# data[].attributes.body
1. They show his power and that he is bigger(literally and mentally) than everyone else. In most of them he is standing or on a horse, clearly above the rest.
2. In the first ones his hands are either pointing (dictating) or open, but in the last one his hands are on his hips.
3. I don't think his actions of forced are justified. I think if he made himself known as a good leader people would've listened to him without him having to force it, but if he wanted things done quickly then he just wanted to take power.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  They are trying to convey that Peter is strong and capable. He is sculpted as heroic and brave.
2. The one in the Netherlands just has him standing on his own, while the Russian ones have him on or horse, a ship, or in a chair.
3. I don't think his reforms could have been accomplished without force because people do not accept change well, so they might have not followed his new plans.

# data[].attributes.body
1) These statues portray Peter as a true leader: courageous, bold, and completely in charge.
2) In most of the statues in Russia, Peter is holding some sort of symbol, like a scroll, axe, or the wheel of a boat, but in this one he is simply standing with his hands free and not appearing to impose as much power. Additionally, his facial features and structure appear different, as they're longer and skinnier.
3) I believe that in order for Peter to accomplish his end goal of bettering Russia, he did have to use force to some extent to enforce his message and ensure obedience. However, taking off years of civilians' lives and brutal forced labor is in humane and should have been avoided. Emphasizing women's rights and a modern society should have been enforced without such brutality.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The statues of Peter the Great look kind of exaggerated and unrealistic in a way but they also portray a kind of strong, powerful, and heroic person by the way he poses.
2. The statue of him that is in the Netherlands look different in the fact that his hair seems to be a bit longer and his hight is a lot more realistic and in the statue he isn't doing anything but standing around, not like the others.
3. I understand that sometimes you have to do some hard or bad things to make your country better in the end but, if his people weren't interested in what he wanted to do he shouldn't force them.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Peter the Great was one of the most powerful, successful rulers of Russia
2.The statues in St.Petersburg are larger and show him to be greater than the ones in the Netherlands.
3. Since I did not live during Peter the Great's rule, I do not know what the situation was. I cannot say if this could be accomplished in a different way. Peter the Great brought a lot of good change to Russia. but it is never acceptable to be cruel to people.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  The statues make Peter the Great look like a great leader who is wealthy and likes to be in charge since one of the statues depicts him directing the a ship at the front.
2.  The last statue is different from the Russian ones because he looks taller and he has more hair. His clothing and face are the same though.
3. I think that you have to use some force when running a country but when you are overly aggressive and are killing people just because you feel like it then it is bad.

# data[].attributes.body
1. the statues portray him as powerful, wise, and respected.
2. The statues in Russia show Peter as more of a leader, while the one from the Netherlands doesn't really show him doing anything important.
3. I do think the reformation could have been done without using force. I think he could have tried to advertise his findings

# data[].attributes.body
1. The statues makes him seem like a very strong leader. I think in the second statue, where he is standing on the boat holding the golden paper, it's showing how he traveled somewhere and came back with a lot of powerful ideas and that's why they made the paper in his hand gold to symbolize it as something powerful.
2.  In the last statue Peter is dressed very different from the other pictures. Also in the picture where he is sitting he looks bigger than the last picture maybe making him seem very powerful.
3. I don't think that the reformation could've been done without force because he made up a lot of new rules and rituals and a lot of people might disagree with him.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The statues portray him as a noble dude who sets a good example for his people. They show that he was powerful and had absolute power over everyone.
2. The only difference I see is that his hair has grown and he's standing up.
3. I think using force for the benefits of your country can be a good and bad thing, especially in an unstable period. In general, it is wrong and messed up to hurt the people who you have authority over. A true good leader wouldn't be so atrociously violent. Although he finished strong and proved himself in the end, it's not okay to hurt your followers. However, in his case, some of the work couldn't have been done without an extent of force.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I first notice that all of the statues depict Peter the Great as very tall (exaggerated). He is also usually in a position where he seems to be leading something. For example, I found that his body language shows that he is a mighty guy and that he knows what he's doing. Like how he is standing on the boat, sort of looking over everything like he's got everything under control.

2. I feel like the pictures in Russia make Peter look more like a leader, where as the one in the Netherlands makes him look less powerful becuase he's kinda just standing there. In my opinion, I think that having him riding a horse or leading a ship would be more interesting and would make him look more important than if he was just standing.

3. I feel that if you are living in a place where society is so chaotic and rebelious, you need to have some sort of force so that the people respect you. But I don't agree with the idea of having an absolute society. Therefore, I feel like the beginning of his journey would be acceptable to use some sort of force without being a dictator.

# data[].attributes.body
1. These pictures show Peter as a strong figure, based on his poses and outfits. They show that Peter not only had power, but was also humble. For instance, in the 6th slide, Peter is working on a boat like a commoner. This shows that Russians valued how humble he was when he travelled to Europe, and they respect that.
2. I think the last statue is very different in that Peter looks quite casual. His back is arched, he has his hands on his hips, and his clothing is more normal. I think this depiction is different because this is how other countries saw him when Peter visited, and because they don't want to show him as too powerful because he was not their leader.
3. I don't think that what Peter did was right, and there are certainly better ways to change a country. I agree with his ideas to change the country, but he took them too extremely. For instance, if people only lived to 35 and they had to serve 25 years in the military, businesses could not thrive. This was also unfair to the people.

# data[].attributes.body
1. These statues how him as powerfull. It shows him helping (like fixing a boat). I also shows him as tall (which he was). Making him tall also conveys power.
2. In this one it shows him standing and with longer hair. Instead of him doing something like fixing a boat, sitting, stanging on a boat, etc, in this he is only standing.
3. I think he had to use force of else no one would listen to him. I do not think this justified anything he did. It is not acceptable to behave in a cruel manner at all. If many people benefit in the end, I think that that is what matters. The question is, did he ruin many people lifes? Did he kill many people? If so, than that is not ok.

# data[].attributes.body
1. His poses show a lot of power and authority. They make him seem very large and tall.
2. The hair is very different. It has the same curls but its longer and less defined in the Netherlands.
3. At times i do think that it is justified if it is for the greater good. But it depends on what you are doing and how bad it is. It also depends on the outcome of the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  The statues show Peter the Great as very tall and commanding. In a lot of the statues, it shows a ship or him going somewhere,  conveying a message that he has traveled to many different places.
2. In the statue from the Netherlands, he is just standing there as apposed to the other statues where he is doing something. Also, in the Netherlands one he looks slightly less powerful.
3. I don't think what he did could have been accomplished without force, though I do believe he could have used a little less of it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The statues make him seem like he's this strong brave person.
2. They both give him god like qualities
3. I think it depends on what the people feel. I they think they need this enforcement to get where they need to be as a country then yes they can use force. I also think that the previous leader dug Russia into this deep hole that they need to get out of and if that takes some force then yes I think it's ok. If peter the great uses force to an extent of killing people the no its not ok.

# data[].attributes.body
1. All the statues show Peter as really tall and most of them show Peter to be standing. I think they were trying to show that he was a really great guy. He is also depicted to be holding a scroll in one of the pictures and two others he is standing on a boat. I think the people were trying to show that he traveled and that the scroll represents new information that he brought back to Russia.
2. The one in the Netherlands seems smaller than all the ones in Russia. It is just of him standing looking like he is powerful whereas the ones in Russia are big and show that Peter was this magnificent person.
3. I think Peter could have been a little less strict with some things such as the army and he could have taken a little bit longer to get everything accomplished and if he took this extra time he could have been able to be less strict. I think that he was very helpful but I don't think that he would have been less helpful if he was less strict.

# data[].attributes.body
1. In some photos it looks like he had discovered something new. In those photos he appears more bold in powerful. In other the statues of him give off more of a gentle and casual vibe, for example the one of Peter sitting in the chair. In some of the pictures he shoes pride and power but not authority
2.The statue in the Netherlands Peter is just standing there, for there are not other elements to the statue . He also is shown to be very tall in  that statue. The statues in St.Petersburg show him to be doing something, such as fixing a boat or riding a horse. The one in the Netherlands is different because he is not doing anything, also there are some general sculptural differences.
3. I don't think it is acceptable for Peter to be mean, but it is okay for him to be direct if the country is in a dire state

# data[].attributes.body
1. He seems very powerful and looked up to. Since he's tall, people may look up to him more. He is also standing up which suggests power and authority.
2. His face looks a bit different in the Netherland statues. He also seems to be in a more public place because there are people around.
3. I do think that his reforms could have been accomplished without force. It might have taken longer for the society to gain his trust to accomplish them, because they had such a terrible ruler before. I think that he had good intentions but could have taken the extra time to accomplish things the right way. He did do things that needed to be done for the society to not fall apart.