# data[].attributes.body
Module itself its interesting and hard at the same time. It requires extra time to be spent by yourself studying as the focus in class is for those students who are "smarter" than others. For those students including myself that needs extra explanation there is not enough time during seminars nor lectures as we simply always behind the schedule that explains why everything is so rushed in this module.
Also, a lot of time some subjects always been referred to those that do not do business management and when asked for extra materials been given the same information as in the lectures.
Every week there is at least 30 40 50 slides that we do not go through 80% of the time, constant delays of explaining, it is not clear, Rushed.
Coursework.
I have spent 3 weeks every single day collecting data writing, calculating, making a report. Fear enough if this would be last minute thing I would not expect to have mark higher than 40%, but now... there is no feedback provided the rubic feedback is not something we can all learn from to improve for the second coursework which now I am scared to write and submit as so much effort put in first and just 40% mark received with no explanation what went wrong, what to improve.
As this knowledge gained from this module will be required in future I would expect this to be more clear and consistent.

# data[].attributes.headline
The module is not being taught in a productive way. I think we spend more time figuring out what we are studying and learning it form various uncertified online sources than we spend in class and it makes it really difficult to keep the pace.

# data[].attributes.subject
The module is not being taught in a productive way. I think we spend more time figuring out what we are studying and learning it form various uncertified online sources than we spend in class and it makes it really difficult to keep the pace.

# data[].attributes.body
because of how this coursework has been handled i’m afraid of how it will be handled for the second one, the marking seemed very unfair as it seems as if all markers understood the criteria differently which impacts the ones that did bad, this makes me lose hope in the second coursework

# data[].attributes.body
The coursework was unclear from the beginning. Handy support only the students that learned alone and have experience on that !!! Sorry but we don’t give such a money to uni to ignore the students that don’t understandand don’t have experience, that’s why we study in uni to LEARN. Also it was very disappointed that when we ask handy to show us how to do this cw, his answer was, you should do it alone and learn alone. Mine grade was zero in this cw and it is unfair because I don’t  have any experience and I have the willing to learn but “we should learn alone”!???

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this module has not been constructed well in terms of organising engagement, as it fails to provide the demand the students are asking for as compensating for the level of difficulty this module is to endure. Grading criteria for first assessment seems very harsh for students. The number of technical activities needed for a 25% weightage was horrifying to experience.

This module in general had a lack of communication between what was necessarily needed for the coursework in order to achieve a top tier mark. This module also fails to keep its promises; 1) Students were promised if they were to learn, encounter and interact with the Bloomberg software and applying it towards the critical analysis segment of the assessment criterion; they were promised to receive above 70% on average via grading the portfolio - FAILED!
2) Students were promised to receive a detailed feedback or at least a summary or two of what was done well and what could improve, however, it has been failed on students yet again by not meeting its expected deadline in time; influencing students to fall behind in schedule of semester 1 - FAILED!

Many improvements are needed in terms of structuring the module before implementing unnecessary actions, including another example of removing lab sessions that aid the practical/technical analytics needed to surpass the academic standards of this module. We encourage and urge not to repeat the same mistake for next year students. Thank you.

# data[].attributes.body
as a finance student the lectures have been a struggle to understand with the teaching style, even though the situation has been bought up before about this i believe not enough action has been taken and instead labs (which was the most helpful part) was taken away. Also, we were a week behind which effected how we could approach this coursework yet we received no extension.

# data[].attributes.body
the main objective of the coursework was not clear when it came towards which section was most significant to get marks

# data[].attributes.headline
The module marking is terrible, how do we get a different scale on the rubric feedback and then a completely different grade? At the same time how is an " over all good report" equivalent to getting marked less than 2.2? We were given samples of the previous year students who did similar work and apparently even got 1sts and everyone tried following that but I know  Alot of people including myself, who got 2.2 or less, how is it possible for people to get just above pass when they have put in so much time and effort and tried following everything we had been guided to do. People get right above pass when they don't even try, but this doesn't seem to be the case here. I honestly do not understand what the teachers expect from us, at least a sample answer would be helpful, but even after trying to follow the sample answer it seems as if it still isn't good enough.

# data[].attributes.subject
The module marking is terrible, how do we get a different scale on the rubric feedback and then a completely different grade? At the same time how is an " over all good report" equivalent to getting marked less than 2.2? We were given samples of the previous year students who did similar work and apparently even got 1sts and everyone tried following that but I know  Alot of people including myself, who got 2.2 or less, how is it possible for people to get just above pass when they have put in so much time and effort and tried following everything we had been guided to do. People get right above pass when they don't even try, but this doesn't seem to be the case here. I honestly do not understand what the teachers expect from us, at least a sample answer would be helpful, but even after trying to follow the sample answer it seems as if it still isn't good enough.

# data[].attributes.body
The module in general is quite interesting and also brings us value as the topics we have covered are essential both for CFA and finance related jobs. However, the labs are, in my opinion, very important as the focus is more on the practical problems rather than the theory and therefore canceling them might have been a mistake. Also, I understand the short marking period but a more thorough feedback would be appreciated.

# data[].attributes.body
I don’t like how the module is taught. It’s really difficult to follow. I think it’s too complex. I wish Bloomberg was integrated into the teaching, especially when we’re expected to use it in the assignment. The first assignment was really difficult as well. The second assignment is even more difficult, I don’t understand how a multi portfolio pitch book is produced. I wish that an example was shown to us and what is required in a recommendation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think we need an adjustment and therefore all grades go up based on what students got because what is the point that the highest grades are in the 70 range?

# data[].attributes.body
I tried the best I could but wasn’t able to achieve this mark as I asked for an extension due to late arrival and till this day have had no response I went to registery to ask for an extension like handy had suggested face to face and was told me arriving late to the uni due to my visa taking 3 weeks to come out which was also an inconvenience for me wasn’t a good enough reason. Bare in mind I communicated this with the university while I was struggling to process my visa and fast track it. Unfortunately due to covid there is no fast tracking. I had to self teach myself everything from all modules which also had their own due dates and hand in my work on time as fast as I could so I would not miss deadlines and get 0%.

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to simply say that the coursework is so spread and I know a lot of students like me who spent tone of hours doing it and then struggled to put everything into 1000 word limit and eventually get lower than 50% mark. All I hope is that the task can be clarified in details, cause as a Finance student I would really like to achieve a higher mark in my core module, but to repeat myself one more time, the coursework is so spread it is not clear at all what to talk about, what to do, it just seems to me that the second coursework will be around the same result if things stay the way they are, which is awful. Hope this will reach somebody ✊🏻

# data[].attributes.body
The coursework requirements were not very clear from the beginning. This is why a big confusion was created among students. I’m also unsatisfied with my mark and probably a second check would be needed.

# data[].attributes.body
with the delay in marking this affects our time for the second coursework since we need the feeback in order to be able to know what to do for second coursework, i believe we deserve an extension hopefully

# data[].attributes.body
The module is OK but it would be even better if the lab sessions came back in our seminars as they were really helpful with calculations. Coursework wise, the feedback I got was vague and won't help much for the upcoming coursework due in Jan. A better clarity is needed for the next coursework.

# data[].attributes.body
The feedback was not in details and clear which would not really help for the next coursework. Also it mentions that there’s no conclusion or recommendation whereas I clearly wrote on even bokd title. And there was no comments from the tutor who marked my coursework.
Additionally, labs are quite helpful for doing the coursework.
If possible, it would be great to have a session regarding the coursework including clear explanation and some tips of how to do the second coursework which is quite difficult.

# data[].attributes.body
The lectures are a struggle to understand

# data[].attributes.body
Very very unhappy with my grade, i understand if I haven’t added the full criteria, However, I feel like all the content I have tried to understand has been for nothing and that I have done exactly has been told in terms of data etc. After raisin concern been shifted to speak to all sorts of people. I think the management of this module is so messy. Also wanted labs to stay I don’t think anyone actually wanted them to go and was just misunderstood because the lecturer was just being too fast with explaining the actual lecture content. Other than that it is fine

# data[].attributes.body
The labs were helpful during seminars and made me understand this course better however it was taken away.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not happy with my grade and i believe due to the confusion of the coursework from the beginning is the reason of this. The main point for this coursework was not highlighted clearly. Also, inefficient feedback was given which makes it unclear for me to understand the second coursework

# data[].attributes.body
The overall feedback was very vague and doesn’t really help me on what to do for my next coursework. The feedback I received was essentially just the summary of the marking rubric

# data[].attributes.body
I am currently enjoying the module and don't see anything wrong with it. I think we need to bring the labs back as those really helped us with the calculations for the coursework. A criticism I have is maybe a little more clarity with the coursework in regards to what to actually what the marker is looking for when marking

# data[].attributes.body
Spoke to handy about my shocking grade, turns out it was “automatically graded by turnitin”? My feedback doesn’t match my coursework and my grade overall doesn’t sum to my work

# data[].attributes.body
The coursework that has been marked the feedback does not relate to the coursework I have submitted. It states I have no conclusion and no reccomendation however there is clear proof that there is a reccomendation and a conclusion