# data[].attributes.body
The heartbreaking sources which really show the impacts of the vietnam war, caused by america. They were well picked out! :) -shing yee

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps you can link a bit more about the Cold War to the Vietnam war, because the Cold War was mentioned at the start but i think the link wasn’t very obvious to me so i was a bit clueless -shing yee

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps you can examine more about the vietnam side as well, by  adding what controversial things vietnam did (in greater detail), because during the presentation it seemed more of talking about the Americans..?

Also, i have a question! Why did you choose those two aspects of controversy to examine? -shing yee

# data[].attributes.body
I like how you identifies two distinct ways the war was controversial, the purpose and the conduct of it. This made it easier to understand what exactly was controversial about the war.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the impacts of the war and the ultimate question of whether the ends were worth the means needed to be more clearly linked to the inquiry question. The impacts were a bit messy and I could not really see why those impacts would make the war controversial.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the presentation focused on the American objectives and the way the Americans conducted the war, perhaps you guys could have explored a bit from the Vietnamese perspective too! (Although I agree that the war was mostly controversial on the American side)

I also think that the structure of the presentation could be improved. Maybe the different aspects you shared about (purpose, conduct, impacts) could be linked and layered better to build up to your main argument on why the war was controversial? I’m also not sure haha but it was a bit difficult for me to identify the thread of the argument throughout the presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
i like how you made it very clear as to why the war was controversial, clearly splitting up purpose and conduct into two points to go more in-depth in too. impacts were obvious, and the argument made convincing

# data[].attributes.body
perhaps you could have explained a bit more as to why laos and cambodia were even involved in the first place?

# data[].attributes.body
personally i felt that maybe you could have placed the opinion of american public together so it’s not so over the place and makes the whole presentation seem clearer and neater? but it’s a personal opinion heh well done guys!

# data[].attributes.body
very well-researched. You used a variety of sources (photos, statistics, recounts) to explain the impacts of the war to us.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the way you organised your points and the background of the war as well as the impacts were quite clearly explained

# data[].attributes.body
Good use of relevant sources to explain background information well!

# data[].attributes.body
link impacts to controversy more strongly.  While you did talk about both, they were not really linked together. Maybe it could've helped if you guys linked it to broader ideas regarding the conduct of war and highlighted the moral ambiguity of the situation by also talking about "the other side" - eg maybe some reasons why people think it's okay to hurt civilians etc.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the information provided didn’t connect to the controversy very well, especially in the front sections of the slides (e.g for purpose, explained the purposes of America and Vietnam in war but didn’t really explain why it was so controversial) so it didn’t link back to the question a lot...

# data[].attributes.body
i felt that although you explained in detail each of your points the layout of the slides and overall structure was quite confusing to follow especially when some of your slides were full of quotes with only verbal explanation

# data[].attributes.body
I think there could be a clearer link between the information provided and the inquiry question!
Also maybe put more explanation in the slides (Don’t just out everything in speaker notes) because now it’s a lot of sources on the slides, maybe it wld be better to have several clear points that you want to make on the slides! Right now it’s a bit hard to understand what the main point of each slide is because it’s either a source only or a lot of words, so I think it would be more audience friendly to state the main points clearly on the slides :)

# data[].attributes.body
- maybe you could organise by type of controversy, instead of jumping between america and vietnam/ going by chronological order of events. Essentially just clearer signposting.
Overall good job :)

# data[].attributes.body
I think you could have linked your points back to the topic of controversy better

# data[].attributes.body
i think because of the way you ordered your points the controversy didnt seem very clear.

# data[].attributes.body
i think everything was very detailed and well explained, like your impact and arguments! it was very easy follow your train of thought as well, so even though your presentation was very content heavy (with a lot of good research) it wasn’t very confusing!

# data[].attributes.body
i think the headers for your arguments could have been more organised, because it was bit hard to see how the points clashed?

# data[].attributes.body
The sources use was relevant and the explanation was quite detailed and clear.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that you should link your points back to the controversy part and the organisation of the points made it quite unclear so it didn’t seem to be related to the controversy sometimes

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe you could organise your points into sub headings.

# data[].attributes.body
Why the war was fought was at first justified. Continuation of war was an issue. proxy war was justified?

# data[].attributes.body
Last part on the impact of war-student demonstrations and impact on civilians in Vietnam and America and -How were these controversial?

# data[].attributes.body
-Nixon's bombing of Cambodia in 1970?
"mad" context?
-Vietnam War controversial-from Vietnamese perspective
-The conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
why did you choose those two aspects of controversy to examine?