# data[].attributes.body
U is for you and me

# data[].attributes.body
N is for anywhere or anytime at all

# data[].attributes.body
Smithson can see your name

# data[].attributes.body
F is for friends who do stuff together

# data[].attributes.body
dead meme

# data[].attributes.body
G A M E D A Y

# data[].attributes.body
be more specific

# data[].attributes.body
Use more than one example to explain  what thy is

# data[].attributes.body
It does not say what text it just says in the text

# data[].attributes.body
what more text?

# data[].attributes.body
they could've been more brief

# data[].attributes.body
They should have said what the text was instead of just saying "the text" it was too vague and from an outside source, you dont know what text they are talking about

# data[].attributes.body
they could have elaborated more, just so they show they have a bit of a deeper understanding of the topics

# data[].attributes.body
They could have explained it more

# data[].attributes.body
one of the documents had 2 sentences

# data[].attributes.body
it could have explained who it effected directly

# data[].attributes.body
more text

# data[].attributes.body
po

# data[].attributes.body
I could have not said the same thing again for every question but I still did good giving information because Quality over quantity

# data[].attributes.body
They could've explained more about each of the facts that they stated

# data[].attributes.body
They could have explained what the quote means

# data[].attributes.body
They gave specific quotes to back up what they were saying, like "irrigation of the..." which was relevant to the point they were making

# data[].attributes.body
more information in less writing

# data[].attributes.body
More paragraph text

# data[].attributes.body
what could have the SECOND answer set improved on?

# data[].attributes.body
More informative overall

# data[].attributes.body
had a lot more information

# data[].attributes.body
我 是 美 国 人 They should have elaborated

# data[].attributes.body
it show us how they were effected directly and gave examples how

# data[].attributes.body
They restated the question, which made me understand what they were talking about

# data[].attributes.body
Gave us more examples

# data[].attributes.body
What was POSITIVE about the other answer set?

# data[].attributes.body
They gave quotes to back up their statement

# data[].attributes.body
more descriptive

# data[].attributes.body
They could bolden words

# data[].attributes.body
I had more quotes to back up my reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
They could have improved by explaining what cuneiform is better

# data[].attributes.body
They cold back the info up with quotes

# data[].attributes.body
What can be improved

# data[].attributes.body
for document 1

# data[].attributes.body
elaboration on different points instead of being long on one point and being short on lots they should elaborate on all points

# data[].attributes.body
They gave specific quotes from the text

# data[].attributes.body
They used information to back up thy clamis

# data[].attributes.body
They could have described it a little better

# data[].attributes.body
they could use quotes

# data[].attributes.body
They could have used specific examples from the text

# data[].attributes.body
It briefly described cunieform and its relevancy in ancient civilizations

# data[].attributes.body
they could have expanded more about vague topics, like they could have explained that the nile was a barrier because of the cataracts in the river

# data[].attributes.body
They answered the question and backed it up

# data[].attributes.body
what can be improved?

# data[].attributes.body
they could've shown its direct impact on us today

# data[].attributes.body
There was a lot more information

# data[].attributes.body
provided examples from the text

# data[].attributes.body
They have specific details, like how the writing was wedge-shaped, and that the symbols weren't words or letters, they were objects, they symbolized things.

# data[].attributes.body
Gives us a better idea

# data[].attributes.body
Described how things were important

# data[].attributes.body
They used thy evidence to support all of their clams

# data[].attributes.body
the rivers gave the people a barrier against enemys.

# data[].attributes.body
They were very descriptive and elaborated on all the points

# data[].attributes.body
Very descriptive

# data[].attributes.body
They explained their answer. For example in Document 4 it said "The Nile River helped a lot with transportation..." instead of saying The Nile river helped a lot and that's it.

# data[].attributes.body
more detail, how were they descriptive

# data[].attributes.body
They got more resources

# data[].attributes.body
describe clearly

# data[].attributes.body
more information

# data[].attributes.body
Provided background information about the topic

# data[].attributes.body
they used things from the past to determinate what things were important and what effect they had on society

# data[].attributes.body
described how the Nile River was an important source in Ancient Egypt

# data[].attributes.body
Described how cuniform was important and changed over time

# data[].attributes.body
Good because of the details that were put in it to back the reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
lack of detail

# data[].attributes.body
What are the positives of DOCUMENT 1

# data[].attributes.body
great thesis statements and use a lot of supporting details which helped to form a understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
DOCUMENT 2

# data[].attributes.body
I feel it could use more more explaining it says the quote and then with out the river they wouldn't be able to build their stuff i feel they need to explain stuff

# data[].attributes.body
It's pretty good. Need more details.

# data[].attributes.body
it's alright, the text is not really detailed though

# data[].attributes.body
It was good explained the importance, but lacked detail

# data[].attributes.body
They could give us more details but they provided quotes.

# data[].attributes.body
In the paragraph on Document 2, they only go over one detail.

# data[].attributes.body
Explains why the rivers are important and how it had helped people.

# data[].attributes.body
It could use more information, but it referenced to the passage which gave it more information

# data[].attributes.body
Good example but a little short

# data[].attributes.body
Document 2 has bad grammar, and lacks information.

# data[].attributes.body
The writing explains what the topic is about and backs up with detail

# data[].attributes.body
it had good detail about the topic

# data[].attributes.body
It was alright because of the lack of detials

# data[].attributes.body
Document 2 is good they gave exact quotes from the passage

# data[].attributes.body
they provided good detail. But the handwriting was pretty sloppy

# data[].attributes.body
The paragraph is well written and contains enough details and evidence to make it trustable

# data[].attributes.body
Good because they gave quotes and reason behind what they were saying

# data[].attributes.body
Good thesis statements and good use of quotes. Only suggestion is that they provide more detail.

# data[].attributes.body
the first paragraph is bad because it doesnt say what they need or who they were talking too

# data[].attributes.body
good deatil and facts about the does not go into detail

# data[].attributes.body
It was a good paragraph and had many details

# data[].attributes.body
(Doc 1) Good; The paragraphs elaborated on the main point and provided a lot of detail. This person also used good punctuation and gave good information about the topics.

# data[].attributes.body
They had a lot of good details and you can tell that they studied

# data[].attributes.body
(document 1)Before they even started writing they stated what they were going to write about which really helped with the understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it's good. It just states most of the information that we already know.