good candident. In addition, the third cv was also not great because I bearly read it due to its writting style preference. It should be more clear.
On the other hand, the second and forth ones are good example of cvs. They have sufficent informations such as work experiences or related courses he or she taked. If I were a manager or something, I would hire these two.

# data[].attributes.body
I think, 1st is a bad cv because it was not prepared professionaly but 2st is a very professional cv and it includes necessary information.

# data[].attributes.body
elif kecebir
The 2nd video is very successful because it is very successful in informing and writing, but 1 and 3 are quite short

# data[].attributes.body
1.i th CV is not very professional and information on many subjects is insufficient.  The 2nd CV is more professional and sufficient in content and more professional.  The third one is not very suitable in terms of format.

# data[].attributes.body
The 2nd example very good.Because it is written in a very good  format and very little information,but it is not same for 1 and 3.

# data[].attributes.headline
1st and 3rd cv examples are wrong examples. In the 1st cv example, although the format is correct, images like ordinary text are used and this is not correct, and the 3rd number is prepared in a bad format.

# data[].attributes.subject
1st and 3rd cv examples are wrong examples. In the 1st cv example, although the format is correct, images like ordinary text are used and this is not correct, and the 3rd number is prepared in a bad format.

# data[].attributes.body
Example 1 and 3 is bad cv.The formatting is poorly done and it is eye-watering.Example 2 is good CV.The information is detailed and sufficient.The design is beautiful.