# data[].attributes.body
A limitation may be that there was not a lot of options for example we didn't add the other option. As well as people may have different views of what revising actually is.

Grace,Grace,Olivia

# data[].attributes.body
Practical-Didn't take long, didn't cost anything, Easy to acess

Ethical- Didn't ask names/ personal info, had the option to complete

Theoretical- Quantitative data

Grace,Grace,Olivia

# data[].attributes.headline
weakness's - george, bella, ella......will

# data[].attributes.subject
weakness's - george, bella, ella......will

# data[].attributes.body
validity concern (people may have given ideal answers)

for example lying about the amount of hours they revise a week. this affects validity

could have joke answers submitted which aren't appropriate

# data[].attributes.body
The highest proportion of people that revised were between 3-4 hours a week, most people who took our survey studied Psychology. From our survey the most common method of revision was mind maps. Lastly most students who took our survey are currently achieving a B grade at Alevel and spent roughly 11-15 hours in Shrewsbury college-

Strength:

1. We had a range of questions from multiple choice.

2. Clear format which made it easy for people to respond.

3. Not everyone who answered did Alevels

4. Was anonymous so people may not feel the need to act or change their persona

Limitations

1. Grades did not include courses outside Alevel

2. Small sample size

3. Results may not be representative enough of first and second years

4. Was not enough data to make correlation and justify findings

Sophia, Ruby, Mia

# data[].attributes.body
The data received was limited as some options were not relevant to the target population. We cannot ensure that the results were valid, since we cannot rely on the honesty of the sample. Some questions may have been worded in a way some participants cannot understand. Demand characteristics are a possibility, as participants may want to give the answers that they think we are looking for

-Cara, Leah, Anna and Max

# data[].attributes.body
the answers were preset so some people may not fit into any of the groups and people may not be telling the truth and giving socially acceptable answers (invalid)

# data[].attributes.body
gender - variety of genders asked, more girls responded

hours on outside activities - 5-10hrs

hours revising a week - 6-8

most time spent revising - mathematical subjects, scientific subjects (psychology, maths , biology)

materials most used - flashcards, mindmaps

least efficient way of revising - re-reading notes

# data[].attributes.body
60% do either mind maps or flashcards however only 10% do practice questions. Most people prefer to revise on there own. 60% of people studied at home however only 30% studied at college. As well as most people prefer using online resources compared to books and text book.

Grace,Grace,Olivia

# data[].attributes.body
The method was very practical as it displayed all results in a simple, easy to understand manner for the target population.

It didn't break any ethical boundaries as the confidentiality of all participants was respected, and they all consented to being a part of the survey.

Quantitative data was received and was able to be generalised to the rest of the students at the college. Subjective.

-Cara, Leah, Anna and Max

# data[].attributes.body
it was easy to get lots of answers that are measurable, and it was easy to make and there were no access problems, it was anonymous to protect privacy, it also was consistent and therefore reliable and was objective

# data[].attributes.body
Practical- .easy accessibility as it's online, targets population

.no finance needed

Ethical- .confidentiality and consent of respondents

.there is consideration of personal issues in research

Theoretical- .research is consistent

.quantative data wanted, but includes objectivity and subjectivity

george, ella, bella and will

# data[].attributes.body
We found that most students used exam papers, mind-maps and a variation of revision apps to revise.

On average, students revised for more than 4 hours a week, dependent on the A-level they took.

Most students consider the homework they are set as revision.

-Cara, Leah, Anna and Max

# data[].attributes.body
the majority of people revise for 2-5 hours at home and get Bs on average, most of them also do essay based subjects

# data[].attributes.headline
What limitations did you find with this method when studying this topic 

# data[].attributes.subject
What limitations did you find with this method when studying this topic 

# data[].attributes.headline
Why was this method useful when studying this topic  .THINK PET....

# data[].attributes.subject
Why was this method useful when studying this topic  .THINK PET....

# data[].attributes.headline
What did we find out about revision and students ?

# data[].attributes.subject
What did we find out about revision and students ?