# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
🚨 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 — 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐤 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🚨

For years, people were mocked for questioning where society was heading.

Now Canadians are discovering that many of the things https://t.co/as9pMqZtsa

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
🚨 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 — 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐤 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🚨

For years, people were mocked for questioning where society was heading.

Now Canadians are discovering that many of the things https://t.co/as9pMqZtsa

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
🚨 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 — 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐤 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🚨

For years, people were mocked for questioning where society was heading.

Now Canadians are discovering that many of the things… pic.twitter.com/as9pMqZtsa
— Raven News (@DanaMetcalfe5) May 15, 2026

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
🚨 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 — 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐤 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🚨

For years, people were mocked for questioning where society was heading.

Now Canadians are discovering that many of the things https://t.co/as9pMqZtsa

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
🚨 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 — 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐤 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🚨

For years, people were mocked for questioning where society was heading.

Now Canadians are discovering that many of the things https://t.co/as9pMqZtsa

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
🚨 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 — 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐤 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🚨

For years, people were mocked for questioning where society was heading.

Now Canadians are discovering that many of the things https://t.co/as9pMqZtsa

# data[].attributes.body
file:///private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/B645A326-4A63-421F-B473-C881219E6C88/tmp/TempDocs/covid19-and-illegal-us-bioweapons-activity-an-insiders-revelations-2432.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-covid-dossier/

# data[].attributes.body
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-spies-who-hate-us/

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/v2abvpg-the-man-with-his-finger-on-the-whos-pulsejames-roguski.html

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/v27ggd7-secrets-of-the-united-nations-what-everyone-should-know.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SECRETS OF THE UNITED NATIONS - What everyone should know!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The United Nations are currently rolling out Agenda 2030, with the notorious "sustainability goals". This worldwide project aims to completely transform every aspect of human existence: food, sexualit

# data[].attributes.body
https://vimeo.com/687745601

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Klaus Schwab - Transhuman Slavery Agenda by 2026

# data[].attributes.body
https://archive.org/details/laurence-h.-shoup-william-minter-imperial-brain-trust-the-council-on-foreign-rel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Laurence H. Shoup William Minter Imperial Brain Trust The Council On Foreign Relations And United States Foreign Policy (1977) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Laurence H. Shoup William Minter Imperial Brain Trust The Council On Foreign Relations And United States Foreign Policy (1977)

# data[].attributes.body
https://stopworldcontrol.com/behavior/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How governments use psychological manipulation to change human behavior

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Governments use applied psychology and hypnosis to create fear and anxiety in the population, with the goal of changing their behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/reconstitution-starter-pack

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Orientation for new readers.

I'll update this page as needed, but I want to get the initial version up so people who want to use the material have access to it in an organized way now.

There are a lot of useful ways for good men and women to engage in the war to restore Constitutional republican government on American soil, and I've written and talked about those approaches a lot.

The responses that I think hold most promise include:

Pray the Rosary.

File civil lawsuits (state and federal) with plaintiffs and fact patterns that have potential to bridge to criminal prosecutions, including terrorism and treason prosecutions. One example is Jackson v. Pfizer, Ventavia and ICON, which offers an opportunity to bridge from 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2) (False Claims Act) to 18 USC 2333 (Terrorism, civil remedies)/18 USC 175 (biological weapons)/18 USC 229 (chemical weapons) and from there to 18 USC 2381 (Treason). These complaints should emphasize that individual war criminals, terrorists and traitors currently committing crimes from within US Government agencies (including DOD, HHS, DHS, DOJ, Treasury, Commerce, Agriculture, etc) are impersonating government officials, illegitimately occupying government offices, and operating outside the scope of official government authority, because legitimate governments cannot and do not make war against their own people. I've explored this framing here, here and here.

Educate and exert sociopolitical pressure on public prosecutors to file criminal charges. Current most-promising targets are county district attorneys and sheriffs, and state attorney generals/AGs who may be open to learning about how things have gone off the rails without their knowledge or consent, as preparation for doing their part to get things back on track. A future federal Attorney General may eventually become useful, but the current occupant of the office (Merrick Garland) is knowingly impersonating a law enforcement official and knowingly committing war crimes. Lists of crimes and criminals here.

Support state and federal judges who deny motions to dismiss and bring cases forward through discovery, pretrial and trial phases.

Pressure county and state lawmakers to pass new laws blocking the enforcement and/or repealing bad state, federal and international laws. Many state legislatures are working along these lines already. Prior coverage here here and here. To find the bad laws on your state's books, and the bills proposed to expand or block them, see State Laws Limiting Public Health Protections: Hazardous for Our Health; Temple University Center for Public Health Law Research Policy Surveillance Program; US data set for Reallocation of Public Authority; and National Conference of State Legislatures, 2021 list (quarantine and isolation laws).

Pressure federal lawmakers to withdraw from (repeal authorizations for US participation in) and stop funding bad international treaties and/or pass new laws blocking the domestic enforcement of bad international treaties. Getting Americans out of the World Health Organization and out from under the WHO International Health Regulations are top priorities. See Rep. Andy Biggs H.R. 79, introduced Jan 2023.

Pressure federal lawmakers to repeal bad existing laws and stop funding programs pseudo-authorized by those laws. Prior coverage of federal enabling laws that need to be repealed: here and here.

Pressure state legislators and corporation commissions to revoke the charters of bioweapons manufacturing companies including Pfizer (Delaware), ATI (South Carolina) and ANSER (Virginia). Also, pressure other state governments to prosecute Delaware, South Carolina and Virginia governments for knowingly harboring criminal organizations producing chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. Prior coverage here.

Support international terrorism and war crimes prosecutions, by reinforcing that the war criminals currently hiding within all national governments worldwide are non-State actors; they are allied with BIS/WHO/WEF/etc. which are not lawful nation-state governments.

[If you're interested in organic constitution and state nationals issues, please subscribe to Shire Herald for further information and comment threads, and/or check out TASA.]

The goal as I see it is to build up social, political, legislative, prosecutorial and judicial conditions through which ordinary people can restore our Constitutional republican government to basic functioning and moral legitimacy.

Key facts to keep in mind: human beings change our minds and change our behavior in response to changes in our rational understanding of reality. Reality is also in a state of constant change, apart from the unchanging reality of God.

If you think that it's all over and we're doomed because the forces of evil are permanently beyond challenge - that they exist on a plane outside the realm in which change, resistance, overthrow and restoration of sound, properly-ordered goverment are possible - think again.

More specifically:

Deep corruption is real, and so are reform and restoration of integrity.

Prosecutors sometimes ignore criminal acts, and sometimes they change their minds and start investigations and file charges.

Legislatures sometimes pass bad laws. And legislators sometimes change their minds and introduce and vote for bills to repeal bad laws.

Courts sometimes ignore bad laws and let them stand and be enforced. And judges sometimes change their minds, take judicial notice of bad laws and nullify them.

The documents linked below are useful for orientation/education purposes, and some can be used as templates, by substituting state and local health officials for federal health officials, for example.

If you want to download, read and use them in your work pressuring county, state and federal lawmakers, prosecutors, governors and judges, or developing cases to file yourself, please do.

Reconstitution Starter Pack

Jan 2023 Legal History American Domestic Bioterrorism Program - Nine-page version of the American Domestic Bioterrorism Program timeline, with five pages of footnotes.

July 2018 ICAN HHS Stipulation No monitoring of vaccines - Informed Consent Action Network v. HHS, stipulation re: no HHS safety data collection or safety review for childhood bioweapons since program established in 1986. This document corroborates the pattern of HHS failure - back to 1986 - to monitor or report to Congress on bioweapons use, morbidity and mortality. (Note: After filing the stipulation, HHS located two reports, for 1988 and 1989, and no further reports thereafter, leaving the evidentiary value of the 2018 stipulation intact.)

June 2021 HHS CDC Re Vaxxes are US Gov Property; diversion prohibited - CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program Provider Agreement. Notifies end users (pharmacists, nurses, doctors) who handle DOD-Pfizer bioweapons that diversion of any vials from the supply chain will be prosecuted as federal theft; the bioweapons are US DOD property until injected into military targets. Relevant section highlighted in yellow. Attorney Warner Mendenhall located this information and reported on it here.

September 2022 IJVTRP Paper: What is in the so-called vaccines? I nternational Journal Vaccines Theory Practice Research paper by David Hughes. Evidence gathered by 26 independent independent research teams studying vials diverted from the supply chain. Provides reinforcing evidence that the DOD and its contractors have not disclosed the complete contents of each vial, lot or batch of bioweapons material, such that contents injected into each military target are unknown. Some ingredients have been identified by independent investigators; many ingredients remain unidentified.

February 2023 Latypova Memo re cGMP intentional noncompliance 2 p; 2022.12.18 Latypova Memo re cGMP intentional noncompliance 12 p. Two memos by Sasha Latypova compiling evidence of intentional noncompliance with certified Good Manufacturing Practice and other pharmaceutical regulations.

January 2023 Watt Draft 18 USC 2333 Terrorism Complaint Outline Azar Kadlec Gruber Hinton - Draft introduction for a federal civil case that could be brought under 18 USC 2333, civil cause of action for terrorism crimes, against federal FDA/HHS officials. (Such a case has not yet been filed). The draft could be used as a template to write state civil complaints, in states that have their own laws prohibiting chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction (i.e. Florida), especially if the state also has a civil cause of action for injuries stemming from criminal acts (i.e. Ohio).

February 2023 Watt Memo re cGMP two prong dilemma argument - Structural argument; to defend, US Government must take one of two positions: mass murder using bioweapons is the official policy of the US Government, and officials carrying it out are fully authorized to do so, or mass murder using bioweapons is prohibited under US law, and US Government officials carrying it out are rogue elements who can and should be removed from power, charged, tried and punished. Same structure applies to bioweapons as non-regulated pharmaceutical products. Could be adapted to address state and local health officials and state/local non-regulation of product safety.

February 2023 Five Step Guide Communicating with Office Holders. Written by Elle Morgan. Prior coverage here. More information at Morgan's Substack, Human Writes.

Other documents:

Affidavit of Noncompliance. For personal filing at county courthouses. Prior coverage here.

Notice of War Crimes Complicity, local state officials 18 USC 2441 - For personal notification of state governments, school officials, doctors/nurses/pharmacists, and others re: their ongoing complicity with war crimes, by their acts to force or submit to bioweapons injections. I'm working on an updated version, specific to ICD-10 Z28.31, 'underimmunization for COVID-19 status,' for patients to personally notify medical professionals of their complicity in war crimes to the extent they ask about patient bioweapons-submission status, coerce submission, and/or log or report resistance to bioweapons in private, state, federal or international databases.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Orientation for new readers. I'll update this page as needed, but I want to get the initial version up so people who want to use the material have access to it in an organized way now.

# data[].attributes.body
https://theconsciousresistance.com/trojanhorse/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Conscious Resistance Network Presents:

Researched, Written, and Narrated by Derrick Broze
Produced and Edited by Jeremy Martin

Watch on LBRY / Purchase the Director's Cut

This 96 minute documentary will expose the truth behind the global "Race to 5G", the health, privacy, and local power concerns, and the corruption between the Big Wireless industry and the U.S. government.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Chapter 1: The Electromagnetic Spectrum and 5g
Chapter 2: The Concerns Around EMF's and 5g
Chapter 3: The Big Wireless-5g Takeover
Chapter 4: Solutions
Transcript and Sources:
My name is Derrick Broze. For the past 8 years I have worked as an independent freelance investigative journalist in Houston, Texas. Since 2012 I have covered a wide range of topics, from indigenous resistance at Standing Rock, exposing government and corporate surveillance, and reporting from important trials like Chelsea Manning's sentencing, and the Silk Road trial. Throughout this time, I have noticed that choosing to investigate certain topics, often results in being labeled a conspiracy theorist, or, at the very least, a proponent of less-than-credible journalism. One of these "forbidden" topics relates to potential harms caused by the use of cell phones and related digital technology.

Over the years I have seen articles discussing research on the dangers of radio frequency radiation and electromagnetic fields. Again, I noticed these studies never made mainstream newspapers, or headlines on the 24 hour cable news cycle. Even if the news had reported on this information, would it have made a difference?

I - like millions of people around the world - never gave a second thought to the possibility that cell phones or laptops could be causing harm to human health. We assume that the government agencies responsible for these fields have tested everything for safety. I started to wonder Has this blind faith in authority been a huge mistake?

My ignorance of these topics came to an end in September 2018 when I learned that the City of Houston had recently partnered with companies like Microsoft and Verizon to turn Houston into a "Smart City". This Smart City would use emerging 5g technology to power the so-called "Internet of Things", which In turn will allow for autonomous vehicles, robot assistant's, artificial intelligence, sensors in the street to moderate street lights and environmental warning systems, and many other futuristic technologies we have been promised.

At this time, I had little understanding of what exactly 5g was, but my preliminary research had shown me that there was an increasing amount of people raising questions about the potential health and privacy concerns. I also learned that there were lawsuits taking place across Texas and around the world, as the opposition pushed back against the federal government and the wireless industry seizing power from towns, cities, and states.

On October 1st, 2018 Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner held a press event with officials from Verizon wireless. The Mayor and Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg were on location at a Houston couples home as they installed 5G equipment and helped the young couple become " the world's first 5g customer".

DB: Mayor Turner, as far as moving forward with innovation and wanting to be the first, has anybody stopped to look at any studies related to potential health effects of increasing the amount of small cells in the city, as well as privacy concerns that the American Civil Liberties Union and others have put out concerns regarding the push towards smart cities?

Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner: you know, I haven't seen any recent studies on it. I mean the reality is that, umm, if you want to move things quicker, if you want to innovate, you've got an installation that, I mean, the infrastructure is critically important"

DB: is there any concern about the health effects of the increase in small cells?

Hans Vestberg, CEO Verizon Wireless: The studies that have been done over years, has not shown any effects or health effects on the radio signals and there's no difference. There are safety rules on all of it that is regulated by the regulators, how much power you can use.

I was not satisfied with their answers. I did more research and the following week I attended Houston City Council to share what I had found with the Mayor and Council. (video) This visit to council was followed by another, and another, and another. These videos gained more than 900,000 thousand views via Youtube alone, leading dozens of activists from around the world to reach out and encourage me to keep going.

I was also featured on local news discussing the concerns around the 5g roll out. I confronted the Mayor of Houston for his close ties to the Wireless Industry and ignoring the concerns about 5g. The Mayor ran away from my questions at City Council and on 3 different occasions in public ( 1, 2, and 3). In fact, due to the response from the Mayor and the City, I ran a campaign for Mayor of Houston, calling for a moratorium on the installation of 5g towers until further studies.

Over the last year my research has involved interviewing health and privacy experts, and uncovering the truth about the Race to 5g. What I have learned is that the industry known as Big Wireless is colluding with the Federal Communications Commission to create a false demand for 5g technology, in total disregard to health and privacy concerns, all the while using the 5g rollout to strip away local power. I offer the conclusions of my research, in the hopes that it will encourage the public to question and oppose the promises of .... The 5g Trojan Horse.
Chapter 1: Understanding the Electromagnetic Spectrum
To have a discussion on 5g we first have to talk about Electromagnetic frequencies or EMFs. An emf is a measure of how many times the peak of a wave passes a particular point per second. It is measured in Hertz. This range of potential frequencies makes up what we call the electromagnetic spectrum.

The electromagnetic spectrum is divided into separate bands, and the electromagnetic waves within each frequency band are called by different names, including radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays at the high-frequency (short wavelength) end.

Within those bands, gamma rays, X-rays, and high ultraviolet are classified as ionizing radiation, meaning they have sufficient energy to ionize atoms, causing chemical reactions. Exposure to these rays can be a health hazard, causing radiation sickness, DNA damage and cancer. Radiation from visible light and lower wavelength are called nonionizing radiation because they apparently cannot cause these effects. We will revisit the science around ionizing and non-ionizing radiation in a moment.
What is 5g?
Devices like Cellphones, Wifi, and Bluetooth all operate on the microwaves band of the spectrum. When it comes to cellphones, a new generation of cellular standards has appeared approximately every ten years since 1G systems were introduced in 1979 and the early to mid-1980s. Each generation is characterized by new frequency bands, higher data rates and non-backward compatible transmission technology.

The 2nd Generation, or 2g, featured cell phones with texting and pictures. The 3rd generation came about around 2000, with the introduction of phones with some internet, video, and images. The 4th Generation came around 2009 with the introduction of smart phones with instant streaming of video, as well as the use of apps.

As we move into 2020, the shift to the 5th generation, or 5g, has begun. In addition to being promoted as the solution to 4k movie downloads, the new technology is expected to herald the beginning of Smart Cities, where driverless cars, traffic lights, pollution sensors, smart phones and countless other smart devices interact in what is known as " The Internet of Things." The IoT is a fancy way to say that we will be surrounded by hundreds of thousands of interconnected devices and sensors which are gathering mass amounts of data that will be used to show you advertising and monitor your habits, and other uses that we can't even predict yet.

The switch from 4g to 5g is a change unlike those of previous generations. One notable difference is that 5G technology uses much higher frequencies, ranging from 10-300 GHZ. 5g is using millimeter waves which do not travel far and are easily blocked by trees, buildings, and walls. The 5 G rollout means the installation of hundreds of thousands of new cell sites, towers, and additions to existing infrastructure. Cities like Houston, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Denver, San Diego, New York City, and Washington D.C. are already deploying 5g for residential and commercial uses.

Let's examine some of the concerns surrounding 5g and electromagnetic fields in general.
Chapter 2: The Concerns Around EMF's and 5g
As I mentioned earlier, over the years I have come across articles claiming that cell phones were giving people cancer or making people sick. I did not pay too much attention at first, but when I finally decided to investigate the topic I realized there was ample evidence that the technology we are so hurriedly surrounding ourselves with might be putting our lives at risk in more ways than one.

I started by trying to understand the concerns around EMFs in general. I went through hundreds of studies, including those from official government sources and others funded independently. I found studies like "International and National Expert Group Evaluations: Biological/Health Effects of Radiofrequency Fields", which examined six decades worth of research into the effects of in vitro and in vivo exposures of animals and humans or their cells to RF fields.

"Data reported in peer-reviewed scientific publications were contradictory: some indicated effects while others did not," the researchers write. Still, in the end, the expert groups suggested a "reduction in exposure levels, precautionary approach, and further research." So I continued digging.

I came across studies discussing extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and their effect on DNA. The researchers concluded that cells exposed to ELFs "presented an increase of the number of cells with high damaged DNA as compared with non-exposed cells." I found studies examining a potential association between nocturnal mobile phone use and mental health, suicidal feelings, and self-injury in adolescents. I also found an interesting one discussing the excitability of the brain being induced by radiofrequencies. The study stated that "These results suggest that low-intensity RF fields can modulate the excitability of hippocampal tissue in vitro in the absence of gross thermal effects. The changes in excitability may be consistent with reported behavioural effects of RF fields."

A 2004 study found "an increased risk of acoustic neuroma [tumors] associated with mobile phone use of at least 10 years' duration."

I also found studies that were inconclusive, which found "No conclusive evidence of an association between use of mobile and cordless phones and a meningioma brain tumor". The study discovered "An indication of increased risk" but was not " supported by statistically significant increasing risk ", ultimately calling for further studies.

A study by Kaiser Permanente examined rates of miscarriages for women near cell towers. The study of hundreds of pregnant women in the San Francisco Area found that those who were more exposed to the type of radiation produced by cell phones, wireless networks and power lines - radiation that grows more common everyday - were nearly three times as likely to miscarry. The Kaiser Permanente study did not show definitively what was causing the higher rate of pregnancy loss, nor did it isolate the potential impact of cell phones or other producers of EMFs. However, the authors said the results underscore the need for more research into the potential dangers.

During my investigation I came across the name of Dr. Martin Pall, a Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University. Pall is a published and widely cited scientist on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields, an expert in how wireless radiation impacts the electrical systems in our bodies.

He has published 7 studies showing sensitivity to electromagnetic fields exists in what is known as the voltage sensor, in each cell of the body. A study by Pall published in the journal of Environmental Health found this sensitivity in human cells in response to wi-fi exposure. He calls this effect an important threat to human health. According to Dr. Pall, there are at least 15 different ways EMFs harm humans, including :

1. changes in brain structure and function, changes in various types of psychological responses and changes in behavior.
2) At least eight different endocrine (hormonal) effects.
3) Cardiac effects influencing the electrical control of the heart
4) Chromosome breaks and other changes in chromosome structure.
5) Histological changes in the testes.
6) Cell death
7) Lowered male fertility including lowered sperm quality and function and also lowered female fertility (less studied).
810) Cellular DNA damage including single strand breaks and double strand breaks in cellular DNA
9) Cancer which is likely to involve these DNA changes but also increased rates of tumor promotion-like events.
10) Cataract formation
11) Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier.
12) Melatonin depletion and sleep disruption.

In 2016 Dr. Pall released another study on EMFs [in the journal of chemical neuroanatomy].He writes:
"18 more recent epidemiological studies, provide substantial evidence that microwave EMFs from cell/mobile phone base stations, excessive cell/mobile phone usage and from wireless smart meters can each produce similar patterns of neuropsychiatric effects. Lesser evidence from 6 additional studies suggests that short wave, radio station, occupational and digital TV antenna exposures may produce similar neuropsychiatric effects. Among the more commonly reported changes are sleep disturbance/insomnia, headache, depression/depressive symptoms, fatigue/tiredness, dysesthesia, concentration/attention dysfunction, memory changes, dizziness, irritability, loss of appetite/body weight, restlessness/anxiety, nausea, skin burning/tingling/dermographism and EEG changes."
He concludes that "extensive epidemiological studies performed over the past 50 years" "all collectively show that various non-thermal microwave EMF exposures produce diverse neuropsychiatric effects". Pall also notes that the effects of EMF's were documented 49 years ago in the U.S. Office of Naval Medical Research report, published in 1971.

Despite the breadth of his work, Dr. Pall has largely been pushed to the fringes of society. To be fair, his work has been criticized by other scientists who have accused him of bias and cherry picking studies to support his claims. In 2018, I asked Dr. Martin Pall why his research has been ignored or pushed out of the mainstream conversation.

Dr. Martin Pall: We quit funding, we quit funding the studies of this sort back between 1986 and 1999. We've done almost nothing since then. So basically the US government's been pushing these technologies, at the same time doing absolutely nothing, well almost absolutely nothing, to protect us.

The debate around the safety of cellphones and other devices that emit EMFs grew a little more heated in early November 2018 when the National Toxicology Program released data concluding there is clear evidence radio-frequency radiation (RFR) can cause brain and heart tumors in male lab rats. The $30 million study took more than ten years to complete as researchers examined the effects of prolonged exposure to high levels of RFR, specifically the type of radiation emitted via 2G and 3G cellular networks.

The researchers write:
"There was also some evidence of tumors in the brain and adrenal gland of exposed male rats. For female rats, and male and female mice, the evidence was equivocal as to whether cancers observed were associated with exposure to RFR."
The NTP caution that the results should not be applied to humans and the FDA and other government agencies also said that they do not support the conclusions and they do not apply to 5g. [John Bucher, Ph.D.,] A senior scientist with the NTP said, "The exposures used in the studies cannot be compared directly to the exposure that humans experience when using a cell phone. In our studies, rats and mice received radio frequency radiation across their whole bodies." The NTP stated that, " The lowest exposure level used in the studies was equal to the maximum local tissue exposure currently allowed for cell phone users."

The NTP seems to suggest the only way to avoid the health concerns is to avoid using a cell phone. In a health advisory, the NTP recommends those concerned about the potential health risks from RFR should, "Use speaker mode or a headset to place more distance between your head and the cell phone," or "reduce the amount of time spent using your cell phone."

Ronald Melnick PhD, a researcher and scientist [Former senior toxicologist, US Environmental Toxicology Program] who designed the exposure systems used in the study, disagrees with the FDA and the FCC.

Melnick notes that, " Dr. Shuren neglects to note that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a part of the World Health Organization, classified radio-frequency radiation from wireless devices as a "possible human carcinogen" based largely on findings of increased risks of gliomas and Schwann cell tumors in the brain near the ear in humans after long term use of cellphones." The IARC designation of cell phones as a possible carcinogen has been highly controversial since it was first issued in 2011.

[In an opinion piece published by The Hill,] Melnick also stated that, "Simply claiming that conclusions about human risk cannot be drawn from animal studies runs counter to standard practices of evaluating human cancer risks by public health agencies including the U.S. EPA, NTP, IARC and even the FDA. Every chemical known to cause cancer in humans is also carcinogenic in animals when adequately tested."

In an interview with Josh Del Sol of Take Back Your Power, Melnick elaborated on the problems he sees with the U.S. regulatory agencies.

Josh Del Sol, Take Back Your Power: Approximately 30 million dollars was invested to see if cell phones cause cancer at levels at or below the allowable levels right and in rats and the answer is that there was a significant increase in schwannomas of the heart and gliomas in the brain and then they dropped it, they just dropped it. So I guess I want to ask the question, like why do you think, now we're getting into speculation here, and we know that Harvard Ethics Department has written about the FCC's being controlled by industry but the FDA? We've heard in other conversations various things about them but like what's actually going on and how significant of a thing is this. The study was done, it showed cancer, and then they just dropped it. Help us to frame this here.
Dr. Ronald Melnick: Well, I can't tell you why they decided as such all I can say is that they decided at this point, or as far as I know, not to do anything about this. This information was actually available in 2016 when the NTP released some of the partial findings because of the potential impact of these findings on the general population. The tumors in the heart and tumors in the brain were known in 2016. If you know, it could be that, they don't want people to think that their cell phones pose a cancer hazard, maybe they have other reasons and I can't say whether or not the industry is having an influence that is certainly a possibility but seems to me that from a public health perspective what you want to do is understand the risk, quantify it, and do something about it, promote precautionary principles.

Even more recently, an August 2019 investigation by the Chicago Tribune found that currently available models of cell phones are already exceeding the safety limits set by the FCC. This means that the cell phones being used by millions of Americans are exposing them to dangerous levels of radiation.

There is clearly sufficient evidence to warrant a mass warning to consumer of electronic devices, yet we are met with silence from health professionals and mainstream corporate media. Regarding the dangers of 5g, Dr. Melnick suggests caution.
"5G is an emerging technology that hasn't really been defined yet. From what we currently understand, it likely differs dramatically from what we studied. Consequently, I believe that new wireless technologies, including 5G, should be adequately tested before their implementation leads to unacceptable levels of human exposures and increased health risks."
Additionally, hundreds of scientists from around the world have signed the "5g Appeal", a statement calling on a moratorium on 5g.

" We the undersigned, scientists and doctors, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment."

At a May 2018 United Nations hearing, Claire Edwards, [a United Nations Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017,] warns the UN Secretary-General António Guterres about the dangers of 5G. Edwards is a co-organizer of a second appeal to Stop 5G, called the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space ( www.5gspaceappeal.org), which as of December 2019, had 186,352 signatories from 208 nations and territories. At the hearing she told Guterres that recently installed wifi equipment could cause harm to UN employees.

Claire Edwards: "Since December 2015, the staff here at the Vienna International Centre have been exposed to off-the-scale electromagnetic radiation from WiFi and mobile phone boosters installed on very low ceilings throughout the buildings. Current public exposure levels are at least one quintillion times (that's 18 zeros) above natural background radiation according to Professor Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.

The highly dangerous biological effects of EMFs have been documented by thousands of studies since 1932 indicating that we may be facing a global health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than those caused by tobacco and asbestos. Mr. Secretary-General, on the basis of the Precautionary Principle, I urge you to have these EMF-emitting devices removed immediately and to call a halt to any rollout of 5G at UN duty stations, because 5g is designed to deliver concentrated and focused electromagnetic radiation in excess of 100 times current levels, in the same way as do directed energy weapons".
Guterres claimed he was ignorant to the dangers of the technology.

Groups like Physicians for Safe Technology have also called for caution and common sense on 5g. Doctors have begun speaking out about the concerns of surrounding ourselves with hundreds of thousands of new cell towers and small cells in the interest of 5g. [In October 2018, Sharon Goldberg, a medical practitioner for 21 years, testified in front of the Michigan House Energy Policy Committee (:13 to 1:58, )]

Thus far, there have only been a few politicians brave enough to speak out about this issue. Former Michigan State Senator Patrick Colbeck recently spoke out against the unprecedented roll out this new, untested technology ( 4:04-5:30)

In April 2019, New York Congressman Thomas Suozzi sent a lette r to the FCC seeking answers about the technology.
"Small cell towers are being installed in residential neighborhoods in close proximity to houses throughout my district. I have heard instances of these antennas being installed on light poles directly outside the window of a young child's bedroom. Rightly so, my constituents are worried that should this technology be proven hazardous in the future, the health of their families and value of their properties would be at serious risk."
New Jersey Congressman Andy Kim also sent a letter, noting that:
"Current regulations governing radiofrequency (RF) safety were put in place in 1996 and have not yet been reassessed for newer generation technologies. Despite the close proximity to sensitive areas where these high-band cells will be installed, little research has been conducted to examine 5G safety."
Most damning of all, Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut exposed that Big Wireless and the FCC have failed to do adequate independent studies into the effects of emerging 5g technology. At a Senate Commerce committee hearing, Blumenthal questioned industry reps about the absence of this research. (2:38-3:44, 4:35-4:44)

Richard Blumenthal: "If you go to the FDA , there basically is a cursory and superficial citation to existing scientific data saying ''he FDA has urged the cell phone industry to take a number of steps, including support additional research on possible biological effects of radio frequency fields for the type of signals emitted by cell phones.'
So my question for you: How much money has the industry committed to supporting additional independent research-I stress independent-research? Is that independent research ongoing? Has any been completed? Where can consumers look for it? And we're talking about research on the biological effects of this new technology."
Brad Gillen, Executive Director of the CTIA: "There are no industry backed studies to my knowledge right now."

At the end of the exchange, Blumenthal concluded, "So there really is no research ongoing. We're kind of flying blind here, as far as health and safety is concerned."

As more health professionals, politicians, and scientists speak out against the dangers of 5g and EMFs, the cellular industry and some in the mainstream media have begun pushing back. In March 2019, William Broad of the New York Times wrote a piece promoting the idea that those who are concerned about the health effects of 5g are simply falling prey to Russian propaganda designed to make America lose the "race to 5g". His article, "Your 5G Phone Won't Hurt You. But Russia Wants You to Think Otherwise.", sought to place the blame for concern around 5g on the shoulders of America's favorite boogeyman - The Russians.

Interestingly, Broad failed to mention that in April 2019 the Times announced a partnership with Verizon to showcase a "5g journalism lab". This seems to be a new trend for corporate media as the Washington Post announced a similar deal with ATT in November 2019. Questions regarding potential conflicts of interest have not been addressed.

Dr. Devra Davis, PhD, President of the Environmental Health Trust, responded to Broad's claim by noting that "by relegating concerns about 5G to a Russian ploy, he misses altogether the fact that the purportedly independent international authorities on which he relies that declare 5G to be safe are an exclusive club of industry-loyal scientists. , , and several other European countries allow up to hundreds of times less wireless radiation into the environment from microwave antennas than does the U.S.."

Davis went even further, comparing the treatment of those who raise awareness about the public impact of radio frequency microwave radiation to that of those scientists in the 1950s and 60s who attempted to ring alarm bells about the dangers of tobacco.

"Scientists who showed the harmful impacts of tobacco found themselves struggling for serious attention and financial support," [Davis wrote].

Dr. Devra Davis: "For health impacts from wireless radiation, a similar pattern is emerging. Each time a U.S. government agency produced positive findings, research on health impacts was. The Office of Naval Research, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the Environmental Protection Agency all once had vibrant research programs documenting dangers of wireless radiation. All found their programs scrapped, reflecting pressure from those who sought to suppress this work."

Ironically, one of the sources for an extensive amount of research on the health effects of EMFs comes from Russia and Ukraine. In fact, a review paper of Russian and Ukrainian science discusses research on the effect of EMFs in the former Soviet Union during the 1950's, 60's, and 70's.

[ The report states that,] "In epidemiological studies of the population of Ukraine, a connection was established between leukemia in children and cancer in adults, and exposure to EMF at industrial frequencies. Specific injuries under radiowave exposure are development of cataracts, instability in leukocyte make-up of peripheral blood, and vegeto-vascular disorder."

Additionally, on March 3, 2011 the Russia radiation watchdog committee [members of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (RNCNIRP)] approved a resolution on the effects of non-ionizing radiation emitted by cell phones. According to U.S. government agencies, cell phones and EMFs are non-ionizing, meaning they do not have the power to alter atoms in the human body. Because of this, and the assumption that heat alone cannot cause health problems, the public is told that non-ionizing means safe. The resolution by the committee says otherwise.

[The committee states that] "urgent measures must be taken because of the inability of children to recognize the harm from the mobile phone use and that a mobile phone itself can be considered as an uncontrolled source of harmful exposure."

The Russian committee called for requiring health information regarding exposure to EMFs on the phone itself, as well as setting limits for children and teens using cell phones and laptops. As of 2019, no U.S. regulatory body has adopted similar measures.

Regarding this debate around ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, I asked Dr. Martin Pall why some researchers claim non-ionizing radiation is safe, and others warn of harm.

Dr. Martin Pall (18:25-19:54): W hen thinking about radiation you're talking about the individual photons that make it up and the fact is that the individual photons that make up non-ionizing radiation, particularly you know in the microwave and lower frequency ranges, don't have enough energy to influence the chemistry of our bodies. That's true. They don't, but we're not talking about the individual photons. It's the fields as a whole and those fields as a whole put forces on a structure called the voltage sensor that controls these voltage-gated calcium channels and that structure is extraordinarily sensitive to these fields and that's why you get activation of the voltage-gated calcium channels, and why you get excessive calcium in the cell. So, we know why the system works and we know why it's so extraordinarily sensitive. And the industry has been claiming that these fields are not strong enough to do anything but the reason the industry is wrong is because this structure is extraordinarily sensitive to the forces of the EMF's. So this comes straight out of the physics and this is where this is where the physics background that I have has been very valuable, in addition an understanding of biology.

By studying the evidence, it becomes abundantly clear that - despite the attacks from mainstream news and promises from Big Wireless - there are a great deal of reasons to be concerned about health issues related to cell phones, laptops, smart devices, and 5g. To be fair, there are, of course, scientists and researchers who say that the claims of health problems associated with EMFs are exaggerated and unfounded.

The proponents of EMFs claim the opposition is cherry-picking evidence to make their case. However, even if one takes only a cursory look at the information we have just presented to you, it should be easy enough to see that rolling out a new untested technology is not smart science. At the very least, we must encourage public officials to exercise the precautionary principle and do further testing before rolling out 5g.
Smart City or Surveillance City?
Cancer and other health issues are not the only concerns being raised by critics of 5g and The Internet of Things. There are a growing number of professionals, government agencies, civil rights attorneys, and activists asking important questions about the digital future.

In April 2018, the American Civil Liberties Union released a guide detailing important questions that should be asked by city officials seeking to join the "Smart City evolution. [The guide, " How to Prevent Smart Cities from Turning to Surveillance Cities ", was written by Matt Cagle, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.] In the course of my research I spoke with the author about his biggest concerns associated with 5g.

Matt Cagle, ACLU: (1:50-3:12): When we talk about smart city technology or the Internet of Things in the government context, that what we're really talking about is you know electronics that are maybe small and cheap that can be placed around the city and that essentially can be designed to collect information, whether it's visual information or audio information or information about say whether a parking space is occupied. But before any smart city technology is acquired or deployed, it's really important that a city working with its community determine whether that technology is actually smart for the city to do.

Why do we ask why do we say that? Well, that's because you know smart city technology can be a wolf in sheep's clothing. It can be another way for the government to amass information that it may not have wanted to collect for law enforcement purposes but that might be vulnerable to that sort of use later or that they may not have wanted to collect for immigration purposes but that could potentially be vulnerable to that later. And again, this technology is often going to be collected by companies that have developed it. So it's really important for the city and the community to be on the same page about who's going to own this data as we go forward with this project, who's going to be able to sell this data, and at the end of the day are communities in control of these technologies.

There already exist a few examples of what a Smart City will resemble. In places like San Diego, activists are already fighting against privacy invasions via environmentally friendly smart streetlights that are always listening. In South Korea the Smart City vision is advancing quite quickly. ( Video 1:27-2:18)

Let's look at another example of a smart city.

Quayside is a planned smart city that has been in the works since 2016. Located on 12 acres of waterfront property southeast of downtown Toronto, Canada, Quayside represents a joint effort by the Canadian government agency, Waterfront Toronto, and Sidewalk Labs, which is owned by Google's parent company Alphabet. Sidewalk Labs claims Quayside will solve traffic congestion, rising home prices and environmental pollution. There are even plans for housing developments and a school within the smart city.

Unfortunately, residents of Quayside will be using a centralized identity management system through which they access public services such as library cards and health care. This means their data will be highly centralized, leaving it open to access by hackers and law enforcement. In fact, Quayside has consistently faced pushback due to a failure to build-in the necessary privacy protections.

At least two officials involved in the project have resigned. Saadia Muzaffar resigned from Waterfront Toronto in protest after the board showed "apathy and a lack of leadership regarding shaky public trust."

In October 2018, Ann Cavoukian, one of Canada's leading privacy experts and Ontario's former privacy commissioner, became the latest person to resign from the project. Cavoukian was brought on by Sidewalk Toronto as a consultant to help install a "privacy by design" framework. She was initially told that all data collected from residents would be deleted and rendered unidentifiable. She later learned that third parties would have access to identifiable information gathered at Quayside.

"I imagined us creating a Smart City of Privacy, as opposed to a Smart City of Surveillance," she wrote in her resignation letter. "I have to resign because you committed to embedding privacy by design into every aspect of your operation."

The fears around Quayside grew in late October 2019, when The Globe and Mail reported that previously unseen documents from Sidewalk Labs detailed how people living in a Sidewalk community would interact with and have access to the space around them. This experience in the proposed smart cities largely depends on how much data you're willing to share, which could be used to reward or punish people for their behavior.

Although the document, known internally as the "yellow book," was designed as a pitch book for the company, and predates Sidewalk's formal agreements with the City of Toronto, it does provide a vision of what the Google sister company would like to do.

Specifically, the document details how Sidewalk will require tax and financing authority to finance and provide services, including the ability to impose, capture and reinvest property taxes." The company would also create and control its public services, including charter schools, special transit systems and a private road infrastructure.

The document also describes reputation-based tools that sound disturbingly similar to the social credit system we have seen in tv shows like Black Mirror and those unfolding in modern China. These tools would lead to a "new currency for community co-operation," effectively establishing a social credit system. Sidewalk could use these tools to "hold people or businesses accountable" while rewarding good behavior with easier access to loans and public services.

In response to the document leaks, Sidewalk spokesperson Keerthana Rang said, "The ideas contained in this 2016 internal paper represent the result of a wide-ranging brainstorming process very early in the company's history."

Perhaps due in part to the push back against privacy invasions, in November 2019 Sidewalk Labs released a 482-page Digital Innovation Appendix stating that none of Quayside's systems will incorporate facial recognition, and that Sidewalk Labs won't sell personal information or use it for advertising. Sidewalk Labs says it will require explicit consent to share personal information with third parties.

For the moment, future residents of Quayside will have their data protected, but these types of systems are already being put into place in China. Under the expansion of China's Sesame Credit System, more than a million people were denied the right to fly. Chinese citizens already live under constant surveillance with CCTV's and facial recognition a part of daily life.

The U.S. is not far behind China. The U.S. government is also expanding their facial recognition capabilities, with the FBI maintaining a massive secret database of "face prints". The 5g roll out, the growth of Artificial Intelligence, and the push towards a Smart City future will only increase the potential for abuses of privacy. As we move ever closer to the Smart City future, privacy - and the liberty that comes with privacy - are under extreme threat.
A Threat to Local Control
In September 2018, the FCC passed a new rule putting the federal government in complete control of the 5G rollout. Although the original 1996 Telecommunications Act was the first power grab by the federal government, the September 2018 rule made it so that cities and towns had little ability to regulate or avoid the installation of so-called "Small Cells".. Under the new rule, phone companies can be charged no more than $270 to install each small-cell antenna. Additionally, local authorities would have 60 days to review the proposed wireless infrastructure.

Localities are already limited in deciding where the equipment can be located. The new rule also continued the tradition of forbidding localities from opposing the equipment on health grounds. The only acceptable claim is based on aesthetics. Basically, if you think the tower looks ugly, they will turn into a palm tree for you.

The Republicans on the FCC stated that limiting the fees that cities can charge localities will free up capital for them to invest in local infrastructure. Democrat Jessica Rosenworcel was the lone dissenter, calling the rule "extraordinary federal overreach".

"I do not believe the law permits Washington to run roughshod over state and local authority like this and I worry the litigation that follows will only slow our 5G future," Jessica Rosenworcel, FCC Commissioner stated.

Rosenworcel was correct about litigation to follow. In fact, in the weeks after the October 2018 rule, two dozen cities and counties filed lawsuits against the Federal Communications Commission. The governments argued that the rule hinders their ability to manage how phone companies use public property.

The mayors of Los Angeles and Philadelphia opposed the rule and accused the FCC of overriding local authority to regulate the new technology. Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti sent a letter to the FCC stating that the rules would override previous agreements established by local authorities and Verizon and AT&T.

Sascha Meinrath, the Palmer Chair in Telecommunications for Pennsylvania State University, stated that he believed preventing local government from collecting fees is "Anti-competitive" and simply a part of Telecom history "that happens again and again and again."

The matter was only made worse when, in April 2019, President Trump issued an executive order stating that local and state bodies must now approve new 5G infrastructure within 90 days. The Trump administration also initiated a cap on the fees local governments can charge telecom companies wanting to install 5G technology. ( video 4:17-5:12)

The push back against the usurpation of local power by the federal government and the telecom lobby can be seen clearly in the town of Danville, California. Back in March 2019, the Danville Town Council voted four to one to block a permit for a 5g small cell wireless installation by Verizon. During the meeting, Danville Mayor Robert Storer stated that the vote was an effort to stand up to the federal government and telecom companies, like Verizon. The Danville Town Council's decision to deny the land use-permit for the small cell opens the town to possible lawsuits from Verizon.

( video 4:55-5:12, 6:06-6:28, 6:41-7:17)

"We've lost local control, and this says: 'You know what? We are sick of this and we're not going to just sit here and be bulled over.' We say no; we play our cards out. We've been in lawsuits before," Mayor Robert Storer said during the council meeting.

Danville city attorney Robert Ewing reiterated that cities cannot fight the small cells or 5g rollout based on health concerns, stating that, "While potential health concerns are a huge concern, if that was the basis on which you were making a decision I would be fairly confident to tell you that you would lose, because that's about as clear as the law can get."

Similar resolutions are passing in towns across the world, either outright banning 5g or requiring more testing before implementation. Between the FCC rules, and the Presidential Executive Order, the U.S. federal government is working with the Big Wireless Lobby to force 5g down the throats of cities and states around the country. Together, in an incestuous corporate-state relationship, they are slowly taking away choice and consent from local bodies. Most worrisome is the thought that the 5g rollout and the subsequent theft of local power, might be setting a precedent for a future where cities and towns have no say in what happens in their own communities, and instead are forced to go along with the agenda of the federal government and their corporate buddies.
A Danger to the Environment
As we examine the impact of 5g, EMFs, and radio frequency radiation on human health, we must also take a moment to consider the impacts on the environment. One of the more recent concerns is how the rolling out of 5g might negatively impact our ability to forecast the weather and accurately predict storms.

In the spring of 2019, NASA and the NOAA said 5G antennas using similar frequencies used by satellites to gather critical water vapor data, could compromise forecasts and science. The FCC and Big Telecom companies are seeking to expand cellular service into frequency bands such as 24 GHz, which falls near the frequency used for weather forecasting, at about 23.8 GHz. The Federal Communications Commission, which licenses the wireless spectrum for 5G in the United States, says the fears are exaggerated.

In March 2019, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, who oversees NOAA, and NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine sent a letter asking the FCC to postpone the auction of the 5g frequency bands. Instead, the FCC went ahead with the auction, selling frequency to both T-Mobile and AT&T. In May 2019, Neil Jacobs, NOAA's acting administrator, testified to Congress that an internal study had found 5G-related interference could cost NOAA 77% of the water vapor data it collects at 23.8 GHz, and could degrade weather forecasts by up to 30%, essentially back to 1980 levels. Due to these concerns, NASA and NOAA were seeking a sizable buffer zone between the frequency bands used for weather and those used for 5g. This buffer is measured in units of decibel watts.

Unfortunately, in late November 2019, at a meeting of the International Telecommunication Union, international regulators agreed to a buffer of 33 decibel watts until 1 September 2027, and a 39 decibel watts limit after that. The goal was to allow 5G companies to start building networks now, and to add more protection for weather forecasting once the companies have established their networks. Eric Allaix, a meteorologist and head of World Meteorological Organization (WMO), called the idea of having eight years of lax regulation "of grave concern" to weather forecasters.

Once again, regulators chose policies that benefit Big Wireless and fail to protect the planet and the people.

The 5g expansion not only poses a threat to human health, privacy, and weather forecasting, but an increasing amount of research indicates that surrounding ourselves with an unprecedented amount of digital devices is creating a new form of pollution, known as a digital or "electrosmog".

n the report, Bees, Birds, and Mankind, German researchers discuss the effects of this electric smog. "The consequences of this development have also been predicted by the critics for many decades and can now no longer be ignored. Bees and other insects disappear, birds avoid certain areas and are disoriented in other locations," the researchers write.

In September 2008, a co-author of the report [Dr. Ulrich Warnke, one of the authors of that report, also presented his findings to the Radiation Research Trust at the Royal Society in London. He] stated that, "an unprecedented dense mesh of artificial magnetic, electrical and electromagnetic fields are disrupting nature on a massive scale, causing birds and bees to lose their bearings, fail to reproduce and die."

A review of studies from around the world show that concerns around the electrosmog are rising. One study Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife reviewed the impact of radiofrequency radiation from wireless telecommunications on wildlife. The researchers note that phone towers located in the living areas of some species are continuously irradiatiating wildlife, causing a reduction of their natural defenses, deterioration of their health, and problems in reproduction. The researchers conclude that "microwave and radiofrequency pollution constitutes a potential cause for the decline of animal populations and deterioration of health of plants living near phone masts. To measure these effects urgent specific studies are necessary."

Studies are also beginning to look at the impact of RFR on trees. A 2016 study [Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations]

attempted to verify whether there is a connection between unusual tree damage and radiofrequency exposure. The researchers conducted a long-term field monitoring study in two German cities. They observed and took photos of unusual or inexplicable tree damage, along with measurements of electromagnetic radiation. A statistical analysis showed that electromagnetic radiation from cell phone towers is harmful for trees. The researchers note that, "These results are consistent with the fact that damage afflicted on trees by mobile phone towers usually start on one side, extending to the whole tree over time."

A 2010 study looked at the decline in Aspen trees in Colorado since 2004. This study suggested that the RF exposure may have strong adverse effects on growth rate, and may be an underlying factor in aspen decline. Additionally, there are concerns that thousands of trees will be cut down or trimmed to ensure the 5g frequencies operate efficiently.

Another area of growing concern relates to the fear that the massive increase in exposure to RFR could be one of the causes for bee colony collapse disorder, which has wreaked havoc on the global honeybee population.

In a 2017 study,[ D isturbing Honeybees' Behavior with Electromagnetic Waves: a Methodology,] researcher Daniel Favre of Switzerland claims that his article describes an experiment on bees, which clearly shows the adverse effects of electromagnetic fields on their behavior. [Favre states that,] "The experiment should be reproduced by other researchers so that the danger of manmade electromagnetism (for bees, nature and thus humans) ultimately appears evident to anyone."

In a study on tadpoles [ Mobile Phone Mast Effects on Common Frog Tadpoles,] researchers exposed eggs and tadpoles to electromagnetic radiation from cell phone antennas for two months, from the egg phase until an advanced phase of tadpole and found low coordination of movements, an inconsistent growth pattern, and a high mortality rate. The authors conclude, "these results indicate that radiation emitted by phone masts in a real situation may affect the development and may cause an increase in mortality of exposed tadpoles. This research may have huge implications for the natural world, which is now exposed to high microwave radiation levels from a multitude of phone masts."

These concerns are not being promoted on the corporate media nightly news or 24 hour news cycles, but to those willing to do the homework, it becomes clear. There is ample evidence of negative impacts as a result of RFR associated with cell phones wifi, and likely, 5g. In fact, in 2018 the European Commission['s Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks] released a statement on emerging health and environmental issues which clearly outlined the need for more independent research.

Under section 4.4 Pote ntial effects on wildlife of increases in electromagnetic radiation, the report states that "How exposure to electromagnetic fields could affect humans remains a controversial area, and studies have not yielded clear evidence of the impact on mammals, birds or insects. The lack of clear evidence to inform the development of exposure guidelines to 5G technology leaves open the possibility of unintended biological consequences. "

These unintended consequences have the potential to affect human life, as well as insects, birds, plants, and trees.
Chapter 3 : The Big Wireless-5g Takeover
As I continued my research and began presenting it to the Houston City Council and fellow Houstonians, I noticed there was often a reluctance to believe what I was claiming. Several times I was asked something along the lines of, "How could something so dangerous be allowed on the market? Doesn't the government regulate this technology?"

Once again, the trust of the authorities made people feel like they were safe from harm. Unfortunately, the research shows otherwise. But how could this happen? How can the U.S. government allow potentially hazardous products to be sold and used by millions of people?

To understand this, we need to go back to 1996. That year the Telecommunications Act was passed as an effort to update the law around communications technology as the internet was beginning to come into mass public use. The Act was also seen as a way to limit the growing AT&T monopoly. Unfortunately, it was the beginning of further consolidation of telecommunications companies and a huge step towards eroding local power.

The 1996 act prohibits local jurisdictions from considering perceived health effects when taking an action on a proposed facility, such as towers or small cells. Instead, cities and towns could only regulate cell sites based on the aesthetics and location of the devices. [Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) of] The Telecommunications Act of 1996 states:
"No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions."
Essentially, as long as the facilities comply with the standards set by the FCC, they cannot be subjected to environmental or health regulations. But what happens if those federal standards set by the FCC in 1996 are not adequate? As we will get into shortly, there are studies which show health effects even at the levels allowed by the 1996 Telecommunications Act, not to mention the fact that the standards are over two decades old and based on outdated technology.

Not only was the Telecom Act designed to protect the profits of the Big Wireless companies, but somewhere along the way the FCC and the Telecoms developed an incestuous relationship that has overtaken the voices and concerns of the American people.

A 2015 expose [, the Harvard Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics published an expose ] by investigative journalist Norm Alster shows the financial ties between the US Federal communications Commission (FCC) and the telecoms industry and how, as a result, the wireless industry bought unfettered access to-and power over-a major US regulatory agency.

The report [ "Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates", ] details how the FCC, an independent government agency created in 1934 to regulate interstate communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable, has become a captured agency with Big Wireless leaders filling the government seats in a revolving door fashion similar to other federal agencies.

Regarding the passing of the 1996 Telecom Act, Alster writes that "late lobbying won the wireless industry enormous concessions from lawmakers, many of them major recipients of industry hard and soft dollar contributions. Congressional staffers who helped lobbyists write the new law did not go unrewarded. Thirteen of fifteen staffers later became lobbyists themselves."

Alster states that direct lobbying by industry is "just one of many worms in a rotting apple". The report says the FCC is involved in a network of powerful moneyed interests with limitless access and a variety of ways to shape policy. Alster believes the worst part is that the wireless industry has been allowed to grow unchecked and virtually unregulated, with fundamental questions on public health routinely ignored.

Unfortunately, the situation goes beyond corrupted government agencies and into defaming those who speak out against potential harms caused by wireless technology.

During the 1990's, Biochemist Jerry Phillips was hired by cellphone giant Motorola to study the effects of the RF Radiation emitted by cell phones. Phillips and his colleagues looked at the effects of different RF signals on rats, and on cells in a dish. Phillips say the relationship between him, and his employer was initially cordial, but soured once he submitted research data to Motorola which found harmful effects to the DNA structure as a result of exposure to radio-frequency radiation. The negative results were not to Motorola's liking, and they began putting pressure on him.

Public Exposure documentary (33:05-33:40; 34:35-35; 35:06-35:30)

In another example of industry attempting to influence research, we have Dr. Henry Lai, the University of Washington, and fellow researcher, Narendra Singh. The researchers were looking at the effects of nonionizing radiation-the same type of radiation emitted by cell phones-on the DNA of rats. They used a level of radiation considered safe by FCC standards and found that the DNA in the brain cells of the rats was damaged-or broken-by exposure to radiation.

After publishing the research in 1995, Dr. Lai would later learn of a full-scale effort to discredit the experiments. Lai and Singh caused controversy when they publicly complained about restrictions placed on their research by their funders, the Wireless Technology Research (WTR) program. In response to this public action, the head of the Wireless Technology Research sent a memo asking then-university president Richard McCormick to fire Lai and Singh. McCormick refused, but the message was clear. Get rid of anyone who makes our products look bad. In a leaked internal Motorola memo executives claimed to have succeed in "War-Gaming " the Lai-Singh experiments.

"This shocked me," [Lai says, ] "the letter trying to discredit me, the 'war games' memo. As a scientist doing research, I was not expecting to be involved in a political situation. It opened my eyes on how games are played in the world of business. You don't bite the hand that feeds you. The pressure is very impressive."

Think about that. An international corporation trying to exert pressure on scientists who are drawing conclusions which prove their product could cause harm to public health. Even further, Dr. Lai's experiments showed negative health consequences at levels considered "safe" by the FCC.

The Captured Agency report makes it clear that this type of corruption takes place because of "the free flow of executive leadership between the FCC and the industries it presumably oversees". For example, at the time of the report's release, the Chairman of the FCC was Tom Wheeler, a man with deep ties to the Big Wireless industry. In 2013, Wheeler was nominated as FCC chairman by former President Obama after raising more than $700,000 for his presidential campaigns. Wheeler lead the two most powerful industry lobbying groups: The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) and the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, or, the CTIA.

The current chairman of the FCC could also be seen as another example of a "captured agency" in action. Ajit Pai, a lawyer and current chairman of the FCC, served as Associate General Counsel at Verizon Communications Inc. between 2001 and 2003, where he handled competition and regulatory matters. Pai was appointed to the FCC by Barack Obama in 2012 and then made FCC Chairman by Donald Trump in January 2017.

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is another example of a government official working closely with industry and maintaining relationships which clearly present conflicts of interest. Carr is credited with accelerating the 5G build out. Prior to joining the FCC, Carr worked as an attorney at Wiley Rein where his clients were Verizon, AT&T, Centurylink, CTIA, the wireless association and the USTA, the telecom lobby. The Wiley Rein law firm is a hot bed of activity for former government officials and industry regulars. One of the founders of the law firm is Richard Wiley, himself a Former FCC Chairman.

On September 30, 2019, Commissioner Carr and other officials were in Houston to discuss the future of 5g. I asked Commissioner Carr about the concerns regarding his connections with the wireless industry. I also asked him about the Captured Agency report released by Harvard's School of Ethics. Unfortunately, Mr Carr had no interest in addressing these questions. ( video 1:49-3:08)

The following day I was able to question Commissioner Carr for a second time and once again he avoided my questions. ( video :38-2:07)

Much of this revolving door relationship between industry and government can be traced to the CTIA, the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association.

Established in 1984, the CTIA claims to represent the U.S. wireless communications industry, from carriers and equipment manufacturers. The CTIA "advocates for legislative and regulatory policies at federal, state, and local levels that foster the continued innovation, investment and increasing economic impact of America's wireless industry. CTIA is active on a wide range of issues including spectrum policy, wireless infrastructure, and the Internet of Things, among others." They also host events on topics ranging from cybersecurity to 5G.

The CTIA's Board of Directors includes the presidents, CEOs and other senior officials of Verizon, Sprint, T Mobile, Nokia, Erricson, Intel, General Motors, Tracfone, EZ Texting and others.

Brad Gillen, the current Executive Vice President of the CTIA, was formerly a Legal Advisor to a former FCC Commissioner and served in other senior policy roles at the FCC and with DISH Network. Mr. Gillen was also a partner at Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP, a law firm stacked with former employees of the FCC, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and other state government positions

The CTIA's current President and CEO is Meredith Attwell Baker. Baker has spent the last two decades bouncing between lobbying for Big Wireless and working for the government. From 1998 to 2000, Baker worked as Director of Congressional Affairs at the CTIA. Afterwards, she worked for the U.S. government as an FCC Commissionner between July 2009 to June 2011. She then went back to the CTIA where she is now President and CEO, in charge of promoting the so-called Race to 5g.
So, what exactly is the race to 5g?
If you have paid attention to any media or visited a cell phone store recently, you have likely heard the buzz about 5g, and more specifically, the Race to 5g.

Geopolitically speaking, the Race to 5g describes the ongoing rift between the U.S. and China, a kind of digital Cold War where the two superpowers race to implement the next generation of cellular technology because of its potential for massive profit and massive data collection. The American media and President Trump have stated that Chinese company Huawei could use their 5g infrastructure to spy on Americans. Trump has called on federal officials and American companies to abandon Huawei equipment. This fear of Chinese spying using 5g equipment completely ignores the reality that the U.S. government has the same exact opportunity to pressure American companies to spy on the private data of Americans.

The Race to 5g could also be described as a clever marketing concept designed to sell consumers an upgrade they did not know they wanted or needed. (Not to mention, an upgrade that has sparked lawsuits, and has many health and privacy concerns.) As part of the ongoing Race to 5G, telecom companies are promoting 5g as the solution for faster downloads and high-definition movie streaming. It's not immediately clear if the public is demanding faster downloads, but the Telecoms, global governments, and the tech industry are pushing the shift towards 5g. While it is true that 5g has the potential to spur on innovation in the fields of medicine, manufacturing, entertainment, and other industries - there has not been a truly organic call for this emerging technology.

It seems much of the hype around the 5g roll out is coming from the CTIA itself. Yes, the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, the organization created to lobby explicitly for the Wireless Industry. The CTIA is Big Wireless.

( video "April 19, 2018 The CTIA Race to 5G Summit")

One of the ways the CTIA has spread enthusiasm for the Race to 5g is by working with city officials. The CTIA has been honoring City Mayors who have worked to erode local authority regarding the 5g roll out. The 5G Wireless Champion Awards "honor the state and local officials" who "bring next-generation 5G networks" into communities and "remove barriers to the deployment of next-generation wireless infrastructure". In 2018, the CTIA gave out 3 "5g Wireless Champion Awards" to mayors across the United States, including Houston's Mayor Sylvester Turner.

As I mentioned earlier, it was the Mayors response to my questions about 5g which encouraged me to look deeper. I found out that in July 2018, Mayor Turner stood side by side with Verizon Wireless officials to announce plans to roll out 5g technology in Houston. The Mayor said 5G will turn Houston into a "smart city", with better control of traffic flow, money-saving smart street lights, and driverless cars. By September 2018 , Turner was awarded the "5g Wireless Champion Award" by the CTIA. The CTIA stated that, "Under Mayor Turner's leadership, Houston has streamlined the permitting process by not requiring a license or attachment agreement for new poles or small cells, and completes review ahead of deadlines. "

Despite my efforts at emailing the Mayor and City Council about the concerns, and visiting city council many times, I continued to be met with silence. When I decided to run for Mayor, making 5g a central part of my campaign, I finally had the opportunity to call out the Mayor to his face, in front of the people of Houston.

( Houston Mayoral Debate 2:53-3:40)

During the campaign, I attempted to question Mayor Turner again. He laughed in my face and dodged my questions while a member of his staff attempted to knock my camera out of my hands. (1:03-1:49)

Sylvester Turner and Mayor's like him are a problem, but they are a symptom of a bigger battle. The CTIA uses the 5g Wireless Champion Awards and other local programs to convince Mayors and local officials to support the 5g agenda. This allows the agenda adopted by the federal government and Big Wireless to be filtered down to the state and local level.

Despite a number of lawsuits from cities and states; objections from scientists and health professionals; concerns from citizens, politicians, and journalists - the CTIA, the FCC, and Donald Trump continue to push the 5g agenda forward. As I discovered in my research, there are health and privacy concerns around cell phones, bluetooth, WiFi, laptops, and other digital devices. The research shows we should limit our exposure to these devices and find ways to protect our privacy.

We should also recognize that the major difference between the 5g Smart Grid and the current technology, is that once 5g rolls out you will not be able to avoid it. You can choose not to use a cell phone, or not install wifi in your home, but once the 5g network is complete, you will be surrounded by hundreds of thousands of sensors, small cells, and other infrastructure. Once I understood this, I realized I had to know what I can do to protect myself, my family, and friends.
Chapter 4: Solutions
The reality is that we are already living in the electro, digital smog. The public has excitedly purchased the latest upgrades to their digital technology of choice. From smart phones, to laptops, doorbell cameras, public wi-fi networks, home assistants, smart houses, and the early stages of 5g - we are inundated with digital technology which emit various levels of radiofrequency radiation. Bit by bit, device by device, we are being exposed to an increasing level of radiation, and this cumulative effect has the potential to cause a great amount of harm to the public.

Collectively, each of these devices form a digital panopticon where private companies, law enforcement, governments, and hackers can literally trace your movements from the moment you wake up and interact with your phone, throughout your entire day as you move through public spaces and visit your work, family, and friends. If the public doesn't wake up to these dangers and quickly organize a massive, global effort to push back against 5g, the Smart City future seems inevitable.
S o, what would this push back look like and what can we do as individuals?
First, the opposition would need to involve ending the relationship between Big Wireless execs and government officials, as well as an honest discussion about the established dangers posed by our digital world. Organizing political opposition should take place at all levels, but I highly encourage everyone to start getting involved in their local communities and asking about the dangers presented in this documentary. You can join a group that might be talking about 5g, privacy, health or the environment, and let them know about these concerns. If there isn't a group already, you can start one. Pass out flyers at community festivals, farmers markets, concerts, and political events. You can host educational events at community centers and show this documentary. If your neighborhood has a Homeowners Association or similar group you can attempt to fight against the installation of new small cells in your neighborhood. Some activists and concerned homeowners have even filed lawsuits in an attempt to stop the 5g rollout.

When it comes to solutions for protecting yourself in the meantime, remember that the National Toxicology Program's ten-year study recommends those concerned about the potential health risks from RFR should, "Use speaker mode or a headset to place more distance between your head and the cell phone," or "reduce the amount of time spent using your cell phone."

Simply put, limiting your use of and exposure to these devices is the best solution available. I would recommend turning your phone on airplane mode when not using it, or simply turn it off when not in use. I know, it is a scary thought, but we will survive. I would also stop using bluetooth headphones and stop using bluetooth while driving in your vehicle. There are also companies producing products which are supposed to be able to block or absorb the EMF's emitted by our devices. Do your research and see what works for you.

Probably one of the most important steps to take is to stop falling asleep with your phone or next to your laptop. I also started unplugging my wi-fi at night to protect myself from unnecessary exposure while I am sleeping. The exposure to these devices and the RFR they emit has the potential to disturb your sleep and create stress. This can cause an overall decline in the body's ability to heal and repair at night.

When it comes to your home or office I recommend rewiring as much as possible using ethernet cables for your desktop or laptop. This will allow you to remove wi-fi if you choose and drastically decrease your exposure. There are even options available to use ethernet connections on your cellphone. When I interviewed Dr. Martin Pall he mentioned the possibility of using graphite paint in your home as an option to block or absorb EMFs. There are also similar concerns regarding the smart meters which have been rolled out around the U.S. Do some research and find out if you can opt out of a smart meter in favor of an analog meter.

Remember what I said about the difference between 5g and previous technologies?

Once it's rolled out, you will not be able to avoid it while in public. No matter what you do in your house, your car, or with your own phone, if 5g is everywhere there will be no way to opt-out. I have seen researchers working on devices that could protect you in public by either repelling or absorbing the EMFs, and others have suggested clothing that can defend you, but for the moment none of these seem adequate to protect you from the coming 5g Smart Grid.

As we have shown, there are numerous valid reasons to oppose the 5g roll out. Whether it's concerns about health, privacy, local power, or the environment, the government and the wireless industry need to answer our questions. Another thing, where has the media been during all of this? If I could dig up this information and gather these sources with my limited skills and time, why didn't the corporate media identify and report on the concerns about 5g? Why did The New York Times and other compliant media outlets insinuate that opponents of 5g are simply victims of Russian disinformation? Instead of listening to the researchers speaking up and the people pushing back, the media stood silent.

So all this begs the question: would consumers be so quick to embrace cell phones, Wi-Fi, and 5g, if the wireless industry and their partners in government hadn't silenced critics and corrupted the science? If the public knew this information, would that change their minds? Does it change yours?

The cold hard truth is that we have willingly accepted this technology. Yes, we have been lied to by people we believed we could trust, but at the end of the day, the power lies in our hands. We decide if we still choose to surround ourselves with devices that threaten our privacy and health. We must take responsibility for our actions and remember to be skeptical of promises of convenience and utopia. As the saying goes, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Thanks for watching.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The 5G Trojan Horse (Documentary) - The Conscious Resistance Network

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Conscious Resistance Network Presents: The 5G Trojan Horse Researched, Written, and Narrated by Derrick Broze Produced and Edited by Jeremy Martin Watch on LBRY / Purchase the Director's Cut This 96 minute documentary will expose the truth behind the global "Race to 5G", the health, privacy, and local power concerns, and the corruption between [...]

# data[].attributes.body
https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/ghosts-in-the-machine-the-highly-symbolic-video-by-the-u-s-armys-psyop-division/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/COVID-19-Great-Reset-Klaus-Schwab/dp/2940631123

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"COVID-19: The Great Reset" is a guide for anyone who wants to understand how COVID-19 disrupted our social and economic systems, and what changes will be needed to create a more inclusive, resilient and sustainable world going forward. Klaus Schwab, founder and executive Chairman of the World Ec...

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-Klaus-Schwab/dp/1524758868

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/Sapiens-Homo-Deus-box-set/dp/0062834312/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sapiens/Homo Deus box set [Harari, Yuval Noah] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Sapiens/Homo Deus box set

# data[].attributes.body
https://freddonaldson.com/2020/02/25/why-was-the-club-of-rome-at-the-world-economic-forum/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why was Club of Rome invited to attend the W.E.F. in Davos?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMgamzziQMM DAVOS, the 2020 World Economic Forum (WEF), had special guests from the Club of Rome last month, and the question is why would the richest folks in the world invite an organization publicly advocating programs that supposedly restrict free markets and reduce capitalist profits? The answer is population control, a goal shared by both...

# data[].attributes.body
https://dailyclout.io/the-rise-of-the-fourth-reich-dr-naomi-wolf-steve-deace-and-daniel-horowitz-discuss-the-return-of-the-fascist-mindset/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/stop-madman-george-soros-pushes-dangerous-technology-cool-earth-stop-climate-change-lead-billions-deaths/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
George Soros wants humans to take control of Earth's atmosphere to halt "climate change."

This idea could create a global calamity resulting in the deaths of millions of humans and animals.

According to Fox News, Soros spoke to the Munich Security Conference Thursday and boasted that he had discovered a process where white clouds are created to reflect sunlight away from warming areas to prevent ice sheets from melting. Ice sheets melting in Greenland in particular, he claimed, could doom human civilization.

"Our civilization is in danger of collapsing because of the inexorable advance of climate change," Soros said.

TRENDING: HUGE: FOX News Filing Shows DOMINION Voting Systems Executives Including Eric Coomer Knew Its Voting Systems Had Major Security Issues, Was Hacked, and Was "Riddled with Bugs"

"The melting of the Greenland ice sheet would increase the level of the oceans by seven meters. That poses a threat to the survival of our civilization," he continued. "I wasn't willing to accept that fate, so I tried to find out whether anything could be done to avoid it.

"I was directed to Sir David King, a climate scientist who had been chief scientific advisor to previous British governments."

"Sir David King has a plan to repair the climate system. He wants to recreate the albedo effect by creating white clouds high above the earth," he added. "With proper scientific safeguards and in consultation with local indigenous communities, this project could help restabilize the Arctic climate system which governs the entire global climate system."

"Unless we change the way, we deal with climate change, our civilization will be thoroughly disrupted by rising temperatures that will make large parts of the world practically unlivable."

The "plan" Soros and King are advocating for is called solar geoengineering. This idea will not save civilization but does have the potential to destroy it.
As the Gateway Pundit has previously reported, the perils of solar geoengineering are profound. One study shows that this type of engineering could endanger wildlife. Implementing and failing to sustain this technology would leave species around the world unable to cope with the changing conditions, causing mass extinction.

Solar geoengineering could also lead to global starvation. According to the website DowntoEarth, releasing man-made clouds into the atmosphere above the Arctic as Soros proposes would have catastrophic consequences. This would disrupt the monsoons in Asia and increase droughts, particularly in Africa, endangering both food and water sources for two billion people.

An even more terrifying truth is that solar geoengineering is a relatively cheap technology. One country could fully fund and implement this technology on its own.

Just try to imagine China, for example, possessing this power. The communist dictatorship would not hesitate to use this technology as a weapon to accomplish their geopolitical goals if necessary and as a self-defense mechanism.

Because one country could have the potential to alter the climate and potentially kill billions of people, this might lead to World War III. A new global war with nuclear weapons exchanged would finish off the life on Earth that solar geoengineering misses.

Governments around the world including here in America must ban this dangerous technological scheme before it takes hold. The fate of the world hangs in the balance.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
George Soros Pushes A Dangerous Technology To Cool The Earth And Stop "Climate Change" - Could Lead To Massive Number of Deaths

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
George Soros wants humans to take control of Earth's atmosphere to halt "climate change." This idea could create a global calamity resulting in the deaths of millions of humans and animals. According to Fox News, Soros spoke to the Munich Security Conference Thursday and boasted that he had discovered a process where white clouds are...

# data[].attributes.body
This series is an on-going investigation into the modern medical industrial complex, how it operates, and examines its ancient and occult origins.

https://www.cultofthemedics.com/#/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
N e w l y R e l e a s e d C u l t o f t h e M e d i c s FEAR NOT x R I S E A T T I R E

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.businessinsider.com/air-force-rods-from-god-kinetic-weapon-hit-with-nuclear-weapon-force-2017-9

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Project Thor envisioned large projectiles dropped from orbit to hit targets on earth at up to 10 times the speed of sound.

The project was seen as prohibitively expensive, but it was an early sign of what hypersonic weapons could do.

The 107-country Outer Space Treaty signed in 1967 prohibits nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons from being placed in or used from Earth's orbit.

What they didn't count on was the US Air Force's most simple weapon ever: a tungsten rod that could hit a city with the explosive power of an intercontinental ballistic missile.

During the Vietnam War, the US used what it called "Lazy Dog" bombs. These were simply solid-steel pieces, less than 2 inches long, fitted with fins.

There was no explosive: They were simply dropped by the hundreds from planes flying above Vietnam.

Lazy Dog projectiles (aka "kinetic bombardment") could reach speeds of up to 500 mph as they fell to the ground and could penetrate 9 inches of concrete after being dropped from as little as 3,000 feet.

The idea is like shooting bullets at a target, except instead of losing velocity as it travels, the projectile is gaining velocity and energy that will be expended on impact. They were shotgunning a large swath of jungle, raining bullet-size death at high speeds.

That's how Project Thor came to be.

Instead of hundreds of small projectiles from a few thousand feet, Thor used a large projectile from a few thousand miles above the Earth. The " rods from god" idea was a bundle of telephone-pole-size (20 feet long, 1 foot in diameter) tungsten rods, dropped from orbit, reaching a speed of up to 10 times the speed of sound.

The rod itself would penetrate hundreds of feet into the Earth, destroying any potential hardened bunkers or secret underground sites. More than that, when the rod hits, the explosion would be on par with the magnitude of a ground-penetrating nuclear weapon - but with no fallout.

Such a weapon could destroy a target with 15 minutes' notice.

One Quora user who claims to work in the defense aerospace industry quoted a cost of no less than $10,000 a pound to fire anything into space. With 20 cubic feet of dense tungsten weighing in at just over 24,000 pounds, the math is easy. Just one of the rods would be prohibitively expensive. The cost of $230 million a rod was unimaginable during the Cold War.

These days, not so much.

The Bush administration even considered revisiting the idea to hit underground nuclear sites in rogue nations in the years after 9/11. Interestingly enough, the cost of a single Minuteman III ICBM was $7 million in 1962, when it was first introduced ($57 million adjusted for inflation).

The trouble with a nuclear payload is that it isn't designed to penetrate deep into the surface. And the fallout from a nuclear device can be devastating to surrounding, potentially friendly areas.

A core takeaway from the concept of weapons like Project Thor's is that hypersonic weapons pack a significant punch and may be the future of global warfare.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The US Air Force's 'rods from god' could hit with the force of a nuclear weapon - with no fallout

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Project Thor envisioned large projectiles dropped from orbit to hit targets on earth at up to 10 times the speed of sound. The project was seen as prohibitively expensive, but it was an early sign of what hypersonic weapons could do.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.secretsdeclassified.af.mil/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Based on President Obama's Transparency objective the Air Force Declassification Office is identifying the location boxes of historically significant documents which we have declassified and are located at the National Archives and other sites. According to historians and other researchers, the following categories of information have been judged "significant" to Air Force history. The purpose of the Secrets Declassified Web Site is to identify as many records as possible that fall into these categories in an effort to capture more thoroughly the full history of the U.S. Air Force. The records captured can be unclassified or declassified.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Air Force Declassification Office > Home

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Based on President Obama's Transparency objective the Air Force Declassification Office is identifying the location boxes of historically significant documents which we have declassified and are located at the National Archives and other sites. According to historians and other researchers, the following categories of information have been judged "significant" to Air Force history.

# data[].attributes.body
https://youtu.be/IkTEVt0lTj0

# data[].attributes.body
https://youtu.be/SyNS-BYWBS4

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The US is making "really exciting" progress on directed energy weapons like high-energy lasers

# data[].attributes.headline
2-minute clip of Snowden at the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville is mandatory listening.

# data[].attributes.subject
2-minute clip of Snowden at the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville is mandatory listening.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
EDWARD SNOWDEN JUST GAVE AN EXISTENTIAL WARNING TO ALL AMERICANS 🚨

“If you stick out, you will become non-normative, an anomaly.”

Snowden warns that within 5-10 years, big data will track every aspect of our lives on the blockchain in order to create predictive behavioral… pic.twitter.com/pqa8Ewf7FC
— Lauren Lee (@sheislaurenlee) July 26, 2024

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
1🧵Trump has claimed the vaccine, but was it really his creation? On Barack Obama's last day in office he gave Trump was "parting gift."  A series of last minute laws on public health, quarantines & a "Not for Public Distribution" Pandemic Playbook.  This points to Trump being… https://t.co/gUgsPwQiU1

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
1🧵Trump has claimed the vaccine, but was it really his creation? On Barack Obama's last day in office he gave Trump was "parting gift."  A series of last minute laws on public health, quarantines & a "Not for Public Distribution" Pandemic Playbook.  This points to Trump being… https://t.co/gUgsPwQiU1 https://t.co/VaEqaf6h6o

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
1🧵Trump has claimed the vaccine, but was it really his creation? On Barack Obama's last day in office he gave Trump was "parting gift." A series of last minute laws on public health, quarantines & a "Not for Public Distribution" Pandemic Playbook. This points to Trump being… pic.twitter.com/VaEqaf6h6o
— Destiny Rezendes (@dezzie_rezzie) July 10, 2024

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
1🧵Trump has claimed the vaccine, but was it really his creation? On Barack Obama's last day in office he gave Trump was "parting gift."  A series of last minute laws on public health, quarantines & a "Not for Public Distribution" Pandemic Playbook.  This points to Trump being… https://t.co/gUgsPwQiU1 https://t.co/VaEqaf6h6o

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
1🧵Trump has claimed the vaccine, but was it really his creation? On Barack Obama's last day in office he gave Trump was "parting gift."  A series of last minute laws on public health, quarantines & a "Not for Public Distribution" Pandemic Playbook.  This points to Trump being… https://t.co/gUgsPwQiU1 https://t.co/VaEqaf6h6o

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
1🧵Trump has claimed the vaccine, but was it really his creation? On Barack Obama's last day in office he gave Trump was "parting gift."  A series of last minute laws on public health, quarantines & a "Not for Public Distribution" Pandemic Playbook.  This points to Trump being… https://t.co/gUgsPwQiU1

# data[].attributes.headline
Dr Astrid Stuckelberger explains how the UN-WHO 'health security' agenda is an attempt to form a one world government. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Dr Astrid Stuckelberger explains how the UN-WHO 'health security' agenda is an attempt to form a one world government. 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
Dr Astrid Stuckelberger explains how the UN-WHO 'health security' agenda is an attempt to form a one world government.

We do not consent.#exitthewho pic.twitter.com/DRRYkp0mGx
— Dr Tess Lawrie (@lawrie_dr) June 18, 2024

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
World Domination Blueprints!

The WEF Disguised everything under the Covid-19 heading. Every Sub Agenda is hidden through many layers as they're all connected to reach their main Agenda. pic.twitter.com/IxaR5yBlSP
— Ryan sikorski (@Ryansikorski10) June 12, 2024

# data[].attributes.body
https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesroguski/p/the-amendments-to-the-ihr-have-been?r=ft4an&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"National IHR Authority" means the entity designated or established by the State Party at the national level to coordinate the implementation of these Regulations within the jurisdiction of the State Party; "pandemic emergency" means a public health emergency of international concern that is caused by a communicable disease and: (i) has, or is at high risk of having, wide geographical spread to and within multiple States; and (ii) is exceeding, or is at high risk of exceeding, the capacity of health systems to respond in those States; and (iii) is causing, or is at high risk of causing, substantial social and/or economic disruption, including disruption to international traffic and trade; and (iv) requires rapid, equitable and enhanced coordinated international action, with whole- of-government and whole-of-society approaches. "relevant health products" means those health products needed to respond to public health emergencies of international concern, including pandemic emergencies, which may include medicines, vaccines, diagnostics, medical devices, vector control products, personal protective equipment, decontamination products, assistive products, antidotes, cell- and gene-based therapies, and other health technologies;
Article 4
1 bis. The National IHR Authority shall coordinate the implementation of these Regulations within the jurisdiction of the State Party.
Article 12
4 bis. If the Director-General determines that an event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, the Director-General shall further determine, having considered the matters contained in paragraph 4, whether the public health emergency of international concern also constitutes a pandemic emergency.
Article 13
(c) support States Parties, upon their request, in scaling up and geographically diversifying the production of relevant health products, (e) support States Parties, upon their request, and, as appropriate, through relevant WHO-coordinated and other networks and mechanisms, pursuant to subparagraph 8(c) of this Article, to promote research and development and strengthen local production of quality, safe and effective relevant health products, 1. States Parties shall take all practicable measures consistent with these Regulations to ensure that conveyance operators: (a) comply with the health measures recommended by WHO and adopted by the State Party, including for application on board as well as during embarkation and disembarkation; (b) inform travellers of the health measures recommended by WHO and adopted by the State Party, including for application on board as well as during embarkation and disembarkation; and
The competent authority may implement additional health measures, including isolation and quarantine of the conveyances, as necessary, to prevent the spread of disease. Such additional measures should be reported to the National IHR Focal Point.

Article 31 (existing)
The State Party may... compel the traveller to undergo...: (a) the least invasive and intrusive medical examination that would achieve the public health objective;

1. (b) vaccination or other prophylaxis; or

2. (c) additional established health measures that prevent or control the spread of disease,

including isolation, quarantine or placing the traveller under public health observation. 2. Health documents under these Regulations may be issued in non-digital format or digital format, subject to the obligations of any State Party regarding the format of such documents deriving from other international agreements. 3. Regardless of the format in which health documents under these Regulations have been issued, said health documents shall conform to the Annexes, referred to in Articles 36 to 39, as applicable, and their authenticity shall be ascertainable. 4. WHO, in consultation with States Parties, shall develop and update, as necessary, technical guidance, including specifications or standards related to the issuance and ascertainment of authenticity of health documents, both in digital format and non-digital format. Such specifications or standards shall be in accordance with Article 45 regarding treatment of personal data.
Article 44
2 bis. States Parties, subject to applicable law and available resources, shall maintain or increase domestic funding, as necessary, and collaborate, including through international cooperation and assistance, as appropriate, to strengthen sustainable financing to support the implementation of these Regulations. 2 ter. Pursuant to subparagraph (c) of paragraph 1, States Parties shall undertake to collaborate, to the extent possible, to: (a) encourage governance and operating models of existing financing entities and funding mechanisms to be regionally representative and responsive to the needs and national priorities of developing countries in the implementation of these Regulations; (b) identify and enable access to financial resources, including through the Coordinating Financial Mechanism, established pursuant to Article 44bis, necessary to equitably address the needs and priorities of developing countries, including for developing, strengthening and maintaining core capacities.
Article 44bis (not in bold text)
1. A Coordinating Financial Mechanism (the Mechanism) is hereby established to: (a) promote the provision of timely, predictable, and sustainable financing for the implementation of these Regulations in order to develop, strengthen, and maintain core capacities as set out in Annex 1 of these Regulations, including those relevant for pandemic emergencies; (b) seek to maximize the availability of financing for the implementation needs and priorities of States Parties, in particular of developing countries; and (c) work to mobilize new and additional financial resources, and increase the efficient utilization of existing financing instruments, relevant to the effective implementation of these Regulations. 2. In support of the objectives set out in Paragraph 1 of this Article, the Mechanism shall, inter alia: (a) use or conduct relevant needs and funding gap analyses; (b) promote harmonization, coherence and coordination of existing financing instruments; (c) identify all sources of financing that are available for implementation support and make this information available to States Parties; (d) provide advice and support, upon request, to States Parties in identifying and applying for financial resources for strengthening core capacities, including those relevant for pandemic emergencies; (e) leverage voluntary monetary contributions for organizations and other entities supporting States Parties to develop, strengthen and maintain their core capacities, including those relevant for pandemic emergencies. 3. The Mechanism shall function, in relation to the implementation of these Regulations, under the authority and guidance of the Health Assembly and be accountable to it.
Article 54 bis
1. The States Parties Committee for the Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005) is hereby established to facilitate the effective implementation of these Regulations, in particular of Article 44 and 44bis. 4. The Committee shall adopt, at its first meeting, by consensus, terms of reference for the Coordinating Financial Mechanism, established in Article 44 bis, and modalities for its operationalization and governance and may adopt necessary working arrangements with relevant international bodies, which may support its operation as appropriate. Each State Party shall develop, strengthen and maintain the core capacities: (c) to coordinate with and support the Local level in preventing, preparing for and responding to public health risks and events, including in relation to: (i) surveillance; (ii) on-site investigations; (iii) laboratory diagnostics, including referral of samples; (iv) implementation of control measures; (v) access to health services and health products needed for the response; (vi) risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation; (vii) logistical assistance (e.g. equipment, medical and other relevant supplies and transport); Section A Conveyance operators
1. Conveyance operators shall prepare for, as appropriate, and facilitate: (a) inspections of the cargo, containers and conveyance; (b) medical examinations of persons on board; (c) application of other health measures under these Regulations, including on board as well as during embarkation and disembarkation; and (d) provision of relevant public health information requested by the State Party. Regardless of the format in which they have been issued, certificates must bear the name of the clinician supervising the administration of the vaccine or prophylaxis, or of the relevant authority responsible for issuing the certificate or overseeing the administering centre. 8. For certificates under this Annex issued in non-digital format, Aa parent or guardian shall sign the certificate when the child is unable to write. The signature of an illiterate A person who is unable to sign shall be indicated in the usual manner by the person's mark and the indication by another that this is the mark of the person concerned, which shall be considered their signature. With respect to persons with a guardian, the guardian shall sign the certificate on their behalf. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA77/A77_ACONF14-en.pdf

The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.

If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.

310-619-3055

All content is free to all readers.

All support is deeply appreciated.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Amendments to the IHR have been adopted

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The 77th World Health Assembly HAS adopted a substantial package of amendments to the International Health Regulations. We the People have suffered a stunning defeat. The battle continues.

# data[].attributes.body
https://x.com/drjudyamikovits/status/1783647850481754238

# data[].attributes.body
https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2024/01/04/four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse-the-regulatory-apparatuses-of-biopower/

# data[].attributes.body
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1666575723857944576.html

# data[].attributes.body
https://brownstone.org/articles/a-coup-without-firing-a-shot/

# data[].attributes.body
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1766929583927099744.html

# data[].attributes.body
https://x.com/denisrancourt/status/1781331724116303897

# data[].attributes.body
https://x.com/joshwalkos/status/1780394112723583484

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/nih-experts-received-325-million-in-big-pharma-royalties-during-covid/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
NIH Experts Received $325 Million In Big Pharma Royalties During COVID | Armstrong Economics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Two weeks to slow the spread was simply not enough time for the elite to steal as much power and wealth as possible. OpenTheBooks recently revealed over 1,500

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/end-of-american-sovereignty-biden-regime-negotiates-legally-binding-deal-to-give-chinese-backed-world-health-organization-full-authority-over-us-pandemic-policies-no-senate-approval-needed/

# data[].attributes.body
https://thegreatfreeset.org/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dr-david-martin-interview-9-26-23/

# data[].attributes.body
https://sovereigntycoalition.org/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
W.H.O. Knew in May '21 MRNA Shots Caused Blood Clots, Heart Damage. Internal FOIA'd Emails Show Freakout

Dr. Naomi Wolf and The Amazing Amy Kelly delve into FOIA'd emails showing that the WHO knew in May of 2021 that the mRNA injections caused blood clots and heart damage. The emails also show the internal freakout among White House officials and a "script" of how to respond to the public.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
W.H.O. Knew in May '21 MRNA Shots Caused Blood Clots, Heart Damage. Internal FOIA'd Emails Show Freakout

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dr. Naomi Wolf and The Amazing Amy Kelly delve into FOIA'd emails showing that the WHO knew in May of 2021 that the mRNA

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Totality of Evidence | COVID-19 pandemic timeline and resource links

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Explore for yourself the series of events and incremental changes leading up and including the COVID-19 pandemic.

There are many global agendas interwoven.

The timelines is best viewed on a large screen.

All links will open in a new tab.

As I research and add more data points the pages are getting longer, I've attempted to divide them up for ease of reading

Before the Pandemic:

1800s - HERE

1900-1999 - HERE

2000-2015 - HERE

2016-2018 - HERE

The Pandemic Years:

Other Timelines

COVID-19 vaccines - HERE

PCR testing - HERE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
COVID-19 Pandemic Timeline | Totality of Evidence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
COVID-19 Pandemic Timeline Explore for yourself the series of events and incremental changes leading up and including the COVID-19 pandemic. There are many global agendas interwoven. The timelines is best viewed on a large screen. All links will open in a new tab.

# data[].attributes.body
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/top-covid-experts-raked-in-58-knab/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.who.int/teams/epi-win/infodemic-management/1st-who-training-in-infodemic-management

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Training booklet
(click on the image to download PDF)

WHO has partnered up with US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, and RCCE collective service, to prepare the first WHO training in infodemic management, supported by First Draft.

The intent is to cover a spectrum of infodemic management skills and topics focused on skills needed to apply infodemic management interventions and practice to promote resilience of individuals and communities to the infodemic, including misinformation, and to promote self efficacy of individuals for self-protective health behaviors. The training will encompass both global and region-specific topics in the infodemic and health misinformation.

Target competencies - infodemic managers should be able to:

Measure and monitor the impact of infodemics during health emergencies

Detect and understand spread and impact of infodemics

Respond and deploy interventions that protect and mitigate the infodemic and its harmful effects

Evaluate infodemic interventions and strengthen resilience of individuals and communities to infodemics

Promote the development, adaptation and application of tools for the management of infodemics

Over 740 applications were received and 275 were selected to be part of the first cohort of trainees.

Those that will successfully pass the course assessment will become part of the WHO roster of infodemic managers, to support technical assistance in countries in infodemic management and response to health misinformation.

Some lectures will be made available on our web site here over the course of November.

Voice of Infodemic Managers' from the 1st WHO Infodemic Manager training

Health misinformation and infodemics: a framework approach to Infodemic Management
Tina Purnat, WHO and Elisabeth Wilhelm, US CDC

UX and Designing for friction: making it harder to share misinformation, and easier to share accurate information with user testing and design tweaks
Claudia Pagliari, Senior Lecturer in Primary Care and Informatics/Programme Co-Director (MSc Global eHealth), Usher Institute - Global Health Academy, University of Edinburgh, UK

*video pending

Skills Lab - Leadership skills for infodemic management
Anna Callaghan, Mame Afua Akyeampong and Breanna Broughton, STOP programme, US CDC

Tina Purnat, WHO and Elisabeth Wilhelm, US CDC

*video pending

Skills Lab - Social marketing and design techniques
Anton Schneider, Senior SBC Advisor, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Infectious Disease, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), USA

▶ Video part1

▶ Video part2

Social network analysis for infodemic management
Angus Thomson, Senior Social Scientist: Demand for Immunization, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)

Joe Smyser, The Public Goods Project, USA
▶ Video

Skills Lab: Using CrowdTangle to understand online conversations
Asha Phillips, CrowdTangle

Lauren Balog Wright, CrowdTangle
▶ Video

Public health experience of infodemic before COVID-19

Infodemic time machine: What have we learned from how misinformation affects human behavior and effectiveness of response
Aybüke Koyuncu, PHI/CDC Global Health Fellow, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA

In conversation with Sylvie Briand, WHO
▶ Video

Africa Infodemic Response Alliance
AbdelHalim AbdAllah (Halim), WHO Regional Office for Africa
▶ Video

Introduction to emergency response structures and environment

Emergency response environment and infodemics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
1st WHO Infodemic Manager training. Over 740 applications were received and 275 were selected to be part of the 1st cohort of trainees. Those that will successfully pass the course assessment will become part of the WHO roster of Infodemic Managers, to support technical assistance in countries in Infodemic Management and response to health misinformation.

# data[].attributes.body
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1669843831095967744.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Thread by @Vltra_MK on Thread Reader App

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
@Vltra_MK: Twitter Spaces with @laralogan covering... The Ericsson Report: A Matter of National Security This Tuesday - June 20th at 4:00:44 PM EST 🎯 Please read the Report & post Q's to be asked! 👇🏽 twitter.com/i/w......

# data[].attributes.body
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1521701808783204353.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
When you dial out to 911...

Your phones connection needs to be ported over to Emergency Services - Fire, Police, EMS etc.

The company controlling that process is Ericsson.

In Feb 2022 their CEO admitted that Ericsson funded & bribed ISIS from 2000-2017.

So how'd we get here?

In 2019 the Justice Dept fined Ericsson $1B to resolve the government's investigation into violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

I'll highlight some salacious points but you should really read the whole thing. It's pretty unbelievable.

justice.gov/opa/pr/ericsso...

Investigation or Coverup?

The $1B in total charges include a criminal penalty of more than $520 million, plus $540 million to be paid to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a related matter.

- SDNY
- SEC
- IRS
- Law Enforcement authorities in Sweden...

The SEC to Ericsson on September 29th, 2010...

"As you know, Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria are countries that are identified by the U.S. Department of State as state sponsors of terrorism, and are subject to U.S. economic sanctions and export controls."

sec.gov/Archives/edgar...

In 2009-10, Ericsson was in hot water w Hillary Clinton's State Department for trading with an enemy state in Iran.

"We are not going to broaden sanctions on Iran to include Technologies like Telecom.

We're going to rely and expect companies like Ericsson to police themselves."

NOV 28, 2010
The US diplomatic cables leak, widely known as Cablegate part of a series known as PlusD.

DEC 1, 2010
Amazon kicks WikiLeaks off of their servers.

DEC 2, 2010
INTERPOL Office in Gothenburg, Sweden issues fresh arrest warrant for@wikileaks founder Julian Assange

DEC 3, 2010
US blocks access to WikiLeaks for federal workers

The Clinton Foundation's outpost in Stockholm, Sweden received nearly 270 million Swedish crowns, or $30 million, since it was established in 2011, while Clinton was still secretary of state.

wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/0...

"Sweden blocked an effort by other EU states to add two telecoms firms in Syria with commercial links to Swedish firm Ericsson"

Telecoms control the Airwaves and the only Telecom allowed to do business with Terrorists and get away with it is Ericsson...

reuters.com/article/us-eu-...

Joe Biden: "Julian Assange is a high tech terrorist"

Julian Assange is a hero and he needs our support now more than ever...

Oct 21, 2011
Barack Obama announces total withdrawal of US troops from Iraq

On this occasion there would be no redrawing of lines in the sand... Obama had to "keep his promises".

President says 'America's war in Iraq will be over'
theguardian.com/world/2011/oct...

April 23, 2012
Executive Order -- Blocking the Property and Suspending Entry into the United States of Certain Persons with Respect to Grave Human Rights Abuses by the Governments of Iran and Syria via Information Technology

Ericsson avoids sanctions...

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-offi...

So let's recap...

Since 2008, Ericsson is known to be trading with an enemy state in Iran.

The SEC knew.

The State Department knew.

U.S. authorities knew because Ericsson was cooperating in 2013.

In 2013, the FCC put the Local Number Portability Administrator contract up for bid.

Neustar and Telcordia (Ericsson) were the only two bidders.

One concern was that the FCC didn't include national security requirements in the initial bid process...

meritalk.com/articles/fcc-d...

"Evidence emerged several months ago that Telcordia had improperly used a small number of foreign nationals, including one Chinese citizen, to do computer coding for early work on the system after Telcordia was given preliminary approval for the job."

nytimes.com/2016/07/22/bus...

Crazy as it seems... It's all connected.

Representing Neustar and Rodney Joffe before the FCC "against" Telcordia (Ericsson)?

Indicted Perkins Coie Attorney Michael Sussman...

web.archive.org/web/2017031616...

Also working on Neustar's behalf is Hogan Lovells, Inc.

See my notes on that star studded cast of misfits...

The Clinton Email investigation started in the EDNY where Telcordia is... Then was moved to the SDNY.

So how corrupt is the SDNY?

SDNY - Weiner evidence collection
SDNY - Clinton Foundation Investigation
SDNY - Epstein evidence collection
SDNY - Ghislaine Maxwell Case
SDNY - Trump Tax Returns
SDNY - SEC v Ripple Labs

Obama made the appointment of Allison Nathan upon the recommendation of sen. Chuck Schumer

IJIC Leak from February
icij.org/investigations...

From a few days ago...

"Iran seeks tech in Sweden for nuclear weapons"
jpost.com/middle-east/ir...

There's a lot more connections to Joffe and Sussman that I'll be revealing in the coming days...

We have a lot of work to do, please consider joining us through plvsvltra.org.

Telegram & Twitter link provided below.

I've been working on plvsvltra.org/about/ for a few years now...

We believe by compiling Action Reports in collaboration w/ the Public we can shift the tide and take our country back.

Follow @ImVltra and join us on Telegram:
t.me/PLVSVLTRAINTEL
t.me/PLVSVLTRAINTEL...

* * *

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Thread by @Vltra_MK on Thread Reader App

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
@Vltra_MK: When you dial out to 911... Your phones connection needs to be ported over to Emergency Services - Fire, Police, EMS etc. The company controlling that process is Ericsson. In Feb 2022 their CEO admitted t......

# data[].attributes.body
https://youtu.be/UzUbhynrry0

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/is-the-dod-running-operation-warp-speed-46deac23

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cia-liberal-media-outlets-the-real-anthony-fauci/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Part 1: CIA’s Extraordinary Role Influencing Liberal Media Outlets Daily Kos, The Daily Beast, Rolling Stone

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Part 1 of a two-part series takes a deep dive into the history of the CIA’s central role in orchestrating news and editorial coverage in America’s most influential liberal national media outlets — and its continued hold today.

# data[].attributes.body
This video will be a powerful video that gives the spiritual side to saving a republic. You will be blown away when you realized the power that God has given you to stand tall against the odds and enemies

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A Faith for the People That Will Save the Nation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This video will be a powerful video that gives the spiritual side to saving a republic. You will be blown away when you realized the power that God has given you to stand tall against the odds and ene

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/live/fWQ2DsHWrQE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A Special Edition of Path Forward with Bill and Melinda Gates

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This special edition of Path Forward will explore the work the Gates Foundation has been doing to fight the coronavirus. We will discuss the importance of a ...

# data[].attributes.body
https://truthtalk.uk/2023/schwabian-cyberpunk-i-read-klaus-schwabs-book-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-so-you-dont-have-to/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Since the turn of the century, we have been in the midst of the "Fourth Industrial Revolution," according to the World Economic Forum (WEF). Klaus Schwab, the Forum's founder and CEO, describes this as a technical revolution accompanied by nothing less than a dramatic transformation of human civilization that "will radically affect the way we live, work, and engage with each other." This transformation will usher in an entirely "new chapter in human development."

The availability and fusion of new, "quite astonishing technology," according to Klaus Schwab, is a distinguishing aspect of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This, he claims, will eventually result in "the blurring of the boundaries between the physical, digital, and biological domains." This mostly pertains to the application of bio- and neurotech, implantable technologies, and the Internet of Bodies (IoB).

The Cyborgization of Society: How the WEF seeks to turn you into a spineless drone

These are technologies that are less concerned with the human surroundings and more concerned with transforming the human person itself, having a long-term impact on its being and identity. With the Fourth Industrial Revolution-according to Klaus Schwab-we are facing "a metamorphosis of the human being the likes of which we have never encountered before".

Schwab's statements speak of the traditional dream of a new, more ideal human being. This is a long-standing dream. It is nothing novel or special. A diverse range of intellectuals often aspired for a more perfect human being, while remaining confident of humanity's unending growth. This conviction in development was sometimes accompanied by an unwavering faith in scientific advances and, later, in the potential connected with the widespread application of technology.

The new man of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, on the other hand, differs fundamentally from prior ideas of man created by Friedrich Nietzsche, or even Karl Marx, for example. Moral ideals, character structure, and societal conditions have all been replaced by technology. Humans are supposed to progress simply through the successful application of new technologies, rather than through education, upbringing, practical experience, or revolutionary action. According to the World Economic Forum's stated intention, the human being emerging from the future economic transition will predominantly be the result of new technology. This transhumanist future vision seeks to perfect and further perfect man through the application of new technology processes and technological interventions in his body. It promotes an elitist and repressive technocratic image of man, the repercussions of which cannot even be estimated at this time.

According to the World Economic Forum, neurotech is at the heart of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. After all, they provide for "unique insights-not only into how the brain interacts with its physical and social environment, but also into novel ways of experiencing life." They could also assist to "advance the industry of mechanizing the human body" by tackling a variety of neurological illnesses and physical limitations.

It is not uncommon for the military to provide the required financing for neurotechnologies and other cutting-edge research. There, they are initially placed in the "defensive context," and then their results are used. As a result, the human brain-particularly "in the border area of war and security"-is the focus of attention. According to Schwab, crossing a national border may need a comprehensive brain scan in the future to assess a person's security risk.

Employers will be increasingly interested in using neurotechnologies to boost performance, as well as to evaluate job applicants and monitor staff. The usage of biometric technology in the workplace, as well as tracking via radio frequency identification (RFID), may lead to "employers directly or indirectly monitoring the brains of employees" in the future. Increased use of brain-monitoring gadgets is also on the horizon for the retail sector. This would allow firms to see through key consumer decision-making tendencies and more readily encourage consumers to behave in a desired manner.

Fundamentally, neurotechnologies are proving to be ideal for affecting people's awareness and thinking. Furthermore, such technology can aid in decoding ideas, repairing "errors" in the brain, and "enhancing" its function. In a society driven by algorithms and pervasive data collecting, access to even a person's most private thoughts cannot be ruled out.

The Forum then sees the next logical step as the broad application of synthetic biology, which results in the production of designer creatures. This would eventually usher humanity into "a whole new age of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology." This should allow one to create organisms for oneself. "They can be customized by writing their DNA. Ultimately, this is about nothing less than interfering with future generations' genetic code," according to Schwab.

IMPLANTS FOR HUMAN BODY OPTIMIZATION

The World Economic Forum has been discussing an Internet of Bodies (IoB) in its publications for several months. Recent technological advancements have heralded the IoB's new era. This period is distinguished by an unparalleled number of networked devices and sensors that can be attached to the human body (non-invasively), implanted, or otherwise introduced into the body (invasive). Invasive technologies include digital pills, the first use of which was allowed in the United States in 2017. They have microscopic sensors that are linked to a medicine, activated in the patient's stomach, and provide data.

The Internet of Bodies makes it fundamentally possible to generate massive amounts of biometric and behavioral data. The human body will be changed into some kind of "technology platform" as a result of this process. However, not everyone will be able to pay the sometimes prohibitively expensive technical optimization of their physical and mental processes, which will inevitably lead to additional discrimination against specific groups and hence a widening of society's already existent social divide. In this event, "a gap is likely to grow up between all those who technically enhance their bodies and those who are left behind," according to Schwab.

As a result, they regard the pandemic as a "fundamental turning point" in global development. They claim that the time has finally come for a paradigm shift. In the following decades, "a new world with a new normal may develop."

The World Economic Forum's organizers regard the crisis caused by the Coronavirus pandemic as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to carry out a "Great Reset" of the capitalist economic order. They are concerned with the global implementation of far-reaching economic and social reforms, which will result in a fundamental upheaval of the entire previous economic and lifestyle system. They rely on enhanced centralism with strong authoritarian elements in the measures they intend to implement to build their technocratic agenda. Within a global regulatory framework (global governance), "'bequeathed' actors must consider themselves as elements of a globally ramified power system that can only succeed through increasingly cooperative forms of engagement."

Concerning the worldwide 'catastrophe' caused by the pandemic, Schwab and Malleret believe that it is precisely deep, existential crises that "carry the promise for change." They even have the nerves to say that the Corona pandemic is similar to World War II in terms of transformative force because "both have the potential of a transformative crisis of previously unknown dimensions." Just as the Second World War caused a "fundamental transformation in the world order and the world economy," the "moment for a paradigm shift" has arrived today. The pandemic expedited this transformation by acting as a catalyst for technology changes that had already begun before the crisis, Schwab continues.

The thesis of the close relationship between a crisis and later social change dates back to economist Milton Friedman, who died in 2006 and was one of the most important economists of recent decades.

"Only a crisis, genuine or perceived, leads to meaningful change. What happens next in such a crisis is determined by the ideas that are in circulation." - Milton Friedman

This speech by Friedman is referred to by Naomi Klein as the key strategic ideology that would become a kind of chant for his movement: the shock doctrine. He claims that the strategy entails "using periods of communal traumatic experience to compel dramatic social and economic change." Here's how the shock doctrine works:

An initial disaster shocks practically the whole society, softening it for the transformations that will follow. "Shocked cultures frequently accept things they would otherwise strongly reject. Companies and politicians would take advantage of people's fear and disorientation as a result of the 'shock' to impose an economic shock therapy. A severe collective trauma that either temporarily suspends or completely stops democratic activities is required for this to be implemented without restriction." This necessitates authoritarian settings and the focused deployment of the state's regulatory agencies.

A cabinet strategy paper on COVID-19 containment, initially confidential, adopts and applies Friedman's shock strategy. The study was written by a group of academics, the bulk of whom were economists, and it is likely that it influenced the federal government's decision to impose the lockdowns, which restricted the economy and fundamental rights. Instead of presenting individuals with real information and educating them to build trust and alleviate existing worries, the scientists took an entirely different strategy. Thus, they openly support a policy whose purpose must be to instigate terror in the peoples' minds through a "desired shock effect."

Schwab and Malleret saw the shock effect of a crisis on people as a wonderful opportunity for social reform to occur. The Corona pandemic, for example, is "a huge shock" that "brings with it the uneasy confidence that it will have both unexpected and extraordinary implications." Despite the difficulty of the changes ahead, Schwab believes the pandemic will hasten a systemic transition that was already underway before the crisis. These include "increasing technological power" and rapid automation. For many individuals, this means that the technologization of their lives will accelerate quickly, as a result of which "life as they have known it up to now will rip apart at the seams with alarming speed". At the same time, however, "the technologization of life provides an opportunity, and this is also the real meaning of the Fourth Industrial Revolution."

Furthermore, governments face a genuine risk of combining technologies to undermine civil society organizations and citizen groups that demand for transparency in government and economic activity. Finally, constraining such organization's' independence and operations through laws and other measures further reduces the space for civil society. As a result, the instruments of the Fourth Industrial Revolution enable "new types of surveillance and new control possibilities that run antithetical to healthy, open communities." Additionally, as the digital world developed and evolved, the Corona pandemic improved options for human observation and control.

In this context, "contact tracing," which was supposedly critical in countering COVID-19, appears to be on track to becoming "a facilitator of mass surveillance."

Corporations, in particular, have become increasingly interested in tracking their employees' health. As a result, it is reasonable to expect increased surveillance of dependent employees in the future. This could be attributed to concerns about their health and safety. According to Schwab and Malleret, technical surveillance tools will most likely stay in place even after the pandemic. This is evident, they write because "employers have no reason to remove a monitoring system once it has been installed, especially if one of the indirect benefits of monitoring is to check worker productivity."

Technical solutions implemented to contain a pandemic, on the other hand, are also ideal for expanding a surveillance state. They can also be employed as political surveillance technology, allowing for greater human control as well as additional coercive tactics. Schwab and Malleret even advocate for "a global surveillance network" in their book. According to them, "once released," "the genie of technical monitoring" will not be "put back into the bottle" in the post-pandemic period and will thus be with communities for a long time. Hooray.

There will also be personal tragedies, as well as the hatred and despair of people from all walks of life. The emergence of social unrest must thus be seen as one of the most serious threats, with such a development-in their opinion-even "generating to social breakdown and political collapse" in extreme situations. However, history has shown that prospects of eliminating current inequities "are unlikely without accompanying severe social disturbance."

To be sure, governments and corporations had employed "increasingly sophisticated technologies to monitor and occasionally control citizens and employees" in earlier years. However, the potential offered by the Corona crisis could have a considerably greater influence on individual rights and liberties, making it a "watershed moment in surveillance history." Such a scenario would result in the growth of authoritarian tendencies and more repression. Perhaps some individuals will soon discover that "their country has suddenly turned into a place where they no longer want to live," as Schwab and Malleret rightfully worry.

Overall, it "all comes down to individuals and values," summarizes Klaus Schwab. That is why it must be feasible to create a future worth living in because "in its worst, dehumanized form, the Fourth Industrial Revolution does certainly have the ability to turn people into machines without a heart or a soul," says Schwab. Furthermore, there had never been a moment "that arrived with more promise, but also with such immense looming doom." As a result, the utopia of mankind's technological perfection may lead sooner than predicted to a dystopian society that offers no future worth living for humans.

The yearning for a new, designed human being did not emerge accidentally, but rather as a result of a protracted historical evolution. However, such a growth is not predetermined nor necessarily imperative for humanity. As a result, it is correctable. Nobody has to accept it as fate. We've been warned!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Schwabian Cyberpunk: I read Klaus Schwab's book "The Fourth Industrial Revolution", so you don't have to

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Since the turn of the century, we have been in the midst of the "Fourth Industrial Revolution," according to the World Economic Forum (WEF). Klaus Schwab, the Forum's founder and CEO, describes this as a technical revolution accompanied by nothing less than a dramatic transformation of human civilization that "will radically affect the way we live, work, and engage with each other."

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2018-01-04

# data[].attributes.body
https://brownstone.org/articles/proof-vaccines-were-military-backed-countermeasure/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Proof that the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure ⋆ Brownstone Institute

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
“Whole of nation” is closely associated with “whole of government” terminology. Both presented as feel-good ideas in plain text…

# data[].attributes.body
https://brownstone.org/articles/proof-vaccines-were-military-backed-countermeasure/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Proof that the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure ⋆ Brownstone Institute

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
“Whole of nation” is closely associated with “whole of government” terminology. Both presented as feel-good ideas in plain text…

# data[].attributes.body
https://twitter.com/SpartaJustice/status/1631363125269209088

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes.… https://t.co/JAK50Z5vmF

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes.… https://t.co/JAK50Z5vmF https://t.co/POFAcPf7Yo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes.… https://t.co/JAK50Z5vmF pic.twitter.com/POFAcPf7Yo
— Truth Justice ™ (@SpartaJustice) March 2, 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes.… https://t.co/JAK50Z5vmF https://t.co/POFAcPf7Yo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes.… https://t.co/JAK50Z5vmF https://t.co/POFAcPf7Yo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes.… https://t.co/JAK50Z5vmF

# data[].attributes.body
https://brownstone.org/articles/amendments-who-ihr-annotated-guide/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Covid-skeptic world has been claiming the World Health Organization (WHO) plans to become some sort of global autocratic government, removing national sovereignty and replacing it with a totalitarian health state. The near-complete absence of interest by mainstream media would suggest, to the rational observer, that this is yet another 'conspiracy theory' from a disaffected fringe.

The imposition of authoritarian rules on a global scale would normally attract attention. The WHO is fairly transparent in its machinations. It should therefore be straightforward to determine whether this is all misplaced hysteria, or an attempt to implement an existential change in sovereign rights and international relations. We would just need to read the document. Firstly, it is useful to put the amendments in context.

The changing role of WHO

Who's WHO?

The WHO was set up after the Second World War as the health arm of the United Nations, to support efforts to improve population health globally. Based on the concept that health went beyond the physical (encompassing " physical, mental and social well-being "), its constitution was premised on the concept that all people were equal and born with basic inviolable rights. The world in 1946 was emerging from the brutality of colonialism and international fascism; the results of overly centralized authority and of regarding people to be fundamentally unequal. The WHO constitution was intended to put populations in charge of health.

In recent decades the WHO has evolved as its support base of core funding allocated by countries, based on GDP, evolved to a model where most funding is directed to specified uses, and much is provided by private and corporate interests. The priorities of the WHO have evolved accordingly, moving away from community-centered care to a more vertical, commodity-based approach. This inevitably follows the interests and self-interests of these funders. More detail can be found on this evolution elsewhere; these changes are important to putting the proposed IHR amendments in context.

Of equal importance, the WHO is not alone in the international health sphere. While certain organizations such as UNICEF (originally intended to prioritize child health and welfare), private foundations and non-government organizations have long partnered with the WHO, the past two decades have seen a burgeoning of the global health industry, with multiple organizations, particularly 'public-private partnerships' (PPPs) growing in influence; in some respects rivals and in some respects partners of the WHO.

Notable among PPPs are the Gavi - the Vaccine Alliance (focused specifically on vaccines) and CEPI, an organization set up at the World Economic Forum meeting in 2017 specifically to manage pandemics, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and the Norwegian Government. Gavi and CEPI, along with others such as Unitaid and the Global Fund, include corporate and private interests directly on their boards. The World Bank and G20 have also increased involvement in global health, and especially pandemic preparedness. The WHO has stated that pandemics occurred just once per generation over the past century and killed a fraction of those who died from endemic infectious diseases, but they nonetheless attract much of this corporate and financial interest.

The WHO is primarily a bureaucracy, not a body of experts. Recruitment is based on various factors, including technical competency but also country and other equity-related quotas. These quotas serve a purpose of reducing the power of specific countries to dominate the organization with their own staff, but in doing so require the recruitment of staff who may have far lower experience or expertise. Recruitment is also heavily influenced by internal WHO personnel, and the usual personal influences that come with working and needing favors within countries.

Once recruited, the payment structure strongly favors those who stay for long periods, mitigating against rotation to new expertise as roles change. A WHO staffer must work 15 years to receive their full pension, with earlier resignation resulting in removal of all or part of the WHO's contribution to their pension. Coupled with large rental subsidies, health insurance, generous education subsidies, cost-of-living adjustments and tax-free salaries, this creates a structure within which protecting the institution (and thus one's benefits) can far outlive initial altruistic intent.

The DG and Regional Directors (RDs - of which there are six) are elected by member states in a process subject to heavy political and diplomatic maneuvering. The current DG is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, an Ethiopian politician with a checkered past during the Ethiopian civil war. The amendments proposed would allow Tedros to independently make all the decisions required within the IHR, consulting a committee at will but not bound by it. Indeed, he can do this now, having declared monkeypox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) against his emergency committee's advice, after just five deaths globally.

Like many WHO employees, I personally witnessed, and am aware of, examples of seeming corruption within the organization, from Regional Director elections to building renovations and importation of goods. Such practices can occur within any large human organization that has lived a generation or two beyond its founding. This is, of course, why the principle of the separation of powers commonly exists in national governance; those making rules must answer to an independent judiciary according to a system of laws to which all are subject. As this cannot apply to UN agencies, they should automatically be excluded from direct rulemaking over populations. The WHO, like other UN bodies, is essentially a law unto itself.

WHO's new pandemic preparedness and health emergency instruments.

The WHO is currently working on two agreements that will expand its powers and role in declared health emergencies and pandemics. These also involve widening the definition of 'health emergencies' within which such powers may be used. The first agreement involves proposed amendments to the existing International Health Regulations (IHR), an instrument with force under international law that has been in existence in some form for decades, significantly amended in 2005 after the 2003 SARS outbreak.

The second is a new 'treaty' that has similar intent to the IHR amendments. Both are following a path through WHO committees, public hearings and revision meetings, to be put to the World Health Assembly (WHA - the annual meeting of all country members ['States parties'] of the WHO), probably in 2023 and 2024 respectively.

The discussion here concentrates on the IHR amendments as they are the most advanced. Being amendments of an existing treaty mechanism, they only require approval of 50 percent of countries to come into force (subject to ratification processes specific to each member State). The new 'treaty' will require a two-thirds vote of the WHA to be accepted. The WHA's one country - one vote system gives countries like Niue, with less than two thousand residents, equal voice to countries with hundreds of millions (e.g. India, China, the US), though diplomatic pressure tends to corral countries around their beneficiaries.

The IHR amendments process within the WHO is relatively transparent. There is no conspiracy to be seen. The amendments are ostensibly proposed by national bureaucracies, collated on the WHO website. The WHO has gone to unusual lengths to open hearings to public submissions. The intent of the IHR amendments to change the nature of the relationship between countries and the WHO (i.e. a supra-national body ostensibly controlled by them), and fundamentally change the relationship between people and central supranational authority - is open for all to see.

Major amendments proposed for the IHR

The amendments to the IHR are intended to fundamentally change the relationship between individuals, their country's governments, and the WHO. They place the WHO as having rights overriding that of individuals, erasing the basic principles developed after World War Two regarding human rights and the sovereignty of States. In doing so, they signal a return to a colonialist and feudalist approach fundamentally different to that to which people in relatively democratic countries have become accustomed. The lack of major pushback by politicians and the lack of concern in the media and consequent ignorance of the general public is therefore both strange and alarming.

Aspects of the amendments involving the largest changes to the workings of society and international relations are discussed below. Following this are annotated extracts from the WHO document (REF). Provided on the WHO website, it is currently under a process of revision to address obvious grammatical errors and improve clarity.

Resetting international human rights to a former, authoritarian model

The Universal Declaration on Human Rights, agreed by the UN in the aftermath of World War Two and in the context of much of the world emerging from a colonialist yoke, is predicated on the concept that all humans are born with equal and inalienable rights, gained by the simple fact that they are born. In 1948 the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was intended to codify these, to prevent a return to inequality and totalitarian rule. The equality of all individuals is expressed in Article 7:

"All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination."

This understanding underpins the WHO constitution, and forms a basis for the modern international human rights movement and international human rights law.

The concept of States being representative of their people, and having sovereignty over territory and the laws by which their people were governed, was closely allied with this. As peoples emerged from colonialism, they would assert their authority as independent entities within boundaries that they would control. International agreements, including the existing IHR, reflected this. The WHO and other international agencies would play a supportive role and give advice, not instructions.

The proposed IHR amendments reverse these understandings. The WHO proposes that the term ' with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons' be deleted from the text, replacing them with ' equity, coherence, inclusivity, ' vague terms the applications of which are then specifically differentiated in the text according to levels of social and economic development. The underlying equality of individuals is removed, and rights become subject to a status determined by others based on a set of criteria that they define. This entirely upends the prior understanding of the relationship of all individuals with authority, at least in non-totalitarian states.

It is a totalitarian approach to society, within which individuals may act only on the sufferance of others who wield power outside of legal sanction; specifically a feudal relationship, or one of monarch-subject without an intervening constitution. It is difficult to imagine a greater issue facing society, yet the media that is calling for reparations for past slavery is silent on a proposed international agreement consistent with its reimposition.

Giving WHO authority over member States.

This authority is seen as being above states (i.e. elected or other national governments), with the specific definition of 'recommendations' being changed from 'non-binding' (by deletion) to 'binding' by a specific statement that States will undertake to follow (rather than 'consider') recommendations of the WHO. States will accept the WHO as the 'authority' in international public health emergencies, elevating it above their own ministries of health. Much hinges on what a Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) is, and who defines it. As explained below, these amendments will widen the PHEIC definition to include any health event that a particular individual in Geneva (the Director General of the WHO) personally deems to be of actual or potential concern.

Powers to be ceded by national governments to the DG include quite specific examples that may require changes within national legal systems. These include detention of individuals, restriction of travel, the forcing of health interventions (testing, inoculation) and requirement to undergo medical examinations.

Unsurprising to observers of the COVID-19 response, these proposed restrictions on individual rights under the DG's discretion include freedom of speech. The WHO will have power to designate opinions or information as 'mis-information or disinformation, and require country governments to intervene and stop such expression and dissemination. This will likely run up against some national constitutions (e.g. the US) but will be a boon to many dictators and one-party regimes. It is, of course, incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but these seem no longer to be guiding principles for the WHO.

After self-declaring an emergency, the DG will have power to instruct governments to provide WHO and other countries with resources - funds and commodities. This will include direct intervention in manufacturing, increasing production of certain commodities manufactured within their borders.

Countries will cede power to the WHO over patent law and intellectual property (IP), including control of manufacturing know-how, of commodities deemed by the DG to be relevant to the potential or actual health problem that he /she has deemed of interest. This IP and manufacturing know-how may be then passed to commercial rivals at the DG's discretion. These provisions seem to reflect a degree of stupidity, and unlike the basic removal of fundamental human rights, vested interests here may well insist on their removal from the IHR draft. Rights of people should of course be paramount, but with most media absent from the fray, it is difficult to see a level of advocacy being equal.

Providing the WHO DG with unfettered power, and ensuring it will be used.

The WHO has previously developed processes that ensure at least a semblance of consensus and an evidence-base in decision-making. Their process for developing guidelines requires, at least on paper, a range of expertise to be sought and documented, and a range of evidence weighed for reliability. The 2019 guidelines on management of pandemic influenza are an example, laying out recommendations for countries in the event of such a respiratory virus outbreak. Weighing this evidence resulted in the WHO strongly recommending against contact tracing, quarantine of healthy people and border closures, as the evidence had shown that these are expected to cause more overall harm to health in the long term than the benefit gained, if any, from slowing spread of a virus. These guidelines were ignored when an emergency was declared for COVID-19 and authority switched to an individual, the director general.

The IHR amendments further strengthen the ability of the DG to ignore any such evidence-based procedures. Working on several levels, they provide the DG, and those delegated by the DG, with exceptional and arbitrary power, and put in place measures that make the wielding of such power inevitable.

Firstly, the requirement for an actual health emergency, in which people are undergoing measurable harm or risk of harm, is removed. The wording of the amendments specifically removes the requirement of harm to trigger the DG assuming power over countries and people. The need for a demonstrable 'public health risk' is removed, and replaced with a 'potential' for public health risk.

Secondly, a surveillance mechanism set up in every country under these amendments, and discussed also in the pandemic preparedness documents of the G20 and World bank, will identify new variants of viruses which constantly arise in nature, all of which, in theory, could be presumed to pose a potential risk of outbreak until proven not to. The workforce running this surveillance network, which will be considerable and global, will have no reason for existence except to identify yet more viruses and variants. Much of their funding will originate from private and corporate interests that stand to gain financially from the vaccine-based responses they envision for infectious disease outbreaks.

Thirdly, the DG has sole authority to declare any event rated (or potentially related) to health an 'emergency.' (The six WHO Regional Directors (RDs) will also have this power at a Regional level). As seen with the monkeypox outbreak, the DG can already ignore the committee set up to advise on emergencies. The proposed amendments will remove the need for the DG to gain consent from the country in which a potential or perceived threat is identified. In a declared emergency, the DG can vary the FENSA rules on dealing with private (e.g. for-profit) entities, allowing him/her to share a State's information not only with other States but with private companies.

The surveillance mechanisms being required of countries and expanded within the WHO will ensure that the DG and RDs will have a constant stream of potential public health risks crossing their desks. In each case, they will have power to declare such events a health emergency of international (or Regional) concern, issuing orders supposedly binding under international law to restrict movement, detain, inject on mass scales, yield intellectual property and know-how, and provide resources to the WHO and to other countries the DG deems to require them. Even a DG uninterested in wielding such power will face the reality that they put themselves at risk of being the one who did not 'try to 'stop' the next pandemic, pressured by corporate interests with hundreds of billions of dollars at stake, and huge media sway. This is why sane societies never create such situations.

What happens next?

If these amendments are accepted, the people taking control over the lives of others will have no real legal oversight. They have diplomatic immunity (from all national jurisdictions). The salaries of many will be dependent on sponsorship from private individuals and corporations with direct financial interest in the decision they will make. These decisions by unaccountable committees will create mass markets for commodities or provide know-how to commercial rivals. The COVID-19 response illustrated the corporate profits that such decisions will enable. This is a situation obviously unacceptable in any democratic society.

While the WHA has overall oversight on WHO policy with an executive board comprised of WHA members, these operate in an orchestrated way; many delegates having little depth in the proceedings whilst bureaucrats draft and negotiate. Countries not sharing the values enshrined in the constitutions of more democratic nations have equal vote on policy. Whilst it is right that sovereign States have equal rights, the human rights and freedom of one nation's citizens cannot be ceded to the governments of others, nor to a non-State entity placing itself above them.

Many nations have developed checks and balances over centuries, based on an understanding of fundamental values, designed specifically to avoid the sort of situation we now see arising, where one group is law unto itself can arbitrarily remove and control the freedom of others. Free media developed as a further safeguard, based around principles of freedom of expression and an equal right to be heard. These values are necessary for democracy and equality to exist, just as it is necessary to remove them in order to introduce totalitarianism and a structure based on inequality. The proposed amendments to the IHR set out explicitly to do this.

The proposed new powers sought by the WHO, and the pandemic preparedness industry being built around it, are not hidden. The only subterfuge is the farcical approach of media and politicians in many nations who seem to pretend they are not proposed, or do not, if implemented, fundamentally change the nature of the relationship between people and centralized non-State powers. The people who will become subject to these powers, and the politicians who are on track to cede them, should start paying attention. We must all decide whether we wish to cede so easily what it has taken centuries to gain, to assuage the greed of others.

Annotated summary of significant clauses in the IHR amendments.

Notes. (Within qualities from the IHR draft, italics are added for emphasis here.

DG: Director General (Of the WHO)
FENSA: (WHO) Framework for Engagement of Non-State Actors
IHR: International Health Regulations
PHEIC: Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
WHA: World Health Assembly
WHO: World Health Organization
"States Parties' in UN parlance (i.e. self-governing countries) is simplified below to 'State(s)' or 'country'.

See full document at the WHO IHR portal.

Setting the scene: Establishing WHO authority over individuals and national governments in health-related decision-making.
Article 1: Definitions
'Health technologies and knowhow';: Includes 'other health technologies', [any of these that solve a health problem and improve 'quality of life' and includes technologies and knowhow involved in the] 'development and manufacturing process', and their 'application and usage'.

Note relevance to requirement for countries to give these up to other entities on WHO demand. This must be unacceptable to most existing legal systems and corporations.

"standing recommendation' means non-binding advice issued by WHO

"temporary recommendation" means non-binding advice issued by WHO

'standing recommendations' and 'temporary recommendations:' The removal of the 'non-binding' is consistent with the requirement later for States to consider the 'recommendations' of the DG as obligatory.
Article 2: Scope and purpose (of the IHR)
"The purpose and scope of these Regulations are to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease including through health systems readiness and resilience in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risk all risks with a potential to impact public health, and which ..."

Wording changed from "restricted to public health risk" to "restricted to all risks with a potential to impact public health." Public health is an extremely broad term, and potential risks can be any virus, toxin, human behavioral change, article or other information source that could affect anything in this vast field. This is an open slather that would in operation provide the WHO with a jurisdiction over anything potentially vaguely pertaining to some change in health or well-being, as perceived by the DG or delegated staff. Such broad rights to interfere and take control would not normally be allowed to a government department. In this case, there is no direct oversight from a parliament representing people, and no specific legal jurisdiction to comply with. It allows the WHO director general to insert himself and give recommendations (no longer 'non-binding' to almost anything pertaining to societal life (health, in the WHO's definition, is physical, mental and social well-being).
Article 3: Principles

"The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development "

This signals a fundamental change in the human rights approach of the UN, including the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) that all UN countries have signed up to. The concept of broad, fundamental rights (equal in all) is removed, and replaced with vacuous wording 'equity, inclusivity, coherence.' Human rights (of the individual) are seen as based on economic and 'social' development. This implies that the wealthy and poor have different rights, and there is a hierarchy of 'development' that defines one's rights. This is a return to a feudalist or colonialist view of human rights (in many respects the excuses used to justify slavery), that the post-War WHO and UDHR had sought to move away from.

"shall be guided by the goal of their universal application for the protection of all people of the world from the international spread of disease. When implementing these Regulations, Parties and WHO should exercise precaution, in particular when dealing with unknown pathogens. "

Again, addition of a clause that enables the WHO to override human rights previously stated, including for speculative (unknown) threats. Article 4: Responsible authorities
Each country is required to appoint an ' authorized responsible authority' for WHO to liaise with. Seemingly innocuous, but reflects the mindset change in status within these regulations, with the WHO becoming a body requiring compliance, no longer 'suggesting' or 'supporting.'

Establishing the international pandemic preparedness bureaucracy with WHO at the center
Article 5: Surveillance.
These amendments establish /expand a periodic review mechanism, similar to the UN human rights office. This seems in itself innocuous, but is a very large resource drain, especially for smaller countries, and requires (as in the human rights compliance case) a dedicated large international (WHO) bureaucracy and consultant base. WHO will require regular detailed reports, send assessors, and require changes. This raises questions both on (1) sovereignty in health and (2) rational and appropriate use of resources. WHO is not assessing the country's health needs here, it is assessing one small aspect and dictating the resources spent on it, irrespective of other health burdens. This is a fundamentally poor and dangerous way to manage public health and means resources are unlikely to be spent for maximum benefit overall.
Article 6: Notification.
Countries (States Parties) to make information available to WHO at WHO request, and WHO can make this available to other parties (see later clauses) in a manner yet to be determined by the WHA. This may seem innocuous but in reality, removes State sovereignty over data (which had been significant prior to 2005 IHA amendments). It is unlikely that powerful States will comply, but smaller ones will be left with little choice (China has significantly inhibited information and will likely do so. It can be argued this is appropriate - such information can have significant economic and social implications).
Article 10: Verification

" If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours , WHO , when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it, whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WHO, taking into account the views of the State Party concerned. "

The WHO gains power to share information from a State or pertaining to a State with other States, without consent. This is remarkable: It is important to understand who the WHO is (essentially unaccountable beyond the WHA).
Article 11: Exchange of Information (Formerly provision of information by WHO).
This article enables WHO to share information obtained as discussed above, to both UN and non-governmental bodies (allowed recipients changed from (formerly) relevant intergovernmental to (now) relevant international and regional organizations (i.e. now including organizations not related to national governments).

WHO can therefore share State information with 'relevant international organizations' - this presumably includes such as CEPI, Gavi, Unitaid - organizations that have private and corporate representation on their boards with direct financial conflicts of interest.

Further:

" Parties referred to in those provisions, shall make this information generally available to other States Parties, until such time as: (a) the event is determined to constitute a public health emergency of international concern, a public health emergency of regional concern, or warrants an intermediate public health alert, in accordance with Article 12; or ... "

Widens the criteria determining when the WHO can disseminate information from sovereign States, from PHEIC to 'health alert' (which in practice the DG or subordinates could apply to almost anything). This could occur, as specified later in the Article, when WHO staff decide a sovereign State does not have 'capacity' to handle a problem, or when the WHO staff decide (with unspecified criteria) that it is necessary to share information with others to make 'timely' risk assessments. This allows unelected WHO staff, on salaries supported from external conflicted entities, to disseminate information from States directly relevant to those entities, based on their own assessment of risk and response, against undefined criteria.

Widening 'public health emergency' definition to include any health or pathogen-related event at DG's discretion, and requiring States compliance.
Article 12: Determination of a public health emergency of international concern public health emergency of regional concern, or intermediate health alert
This Article both reduces the threshold for the DG to declare an emergency (it can just be a concern of a potential outbreak) and greatly increases the power of the WHO (removes requirement for State agreement) to then act.

"If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring ..... determines that the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, and the State Party are in agreement regarding this determination, the Director-General shall notify all the States Parties, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49, seek the views of the Committee established under Article 48 (but is not required to follow them)

Removes requirement for State to agree to release of information pertaining to that State. DG can declare a PHEIC against States wishes and instructions. The WHO becomes the dominant party, not the servant of the sovereign State.

Emergency committee review is optional for DG, who can act completely alone in determining PHEIC - a decision that can have vast health, social and economic implications and is allowed above to abrogate basic human rights norms.

If, following the consultation in paragraph 2 above, the Director-General and the State Party in whose territory the event arises do not come to a consensus within 48 hours on whether the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern, a determination shall be made in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 49.

Removes requirement of DG to seek agreement of State before acting.

"Regional Director may determine that an event constitutes a public health emergency of regional concern and provide related guidance to States Parties in the region either before or after notification of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern is made to the Director-General, who shall inform all States Parties"

Regional directors appear to be granted similar powers, though full implications are unclear.

"In case of any engagement with non-State actors in WHO's public health response to PHEIC situation, WHO shall follow the provisions of Framework for Engagement of Non-State Actors (FENSA). Any departure from FENSA provisions shall be consistent with paragraph 73 of FENSA."

The WHO Framework for Engagement of Non-State Actors (FENSA) allows the DG to " exercise flexibility in the application of the procedures of FENSA " in the case of a health emergency (which here in the IHR is widened, as above, to any concern the FG has of potential harm, irrespective of State agreement.

"Developed State Parties and WHO shall offer assistance to developing State Parties depending on the availability of finance, technology and know how...".

A line fascinating mainly for its anachronistic (but telling) use of the colonialist-like terms developing and developed in this formerly egalitarian WHO context.

"The State Party shall accept or reject such an offer of assistance within 48 hours and, in the case of rejection of such an offer, shall provide to WHO its rationale for the rejection, which WHO shall share with other States Parties. Regarding on-site assessments, in compliance with its national law, a State Party shall make reasonable efforts to facilitate short-term access to relevant sites; in the event of a denial, it shall provide its rationale for the denial of access"

WHO set as the dominant partner. The State must comply or provide excuses for not agreeing with WHO's dictates.
NEW Article 13A WHO Led International Public Health Response
"When requested by WHO, States Parties provide, to the extent possible, support to WHO-coordinated response activities including supply of health products and technologies, especially diagnostics and other devices, personal protective equipment, therapeutics, and vaccines, for effective response to PHEIC occurring in another State Party's jurisdiction and/or territory, capacity building for the incident management systems as well as for rapid response teams".

'Should' changed to 'Shall,' requiring States to provide resources at the WHO's request for a PHEIC (e.g. monkeypox of an event the DG considers may pose a potential threat.) This begins a theme of the WHO acquiring the ability to order States to provide resources, and (later) know-how and intellectual property when ordered by the DG to do so.

This new article explicitly lays out the new international public health order, with the WHO in charge at the center, rather than national sovereignty being paramount.

" States Parties recognize WHO as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response during public health Emergency of International Concern and undertake to follow WHO's recommendations in their international public health response. "

This requires States to follow WHO recommendations in a PHEIC - declared by an individual (DG) whose position is determined by non-democratic states and who is open to wide influence by private and corporate money. The criteria for PHEIC are deliberately vague, and at the DG's discretion. This is an amazing reversal of roles of the WHO versus States, and clearly abrogates sovereignty.

The wild failure of Covid response, and the WHO's abrogation of its own guidelines, should give pause for thought here. The WHO could mandate abrogation of bodily autonomy on states regarding medication or vaccination, or testing.
NEW Article 13A WHO Led International Public Health Response

" Upon request of WHO, States Parties with the production capacities shall undertake measures to scale up production of health products, including through diversification of production, technology transfer and capacity building especially in the developing countries."

The WHO can require (tell) countries to scale-up production of certain products - to interfere with markets and commerce, at the WHO's (DG's) discretion.

This requires States to follow WHO recommendations in a PHEIC - declared by an individual (DG) whose position is determined by non-democratic states and who is open to wide influence by private and corporate money. The criteria for PHEIC are deliberately vague, and at the DG's discretion. This is an amazing reversal of roles of WHO versus States, and clearly abrogates sovereignty. It is requiring sovereign states to submit themselves to an external authority, whenever that authority desires it (as the WHO DG can through previous amendments above, declare a PHEIC on the basis of just perceiving the potential form an infectious disease event).

The Covid response, including the WHO's abrogation of its own guidelines and policies, should give pause for thought here. The WHO could mandate abrogation of bodily autonomy on states regarding medication or vaccination, or testing.

The WHO can require (tell) countries to scale-up production of certain products - to interfere with markets and commerce, at WHO's (DG's) discretion.
New Article 13A: Access to Health Products, Technologies and Know-How for Public Health Response
This enables the WHO to collaborate with non-State actors (private individuals, Foundations, private corporations (Pharma, its sponsors etc.). FENSA, which restricts such contacts, can be varied by the DG in a 'health emergency' that the DG declares.

WHO requiring countries to provide resources, intellectual property and knowhow at WHO's discretion.

"States Parties shall co-operate with each other and WHO to comply with such recommendations pursuant to paragraph 1 and shall take measures to ensure timely availability and affordability of required health products such as diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and other medical devices required for the effective response to a public health emergency of international concern."

The WHO determines response within States' borders, and requires States to provide aid to other countries. At the WHO's behest.

States shall change their intellectual property (IP) laws, to allow sharing of IP on the DG's determination of a PHEIC, at his/her discretion, to whom they determine. It is difficult to imagine a sane State would do this, but it is clearly required here.

"States Parties shall use or assign to potential manufacturers, especially from developing countries, on a non-exclusive basis, the rights over health product(s) or technology(ies)"
Requirement to release confidential regulatory dossiers to other States, including to WHO qualification programme, and to sovereign state regulatory agencies.
The WHO can require IP to be shared with other States (and thereby IP is passed to private corporations within those States.

"Upon request of a State Party, other States Parties or WHO shall rapidly cooperate and share relevant regulatory dossiers submitted by manufacturers concerning safety and efficacy, and manufacturing and quality control processes, within 30 days"

"[WHO shal]... establish a database of raw materials and their potential suppliers, e) establish a repository for cell-lines to accelerate the production and regulatory of similar biotherapeutics products and vaccines",

WHO holding such materials is unprecedented. Under whose laws and regulatory requirements would this be done? Who is responsible for damage and harm?

"States Parties shall take measures to ensure that the activities of non-state actors, especially the manufacturers and those claiming associated intellectual property rights, do not conflict with the right to the highest attainable standard of health and these Regulations and are in compliance with measures taken by the WHO and the States Parties under this provision, which includes: b) to donate a certain percentage of their production at the request of WHO. c) to publish the pricing policy transparently. d) to share the technologies, know-how for the diversification of production. e) to deposit cell-lines or share other details required by WHO repositories or database established pursuant to paragraph 5. f) to submit regulatory dossiers concerning safety and efficacy, and manufacturing and quality control processes, when called for by the States Parties or WHO."
a) to comply with WHO recommended measures including allocation mechanism made pursuant to paragraph 1.

The 'highest attainable standard of health is beyond what any State has now. This effectively means, as worded, that the WHO can require any state to release almost any confidential product and intellectual property on any product related to the health sector.

This is an amazing list. The DG (WHO) on their own criteria can declare an event, then require a State to contribute resources and give up sole rights to intellectual property of its citizens, and share information to allow others to manufacture their citizen's products in direct competition. The WHO also requires States to donate products to the WHO /other States on DG's demand.

To understand the scope of the intellectual property rights to be forfeited to the DG, the definitions (Article 1) describe them as:
Article 18 Recommendations with respect to persons, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods and postal parcels.

"health technologies and know-how" includes organized set or combination of knowledge, skills, health products, procedures, databases and systems developed to solve a health problem and improve quality of life, including those relating to development or manufacture of health products or their combination, its application or usage ...".

- review proof of medical examination and any laboratory analysis;

WHO claiming control of individuals and their rights within States

"Recommendations issued by WHO to States Parties with respect to persons may include the following advice:.....

require medical examinations;

review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis;

require vaccination or other prophylaxis;

place suspect persons under public health observation;

implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons;

implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons;

implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons;

refuse entry of suspect and affected persons;

refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas; and

implement exit screening and/or restrictions on persons from affected areas."

This (article 18) was already in existence. New Article 13A, however, now requires States to follow WHO recommendations. The WHO will thus now be able to, based on the sole determination of an individual (DG) under influence of non-democratic states and private entities, order states to incarcerate their citizens, inject them, require identification of medical status, medically examine, isolate and restrict travel.
Article 23 Health measures on arrival and departure
This is clearly insane.

"[Recommendations issued by WHO shall]...ensure mechanisms to develop and apply a traveller's health declaration in international public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) to provide better information about travel itinerary, possible symptoms that could be manifested or any prevention measures that have been complied with such as facilitation of contact tracing, if necessary."

The WHO can require the availability of private travel (itinerary) information, and require the provision of medical travel documents. This is requiring the disclosure of private medical information to the WHO.
Article 35 General rule Digital health documents must incorporate means to verify their authenticity via retrieval from an official web site, such as a QR code." Article 36 Certificates of vaccination or other prophylaxis

"Documents containing information concerning traveller's destination (hereinafter Passenger Locator Forms, PLFs) should preferably be produced in digital form, with paper form as a residual option. Such information should not duplicate the information the traveller already submitted in relation to the same journey, provided the competence authority can have access to it for the purpose of contact tracing."

Text (which clearly needs further work) aimed at future requirements for vaccine passports for travel.

WHO setting the scene for digital health passports

Further presaging digital IDs containing health information, that must be available to enable travel (i.e. not at individual's discretion).

"Such proofs may include test certificates and recovery certificates. These certificates may be designed and approved by the Health Assembly according to the provisions set out for digital vaccination or prophylaxis certificates, and should be deemed as substitutes for, or be complementary to, the digital or paper certificates of vaccination or prophylaxis."

As above. Setting up the WHO/WHA to set international travel requirements (the UDHR says there is a basic right to travel). While not new here, this is expanded by the expansion of PHEIC provisions, and focused more on the DG's determination. It is moving from national sovereignty to a transnational travel control beyond national sovereignty - not directly answerable to populations, but heavily funded and influenced by private interests.

" Health measures taken pursuant to these Regulations, including the recommendations made under Article 15 and 16, shall be initiated and completed without delay by all State Parties"

Requirement for all countries to comply with these recommendations (they only take 50 percent of the WHA to implement).
Article 43 Additional health measures

"State Parties shall also take measures to ensure Non-State Actors operating in their respective territories comply with such measures."

Also requires private entities and citizens within the state to comply (which likely requires changes of many national laws, and the relationship between government and people).

This requires a totalitarian approach from the State, subject to a totalitarian approach from a supra-state (but clearly not meritocratic) entity. Following these IHR revisions, the DG of WHO, at his discretion, has the capacity to order private entities and citizens in any country to comply with his/her directives.

WHO being empowered to order changes within States, including restrictions on freedom of speech.

"[Measures implemented by States shall not be more restrictive than.]... would attain the appropriate highest achievable level of health protection."

Article 44 Collaboration and assistance
These changes are very significant. Appropriate' meant taking into account the costs and balancing these against potential gains. It is a sensible approach that takes the whole of society and population needs into account (good public health).

'highest achievable level of protection' means elevating this problem (an infectious disease or potential disease) above all other health and human/societal concerns. This is stupid, and probably reflects lack of thought and poor understanding of public health.

" WHO may request that shall make recommendations to the State Party concerned reconsider to modify or rescind the application of the additional health measures ... "

On removing health interventions, the WHO DG now can require such actions (States have agreed to 'recommendations' being binding above). As elsewhere, the WHO is not the instructing party, not the suggesting party. The WHO takes sovereignty over formerly State matters. The following paragraph requires a response in 2 weeks rather than formerly 3 months.

" States Parties shall undertake to collaborate with each other, in particular developing countries States Parties, upon request, to the extent possible, in:..."

Changes move the relationship from the WHO suggesting/requesting, to the WHO requiring.

"in countering the dissemination of false and unreliable information about public health events, preventive and anti-epidemic measures and activities in the media, social networks and other ways of disseminating such information."

States undertake to work with the WHO to control information and limit free speech.

"the formulation of proposed laws and other legal and administrative provisions for the implementation of these Regulations."

NEW Chapter IV (Article 53 bis-quater): The Compliance Committee 53 bis Terms of reference and composition
States agree to pass laws to implement restrictions on free speech and sharing of information.

"countering the dissemination of false and unreliable information about public health events, preventive and anti-epidemic measures and activities in the media, social networks and other ways of disseminating such information;..."

The WHO shall work with countries to control free speech and flow of information (based on their own criteria of what is right and wrong).

Nuts and Bolts of the verification bureaucracy to ensure countries follow WHO requirements.

"The State Parties shall establish a Compliance Committee that shall be responsible for:(a) Considering information submitted to it by WHO and States Parties relating to compliance with obligations under these Regulations;(b) Monitoring, advising on, and/or facilitating assistance on matters relating to compliance with a view to assisting States Parties to comply with obligations under these Regulations;(c) Promoting compliance by addressing concerns raised by States Parties regarding implementation of, and compliance with, obligations under these Regulations; and(d) Submitting an annual report to each Health Assembly describing:(i) The work of the Compliance Committee during the reporting period;(ii) The concerns regarding non-compliance during the reporting period; and (iii) Any conclusions and recommendations of the Committee. 2. The Compliance Committee shall be authorized to:(a) Request further information on matters under its consideration;(b) Undertake, with the consent of any State Party concerned, information gathering in the territory of that State Party; (c) Consider any relevant information submitted to it; (d) Seek the services of experts and advisers, including representatives of NGOs or members of the public, as appropriate; and (e) Make recommendations to a State Party concerned and/or WHO regarding how the State Sarty may improve compliance and any recommended technical assistance and financial support."

This sets up the permanent review mechanism to monitor the compliance of States with the WHO's dictates on public health. This is a huge new bureaucracy, both centrally (WHO) and with a significant resource drain on each State. It reflects the review mechanism of the UN human rights office.

More on WHO requiring states to provide taxpayer money to WHO's work, and restricting freedom of populations to question this work.

ANNEX 1

A. CORE CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS FOR DISEASE DETECTION, SURVEILLANCE

AND HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE

"Developed Countries States parties shall provide financial and technological assistance to the Developing Countries States Parties in order to ensure state-of-the-art facilities in developing countries States Parties, including through international financial mechanism..."

States shall provide (i.e. divert from other priorities) aid funding to help other States develop capacity. This has a clear opportunity cost in other disease/societal programs where funding must accordingly be reduced. However, this will no longer be in the budgetary control of States, but required by an external entity (WHO).

"At a global level, WHO shall... Counter misinformation and disinformation".

As above, the WHO takes the role of policing / countering free speech and exchange of information (funded by the taxes of those whose speech they are suppressing).

Useful links

The WHO documents regarding the IHR amendments
A summary of the amendments and their implications

WGIHR_Compilation-Annotated-1

David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA.

READ MORE

Subscribe to Brownstone for More News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Amendments to WHO's International Health Regulations: An Annotated Guide ⋆ Brownstone Institute

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Covid-skeptic world has been claiming the World Health Organization (WHO) plans to become some sort of global autocratic government, removing national sovereignty and replacing it with a totalitarian health state. The near-complete absence of interest by mainstream media would suggest, to the rational observer, that this is yet another 'conspiracy theory' from a disaffected fringe.

# data[].attributes.body
https://open.substack.com/pub/therebelpatient/p/the-great-democide-how-and-why-it

# data[].attributes.body
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/reject-digital-enslavement

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We, the People of the World, will NOT allow a “digital health certificate”, “vaccine passport”, “digital ID” or any other attempt to restrict our rights in any way. OUR FREEDOM IS NON-NEGOTIABLE.

# data[].attributes.body
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/09/investigative-reports/sustainable-debt-slavery/

# data[].attributes.body
https://covileaks.co.uk/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
CoviLeaks; based in the UK and Founded by Fiona Hine in June 2020, was born in response to mainstream media propaganda and government misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 'pandemic'.

We believe that the lockdown has had catastrophic consequences leading to excess deaths, poverty and severe economic damage.

We believe the lockdown and Coronavirus Legislation was wholly disproportionate and an offence on our human rights and civil liberties; we continue to fight for justice for those who have suffered, and we continue to stand against further attacks on our Freedom.

We strongly believe the 'vaccine' has not been proven safe or effective, is harming millions and for some, it has been fatal.

We have simple aims: To fight for our freedoms through action in our community, to seek the truth and to provide the truth through publishing what the mainstream media won't.

You can help us continue our work...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
CoviLeaks; based in the UK and Founded by Fiona Hine in June 2020, was born in response to mainstream media propaganda and government misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 'pandemic'. We believe that the lockdown has had catastrophic consequences leading to excess deaths, poverty and severe economic damage.

# data[].attributes.body
https://borkena.com/2021/01/03/w-h-o-s-chief-tedros-adhanom-facilitated-butchering-prisoners-private-parts/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
By LJDemissie
January 3, 2021

"An American economist [David Steinman] nominated for the Nobel peace prize [in 2019] has called for the head of the World Health Organisation [Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (PhD)] to be prosecuted for genocide over his alleged involvement in directing Ethiopia's security forces [from 2013 to 2015]."

First off, for appealing to the world to bring Tedros to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, I would like to express my deepest appreciation and gratitude to Steinman. I sincerely thank him for his time and energy.

Regrettably, the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor appears that it doesn't have a mandate to carry out investigations and prosecution against an Ethiopian such as Tedros because Ethiopia didn't ratify the Rome Statute of the ICC.

As a result of Ethiopia not being party to the Rome Statue of the ICC, I'm writing this article to plead with the Ethiopian government to support Steinman's call to make Tedros face charges of genocide and crimes against humanity at the ICC.

I'm also penning this piece to appeal to the Ethiopian government to consider ratifying "the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court", which the majority of African States approved.

To illustrate, according to the ICC, "123 countries are States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Out of them 33 are African States..." Put differently, there are 195 Sovereign States in the world, according to the UN. Out of the 195 countries, 54 are African States. Of which, only 21 African countries, including Ethiopia have not yet ratified the Rome Statute.

Tedros is the personification of the TPLF's demons

To charge Tedros for genocide and crimes against humanity, the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor will most certainly find a sea of witnesses and a mountain of evidence against him.

So, I personally say yes, Tedros should be brought to justice at the ICC for enabling the TPLF's security forces and accomplices to carry out genocide and crimes against humanity. Because when he was Ethiopia's health minister from 2005 to 2012, a significant number of Amhara women accused him of perpetrating genocide against them by "imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group [the Amhara Women]". Furthermore, when he was "one of three officials in control of the Tigray People's Liberation Front's (Woyane's) security services from 2013 to 2015", mass imprisonment, torture, disappearance and killings were common across Ethiopia. For example, a DW Documentary said "in 2015 and 2016 security forces [which were led by Tedors] killed more than a thousand people and imprisoned tens of thousands more..."

To conclude, you don't need me to tell you: Tedros himself didn't perpetrate the alleged genocide and crimes against humanity. But he held the office that bore the greatest responsibility and created conditions that sustained criminality against Ethiopians, particularly against the Amhara and the Oromo people, including butchering detainees' private parts.

"The certainty of being caught is a vastly more powerful deterrent [of crime] than the punishment." Definitely, Steinman's plea to bring Tedros before the ICC isn't in vain, as a result of Ethiopia's unwillingness to ratify the Rome Statute of the ICC. His appeal is creating more awareness across the globe among government officials who use their hired thugs to silence opposition. Likewise, Steinman's effort to get Tedros charged, for heinous crimes he enabled, is not hopeless. It is giving hope to Tedros' countless victims and those who have been demanding justice for more than a decade, including this writer.

I dedicated this article to the genocide and crimes against humanity victims of the World Health Organization's chief, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (PhD), and by extension, the deposed TPLF's rulers.

The writer, LJDemissie, can be reached at LJDemissie@yahoo.com

___

Related story : The Tedros Adhanom-Michelle Bachelet Conspiracy of Lies and Disinformation on Ethiopia EXPOSED

Join the conversation. Like borkena on Facebook and get Ethiopian News updates regularly. As well, you may get Ethiopia News by following us on twitter @zborkena

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
W.H.O.'s Chief, Tedros Adhanom, Facilitated Butchering Prisoners' Private Parts

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By LJDemissieJanuary 3, 2021 "An American economist [David Steinman] nominated for the Nobel peace prize [in 2019] has called for the head of the World Health Organisation [Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (PhD)] to be prosecuted for genocide over his alleged involvement in directing Ethiopia's security forces [from 2013 to 2015]."

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-limits-to-growth/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
10 March 2023 - "Ocean Food Production: Limits and Strategies" is a recent report published by the Club of Rome, where the authors dive straight into the issue of food production in a saturated planet, damaged by the severe impacts of climate change and ecological...

# data[].attributes.body
https://healthpolicy-watch.news/pandemic-treaty-zero-draft-proposes-who-gets-20-of-products/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Pandemic Treaty 'Zero-Draft' is Out - Proposes WHO Gets 20% of All Pandemic Products to Ensure Equity

The World Health Organization (WHO)'s ' zero-draft ' of a pandemic treaty proposes that 20% of pandemic-related products - vaccines, diagnostics, personal protective equipment and therapeutics - should be allocated to the global body, which will then ensure their equitable distribution.

The draft, which has been seen by Health Policy Watch, was sent to the WHO's 194 member states this week, officially opening the door for negotiations on how the world should behave in future pandemics.

According to the draft, half of the pandemic products allocated to WHO (10% of total global production) should be donated while the other half would be bought for an "accessible" price.

No less than 11 of the draft's 49-clause preamble deal in one way or another with intellectual property rights, signalling the key battleground for upcoming negotiations.

These clauses recognise that "protection of intellectual property rights is important for the development of new medical products", but highlight their impact on price and access.

'Use IP waivers'

In the text itself, member states are directed to "take appropriate measures to support time-bound waivers of intellectual property rights that can accelerate or scale up manufacturing of pandemic-related products during a pandemic, to the extent necessary to increase the availability and adequacy of affordable pandemic-related products".

In addition, parties (member states) are encouraged to "apply the full use of the flexibilities provided in the TRIPS Agreement" and encourage all patent-holders of pandemic-related products to "waive, or manage as appropriate, payment of royalties by developing country manufacturers".

Manufacturers that get significant public financing will also be encouraged to waive royalties on the continued use of their technology for the production of pandemic-related products.

Health activist Jamie Love, director of Knowledge Ecology International (KEI), described the draft as being "surprisingly strong on several topics" including intellectual property.

The WHO zero draft of the pandemic treaty is out, it is surprisingly strong on several topics. This is one section on intellectual property rights. pic.twitter.com/Bg8P0SPU5P

- James Love (@jamie_love) February 1, 2023

The pandemic treaty is being developed in reaction to what the draft describes as "the catastrophic failure of the international community in showing solidarity and equity in response to the coronavirus disease".

Put together by the intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) bureau, the draft will be negotiated in this body - and it is unlikely to survive in its current form given the strong pharmaceutical lobby, particularly in the European Union.

The next meeting of the INB is on 27 February, with the final version of the accord expected to be tabled at the WHO's 2024 World Health Assembly.

'Nothing agreed'

The zero draft states it has been developed "without prejudice to the position of any delegation and following the principle that 'nothing is agreed until everything is agreed'. "

While the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA) was still analysing the draft, it described its release as "an important milestone in the negotiation process of the WHO Accord".

"The innovative pharmaceutical industry has been at the forefront of the response to the current pandemic and as a result is uniquely positioned to contribute to future pandemic preparedness discussions," according to the IFPMA.

"We will continue to constructively engage in these negotiations, by emphasizing the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic , and bringing proactive solutions to the table, such as Berlin Declaration ."

Building from the 'bottom up'

Meanwhile, Dr Mike Ryan, WHO's executive director of health emergencies, told the WHO's executive board (EB) on Wednesday morning that the conditions conducive for pandemics - war, hunger, epidemics and natural disasters - were " converging with unprecedented frequency and intensity".

"Currently, WHO is responding to 55 graded emergencies around the world, which is unprecedented," said Ryan. "Last year, we supported member states in response to over 75 different health emergencies around the world.

"Over 339 million people are now in need of direct humanitarian assistance, and within those countries affected by fragility and conflict, we're seeing 80% of the world's major epidemics occurring."

Ryan urged countries to build their national action plans for public health security alongside the INB negotiations, stressing that "global health security builds from the bottom up".

Image Credits: Flickr - Trinity Care Foundation, International Rescue Committee.

Combat the infodemic in health information and support health policy reporting from the global South. Our growing network of journalists in Africa, Asia, Geneva and New York connect the dots between regional realities and the big global debates, with evidence-based, open access news and analysis. To make a personal or organisational contribution click here on PayPal.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pandemic Treaty 'Zero-Draft' Is Out - Proposes WHO Gets 20% Of All Pandemic Products To Ensure Equity - Health Policy Watch

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Pandemic Treaty 'Zero-Draft' is Out - Proposes WHO Gets 20% of All Pandemic Products to Ensure Equity The World Health Organization (WHO)'s ' zero-draft ' of a pandemic treaty proposes that 20% of pandemic-related products - vaccines, diagnostics, personal protective equipment and therapeutics - should be allocated to the global body, which will then ensure their equitable distribution.

# data[].attributes.body
https://globalcovidsummit.org/experts/drkatlindley/news-policy/the-world-health-organization-and-their-quest-for-power

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The WHO was started in 1948 as an agency of the United Nations, with the goal to improve population health globally and allow the people to be in charge of their own health. They lead the global initiative to expand universal health coverage. Their Constitution is based on the concept that the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition. As per one of the tenets, informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.

At the beginning the funding came from the member state countries and funds were allocated based on the member state country's GDP. In recent years, the funding has changed to private and corporate funding based on specific interests.

The priorities of the WHO have also changed, from people centered care to special interests based approach that follows the interests of its many donors. Another important change is the recent rise of public private partnerships PPPs, like GAVI Foundation, CEPI, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and their strong relationship with WHO. As we have seen during the Covid-19 pandemic, many of these entities worked in a very close partnership with WHO in managing many aspects of the global response at the detriment, in my opinion, to the citizens of the world.
Danger Ahead
The WHO is currently working on two different approaches in an attempt to strengthen their control over future pandemic responses. Those are the Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the IHR.
The Pandemic Treaty
Member state countries of the World Health Organization have started a global process to draft and negotiate an agreement under the Constitution of the WHO to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) has been tasked with drafting and negotiating this international agreement known as the Pandemic Treaty. The INB is currently reviewing Conceptual Zero Draft that will form a basis for future negotiations. They will deliver a progress report to the 76 th World Health Assembly in May of 2023, with the aim to adopt the treaty by 2024. The INB determined that the Pandemic Treaty will be negotiated under WHO Constitution Article 19, and it can be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the World Health Assembly. This is then subject to the ratification processes specific to each individual member state country.

Under the Pandemic Treaty, WHO would focus on early detection and prevention of future pandemics, universal and equitable response via vaccines, medicines and diagnostics, a stronger international health framework with WHO in charge and "ONE HEALTH" approach that would connect the health of humans, animals and the planet.
The International Health Regulation (IHR)
The second approach in strengthening WHO powers over future pandemic responses involves approving amendments to the existing International Health Regulation (IHR) that were first adopted in 1969 and most recently amended in 2005. The IHR is legally binding international law that covers measures for preventing the transnational spread of infectious diseases. The IHR of 2005 has broadened the scope of the IHR 1969 to cover existing, new and re-emerging diseases, including emergencies caused by non-infectious disease agents. The current proposed amendments only require 50% of the member state countries to be approved. This is again subject to the ratification processes specific to each individual country. The concern is that as proposed these amendments will empower WHO to control pandemic response of each individual member state country thus interfering with basic human rights and the sovereignty of the countries in question.

The proposed IHR amendments would give WHO authority over member state countries by changing the wording from non-binding to binding recommendations that will now mandate the member state countries to follow instead just consider those recommendations. Countries will have to accept the WHO as the "AUTHORITY" in international public health emergencies over their own health agencies. The amendments will also change the definition of Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) to include not only actual, but any potential concerns that the Director General deems necessary.

Some of the powers that Director General will have include detention of individuals, restriction of travel, the forcing of health interventions (like testing, vaccinations, medical treatments, etc) and requirement to undergo medical examinations if necessary. The WHO will have power to designate specific opinions or information as "misinformation" or "disinformation" and it can require member state country's government to intervene and interfere with individual's rights to speech and free expression. Obvious concern is that such interventions will specifically interfere with the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

After declaring an emergency Director General will also have the power to instruct governments to provide WHO and other countries with resources, funds and commodities as deemed necessary. Member state countries will also give power to the WHO over patent law and intellectual property, including control of manufacturing, materials deemed to be relevant to potential or actual health problems that the WHO considers of interest. These are just few of the concerns when it comes to the proposed amendments.
Where Do We Go from Here?
Empower yourself with knowledge. Speak with your legislators and make sure they understand the dangers of WHO gaining even more control in the future pandemic responses. Some States in US have already started on legislation to limit WHO control on their Constitutions. As most of us know, individual health and considerations are extremely important and one size fits all should not be a primary approach. "One Health, One World" approach by the WHO threatens individual sovereignty and member state countries independence. Specifically when it comes to the United States of America, I would venture to say that it is in direct contradiction to the intent of our Forefathers, our Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

(Credit to David Bell for background information on WHO and IHR.)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The World Health Organization and Their Quest for Power

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The WHO was started in 1948 as an agency of the United Nations, with the charge to improve population health globally and allow the people to be in charge of their own health. They lead the global initiative to expand universal health coverage.

# data[].attributes.body
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3tQgzz4thLA&si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Danger of CBDCs - Catherine Austin Fitts

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-government-received-400-million-in-covid-19-vaccine-royalty-payments-moderna_5078600.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Moderna said on Feb. 23 that it recently reached a patent agreement with the U.S. government over disputed technology that is featured in its COVID-19 vaccine.

In December 2022, Moderna entered "a nonexclusive patent license agreement" with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said CFO Jamey Mock during an earnings call on Thursday.

The agreement lets the company use "certain patent rights concerning stabilizing prefusion coronavirus spike proteins and the resulting stabilized proteins for the use in COVID-19 vaccine products," Mock said.

Under the agreement, Moderna sent a "catch-up payment" of $400 million to the NIAID before the new year, according to Moderna executives.

"We have agreed to pay low single-digit royalties on future net sales of our COVID-19 vaccines," Mock said.

NIAID and its parent agency, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), did not respond to requests for comment.

The Epoch Times has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the agreement.

NIAID was headed for decades by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who retired around the end of 2022.

The disclosure means the government was paid shortly before telling a court that it, not Moderna, should face a lawsuit over patent infringement.

NIH Says Wrongly Left Off Patent

U.S. government researchers were wrongly left off of a patent filing for a key sequence that's part of the vaccine, according to government officials.

NIH scientists were working with Moderna for four years on vaccines for diseases before the pandemic started. After COVID-19 emerged, the NIH and Moderna collaborated to develop the COVID-19 vaccine, both parties have said.

But the messenger RNA sequence "was selected exclusively by Moderna scientists using Moderna's technology and without input of NIAID scientists, who were not even aware of the mRNA sequence until after the patent application had already been filed," Moderna said in one statement.

NIH officials and Moderna were negotiating over the matter when Moderna said in a patent application that it "reached a good-faith determination" that government scientists did not invent the messenger RNA sequence.

An NIH review concluded that doctors Kizzmekia Corbett, Barney Graham, and John Mascola, who all worked with Moderna while at the NIH, co-invented the sequence, a government official familiar with the situation told The Epoch Times previously.

"The work of Dr. Barney Graham and Kizzmekia Corbett and others stabilized the prefusion spike protein which is used in virtually all, with few exceptions, of the vaccines that are now successful," Fauci told one congressional hearing.

The scientists were named on several related patents, but not the sequence one.

Moderna changed its stance in December 2021, announcing it was abandoning, at least temporarily, its pursuit of the sequence patent.

"Moderna has taken this action to allow more time for discussions with the NIH. Moderna believes that its scientists invented the specific mRNA sequence at the heart of the patent in question. The company acknowledges that NIH feels equally strongly that its scientists should be listed as co-inventors for their contemporaneous work on the protein sequence," Moderna said at the time.

"Moderna decided that issuance of the mRNA sequence patent in the current environment could interfere with further discussions aimed at an amicable resolution with the NIH. Further, the company would like to avoid any distraction to the important public-private efforts ongoing to address emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Omicron. Moderna continues to be grateful to the NIH and its scientists for their substantial contributions to developing the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine," it added.

The U.S. government authorized the vaccine in December 2020, and later granted a biologics license. It paid $10 billion to Moderna for developing the vaccine and has paid another $9 billion for doses of the vaccine.

Royalty Payments

Research conducted at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services led to more than 4,400 U.S. patents from 1980 to 2019, according to the Government Accountability Office.

The NIH had 2 percent of the patents. Those patents generated up to $2 billion in royalty revenue during the same period of time.

"The NIH provides limited information to the public about its licensing activities. For example, the agency does not report which of its patents are licensed or release metrics that would enable the public to evaluate how licensing affects patient access to resulting drugs," the office concluded. "Increasing the transparency of its licensing activities could improve the public's and policymakers' understanding of NIH's management of its intellectual property."

Some of the payments go to individual scientists, including Fauci.

Open the Books, a nonprofit watchdog, obtained documentation of approximately $350 million in royalties going to Fauci and other government scientists from fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2020.

Dr. Lawrence Tabak, acting director of the NIH, acknowledged the payments present "an appearance of a conflict of interest," but claimed there are "substantial and significant" firewalls that mitigate the issue.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
US Government Received $400 Million in COVID-19 Vaccine Royalty Payments: Moderna

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Moderna said on Feb. 23 that it recently reached a patent agreement with the U.S. government over disputed technology that is featured in its COVID-19 vaccine. In December 2022, Moderna entered "a nonexclusive patent license agreement" with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said CFO Jamey Mock during an earnings call on Thursday.

# data[].attributes.body
https://brownstone.org/articles/us-government-negotiates-who-authority-over-pandemic-policies/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/06/world-economic-forum-and-un-sign-strategic-partnership-framework

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Alem Tedeneke, Media Manager, Tel.: +1 646 204 9191, Email: ated@weforum.org

The UN-Forum Partnership was signed in a meeting held at United Nations headquarters between UN Secretary-General António Guterres and World Economic Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

The partnership identifies six areas of focus - financing the 2030 Agenda, climate change, health, digital cooperation, gender equality and empowerment of women, education and skills - to strengthen and broaden their combined impact by building on existing and new collaborations

The full partnership framework can be found here

New York, USA, 13 June 2019 - The World Economic Forum and the United Nations signed today a Strategic Partnership Framework outlining areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement and jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The framework was drafted based on a mapping of existing collaboration between the two institutions and will enable a more strategic and coordinated approach towards delivering impact.

The UN-Forum Partnership was signed in a meeting held at United Nations headquarters between UN Secretary-General António Guterres and World Economic Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab.

" Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals is essential for the future of humanity. The World Economic Forum is committed to supporting this effort, and working with the United Nations to build a more prosperous and equitable future," said Klaus Schwab, World Economic Founder and Executive Chairman.

"The new Strategic Partnership Framework between the United Nations and the World Economic Forum has great potential to advance our efforts on key global challenges and opportunities, from climate change, health and education to gender equality, digital cooperation and financing for sustainable development. Rooted in UN norms and values, the Framework underscores the invaluable role of the private sector in this work - and points the way toward action to generate shared prosperity on a healthy planet while leaving no one behind," said António

Guterres, UN Secretary-General.

The Strategic Partnership Framework will focus on the following areas:

Financing the 2030 Agenda -Mobilize systems and accelerate finance flows toward the 2030 Agenda and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, taking forward solutions to increase long-term SDG investments.

Climate change -Achieve clear, measurable and public commitments from the private sector to reach carbon neutrality by 2050, help create public-private platforms in critical high-emitting sectors, and scale up the services required to adapt to the impacts of climate change.

Health - Support countries achieve good health and well-being for all, within the context of the 2030 Agenda, focusing on key emerging global health threats that require stronger multistakeholder partnership and action.

Digital cooperation - Meet the needs of the Fourth Industrial Revolution while seeking to advance global analysis, dialogue and standards for digital governance and digital inclusiveness.

Gender equality and the empowerment of women - Foster multistakeholder partnerships and coalitions for full participation and equal opportunities of women at all levels of decision-making and for productive participation of women in the labour force, and promote equal pay for work of equal value across sectors and occupations as well as within them.

Education and skills - Promote public-private partnerships to address global reskilling and lifelong learning for the future requirements for work, and empower youth with competencies for life and decent work.

The leadership across the United Nations will engage in and utilize the different platforms provided by the World Economic Forum to advance impact in the above areas. Both institutions will annually review the partnership to further streamline collaboration, take stock of results and identify additional areas to jointly invest efforts in.

Notes to Editors
Read the Forum Agenda at http://wef.ch/agenda
Become a fan of the Forum on Facebook at http://wef.ch/facebook
Watch Forum videos at http://wef.ch/video
Follow the Forum on Twitter via @wef and @davos
Follow the Forum on Instagram at http://wef.ch/instagram
Follow the Forum on LinkedIn at http://wef.ch/linkedin
Learn about the Forum's impact on http://wef.ch/impact
Subscribe to Forum news releases at http://wef.ch/news

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
World Economic Forum and UN Sign Strategic Partnership Framework

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Alem Tedeneke, Media Manager, Tel.: +1 646 204 9191, Email: ated@weforum.org The UN-Forum Partnership was signed in a meeting held at United Nations headquarters between UN Secretary-General António Guterres and World Economic Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development The

# data[].attributes.headline
Operation Paperclip: Importing Nazi Scientists to the USA for their Technology Expertise

# data[].attributes.subject
Operation Paperclip: Importing Nazi Scientists to the USA for their Technology Expertise

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-us-government-brought-nazi-scientists-america-after-world-war-ii-180961110/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
As the war came to a close, the U.S. government was itching to get ahold of the German wartime technology

smithsonian.com

The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have put an end to World War II, but they weren't the only destructive weaponry developed during the war. From nerve and disease agents to the feared and coveted V-1 and V-2 rockets, Nazi scientists worked on an impressive arsenal. As the war came to a close in 1945, both American and Russian officials began scheming to get that technology for themselves. So it came to pass that 71 years ago today, 88 Nazi scientists arrived in the United States and were promptly put to work for Uncle Sam.

In the days and weeks after Germany's surrender, American troops combed the European countryside in search of hidden caches of weaponry to collect. They came across facets of the Nazi war machine that the top brass were shocked to see, writer Annie Jacobsen told NPR's All Things Considered in 2014. Jacobson wrote about both the mission and the scientists in her book, Operation Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program That Brought Nazi Scientists To America.

"One example was they had no idea that Hitler had created this whole arsenal of nerve agents," Jacobsen says. "They had no idea that Hitler was working on a bubonic plague weapon. That is really where Paperclip began, which was suddenly the Pentagon realizing, 'Wait a minute, we need these weapons for ourselves.'"

But just studying the weapons wasn't enough, and the U.S. military wasn't the only country eyeing Nazi scientists-their one-time allies in the Soviet Union were doing the same thing. If the Soviets were going to press their former enemies into service, American military officials didn't want to be left behind.So the U.S. government hatched a plan to bring 88 Nazi scientists captured during the fall of the Nazi Germany back to America and get them back on the job. Only this time, according to History.com, they were working for the U.S. under a project known as "Operation Paperclip."

While the military did what they could to whitewash the pasts of their "prisoners of peace," as some of the scientists called themselves, many had serious skeletons in their closets. For example, Wernher von Braun was not just one of the brains behind the V-2 rocket program, but had intimate knowledge of what was going on in the concentration camps. Von Braun himself hand-picked people from horrific places, including Buchenwald concentration camp, to work to the bone building his rockets, Jacobsen tells NPR.

Operation Paperclip was top secret at the time. After all, the devices these men helped design killed many people throughout Europe, not to mention the deaths their government was responsible for on the battlefield and in the concentration camps. Even agents with the Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations, which the U.S. government tasked with hunting down top Nazi officers who went on the lam after the war, were unaware for decades of the extent to which government officials were collaborating with their quarry, Toby Harnden reported for The Telegraph in 2010.

While many of the men who were brought to the U.S. under the program were undoubtedly instrumental in scientific advancements like the Apollo program, they were also supportive and responsible for some of the horrors experienced by victims of the Holocaust. Operation Paperclip has certainly left a questionable legacy.

Like this article?
SIGN UP for our newsletter

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why the U.S. Government Brought Nazi Scientists to America After World War II

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
smithsonian.com The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have put an end to World War II, but they weren't the only destructive weaponry developed during the war. From nerve and disease agents to the feared and coveted V-1 and V-2 rockets, Nazi scientists worked on an impressive arsenal.

# data[].attributes.headline
Operation Paperclip : Pardoned Nazis imported to America.

# data[].attributes.subject
Operation Paperclip : Pardoned Nazis imported to America.

# data[].attributes.body
https://twitter.com/SikhForTruth/status/1628171379487956997

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
This is the plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st century. It's a totalitarian global state being developed right now all over the world. It's the digital control plan for all land, water, food and all information / data.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
This is the plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st century. It's a totalitarian global state being developed right now all over the world. It's the digital control plan for all land, water, food and all information / data. https://t.co/oW1EbO2NmW

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
This is the plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st century. It's a totalitarian global state being developed right now all over the world. It's the digital control plan for all land, water, food and all information / data. pic.twitter.com/oW1EbO2NmW
— SikhForTruth (@SikhForTruth) February 21, 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
This is the plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st century. It's a totalitarian global state being developed right now all over the world. It's the digital control plan for all land, water, food and all information / data. https://t.co/oW1EbO2NmW

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
This is the plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st century. It's a totalitarian global state being developed right now all over the world. It's the digital control plan for all land, water, food and all information / data. https://t.co/oW1EbO2NmW

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
This is the plan that was agreed to by 179 nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st century. It's a totalitarian global state being developed right now all over the world. It's the digital control plan for all land, water, food and all information / data.

# data[].attributes.body
https://home.solari.com/the-iron-bank-is-bis-sovereign-immunity-the-secret-sauce-behind-the-global-coup-part-i-with-patrick-wood/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
DATE

EVENT

2021/11/12

The Trojan Horse of Switzerland - Going for a "No" in Order to Save Democracy

Information
Friday 12 November - BERN / SWITZERLAND
Press conference from 9:30 until 10:45 / 11:00 CET
Rally from 13:30 to 16:30 CET
Saturday 13 November - MILANO
Press conference 11:00 until 12:00 / 12:30 CET
Rally from 15:00

Location: Rosalia-Wenger-Square in Bern, Switzerland

Milan Rally video

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. from Milan with Catherine Austin Fitts, Senta Depuydt and other guests: - ENGLISH (translated consecutively)

Video of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speech at the rally in Milan: FRENCH

Transcript of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speech in Milan: ENGLISH

Video of Catherine Austin Fitts' speech at the rally in Milan: FRENCH

Video of the full Rally: GERMAN:

GERMAN (simultaneous translation)

2021/09/23

Join Dr. Mercola in a Call to Action Against Censorship and Propaganda.
Panel: Patrick Wood, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Catherine Austin Fitts and Bill Martinez.
Details & video intro
The live stream will be on the CFFS channel at Rumble.com/user/cffs

2021/08

Join us for the first ever Rogue Food event at Polyface Farms, in Swoope, Virginia.Virginia
Polyface Event Info and Tickets
HERE

2021/08/12

Link to: Interview

2021/07

Don't miss it!
Presented by Doctors for Covid Ethics and hosted by UK Column
23 speakers over 2 days
Information here
Day 1 (Thursday, July 29, 2021) Now Available

Day 2 (Friday July 30, 2021)

2021/07/26

strong>Catherine Austin Fitts joins Student Debt Crisis (Filmmakers Panel)

Student Debt Crisis
Panelists:
‍Michael McCray (Moderator), ACORN 8
Alan Collinge author of the book The Student Loan Scam, , founder StudentLoanJustice.org
Catherine A. Fitts - Former Sallie Mae Board Member, and Solari Report publisher
Jon Oberg - New York Times whistleblower on Department of Education lenders.
Mike Camoin, filmmaker, Sallie Mae Not
Schedule
Getting Started
How to register for WSFF and created your Film Festival Flix account

2021/07/03

Topic: Using Disaster Capitalism to Control All Humans
Greg Hunter and Catherine

2021/07/02

Topic: Tools to Resist Vaccine Mandates & Great Reset Currency Controls
Interview

The David Knight Show

2021/06
Interview: State of our currency - who controls, who decides

RED PILL EXPO

2021/06

Globalist To Initiate Tribulations
Presentations from Steve Quayle, Catherine Austin Fitts, Gary Heavin, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Egon von Greyerz, Mike Adams, Lisa Haven, Paul Begley, Dave Hodges, Daniel Holdings, and more. This panel of expert speakers will encourage, equip and warn you for the days of darkness ahead.
Register

2021/06

Flat Rock Farms in Lewisburg, TN
2021 TN Event Details and Schedule
HERE

2021/06/03

News segment Topic - Economy Update
Coast to Coast

2021/06

King Hero Panel Discussion

Hear first hand victory stories from those on the front lines of law. They will be sharing their trials, tribulations, victories and defeats, and comparing notes about what worked, what didn't, and why.

2021/06

June 5-6, 2021

Catherine Austin Fitts joins RED PILL EXPO
Mt. Rushmore / Rapid City, South Dakota

Register

Schedule

2021/05/07

Catherine Austin Fitts joins Chavankhe's - from India
(3:30am PT- 4:30am MT- 5:30am CT- 6:30am ET - 12:30pm CET)
More to come

2021/04/24

Interview
This is a Slave System Orchestrated by Central Banks
This is a Slave System Orchestrated by Central Banks

2021/04/17

Interview
Greg Hunter and Catherine discuss the Biggest violation of Nuremberg Code in History

USAWatchdog.com

2021/04/12

Interview
Polly Tommey and Catherine discuss the Family Financial Disclosure Form

See more Here. . .

2021/03

March 20 - 26, 2021
Hosted by Mike Winner & Josh del Sol

Information here. . .

2021/02/23

Interview: Secret Space Economy - Black Budgets - UFOs

Great viewers and guests of NTV.

2021/02/23

Interview: The Battle of Ideas
"This was easily one of the most interesting conversations I've had on my podcast." ~ Jeremy Nell
Continue reading. . .

2021/02/11

Interview: News segment Catherine Austin Fitts! On a Whirling World Tour of World Relations

Catherine Austin Fitts,communicates new understandings of everything from how we are destroying our children for profit to our relationships with China, all in one integrated tapestry of insights.

2020/12/25

Christmas Meditation
We are celbrating Christmas
as a Family of Light!

Description:
Prayer & meditation, reading of the Scriptures, music and the sharing of joy as we feel the birth of Higher Creation in all of us.
Info Here

Topic: CHRISTMAS 2020

2020/12/19

Listen to the interview

2020/12/07

Interview: How the Money Rules Politics: (Part II)

Interview: Background on the US Election (Part I)

Topic: Catherine analyzes certain current trends in finance and economics and explains the effects the central bankers of this world want to have on all of us. This interview is absolutely worth watching to the very end and spreading to all of your contacts!

2020/12/06
Listen to the interview
Topic:
Destroying Small Business
Transhumanism/Slavery

2020/11/24

Listen to the interview

2020/11/20

50 minute discussion hosted by the New York State Writers Institute.
Mike Camoin Documentary Filmmaker
Listen to the interview

Guest list:

Matt Taibbi Rolling Stone Moderator
Alan Collinge Student Loan Advocate
Tom Borgers Wall Street Investor
Catherine Austin Fitts Solari Report, Former Sallie Mae Board Member
Anasa Troutman Culture Shift Creative
Mike Camoin Documentary Filmmaker

2020/11/20

Listen to Interview

Topic: Current Events

2020/11/18

Listen to the interview

Topic: Great Reset

2020/11/11

HOLD UP Listen to the interview

Coming Soon English Version:
After a crowdfunding campaign on Ulule which raised 182,970 euros and a premium access release of the film, HOLD-UP, the highly anticipated documentary by investigative journalist Pierre Barnérias on the management of the Covid crisis- 19

2020/11/03

Listen to the interview
Topic: 2020 Election Special

2020/10/31
The Keys of Enoch - Europe Online Workshops

Netherlands - 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Sacred Resonance of the Divine Names - KEY 403 - Our new workshops will be online!
Register for €45 (via Paypal)

Also times for: Amsterdam, Berlin, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna

Topic: This is an in depth experience of the meaning and science of resonance in the 72 Sacred Names of God based on the new Key 403 which speaks of the vibratory temple. With the intonation of the Divine Names we can amplify and purify our Image Space through the sacred codes of light as we learn how the world of Negative Mass is influenced by sound. Seminar in English.

2020/10/29
Listen to the interview
Topic: A wide range of subjects

2020/10/23

Covid-19 is Disaster Capitalism, says Banking Industry Insider
at 11:00 pm CT

Topic: Banking industry expert Catherine Austin Fitts joins The Alex Jones Show to break down how the authoritarian medical tyranny lockdown of society is disaster capitalism.

2020/10/13
Listen to Interview
Bernard Grover @RadioFarSide
and Dr. Joseph P. Farrell @Gizadeathstar
Catherine Austin Fitts @SolariReport
Topic: The whos, whats, whys, and hows of the Q Phenom

2020/10/09

Academy For Future Science in Europe
Seminar: WATERS OF CREATION - BREATH OF CONSCIOUSNESS with Ulrike Granögger
Seminar in English with Italian translation.

2020/10/09
Listen to Interview
Topic: the push for a cashless society and transhumanism - how they're connected and what you can do to protect against them

2020/10/03

2020/09/27
Listen to Interview
Topic: The Deep State Chaos

2020/09/26
Tea Time: Lake Geneva, Wisconsin

2020/09/06

September 6, 2020 - 10:00pm-12:00 PT

Coast to Coast

News segment guests: Catherine Austin Fitts
Topic: 52% US Millennials living with parents

2020/08/29

DARKNESS IN THE AGE OF LIGHT
Click to view the Cover Darkness in the Age of Light
The world situation and its recovery - spiritually, economically, politically
with Catherine Austin Fitts, Thomas Meyer, Gerald Brei and other speakers.
English, with German translation

Saturday, August 29th 10am - 10pm
Sunday, August 30th 10am - 5pm
SCALA BASEL
Freie Strasse 89
4051 Basel
Cost: 200 CHF
To Register: kontakt@perseus.ch
or by phone +41 (0) 61 383 70 63

2020/08/08

August 8 - 14, 2020 - CANCELED
HANG WITH SOLARI - LAKE CONSTANCE OPERA 2020

HANG WITH SOLARI - LAKE CONSTANCE OPERA 2020
Existing subscribers can login for moreInformation here!

2020/06/27

SATURDAY 27 June 2020 at 11:30 AM (CEST, Zurich time) -
"The Sword of Michael" - Part 2
Box A

SATURDAY 27 June 2020 at 11:30 AM (CEST, Zurich time) -
"The Sword of Michael" - Part 2

Saturday 11 July 2020 at 11:30 AM (CEST, Zurich time) -
Webinar with Translations
The Keys of Enoch - Key 104

Saturday 25 July 2020 at 11:30 AM (CEST, Zurich time) -
The Meaning of Israel - continued

2020/06/06

EXECUTIVE BRIEFING WITH RICHARD DOLAN - June 6, 2020
Box A

For this event, Richard has prepared two brand-new, never-heard-before presentations and will sit with respected journalist Alejandro Rojas for a wrap-up interview. Each of these segments is 90 minutes long. Information here!

2020/06/06

2019/12/20
Tea Time with Catherine Information here!

2019/12/05

December 5, 2019 - 10:00pm-12:00 PT

2019/11/15
Tea Time with Catherine Information here!

2019/10/25

October 25 - 27, 2019
SPACES OF RESONANCE IN THE 72 NAMES OF GOD

August 8 - 14, 2020

Academy For Future Science - Workshops/Study 2019
Catherine will be attending.

2019/10/20

2019/08/24
Join Rob Kirby, Daniel Estulin, Mark Skidmore and Catherine Austin Fitts
Solari Report Subscribers - Event is Over

2019/06/24
New York at Carnegie Hall -Weill Recital Hall
No Tickets Remaining (Solari Report Subscribers)

2019/05/22
Tea Time with Catherine - Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
Tea Time with Catherine - Bloomfield Hills, Michigan

For Solari Report Subscribers

2019/03/09
Join us at Stavoren 2019!
HANG WITH SOLARI - STAVOREN 2019

For Solari Report Subscribers

2018/10/19

"Scientists for Peace. Planetary Consciousness and Ethics"

International Conference

The conference will take place be in the Hall of Culture, a building designed and built according to the laws of harmonious construction and sacred geometry.

2018/10/13

Academy For Future Science - Workshops/Study
Seminar: The Ancient Book of Enoch (Ethiopic Enoch)
With Ulli Granögger
Time: 10:00am - 3:00pm

Academy For Future Science in Europe
Bischofszell, Switzerland
Phone: 0041 71 7224700
Email: academy @ affseurope.org

Email: academy @ affseurope.org

Registration/Information - Europe for 2018

Note: Catherine is attending not speaking.

2018/06/02

Afternoon Tea with Catherine

Solari Report Subscribers, have an afternoon tea with Catherine, in San Francisco Bay Area, to learn more click HERE

2018/05/19

"The Real Financial Flows Blowing Bubbles - Connecting the Dots from Washington to Auckland"
Time: 4:00 PM

Guests can join Catherine at one of Auckland's iconic homesteads at 268 West Tamaki Drive, Glendowie for a 2 hour guided conversation which will expose the myths, lies and deceptions we are subjected to on a daily basis.

2018/05/

Australian Tour

Australian Outback Trip - May 2018

"Tell me a story.
In this century, and moment, of madness, tell me a story.
Make it a story of great distances, and starlight.
The name of the story will be time - but you must not speak its name.
Tell me a story of deep delight"
~ Robert Penn Warren

December 26, 2017

Coast to Coast
Topic: Current Events

December 19, 2017

The Lars Larson Show

December 19, 2017

Rense Radio

December 18, 2017

Rense Radio
Topic: Current Events

December 13, 2017

Coast to Coast
Topic: Economy Update

December 13, 2017 1:00pm CT

Alex Jones Show
Topic: Control 101

December 10, 2017

USA Watchdog - Greg Hunter
Topic: Control 101

December 6, 2017

Coast to Coast
Topic: Economy Update

November 29, 2017 10pm - 2am PST

Coast to Coast
Topic: Goldman Sachs

November 14, 2017

Coast to Coast
Topic: Economy

November 12, 2017

Forum Borealis
Topic: This is the Black Economy (Part 2 of 2) - A Conversation with Catherine
Link to Part One

November 12, 2017 2:00-5:00 pm ET

Operation Freedom (Podcast)
Topic: The Missing $21 Trillion

November 1, 2017

Coast to Coast
Topic: Economy Update

October 25, 2017

Coast to Coast
Topic: News Segment- Economy Ppdate

October 21, 2017

Soaring Eagle Radio
Topic: Technocracy and Entrainment Equals Enslavement

October 17, 2017

Alex Jones - Infowars
Topic: Missing Money

October 16, 2017

Coast to Coast
Topic: News Segment- Stocks

October 16, 2017

The Shift, host Doug McKenty
Topic:
This interview with Catherine Austin-Fitts reveals her philosophy behind the elite controlled banking system that acts as a parasite on the larger US economy. She also discusses her work as an investment advisor with the Solari Report.

October 13, 2017 - 1:00 pm ET

Dark Journalist

October 5, 2017

Forum Borealis
Topic: This is the Black Economy (Part 1 of 2)

July 8, 2017
Lunch with Catherine - Larkspur, CA
Subscriber Only Luncheon

June 21, 2017
Bloomberg Daybreak Asia - with Juliette Saly and Bryan Curtis
Topic: Young People Are The Superconductors
Outlook for the U.S. economy for the second half of the year. She looked at the Trump agenda, deflation and the war on the grocery market. She also gave her thoughts on the outlook for Hong Kong with the 20th anniversary of the handover upcoming. She stressed the importance of giving opportunity to young people.

Open to the public June 20, 2017
Interview date: April 27, 2017
Dark Journalist - Part 2 episode
Topic: Empire Endgame

May 17, 2017
Coast to Coast
Topic: James Comey
All You Need to Know About James Comey
If You are Doing Due Diligence on Frank Keating

May 6, 2017
Lunch with Catherine, May 6, 2017 - Pasadena, CA

April 30, 2017
Freedom - WAAM Radio
Topic: Current events
Freedom - WAAM Radio

October 15, 2016
The Grand Virtual Pipe Organ Crowdfund
Kilkennys Irish Pub
Tulsa, OK 74120

October 9, 2016, 2016
Lunch with Catherine in Dallas, TX

April 20, 2016
Wall St. for Main St. - Jason Burack
Topic: Why Privacy is Over & Taxes Set to Increase
Listen to InterviewHERE

April 19, 2016
Wake Up & Mid-Day Matters with Steve Curtis - 560 AM KLZ
Topic: Black Budget
Listen to InterviewHERE

‬‬‬

March 16, 2016 6:40pm - 8:00 pm CT
Campaign for Liberty - Memphis
Topic:Building Family Wealth in the Memphis Area
- Opportunities You Can Do Yourself
- Opportunities for Group Action

October 31 - November 1, 2015
Secret Space Program Conference 2015
The Space Based Economy: Catherine's Presentation at the Secret Space Program
Subscription only: The Space-Based Economy -Slide Presentation

October 25, 2015
Brunch with Catherine in Edinburgh, Scotland
The Edinburgh Larder Licensed Cafe

October 17, 2015
Lunch With Catherine
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Hampshire Hotel - The Manor Amsterdam

August 22, 2015
Lunch With Catherine
Austin, TX

July 14, 2015
Catherine Austin Fitts & Chris Waltzek
GoldSeek Radio
Topic: Infrastructure

June 02, 2015 6 PM - 9 PM
Planet Debt
Location: Sydney, Australia
Clickhere for more details!

May 23, 2015 4 PM - 6 PM
The Global Rebalancing
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Clickhere for more details!

April 25, 2015
Lunch with Catherine and Richard Dolan
21 Club
New York, NY

April 15, 2015
The Power Hour with Joyce Riley 9:15 AM CST
Topic: Catherine Austin Fitts gives us a briefing on what is currently on her radar along with money & market updates and common core.
Interview

December 10, 2014
The Power Hour with Joyce Riley 9:00-10:00 AM CST
Topic: Catherine Austin Fitts gives us a briefing on what is currently on her radar along with money & market updates
Interview

September 24, 2014
Subscriber Luncheon with Catherine - Albuquerque, NM

September 05, 2014
Dreamland
Topic:Black Budget

July 07, 2014
Live In Studio: Coast to Coast News

June 28-29, 2014
Secret Space Program & Breakaway Civilization
San Mateo, CA
More InformationHere

June 22, 2014
Lunch with Catherine
Marin County, CA

June 16, 2014
The Progressive Film Hour with Mitchell Rabin

June 04, 2014
Coast to Coast

May 04, 2014
Lunch with Catherine with Going Organic Magazine
Palm Springs, CA

April 08, 2014
Red Ice Radio & TV
Radio 3Fourteen

April 01, 2014
Talk Radio With Meria Heller

March 03, 2014
Living Wealthy Radio Show

February 05, 2014
Coast to Coast News
Topic:Open Letter to Mayor of Syracuse

October 29, 2013
"What's Next? - Primary Trends in the Global Financial Markets & the Impact on San Francisco Bay Area Real Estate"
2013 Annual Fall Conference: Real Estate and Appraisal Symposium
Marriott Marquis, San Francisco
Learn MoreHere.

October 23, 2013
Flashpoints
Topic: Detroit Bail-Ins
You can listen to a recording of the showhere.

October 10-12, 2013
GlobalBEM, Breakthrough Energy Movement
University of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado
Topic for October speech:
Funding Breakthrough Energy:
Crowdfunding & Trends in the Financial Markets

October 4, 5 & 6, 2013
Speaker
Casey Summit 2013
Casey Summit Agenda
Tucson, Arizona

August 20, 2013
The Byte Show
Listen to the interview(Right-click to save)

July 26, 2013
The Rense Show

July 24, 2013
Coast to Coast

July 19, 2013
Far Out Radio 7-8 P.M. ET
Far Out Radio Official Website

July 16, 2013
KPFA Radio Flashpoints
KPFA Radio Flashpoints Website

July 12, 2013
Coast to Coast

June 23, 2013
Catherine was interviewed by The Bruce Montalvo Show
The interview can be found here atThe Bruce Montalvo Show

June 8, 2013
Catherine attended
John Trudell and Bad Dog at The David Brower Center
Berkeley, California

June 1, 2013
Lunch With Catherine
At a private home in Nicasio, CA.

May 25, 2013
Catherine Live with George Noory
Vancouver, British Columbia

May 4, 2013
Special Seminar at RPI
"Your Money in Changing Times"
with Catherine Austin Fitts

April 24, 2013
2013 Illahee Lecture Series:Who Owns You?
Who Owns Your Money? What Can You Do About It?
First Congregational Church
1126 SW Park Ave, Portland, OR

April 11, 2013
Coast to Coast

February 25, 2013
Coast to Coast

February 25, 2013 8pm Pacific
The Rense Show

November 20, 2012 7:00pm PT
Rense Radio Network

October 12-14, 2012
Transformations
& Renewals Gathering
Westpoint, Tennessee
Video
and commentary on the Solari blog

October 1, 2012 10:00pm PT
Coast to Coast AM

Sept 10, 2012, Interview with Jeff Rense Show
Topic: Banksters Kill With Impunity!

Sept 5, 2012, Interview with Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog

Sept 5, 2012, Interview posted on Jim Sinclair's MineSet

Aug 29, 2012, 7-8 pm Pacific Time
Jeff Rense Radio | rense.com

Aug 29, 2012
Interview: Financial Survival Network

August 25, 2012, 9:00 am EST
Breakfast talk supporting Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur
Topic:Committed to Our Community
Island House, Port Clinton, Ohio

August 18, 2012
Subscribers' Luncheon with Catherine
East Troy, Wisconsin

August 17, 2012
Southern Oregon Public Television
and
Immense Possibilities
Thirty minutes with Catherine Austin Fitts
A much broader take on "investment"
Topic: Not your father's investment adviser

August 12, 2012, 1:00 pm EST
Airs live in Upper Manhattan on 90.3 FM
The Communicators
Topic: What Can I Do? A Lot!

July 7, 2012 5:50 am PT
Mandelman
Matters, with Catherine Austin Fitts: LBO AMERICA
Interview
Topic: Perspective on the housing and mortgage meltdown

July 5, 2012 10:00 pm PT
Coast to Coast News
Topic:California
Cities Consider Seizing Mortgages - Fox News

May 16, 2012 8:00 am CT
The Power Hour with Joyce Riley
Schedule
May 16, 2012 (hour 1) -News LIVE with talk show host Joyce Riley
May 16, 2012 (hour 2) - Guest Catherine Austin-Fitts
May 16, 2012 (hour 3) - Guest "Ken" shares what works for him!
May 9, 2012 10:00 pm PT
Coast to Coast News
Topic: Economic Update

March 10, 2012 4:00pm
Catherine Austin Fitts
THRIVE - What on Earth Will it Take?
At the Ojai Playhouse

March 3, 2012 12:00pm
The
2012 Long Beach Health Freedom Expo
Catherine Austin FittsLecture
Details
and Information
Speaker
Schedule

March 1, 2012 10:00 pm PT
Coast to Coast
News
Topic: The State of the Economy
Video
and commentary on the Solari blog

February 23 , 2012 19:30 am PT
The Thursday Report
KZYX - Mendocino County California
Host Doug McKenty
Topic: Who's Really Running Things?

February 11, 2012, 1:00pm-1:30pm
Catherine Austin Fitts
2012
California Resource Investment Conference
Successful Investing in Natural Resources: Key Issues for the
Retail Investor
Hyatt Grand Champions Resort, Indian Wells, CA

February 12, 2012
Friendly Favors
Catherine
Austin Fitts
The global financial system and the power of people to overcome
it.
Location: 1240 Powell St.
Emeryville, CA 94608
2012 Feb 12th - Sun at 2:00 PM
Duration: 4 hours, 2 to 6 pm

January 26-27, 2012
Catherine
Austin Fitts Comes to the Rogue Valley
Getting Beyond Fear to Real Prosperity

January 27, 2012 7:00pm-9:00 pm
2012: The Year
We've All Been Waiting For
Library-
Medford,Oregon
Registration Fee: $15.00
Free for Project Rogue Valley Members
Co-sponsored by Rogue Trade Exchange

January 27, 2012 11:00am-12:30pm
Complementary
Currencies
Large RoomMain
Library Medford,Oregon
Free Admission
Co-sponsored by Rogue Trade Exchange

January 26, 2012 7:00 pm
Dinner with Catherine Austin Fitts
Blue
Greek On Granite
5 Granite Street, Ashland, Oregon
Registration Fee: $65.00
Co-sponsored by Rogue Trade Exchange

January 26, 2012 10:30am -1:00 pm PST
Investment Strategies
for 2012
Topic: Investment Strategies for 2012
Elks
Lodge, Ashland, Oregon
Registration Fee: $45.00
Co-sponsored by Rogue Trade Exchange

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Special Report: The Iron Bank: Is BIS Sovereign Immunity the Secret Sauce Behind the Global Coup? Part I with Patrick Wood

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
DATE EVENT 2021/11/12 The Trojan Horse of Switzerland - Going for a "No" in Order to Save Democracy Information Friday 12 November - BERN / SWITZERLAND Press conference from 9:30 until 10:45 / 11:00 CET Rally from 13:30 to 16:30 CET Saturday 13 November - MILANO Press conference 11:00 until 12:00 / 12:30 CET Rally from 15:00 Location: Rosalia-Wenger-Square in Bern, Switzerland Milan Rally video Robert F.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/Technocracy-Hard-Road-World-Order/dp/0986373982

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In 1974, Trilateral Commission member and academic Richard Gardner wrote an article "The Hard Road to World Order" for Foreign Affairs magazine, predicting the future of the Commission's self-proclaimed New International Economic Order. Gardner spoke of an "end-run around national sovereignty", a...

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/nunisasyu/1-red-pill-starter-pack-tey4sw7a1g0ooz4f

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/nunisasyu/2-red-pill-intermediate-pack-aewt8es9srpcnid8

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/nunisasyu/3-red-pill-advanced-pack-hv9i3vu1x550el9m

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/One-Nation-Under-Blackmail-Intelligence/dp/1634243013/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
One Nation Under Blackmail - Vol. 1: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein, VOL.1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
One Nation Under Blackmail - Vol. 1: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein, VOL.1 [Webb, Whitney] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. One Nation Under Blackmail - Vol.

# data[].attributes.body
https://open.substack.com/pub/prometheusshrugged/p/allegory-of-the-plague

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Gaslight of the Gods, part VII: Allegory of the Plague

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Carlos-Moreno-The-15-minute-city

# data[].attributes.body
https://davidicke.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
This week on The Dot Connector with David Icke on Ickonic

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
https://youtu.be/6KWyFsuAQxM On Dot Connector this week... The massive train wreck in Ohio that has been set ALIGHT by authorities, making the chemicals far more lethal than previously, before telling residents it was safe to return. Some new mysteries have come to light about Saturn. Why is it people worship this planet like a God?

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/world-government-summit-suggests-crisis-events-are-useful-path-globalism

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
One of the premier conferences on global centralization behind Davos is the annual World Government Summit in Dubai; a place where establishment elites get to speak aloud on agendas which they used to keep highly secret only a decade ago. The 2023 conference is providing a flurry of revealing speeches, including a talk by Ian Bremmer, President and Founder of Eurasia Group. The organization is a "political risk consultancy" that views global governance as the solution to a majority of the world's problems.

The following clip of Bremmer's speech is yet another example of a globalist saying the quiet part out loud - They view crisis events as useful for furthering centralization, and Bremmer includes the covid pandemic in his list of valuable disasters. Why? He does not elaborate, but it is likely because disasters cause public fear, and fear is easy to exploit. While Bremmer seems to admonish increased "protectionism" and nationalism in recent years, it is clear that he views national tensions as a valuable tool for the eventual end game: Global government.

Ian Bremmer, President and Founder of Eurasia Group claims one of the obstacles to achieving globalization and a "new order" is "nationalism" at the World Government Summit 2023 in Dubai

He cites Trump's "America First" agenda as an obstacle

He also claims the "pandemic"
made... https://t.co/2KjaUlAT7Q pic.twitter.com/OgPRL5ON56
- Drew Hernandez (@DrewHLive) February 15, 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
World Government Summit Suggests Crisis Events Are A Useful Path To Globalism

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
One of the premier conferences on global centralization behind Davos is the annual World Government Summit in Dubai; a place where establishment elites get to speak aloud on agendas which they used to keep highly secret only a decade ago.

# data[].attributes.body
https://twitter.com/BernieSpofforth/status/1627581016045981696

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
WEF - Deleted this video, you didn’t react as they wanted.

This is the plan for your future. Crammed mega cities. No nature, no open spaces, no wilderness, just manmade fake order & control.

The open land owned by elites, who will feed you.

Say No 🔥

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
WEF - Deleted this video, you didn’t react as they wanted.

This is the plan for your future. Crammed mega cities. No nature, no open spaces, no wilderness, just manmade fake order & control.

The open land owned by elites, who will feed you.

Say No 🔥

 https://t.co/6rpLR02EMi

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
WEF - Deleted this video, you didn’t react as they wanted.

This is the plan for your future. Crammed mega cities. No nature, no open spaces, no wilderness, just manmade fake order & control.

The open land owned by elites, who will feed you.

Say No 🔥

pic.twitter.com/6rpLR02EMi
— Bernie's Tweets (@BernieSpofforth) February 20, 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
WEF - Deleted this video, you didn’t react as they wanted.

This is the plan for your future. Crammed mega cities. No nature, no open spaces, no wilderness, just manmade fake order & control.

The open land owned by elites, who will feed you.

Say No 🔥

 https://t.co/6rpLR02EMi

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
WEF - Deleted this video, you didn’t react as they wanted.

This is the plan for your future. Crammed mega cities. No nature, no open spaces, no wilderness, just manmade fake order & control.

The open land owned by elites, who will feed you.

Say No 🔥

 https://t.co/6rpLR02EMi

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
WEF - Deleted this video, you didn’t react as they wanted.

This is the plan for your future. Crammed mega cities. No nature, no open spaces, no wilderness, just manmade fake order & control.

The open land owned by elites, who will feed you.

Say No 🔥

# data[].attributes.body
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-final-report-of-the-international

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf
Article 1- Definitions In relation to the two proposed amendments to remove the word "non-binding" from the definitions of "temporary" and "standing recommendations", the Committee notes that on a plain reading the proposed change would not affect the current understanding of the definition of standing or temporary recommendations as merely advice that is not mandatory. However, given that substantial proposals were made in relation to WHO recommendations in other related articles, the proposed amendments to these definitions could be understood as aiming to change the nature of these recommendations from non-binding to binding, and giving a binding effect to WHO recommendations and requests as proposed in other articles. Th at change would require a fundamental reconsideration of the nature of recommendations and the process for their adoption and implementation. The Committee further notes that during a public health emergency of international concern the recommendations may work better if they are not mandatory and advises against changing the nature of recommendations.
-Page 26

Article 42 - Implementation of health measures The proposed amendments expand the scope of Article 42 in three ways: by making specific reference to recommendations made under Articles 15 and 16 (temporary and standing recommendations); The proposed amendment to include a reference to temporary and standing recommendations seems to make application of these recommendations obligatory.
-Page 67

Article 2 - Purpose and scope The Committee considers that the proposed amendment to replace "public health risk" with "all risks with a potential to impact public health" may not increase the clarity of this Article. Public health risks are already defined in Article 1.
-Page 27

Article 3 - Principles The Committee strongly recommends the retention of the existing text "full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons" as an overarching principle in the first paragraph, and notes that the concepts of human rights, dignity and fundamental freedoms are clearly defined within the framework of treaties to which many of the States Parties to the Regulations have adhered. The inclusion of human rights in Article 3 of the current International Health Regulations (2005) was a major improvement on the previous 1969 Regulations.1 The reference to "respect for dignity, human rights and freedoms of persons" works not only as an overarching principle in Article 3, but also as a concrete reference point in the operationalization of all articles concerning public health response, response measures, additional health measures and recommendations.
-Page 28

NEW Article 13A - Access to health products, technologies and know-how for public health response This proposed new Article addresses a range of considerations pertaining to the availability and affordability of health products, technologies and know-how. It goes further than the other proposed new Article 13A WHO-led international public health response in that it imposes obligations on States Parties as well as on WHO and it introduces a more robust final paragraph concerning the role and regulation of non-State actors. WHO recommendations, as currently stated under Articles 15 and 16, were not envisioned for the purposes of establishing a medicines allocation mechanism or otherwise directing States Parties on increasing access to health products.
-Page 52

NEW Article 13A - Access to health products, technologies and know-how for public health response However, the requirement in paragraph 1 for the Director-General to make an "immediate assessment of availability and affordability of required health products" may not be feasible due to the magnitude of such a list implied by the proposed amendment and the very high workload imposed on WHO during the initial stages of determining a PHEIC . The Committee has concerns regarding the proposal in paragraph 1 to use Article 15 (temporary recommendations) for the purposes of establishing an "allocation mechanism." Temporary recommendations, as defined under Article 1, are "non-binding advice and do not authorize WHO to direct States. A different mode of authority may be required to establish an allocation mechanism. It is unclear to the Committee what it means to comply with non-binding recommendations as per Articles 15 or 16.
-Page 53

NEW Article 13A - WHO-led international public health response The Article goes further, however, in attributing to WHO several obligations that it does not currently have under the International Health Regulations (2005), including: to conduct an assessment of availability and affordability of "health products"; to develop an allocation and prioritization plan in the event that such an assessment reveals shortages in supply; and to direct States Parties to increase and diversify production and distributive functions for health products within individual States. The Article further mandates WHO to establish a database "containing details of the ingredients, design, know-how, and manufacturing process or any other information required to facilitate manufacturing of health products" required to respond to potential PHEICs, and to maintain the database for all past PHEICs, as well as diseases identified in the International Health Regulations (1969). This proposal also renders mandatory the temporary and standing recommendations addressed under Articles 15 and 16. The State Party making this proposal has also provided corresponding proposals to change the definitions of temporary and standing recommendations under Article 1 to render them coherent with new proposals in paragraph 1 of this proposal for a new Article 13A. More fundamentally, it remains unclear how WHO could discharge the unprecedented set of new responsibilities attributed to it relating to health products and know-how under this proposed amendment, as these may arguably exceed its constitutional mandate. In order to be legally feasible, this amendment will require coherence with States Parties' relevant national laws and other international obligations.
-Pages 54-55

NEW Article 13A - WHO-led international public health response Finally, it is unclear whether reference to "WHO's recommendations" in this paragraph refers to WHO's authority to issue non-binding recommendations under Articles 15 and 16, or whether other forms of recommendations are envisioned. If indeed recommendations under Articles 15 and 16 are the targets of this addition in paragraph 1, the addition would be incoherent with the existing Regulations, as it would render these recommendations mandatory, whereas they were intended to be non-binding. Irrespective of legal coherence, changing temporary and standing recommendations into binding obligations may raise questions of feasibility. At this moment it is still unclear how to assess "compliance" with temporary recommendations issued during PHEICs, since they are defined as non- binding advice.
-Page 56

The IHRRC did not specifically address the types of "recommendations" that are listed in Article 18 (see below), they did raise concerns regarding articles 1, 13A and 42 that directly relate to the concept of changing non-binding "recommendations" to obligations.

Article 18 Recommendations with respect to persons, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods and postal parcels 1. Recommendations issued by WHO to States Parties with respect to persons may include the following advice: - no specific health measures are advised;
- review travel history in affected areas;
- review proof of medical examination and any laboratory analysis;
- require medical examinations;
- review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis;
- require vaccination or other prophylaxis;
- place suspect persons under public health observation;
- implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons;
- implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons;
- implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons;
- refuse entry of suspect and affected persons;
- refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas; and
- implement exit screening and/or restrictions on persons from affected areas.

Article 18 - Recommendations with respect to persons, baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods and postal parcels
-Page 60

Article 23 - Health measures on arrival and departure Lastly, the Committee recommends examining these proposed amendments in conjunction with Articles 31, 32, 35 and 36 and Annexes 6 and 7, as well as with the related proposed amendments thereto. Should any of these amendments be retained, definitions should be provided in Article 1 for the terms "information", "digital" and "report".
-Page 62

Article 27 - Affected Conveyances The Committee considers the proposed amendment to be redundant.
-Page 63

Article 35 - General rule This Article states that, as a general rule, no health documents, other than those provided for under the Regulations or in recommendations issued by WHO, shall be required in international traffic.
-Page 65

Introducing an obligation for States Parties to recognize the health documents of other States Parties may pose many practical difficulties, especially considering that domestic legislation concerning privacy and personal information protection differs from one State Party to the next. Another concern, depending on how the amendments are implemented, is the appropriate level of protection of personal data under the applicable regional and international instruments. As a general observation, the Committee recommends that the multiple proposals for amendments related to the digitalization of health information should be addressed in one single article and be harmonized with the provisions of Annexes 6 and 7.
-Page 66

Article 36 - Certificates of vaccination or other prophylaxis It is unclear how the specifications and requirements for such "other types of proofs and certificates" would be formulated and by whom, since the proposal only mentions a possibility for the Health Assembly to design and approve such certificates. It is also unclear whether "substitutes for" and "complementary to" are to be used interchangeably. This matters because the meaning is different. The proposal that such certificates may include test certificates and recovery certificates should be read in conjunction with the proposed amendments to Article 23, paragraph 1(a), introducing laboratory tests and/or information on vaccination as part of the information that may be required of travellers.
-Page 67

The comments made under Article 35 apply in general to Annex 6, for example, with regard to the feasibility of digital certificates in many countries, as well as not precluding future technological developments. Similar considerations apply to the feasibility of having the Health Assembly decide on the related technical requirements, since situations may change periodically at short notice.
-Page 87

It is unclear to the Committee how this additional question on the maritime declaration will facilitate application of the Regulations. The issue of the digital format of vaccination cards is being addressed in other proposed amendments to Articles 31, 35 and 36 (see related comments).
-Page 88

Article 43 - Additional health measures
-Page 68

New Article 44A - Financial mechanism for equity in health emergency preparedness and response The Committee notes a divergence of views as to whether WHO has a financing function.
-Page 71

The IHRRC did not specifically address the proposed amendment regarding increased censorship powers for the WHO in Annex 1, but they did state the following:

A balance is needed between ensuring more accurate scientific information on one hand and freedom of speech and the press on the other. How to strike that balance while navigating global policy and national regulatory landscapes will be an ongoing challenge.

NEW Annex 10 The obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this proposed new Annex appear to be absolute and unconditional. If requested to provide assistance, it is unclear what steps WHO or States Parties should take. However, the proposed new Annex 10 goes well beyond that supporting function, containing provisions that exceed the scope of both the current Article 44 and the amendments proposed thereto.
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/e/e_wgihr-2.html https://www.who.int/teams/ihr/ihr-review-committees/review-committee-regarding-amendments-to-the-international-health-regulations-%282005%29 https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_1-en.pdf https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_2-en.pdf https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_3-en.pdf https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_4-en.pdf https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_6-en.pdf https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_7-en.pdf https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/ihr/review-committee/sixth-rc-meeting-report--9-13-jan-2023_rev_rev.pdf?sfvrsn=a529b723_1&download=true by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.

If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.com JamesRoguski.substack.com/about JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055

All content is free to all readers.

All support is deeply appreciated.
CLICK HERE TO DONATE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Final Report of the International Health Regulations Review Committee

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf Article 1- Definitions In relation to the two proposed amendments to remove the word "non-binding" from the definitions of "temporary" and "standing recommendations", the Committee notes that on a plain reading the proposed change would not affect the current understanding of the definition of standing or temporary recommendations as merely advice that is not mandatory.

# data[].attributes.body
https://stopworldcontrol.com/crimes/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
An overview of cruel crimes against humanity, committed by the globalist financial elites, who run the WEF, WHO, UN, IMF, BIS, and other organizations.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1RiKoMyboYVp/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
RECOMMENDED WATCH BY MIKE YEADON. PAUL SCHREYER - PANDEMIC SIMULATION

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
PAUL SCHREYER - PANDEMIC SIMULATION RECOMMENDED WATCH BY MIKE YEADON.

# data[].attributes.body
https://palexander.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-mandates-and-how-we

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
COVID vaccine mandates & how we got here: Key Laws You Need to Know on the Groundwork for Vaccine Mandates; excellent scholarship by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, I recommend you read this piece

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This treatise covers Bird flu in 2005 and Project BioShield under George W. Bush; See Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s substack below, worth the read and support; see also prescient work by Kathrine Watt

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/Bodies-Others-Authoritarians-COVID-19-Against/dp/1737478560/ref=pd_bxgy_vft_none_img_sccl_1/143-7100440-6798108

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and The War Against the Human

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Amazon.com: The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and The War Against the Human: 9781737478560: Wolf, Naomi: Books

# data[].attributes.body
https://theodoreatkinson.substack.com/p/15-minute-cities-and-what-you-should

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A 15-minute city is described as a city re-organized into distinct commutable districts. A district is a geographical region where all necessary amenities are available within 15 minutes of walking, biking or public transit to minimize travel.

Is that it?

No.

'The climate crisis and global COVID-19 pandemic combined to accelerate consideration and implementation of the 15-minute city. In July 2020, the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group published a framework for cities to " build back better" using the 15-minute concept.'

The purpose of a 15-minute city is related to the ability to provide immediate response to one or more crises. This implies the city is equipped with policy and tools that can monitor and control specific aspects of infrastructure and civil activity.

Where did this idea come from?

15-minute cities - as well as other initiatives - are an implementation satisfying a high-level framework proposed by the United Nations (UN).
This framework is called Agenda 2030.
Agenda 2030 is a plan of action containing 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and 169 targets. It is a declaration by UN members to radically transform economic, social and environmental policy under a unified idealized vision.

The goals are broad and long-term, which address supposed existential threats to UN members, e.g., climate change, pandemics, gender equity, social injustice etc.
It is a vision that prescribes actions to maximize happiness and well-being.
This is a form of Top Down Management, where decisions are centrally commanded from a small leadership team. There is no opportunity to question, discuss or provide feedback from decisions or visions delegated from the top.

Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy that prescribes actions to maximize happiness and well-being for all affected individuals. The primary goal of this philosophy is to maximize utility, which creates a supplementary objective to quantify, compare and measure happiness or well-being.

Utility is described as:

"That property in any object, whereby it tends to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness ... [or] to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness to the party whose interest is considered."
See Chapter 3: Social, Economic, and Ethical Concepts and Methods from Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for model specifics.
[Referred hereon as IPCCWG3].
The 15-minute city solution primarily falls under the scope of:

15-minute cities can also satisfy secondary goals through policy.

For example:

IPCCWG3 provides a high level Summary for Policymakers and a Technical Summary containing aggregate data and models - subsequent chapters provide further detail. In relation to Goals 9/11, section SPM.4.2.5 provides policy rationale based on climate crisis risks, which a 15-minute city would satisfy.

SPM.4.2.5 - Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning:

1. Urbanization is a global trend and is associated with increases in income, and higher urban incomes are correlated with higher consumption of energy and GHG emissions.

2. The next two decades present a window of opportunity for mitigation in urban areas, as a large portion of the world's urban areas will be developed during this period.

3. Mitigation options in urban areas vary by urbanization trajectories and are expected to be most effective when policy instruments are bundled.

4. The largest mitigation opportunities with respect to human settlements are in rapidly urbanizing areas where urban form and infrastructure are not locked in, but where there are often limited governance, technical, financial, and institutional capacities.

5. Thousands of cities are undertaking climate action plans, but their aggregate impact on urban emissions is uncertain.

6. Successful implementation of urban-scale climate change mitigation strategies can provide co-benefits.

There are various initiatives being evaluated to satisfy these concerns.

For example, a new building in a 2030 District shall:

1. Reduce energy use by 70% below national average.

2. Reduce water use by 50% below current district average.

3. Reduce CO2 emission by 50% below current district average.

Existing buildings and infrastructure have similar targets.

"A smart city is a technologically modern urban area that uses different types of electronic methods and sensors to collect specific data. This includes data collected from citizens, devices, buildings and assets that is processed and analyzed to monitor and manage traffic and transportation systems, power plants, utilities, water supply networks, waste, criminal investigations, information systems, schools, libraries, hospitals, and other community services."

1. Energy production and distribution.

2. Transportation and traffic.

3. Buildings, utilities and amenities.

4. Environmental impact.

5. Productive human activity.

The 15-minute city was proposed by Carlos Moreno at the COP21 conference in 2015.

It has four principles:

Sounds great! What's wrong with it?

The UN claims that irreversible climate change will induce food and resource shortages for an exponentially growing population.

This justifies the need for:

Preventative population control.
Reduce fertility rates, e.g., celibacy, chastity, contraception, infanticide, abortion.

Neo-Malthusianism is closer to the UN's stated objectives, which advocates for human population planing to ensure resource and environmental integrity.

In IPCCWG3 Chapter 3 under Values and wellbeing, 3.4.7 Valuing population provides the rationale for scoring the utility of human populations.

"Average utilitarianism gives no value to increasing numbers of people. The implicit or explicit goal of a great deal of policy-making is to promote per capita wellbeing (Hardin, 1968). This is to adopt average utilitarianism. This goal tends to favour anti-natalist policies, aimed at limiting population. It would strongly favour population control as a means of mitigating climate change, and it would not take a collapse of population to be, in itself, a bad thing."

"First, we've got population," he said during the talk organized by TED, a non-profit organization devoted to spreading ideas. "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3."

During the talk, he also stated that reducing the economic standard of living, by targeting consumption and demand, is another method of achieving emission targets. This is in line with IPCCWG3 SPM.4.2.5 item 1.
i.e., Shift advanced populations to lower standards of living.

After reviewing Utilitarian and Malthusian "ethical" scoring of human life,
Do you want to live in a 15-minute city designed under UN Agenda 2030?

If however you are nihilistic, then 15-minute cities and other initiatives are simply a means to your end, "for the greater good."

How is this Agenda being sold if the goal is to "limit" and control the population?

Why should we trust these people?

Who are they and what gives them the authority to dictate Truth?
Make no mistake.
Totalitarianism is here, arriving in a glittery rainbow package claiming to save humanity from itself by monitoring, controlling and enslaving it.

It has infected our government at every level.

"Though Canada has a relatively small population, it also has a large land mass with most of it located in the northern half of the northern hemisphere. These factors contribute to relatively higher energy and transportation costs.
Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges humanity faces today. The science is conclusive. It tells us that swift action is needed to reduce greenhouse gases, improve climate resilience and protect our natural environment. "

" Local governments can advance progress on sustainable communities (SDG 11) through integrated planning, housing, sustainable transport, inclusive urbanization, waste management and inclusive and green public spaces. Local governments across Canada are not only implementers of the 2030 Agenda, they are also policy makers who deliver direct programs and services to Canadians."

Just remember. You do not have a choice.
It is happening whether people like it or not.

And he insisted the controversial plan would go ahead whether people liked it or not. People can drive freely around their own neighbourhood and can apply for a permit to drive through the filters, and into other neighbourhoods, for up to 100 days per year. This equates to an average of two days per week. A maximum of three permits a household will be allowed where there are several adults with cars registered to the address.'

Take into consideration this agenda with Canada's parallel plans to monitor and control human behaviour through embedded digital social credit systems.

So what is a 15-minute city?

It is a sales pitch predicated on fear. It omits the context of Agenda 2030 Utilitarian and Malthusian "ethical" scoring of human life and ecosystem management.

It declares that your freedoms and human value should be handed over to an unelected few and scored through their inhumane scheme.

Will you comply? Will you sulk in apathy?
Welcome to digital urban gulags - managed by your new supreme overlords.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
15-minute cities and what you should know, now!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What is a 15-minute city? A 15-minute city is described as a city re-organized into distinct commutable districts. A district is a geographical region where all necessary amenities are available within 15 minutes of walking, biking or public transit to minimize travel.

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/vn7lf5-monopoly-who-owns-the-world-must-see.html

# data[].attributes.body
https://archive.org/details/trust-who

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Trust WHO : Lilian Franck, Thomas Schlottmann : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/v288dv6-archbishop-vigano-calls-christians-to-defend-tradition.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Archbishop Viganò Calls Christians to Defend Tradition

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Let's take a look back to when Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò called out for the creation of an Anti-Globalist Alliance! Declaring it "under the Cross of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the only King and Savior

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/01/10/declaration-of-north-america-dna/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Today, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, President Joseph R. Biden, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met in Mexico City for the 10th North American Leaders' Summit (NALS). The leaders are determined to fortify our region's security, prosperity, sustainability and inclusiveness through commitments across six pillars: 1) diversity, equity, and inclusion; 2) climate change and the environment; 3) competitiveness; 4) migration and development; 5) health; and 6) regional security.

North America shares a unique history and culture that emphasizes innovation, equitable development, and mutually beneficial trade to create inclusive economic opportunities for the benefit of our people. We are not just neighbors and partners. Our people share bonds of family and friendship and value - above all else - freedom, justice, human rights, equality, and democracy. This is the North American DNA.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Diversity, equity, and inclusion is foundational to the strength, vibrancy, and resilience of our countries. We focus on providing marginalized communities opportunities for their full, equal, and meaningful participation in our democracies and economies. To advance these objectives, President López Obrador, President Biden, and Prime Minister Trudeau reiterated their joint commitment to protect civil rights, promote racial justice, expand protections for LGBTQI+ individuals and deliver more equitable outcomes to all.

In partnership with Indigenous Peoples, we will promote innovative and sustainable solutions that honor traditional knowledge, foster Indigenous-led growth and drive job creation. We will continue our cooperation to build societies where Indigenous women and girls can live, learn, and lead without fear through the Trilateral Working Group on Violence Against Indigenous Women and Girls. Indigenous women from all three countries will convene in the coming weeks to facilitate discussions about priorities and best practices including in areas of political, economic, and social development. The three countries also reaffirm our commitment to gender equality and empowerment of women and girls, in all their diversity by aiming to improve financial and political support for women's and girl's rights.
Climate Change and Environment
Mexico, the United States, and Canada recognize the critical nature of taking rapid and coordinated measures to tackle the climate crisis and respond to its consequences. This includes achieving our respective 2030 nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement, and working together and with other countries to keep a 1.5-degree C temperature limit within reach. To promote buy-in for ambitious cuts to emissions, we will come together to align approaches on estimating the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions.

We will continue to implement and build on commitments from the 2021 North American Leaders' Summit on climate mitigation, adaptation, and resilience, while renewing our focus on reducing methane emissions from all sources, with a new focus on waste methane. We will explore standards to develop hydrogen as a regional source of clean energy. We will move swiftly to accelerate the energy transition by deploying clean energy solutions, increasing the production and adoption of zero-emission vehicles in North America and transitioning to cleaner fuels. In partnership with Indigenous Peoples, we reiterate our pledge to protect biodiversity, to work toward ending deforestation, and doing our part to conserve 30 percent of the world's land and waters by 2030.
Competitiveness
We seek to deepen our regional capacity to attract high quality investment, spur innovation, and strengthen the resilience of our economies, recognizing the benefits brought by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. To boost regional competitiveness, the three countries will seek to forge stronger regional supply chains, as well as promote targeted investment, in key industries of the future such as semiconductors and electric vehicle batteries, which will be critical to advance electric vehicle development and infrastructure. We will convene public-private dialogues and map out supply chains to address common challenges and opportunities.

Critical minerals are an essential component to accelerating North America's clean energy transition. Each country will review and map out existing and potential reserves of critical mineral resources in the region, while taking care of the environment, respecting local communities, and adhering to high ethical standards.

To support innovation, job creation, and workforce development, the three governments commit to working with the private sector, civil society, labor and academia across North America to foster high-tech entrepreneurship, promote small and medium-sized enterprises, and strengthen technical education. We will also consider trilateral approaches to promote sustainable, inclusive jobs and develop the workforce to meet our climate commitments.
Migration and Development
Today marks the six-month anniversary of the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection, a bold new framework for regional responsibility-sharing that 21 leaders endorsed on the margins of the Ninth Summit of the Americas. The three countries of North America each made ambitious commitments under the Los Angeles Declaration, including working together to advance labor mobility in North America, particularly regarding regular pathways, and have been delivering on these commitments.

Since June, Mexico, the United States and Canada have collectively welcomed record numbers of migrants and refugees from the Western Hemisphere under new and expanded labor and humanitarian programs. Today, we affirm our joint commitment to safe, orderly, and humane migration under the Los Angeles Declaration and other relevant multilateral frameworks. This includes assisting host communities and promoting migrant and refugee integration; providing protection to refugees, asylum seekers, and vulnerable migrants; strengthening asylum capacity in the region; expanding and promoting regular pathways for migration and protection; addressing the root causes and impacts of irregular migration and forced displacement; and collaborating to counter xenophobia and discrimination against migrants and refugees.

Now more than ever, we need to identify and address the root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement. Mexico, the United States, and Canada commit to supporting countries across the Western Hemisphere to create the conditions to improve quality of life, especially in marginalized communities that are vulnerable to both forced internal and regional migration and displacement. To that end, we will continue to work together and with our respective private sectors to promote responsible business practices, implement obligations under the USMCA and international labor conventions, and cooperate to eradicate the use of forced and child labor in our supply chains.
Health
Trilateral health cooperation will focus on launching an updated North American Plan for Animal and Pandemic Influenza (NAPAPI) to improve prevention, preparedness, agility, and to provide rapid response to health emergencies in North America. The North American Health Security Working Group will develop and launch a new, revised NAPAPI as a flexible, scalable, and cross-sectoral platform to strengthen regional prevention, preparedness and response to a broader range of health security threats that include influenza and beyond. As we emerge from the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, we also recognize that resilient health systems, including a strong health workforce, are the foundation upon which effective pandemic preparedness and response will be built. We will continue efforts to build stronger and more resilient health systems that meet the broad range of health needs in our countries.
Regional Security
Mexico, the United States, and Canada will focus on strategies to bolster our shared continental security against domestic, regional, and global threats, including cyber threats. Security cooperation will continue to abide by our common understanding that respect for human rights and the rule of law contribute to a more secure North America. Our security cooperation includes actions to disrupt criminal actors and associated crimes across our shared borders, including money laundering, child sexual exploitation, firearms and human trafficking. We also are taking a consistent approach to the collection, use, processing, retention, and protection of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data to strengthen our shared security perimeter and the safety of our citizens, including advocating for the global adoption of standards and recommended practices of the International Civil Aviation Organization on PNR data.

We will continue our North American Drug Dialogue and further advance our cooperative international efforts to address the growing global synthetic drug threat as the United States takes the chair in 2023. We will enhance trilateral work to address the use of precursor chemicals in the production of illegal substances in North America and to disrupt drug trafficking, as well as strengthen public health approaches to prevention, harm reduction, treatment, and recovery.

As both natural and human-induced hazards and disasters increase risks to vulnerable populations, we will continue to work together to share training and best practices to keep our people safe and address emergencies including natural and other disasters. Recognizing the differentiated impact disasters have on women and girls, we aim to integrate a gender perspective in these efforts.
Looking forward
The commitments made during this summit are rooted in a shared vision for a more equitable, just, inclusive, resilient, secure, and prosperous North America and a shared responsibility to achieve more equitable outcomes responsive to the needs and aspirations of our citizens. As we work to implement these commitments in the upcoming year, we seek to model a democratic and sustainable path based on trust to promote inclusive prosperity and security. Mexico, the United States, and Canada look forward to building on this progress at the eleventh NALS (NALS XI), to be hosted by Canada.

###

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Declaration of North America (DNA) | The White House

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Today, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, President Joseph R. Biden, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met in Mexico City for the 10th North American Leaders' Summit (NALS). The leaders are determined to fortify our region's security, prosperity, sustainability and inclusiveness through commitments across six pillars: 1) diversity, equity, and inclusion; 2) climate change and the environment; 3) competitiveness; 4) migration and development; 5) health; and 6) regional security.

# data[].attributes.body
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/spraygate-the-ecohealth-defuse-proposal

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
SECRET HISTORY: Military Spraying the Flu, RULE 23 and BIO WARFARE on Citizens

Exposing The Darkness is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi: A Must-Watch 17 min. video: Aligning the CDC "50 yrs of Vaccine Progress" timeline with known military spraying experiments and disease outbreaks...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SprayGate: the Ecohealth DEFUSE Proposal and Use of the Aerosol Sprayers To Distribute 'Vaccines'

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
SECRET HISTORY: Military Spraying the Flu, RULE 23 and BIO WARFARE on Citizens Exposing The Darkness is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi: A Must-Watch 17 min.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Catastrophic Contagion | A Pandemic Tabletop Exercise

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.

The extraordinary group of participants consisted of 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany, as well as Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The exercise simulated a series of WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic set in the near future. Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people.

Participants were challenged to make urgent policy decisions with limited information in the face of uncertainty. Each problem and choice had serious health, economic, and social ramifications.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
johns hopkins center for health security

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
series of who emergency health advisory board meetings

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Catastrophic Contagion, a high-level pandemic exercise in 2022

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.