# data[].attributes.body
I think that the two were very different because one was gently lowered toward the ground and the other was basically going ridiculously fast and hoping an airbag would break the fall. I think the design was changed because I would imagine that the sky crane was more expensive.

# data[].attributes.body
The rovers landing was smoother and more precise with the sky crane but it had a higher chance of failure, Whereas with the bubble it was a lot less smooth when landing but it had a lower chance of failure.

# data[].attributes.body
The first Curiosity design and lading was more precise ans smoother than the bubble Curiosity the bubbles was more freely dropped and didn't have a set landing. They most likely had to change the design because the landing would not be in a precise place.

# data[].attributes.body
With the bubble design, the consistency of the landing would not be as precise as the sky crane method even if the chance of failure is higher. The sky crane is more precise as you know more where exactly you will land whereas with the bubble you are at the mercy of the terrain. weather, and how it will bounce.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the landing of the Curiosity was very smooth but it also took a lot more precision and it had more mathematical components. The one with the bubbles was a lot more fun and I'm surprised it worked. It was a very creative solution.

# data[].attributes.body
The curiosity landing was smooth and was lowered on a rope while the other rover bounced until it eventually stopped. They probably had to change the design because landing spot was inaccurate and there could have been more accidents with the balloons.

# data[].attributes.body
The bouncy design was a very cool way to go about it, however the first one is definitely more safe and cautious.

# data[].attributes.body
It was probably not nearly accurate enough. The bouncing went on for forever, and it could've deflated too early. It was also probably pretty difficult to determine where it would end up, and it could've accidentally ended up in a dangerous place for the rover and gotten messed up.

# data[].attributes.body
yeet

# data[].attributes.body
They had to screenfade to condense the footage into a single video. Humans can

# data[].attributes.body
one lowered the rover down from a cable and then flew away while the second one droped it out and then let go of it

# data[].attributes.body
they boyh landed on mars

# data[].attributes.body
one would be a great ride

# data[].attributes.body
they both started in a pod that looked very similar

# data[].attributes.body
SECOND ONE CONCUSION INDUCING

# data[].attributes.body
the first on works better is lands smoother and dosent bounce

# data[].attributes.body
I think the ballon would work worse

# data[].attributes.body
both had parachutes

# data[].attributes.body
one used force to land slowly and the other just bounced until it stoped

# data[].attributes.body
the ball one looked more fun

# data[].attributes.body
One was quiker then the other

# data[].attributes.body
This one looked like a bunch of volleyballs glued together

# data[].attributes.body
one lowered it down and cut the string while the other had ballon type things attached to it

# data[].attributes.body
one was more stable one was bouncy

# data[].attributes.body
One looked safer

# data[].attributes.body
the landing of this one was funnier

# data[].attributes.body
one landed on its wheels one bounced around

# data[].attributes.body
the parachutes were very different

# data[].attributes.body
one has parachute other does not

# data[].attributes.body
Both parachuted down

# data[].attributes.body
they both had parchutes

# data[].attributes.body
They both had a parachute and a jet prepultion system

# data[].attributes.body
they both had parasuts

# data[].attributes.body
one bounce other no bounce

# data[].attributes.body
This one is very bouncy