# data[].attributes.body
Internet

# data[].attributes.body
Post it wall for on their way out / written feedback on the whiteboard

# data[].attributes.body
We will have written feedback on what could be improved on:
- What could be improved?
- What did they enjoy?
- What did they learn?

# data[].attributes.body
To give students an experience of participating in a (mock) deliberation.’

# data[].attributes.body
Thoughts on the case study from each group

# data[].attributes.body
Notes on the opinions of the activity for each group

# data[].attributes.body
Key points of each lecture

# data[].attributes.body
- Sticky notes of views from each group
- Group guidelines

# data[].attributes.body
Ordered list from each group and a final decision from each group

# data[].attributes.body
Students would have been able to prioritise and weight the decisions

# data[].attributes.body
Students will have been able to filter the brainstorm ideas into a shortened list of solutions

# data[].attributes.body
List of reasons with prioritisation

# data[].attributes.body
- Post it notes on a wall with all the ideas

OR

- it could be digital and the facilitator could have them on the smart board

# data[].attributes.body
Students will have enquired and explored new ideas on where the funding should go to: treatment or cure

# data[].attributes.body
Students will have discussed, shared and explored their thoughts on how antibacterial resistance will affect the lives and treatment plan of people with CF

# data[].attributes.body
- Students will have developed their thoughts on the issue of antibiotic resistance
- Students will be aware of the different ways of thinking

# data[].attributes.body
Students will have been provided with sufficient information on cystic fibrosis

# data[].attributes.body
- Students feel they are in a safe environment to share their opinions
- Initial insights of the topic

# data[].attributes.body
Case study examples, questions for students to answer, pen and paper for each group

# data[].attributes.body
'To open students’ eyes to the complexity surrounding funding choices for chronic conditions and inherited diseases like CF, by posing the question: Where should CF research funding be allocated – treatment of cure?'

# data[].attributes.body
‘To give students the chance to discuss a real-life scenario involving superbugs.'

# data[].attributes.body
-  Our patient could be via zoom call because it would be dangerous if there was  a teacher or student  with CF in the room (people with CF should not mix together as there is too much of a risk of transmitting illnesses to each other). It also means they don't have to hang around for the whole session

- The stakeholder will be allocated a limited time and will be allowed to use slides but will have capped number of slides (so each speak in a similar style)

- slides will be checked in advance to check it uses accessible language

# data[].attributes.body
What did they enjoy?
What could be improved?

# data[].attributes.body
Give feedback

# data[].attributes.body
12:00-12:15 (15 min)

# data[].attributes.body
To gather evaluation.
(the deliberation part ends)

# data[].attributes.body
Paper, pen, blackboard, sticky notes.

# data[].attributes.body
- Gather rationales of each group
- Make the final decision in the whole class
- For example, if students eventually find 4 reasons for funding cure and 6 reasons for funding treatment, then our final conclusion is that 40% of funding is supposed to be used in cure and 60% for treatment, so maybe more funding for treatment.
(also consider the priorities of every option)

# data[].attributes.body
Convergent process

# data[].attributes.body
11:40-12:00 (20 min)

# data[].attributes.body
To prioritise the solutions and find consensus on the final decision
(win - win)

# data[].attributes.body
- Whole class discussion
- Randomly allocate groups, prioritising the rationales in small groups

# data[].attributes.body
Pick up group options about CF fundings (filter the misunderstanding options)

# data[].attributes.body
11:25-11:40 (15 min)

# data[].attributes.body
To shortlist the solutions to our main question.

# data[].attributes.body
Slides, online platforms

# data[].attributes.body
- Students write down their initial thoughts about the topic -'which places could the funding be placed' and the teacher collects them
- Show them to the whole class using the sliding scale (e.g. Mentimeter platform)
- Let students choose their weights.

# data[].attributes.body
- Change the group
- Personal thoughts writing
- Prioritise all the thoughts

# data[].attributes.body
10:55-11:15 (20min)

# data[].attributes.body
To gather  initial thoughts.

# data[].attributes.body
11:15-11:25 (10 min)

# data[].attributes.body
- Relate to real-world (newest) findings
- Group discussion about their feelings
- Summarise by teachers

# data[].attributes.body
Case studies (give specific examples), a story from different angles and various groups surrounding patients.

# data[].attributes.body
10:25-10:55 (30min)

# data[].attributes.body
To give students a chance to discuss real-life situations and what it means for the development of treatment and cures of  CF.
(the deliberation part starts)

# data[].attributes.body
Timer, paper, pens

# data[].attributes.body
- Allocated into 6 groups
- Provide each group a postdoctoral researcher to be a facilitator and pick up a student to be the scriber
- Facilitators will invite students to 'put on different coloured hats' - answering questions about different aspects of the topic
- Share group opinions to the whole class and evaluation
- Invite  researchers to comment (Some inaccuracies can be corrected in time to avoid misunderstandings)

# data[].attributes.body
Use thinking hats questions strategy

# data[].attributes.body
9:55-10:15 (20min)

# data[].attributes.body
To recap the information they learnt on antibiotic resistant. Provide an opportunity to discuss the issue.
(the dialogue part ends)

# data[].attributes.body
- Recruit 1 patient (online), 1 doctor, 1 postdoctoral researcher and 1 charity organiser (others offline) to give 10 min speech each. (include Q&A part)

# data[].attributes.body
9:15-9:55 (40min)

# data[].attributes.body
Lectures - from people

# data[].attributes.body
to engage the students on the information they will need ot make the decision, opportunity to ask questions

# data[].attributes.body
Post-it notes, pens, chairs and desks, projector

# data[].attributes.body
- Divide the whole class into 5 groups
- Self-introduction in the groups
- 6 words activities of what they think this topic is about.
- Write them on sticky notes and put them on the board.
- Categorise and evaluate. (metaplan)

# data[].attributes.body
9:00-9:15 (15min)

# data[].attributes.body
- Familiar with each other
- Introduce the topic
- Build a comfortable environment for conversation
(the dialogue part starts)

# data[].attributes.body
- Self-introduction of participants
- Making ground rules by participants(e.g. privacy)

# data[].attributes.body
10:15-10:25 (10min)

People can only really focus for 45mins at a time