# data[].attributes.body
Recently, I read the article “How does cultural appropriation work – and how can you spot it?” and honestly i can understand why it makes people so angry about it, but I don't think that the problem is Justin Biber wearing a dreadlock. Let's think about it. The person who did the dreadlocks on Justin needs money to survive or do you really think her rentage sees color? At the end of the day this person is only trying to pay it´s bills. At the same time, I can totally understand why people are mad, because you're taking someone else's culture. But I don't really think cultural appropriation it´s related to individual people, I think it's related to companies. So let's think, culture is what we ,ive in our daily life and how we do it, and appropriation it's taking this and making it yours. And this is what capitalism does every day. They get something you don't need and make you want that. So capitalism takes people's culture and sells it. Or do you really think the money from the Tapioca you eat goes to the indigenous people? Do you really think that the money from Zara's clothes goes to the dressmakers? So to me, cultural appropriation only can be debated at a company level, not at an individual level.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't have a concrete opinion because I don't understand anything about this subject, but from what I read I understood that art does have limits and must be respected, like cultural appropriation, it's as if a cat was dressing up as a dog, we must see whether this is cool or not in the eyes of the dog, I hope you understand, “It is Very safe to say that imagination has no limite.” It's easy to tell if it's not yours.

# data[].attributes.body
I’m writing this because although I agree with you, I also think that some factores should be considered, for example your argument saying that cultural appropriation can limit criativity, can actually be interpreted in another way as well. The biggest determinant for identifying whether it is a cultural appropriation or a reference depends on how the work is constructed. The topic addressed in your article is quite important and valid, perhaps what really determines cultural appropriation or not will simply be the opportunistic or respectful use of the cultural object discussed.

te biggest dereumnait fro identifying whetjer it is a cultural appropriantion or a reference depends on how the work is cotructed.

# data[].attributes.body
In the delicate balance between artistic freedom and cultural respect, artists face a significant challenge. While having the freedom to create is important, understanding cultural boundaries is also crucial. For example, when we see a white actor playing a character from manga, it makes us think about sensitivity and respect. Artists can address this by engaging in genuine conversations with the communities they represent, understanding their stories and experiences. Thus, by creating works that celebrate diversity and advocate for social justice, artists help build a world where art is authentic and inclusive for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at my english class, i just found this article that was made by Esther Davis and i could form my opinion about it, and i think, although we have freedom of our imagination and creations, we need to understand that there are limits linked to cultures. Like, if an white actor plays a character of another ethnicity, we could see what it could mean to that ethnicity, because for some people, it could be something disrespectful, but for another group of people, it could be a normal thing, nothing to worry about it, and it makes us to think about respect, we have to see people opinion about it before putting it to work, or this could cause a problem for the people working on it. These inclusion problems are making art something hard to work, but if we all started doing things to enlarge inclusion, we could not only live in a peaceful world, but also an inclusive world.

# data[].attributes.body
My opinion about the article is the same as the author's: we should learn to differentiate cultural appropriation from cultural appreciation, as this subject should be handled with care, given that many people do not know how to distinguish them, leading to misunderstandings among individuals. For instance, a white actor portraying a character from a manga leans more towards appropriation than appreciation. On the other hand, cultural appreciation involves studying and wanting to learn about the culture. In conclusion, this topic is delicate; the solution lies in distinguishing between appropriation and appreciation.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, this text describes very well the feelings of many people towards art and music! Many people identify with what the main person describes. music is one of the best forms of connection between people in the artistic world! I really liked the themes covered in the text

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the articles are valid is important because dance and music are two forms of artistic expression that complement each other in a wonderful way creating a harmonious environment. Dance, with its ability to convey narratives, emotions and ideas through the movement of the body, Music, in turn, is the soundtrack that gives life to the dance, providing the rhythm, the melody.

# data[].attributes.body
This article of yours is very interesting, as it talks about artistic political correctness, which is a complex and controversial topic, without a single, consensual definition. In general terms, it refers to the adequacy of artistic production and contemporary social norms and values, to avoid offenses or discrimination against minority or marginalized groups. I am writing this letter to you, because more people should know about this subject and understand or think of it different way, as you say “Artistic political correctness is the unrecognized or inappropriate adoption of practices, ideas, customs, etc., of one society or people by members of another, more dominant society.”

# data[].attributes.body
This article delves into a crucial and contemporary subject revolving around the intricate relationship among art, imagination, and the contentious issue of cultural appropriation. The notion that art knows no bounds due to the boundless nature of human imagination is intriguing, yet the text brings to light how this very concept is currently under scrutiny, largely owing to concerns regarding cultural appropriation.

My impetus for delving into this discourse stems from the paramount significance of the themes expounded in the article and the imperative to meticulously ponder over matters pertaining to cultural representation within art. Furthermore, it is imperative to foster a climate of mutual understanding and respect among diverse cultures, necessitating candid dialogues about how art can influence these intercultural dynamics. Hence, my objective is to contribute to this ongoing dialogue by offering a discerning analysis of how artists can navigate the terrain of cultural appropriation with responsibility and reverence.

"It is very safe to say that imagination has no limits; therefore, it is also possible to say that art has no limits, as it is the fruit of human imagination." This assertion underscores the inspiring notion that art serves as an inexhaustible conduit for human creativity, prompting me to contemplate how cultural diversity imbues this creative expression with richness and depth.

In essence, the article prompts us to grapple with complex questions about artistic freedom, cultural sensitivity, and the ethical boundaries of creative expression. By engaging in thoughtful discussions and promoting cross-cultural understanding, we can pave the way for a more inclusive and respectful artistic landscape that celebrates diversity while steering clear of harmful appropriation practices.

# data[].attributes.headline
My opinion on cultural appropriation: (Feito por Arthur Motta)

# data[].attributes.subject
My opinion on cultural appropriation: (Feito por Arthur Motta)

# data[].attributes.body
First, to begin we must know what cultural appropriation is. Cultural appropriation consists of taking something from one culture (such as a dance, symbol, music, among others), and then applying it to another context or culture.

With this in mind we can start. Most of the time I think this is wrong. Because for me, this is the same thing as taking a black person, for example, and trying to change his ethnicity to another. Of course, every rule has its exception, and this is one of those. I will give both a good and a bad example about this in my opinion.

First the good example: Brazilian Certaneija music. It is a song that derives from traditional American country music, more specifically that coming from Texas.

Now a bad example of cultural appropriation in my opinion: Blackface, this was a racist form that appeared in comedy shows that tried to imitate in the most stereotypical way possible what a black person was, usually it was a white actor who painted himself black and He made a circle with red paint that symbolized the racist stereotype that black people have huge lips.

And now I'm going to give an example that many people think is wrong, but I think there's nothing wrong with it: Using religious artifacts from religions that you don't participate in just because you think it's beautiful. Why don't I think it's wrong? I don't think it's wrong because it's a symbol, for some it has a meaning, for others it doesn't, I'm going to give a very niche example here but I think you'll understand. A person goes out on the street wearing a shirt from the metal band Slayer, this shirt contains a satanist pentagram, but this person is not satanic. He only uses clothes as an aesthetic. Now I'm going to give some examples of symbols that, in my opinion, shouldn't be used in this type of thing because I think it's very wrong. The first symbol is 88. Then you must be asking yourself "Hey, why is 88 wrong?" Here comes the political question. 88 is a Nazi symbol that stands for "Hail Hitler". That's why I disagree with using this symbol, other symbols are: Eagle with 14 or 18 feathers, skull with 14 or 18 teeth, black sun, Nazi swastika (I don't think I need to explain that last one). All these symbols should not be used in my opinion as they are from the same political context.

NOTE: The iron cross is not considered one of these, because if it does not have any of these symbols in the middle it is just a symbol that has different meanings but none of them are bad, the bad ones are when there is one of those symbols that I mentioned previously.

NOTE 2: I do not consider non-Nazi swastikas like those used in numbering in China to be wrong. Only the Nazi is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
In the delicate balance between artistic freedom and cultural respect, artists face a significant challenge. While having the freedom to create is important, understanding cultural boundaries is also crucial. For example, when we see a white actor playing a character from manga, it makes us think about sensitivity and respect. Artists can address this by engaging in genuine conversations with the communities they represent, understanding their stories and experiences. Thus, by creating works that celebrate diversity and advocate for social justice, artists help build a world where art is authentic and inclusive for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
My opinion: The article by Esther Davis delves into the complex issue of cultural appropriation in art, challenging the notion of limitless artistic expression. Cultural appropriation, defined as the unauthorized adoption of practices from a dominant culture by another, is a sensitive topic that artists must navigate. While it is crucial for artists to be culturally sensitive, the concept of appropriation can also limit artistic freedom. The article raises the question of how to differentiate between appropriation and appreciation in art. It emphasizes the importance of respectful dialogue, research, and collaboration to ensure art celebrates diversity without perpetuating stereotypes. By fostering understanding, engaging in ethical practices, and promoting cross-cultural exchange, artists can contribute to a more inclusive creative landscape.

Tradução: A opinião do artigo "Uma Palavra Sobre a Correção Política Artística de Esther Davis" aborda o complexo tema da apropriciação cultural na arte, questionando a ideia de que a arte é ilimitada. A apropriação cultural, definida como a adoção não reconhecida ou inadequada de práticas, ideias, costumes, etc., de uma sociedade ou povo por membros de outra sociedade mais dominante, é um assunto delicado que deve ser sempre levado em consideração pelos artistas. Enquanto é importante que os artistas sejam sensíveis às sensibilidades culturais e respeitem as comunidades, a apropriação cultural pode também limitar a liberdade artística. A opinião pede a pergunta de como diferenciar a apropriação cultural da apreciação cultural na arte. Ela enfatiza a importância de um diálogo respeitoso, de pesquisa e de reflexão para garantir que a arte celebre a diversidade sem perpetuar estereótipos ou explorar culturas marginalizadas. Por promover um entendimento mais profundo das perspectivas culturais, engajando-se em colaborações significativas com as comunidades e abordando a expressão artística com sensibilidade e empatia, os artistas podem contribuir para um ambiente criativo mais inclusivo e harmônico que celebre a riqueza da diversidade humana.

Motivation: The motivation behind crafting this text in English is to convey a concise and insightful summary of the article "A Word on Artistic Political Correctness by Esther Davis" to the author. By highlighting the nuanced discussion on cultural appropriation in art and the importance of distinguishing between appropriation and appreciation, this summary aims to showcase the depth of thought and consideration present in the original piece. It underscores the significance of respectful dialogue, research, and reflection in fostering a more inclusive and harmonious creative environment that celebrates human diversity.

Tradução: A motivação por trás da elaboração deste texto em inglês é transmitir um resumo conciso e esclarecedor do artigo "Uma Palavra Sobre a Correção Política Artística de Esther Davis" para o autor. Ao destacar a discussão sutil sobre a apropriação cultural na arte e a importância de distinguir entre apropriação e apreciação, este resumo visa mostrar a profundidade de pensamento e consideração presente no texto original. Ele enfatiza a significância do diálogo respeitoso, da pesquisa e da reflexão para promover um ambiente criativo mais inclusivo e harmonioso que celebra a diversidade humana.

Conclusion: In the intricate balance between artistic freedom and cultural respect, artists face a significant challenge. While the freedom to create is crucial, understanding cultural boundaries is equally important. For instance, when a white actor portrays a manga character, it prompts considerations of sensitivity and respect. Artists can tackle this by engaging in genuine dialogues with the communities they depict, grasping their narratives and experiences. By crafting works that honor diversity and champion social justice, artists aid in shaping a world where art is genuine and inclusive for all.