# data[].attributes.body
1. after reading the essay discuss the strengths with a neighbour
2. each of you individually add your own post-it to the wall where you communicate a) what the strengths of the essay are and b) what particular skills or aspects of your own essay writing could improve
3. make sure your name is on the post
4. read posts made by other students and give them 1-5 stars according to the quality of their contribution

# data[].attributes.body
I think the essay was strong for 4 main reasons 1) ..... 2) ..... 3) .... and 4) ....

I would love to be able to do .... better

# data[].attributes.body
I think essay X was powerful for:-

1. Lots of incidents were specifically illustrated which functioned as a sound reasoning for a particular incident.

2. For each information utilized in the essay, there is a document cited, showing us the source of the information.

3. The essay is easy to follow as it progresses in time order concisely.

4. The essay includes lots of perspective for a particular incident utilizing quotes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think all of the essays were descent for 5 main reasons.
1.  every essays have a logical flow of the essay by using different transition words.
2. essays uses appropriate evidences for each paragraphs.
3. essays provide effective explanation of how does the evidence support the claim.
4. provided exact date(year) and cited the documents.
5. explained background information during paragraphs.

# data[].attributes.body
Essay X)

I think the four main strengths of the essay x were:

1) Well-organized essay structure(especially its chronological structure helped me to understand the flow of the essay)

2) Transitions between paragraphs contribute to the logical flow of the essay

3) Well-explained historical context in the introduction

4) Strong & properly cited evidence and reasoning(explanation) and logical links between them

# data[].attributes.body
I think essay X was strong for a few reasons; The essay was easy to follow, it was chronological and was organised in a timeline that made sense.

A solid foundation of causation could be observed throughout the essay, with clear causes, reasons behind a certain event and their effects, what were the results and/or repercussions of this.

There was good use of solid proof from the documents used to back up claims and claims of causation, with in text citations and apt reference to each document, respectively.

The essay read very well, as a whole. There was commendable use of specific, accurate and relevant vocabulary throughout the essay which enhanced the student's demonstration of not only a well thought out and well written, but a well researched essay.

I would love to be able to be specific with my evidence. To fully use the documents before me, include them specifically in my essay and properly connect them to the main themes of my essay - in a seamless manner, with continuity.

# data[].attributes.body
1)A very good link between the different paragraphs (easy, short, etc.)
2) The vocabulary used is very enriched
3)The student says his idea then the support with a quote
4)the writing used and very good because it is linear (constant the ideas do not go in all directions, coherent ...)

# data[].attributes.body
Essay x was strong for a couple of reasons.

the first is the flow of the essay, this is very important. an essay should have an excellent flow to ensure the reader isn't overloaded with information. the writer accomplishes this by providing clear explanations and evidence and connecting them in a readable manner.

the second reason the essay was very strong is the explanations. in the essay, we got a little bit of evidence followed by a little bit of explanation which is repeated throughout the whole essay. this is important so that we don't get a large amount of evidence followed by a large amount of explanation. this is also important for the flow of the essay.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the essay by student X was strong for 2 main reasons:

1. The connection between documents for explanation. The evidence was all connected, so it was easy for people to read and understand the claim.

2. The conclusion was clearly written. After people read the essay, they made it more clear and organized.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that essay x was strong because it used a wide range of vocabulary, the organization was good and made sense, All of the documents that were used were cited, and it was fully related to the topic and didn't stray from the topic.
Essay y was strong because it explained all of the different aspects of the question, it also had strong vocab and transitions and cited the documents that were used.
Essay z was strong because it again answered the question fully, used good vocab, had good transitions and, cited the sources that were used.
I can do better at adding more advanced vocab and transitions in my writing.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The evidence and reasoning are detailed, and are explained in a logical flow which helps understand what they are trying to say.
2. Every document supports the claim appropriately.
3. Has a very efficient explanation/reasoning of how and why the evidence supports the claim.
4. The use of vocabs

# data[].attributes.body
I think the essay was strong for 3 reasons.

- This text clearly states the claim for the question and then clearly writes the evidence that supports and connects the claim.

- This text Uses rich vocabulary that will improve the quality of the essay content.

- This text is clear how each event affected who.