# data[].attributes.body
They Both cause more pollution and create more waste. They promote using more fossil fuels They both harm the environment by taking up a huge amount of water.
-Umar Choudhery

# data[].attributes.headline
mountaintop removal and underground mining

# data[].attributes.subject
mountaintop removal and underground mining

# data[].attributes.body
Both solutions avoid making waste, but create pollution through coal.  Both promote the use of fossil fuels and usage of natural resources.  Both destroy the environment while mining and through burning coal.
Zaiden Ingle

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these either pollute the air or water and contaminate many things with chemicals. They promote the use of these natural resources. These methods can be dangerous and are worse for the environment and human health.
-Victoria O.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a form of surface mining at the summit or summit ridge of a mountain. This technique extracts coal. It is bad for the environment, does not promote renewable energy, and causes pollution.
-Natasha Kravchenko

# data[].attributes.body
It is not healthy for the environment
it can cause pollution
its an easy to use source

# data[].attributes.headline
Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling oil (fracking

# data[].attributes.subject
Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling oil (fracking

# data[].attributes.body
Oil can pollute the air, oceans, and possibly land. Oil is an easy to use energy source which can convince people to keep using it. It does not promote renewable resources because it is nonrenewable and appealing to the public.
By: Dylan Rattet

# data[].attributes.body
This solution is bad for the environment. It poisons sea life and contaminated water. Rubble get dumped into valleys and deforestation occurs. This method promotes the overusing of natural resources. It’s not efficient and a non renewable source of energy. -jenna Greenberg

# data[].attributes.headline
Hydraulic Fracturing and Horizontal Drilling

# data[].attributes.subject
Hydraulic Fracturing and Horizontal Drilling

# data[].attributes.body
This solution does not help the environment. Instead, it causes more damage than good. It pollutes with water contamination, land destruction, air pollution and geologic disruption. Because of this, people can overuse is a limited natural resource that does more harm than good.

# data[].attributes.body
Mining oil sands causes pollution by creating greenhouse gas emissions. It also destroys ecosystem which displaces lots of wildlife. This would cause the use of more fossil fuels which causes air pollution. Evan Losin

# data[].attributes.body
By Sarag
This solution is bad for the environment. It causes a lot of pollution. It uses fossil fuels which is a limited natural resource. This is why it is bad for the environment.

# data[].attributes.headline
Extracting Unconventional Sources of Oil  By: Emma Haile

# data[].attributes.subject
Extracting Unconventional Sources of Oil  By: Emma Haile

# data[].attributes.body
Solutions: Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling oil and mining oil sands
Both of these solutions are bad for the environment and doesn't keep ecosystems healthy at all. Hydraulic Fracturing leads to higher pollution levels in rivers and streams and mining oil sands creates more waste with the oil sands being mined. Both of these solutions promote renewable, efficient energy and mining oil sands keeps people from overusing natural resources but they will come with serious consequences.

# data[].attributes.body
The companies that make the product profit the most often by selling it through stations and to certain car companies jobs that are created are mechanics the producer and the sellers Natural gas makes money on a local and state level while Gasoline make money on a national level due to brands such as shell and other companies. They both hurt each other and also fertilizer companies.
- Umar Choudhery
.

# data[].attributes.body
The companies who drill the oil make the most money.  They make national money for the government and the company.  Offshore drilling allows companies to flourish when they drill for oil.
-Zaiden Ingle

# data[].attributes.headline
Expanding drilling offshore for oil in the USA

# data[].attributes.subject
Expanding drilling offshore for oil in the USA

# data[].attributes.body
These solutions people can sell the oil to people that want it. The people that drill the oil then sell it and make money. It makes money on local levels because people can open gas stations and sell gas. It can make states money because they can buy it cheap from drilling companies then sell it for more money making a profit.

By: Dylan Rattet

# data[].attributes.body
This solution can power homes, cars, and anything that needs electricity through combustion. This can make money on local, state, and national levels by selling gas and oil to other companies to make a profit. This can also make consumers' lives easier because gas and oil are easy to use.
- Nathan T

# data[].attributes.body
Businesses make money from this because they are very common and most people use these types of cars. Mechanics, Engineers, and a Sales Person would be necessary for this business. This option is not very good for the environment since the cars burn fossil fuels, but this solution is beneficial for the economy.
-Natasha Kravchenko.

# data[].attributes.headline
Drilling offshore for oil in the United States

# data[].attributes.subject
Drilling offshore for oil in the United States

# data[].attributes.body
Drilling offshore in areas that have lots of oil can help power more vehicles and other things that require gasoline. This creates more jobs because oil rigs require hundreds of employees to keep them running 24/7. It makes money  on all levels by creating more jobs and expanding gas companies.
Evan Losin

# data[].attributes.body
companies get oil from people who get it from the coast. They use this oil for gas and other things and sell it to there customers. It can be dangerous especially in the Arctic where there are icebergs.
- Victoria O

# data[].attributes.headline
gasoline powered automobiles: Jenna Greenberg

# data[].attributes.subject
gasoline powered automobiles: Jenna Greenberg

# data[].attributes.body
Gasoline powered automobiles uses fossil fuel for combustion engines. Its bad for the environment but good for the economy. Its cheaper then natural gas but has so much more users giving them tons more money. Also they have gas stations contributing to their profit.

# data[].attributes.body
In the Arctic, miners can easily find materials to sell. Companies who buy them also benefit as they put them in everyday objects. They sell these objects all over the world and because of this it makes it hard for other businesses to flourish.

Sarah Scherr

# data[].attributes.headline
Expanding drilling offshore for oil in the US     By: Emma Haile 

# data[].attributes.subject
Expanding drilling offshore for oil in the US     By: Emma Haile 

# data[].attributes.body
Solutions: Atlantic Ocean- Coastline/Continental shelf and Arctic Ocean
Both of these solutions will allow existing businesses and industries to grow and flourish. Continental shelves/coastlines contain valuable resources like oil and gas which would help existing businesses and industries to make money. As the Arctic Ocean melts because of climate change and other things, new shipping routes would open and would allow existing businesses and industries to trade with each other and make more money.

# data[].attributes.headline
Extracting Unconventional Sources of Oil By:Jennifer Scherr 

# data[].attributes.subject
Extracting Unconventional Sources of Oil By:Jennifer Scherr 

# data[].attributes.body
Solution #1- Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling oil (fracking)
Solution #2- Mining oil (tar) sands

They both just make the problem worse. First of all, Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling oil (fracking) creates water contamination, land destruction, oil pollution, geologic disruption, and uses fossils fuels. Also, mining oil (tar) sands releases up to more than three times more greenhouse gas pollution than conventional and in this solution it’s not making a difference since they are still trying to get oil.

# data[].attributes.headline
Topic: Expanding drilling offshore for oil in United States                                    By: Jennifer Scherr

# data[].attributes.subject
Topic: Expanding drilling offshore for oil in United States                                    By: Jennifer Scherr

# data[].attributes.body
Solution #1: Atlantic Ocean- Coastline/continental shelf
Solution #2: Arctic Ocean

They both are very good economically but not so environmentally. These solutions help fisherman and seafood companies make money. It's a process that starts with fisherman, seafood companies, then citizens. The fisherman make money from selling the animals they've caught to seafood companies. After this, seafood companies sell the seafood to citizens. This is good economically because there are so many fish that as long as they keep reproducing, this process will continue.

# data[].attributes.headline
more efficient and technologically advanced coal power plants

# data[].attributes.subject
more efficient and technologically advanced coal power plants

# data[].attributes.body
Coal gasification greatly increases the carbon emission and is a terrible long-term solution.  Gasification only benefits the people who own the plant because it is economically better than burning coal.  Carbon storage and sequestriation is a better solution because it greatly reduces pollution and carbon emissions and will benefit everyone long-term.
-Zaiden Ingle

# data[].attributes.body
hurts and helps society can get rid of waste does corrode engines I helps a lot of people and it could be used by the future generations.
-Umar

# data[].attributes.body
Harnessing bio gas can both hurt and help the environment. It helps the environment by limiting deforestation and helping to get rid of extra waste that can cause harm to the environment. It can harm the environment because if it is released into the atmosphere it can severely damage the ozone layer. It benefits many people by reducing the toxins in waste treatment plants to prevent individuals that live near it not get sick .

# data[].attributes.body
This solution will benefit many people by it providing electricity and technology. This solution also has a greater efficiency than conventional coal-burning and you can effectively use the gases twice to generate electricity for many people. More people in the future can have electricity and power at a low cost no matter who they are. This solution will also create more jobs because people can participate in the process.

# data[].attributes.body
This solution benefits anyone who needs gas or an energy source. It can harm anyone who takes in any of the emissions.  It is beneficial to many people because it can generate electricity for an entire community. This solution can make people sick because of air pollution entering human bodies.  This solution can provide jobs for unemployed citizens and different races in the lower class. This may also provide jobs for veterans returning from war.
By: Dylan Rattet

# data[].attributes.body
This solution benefits people who need energy. The emissions can be harmful. It also helps reduce soil and water pollution because it will help get rid of the toxins in landfills which sit there for a long time. It can provide jobs for unemployed people who are in need -Evan Losin

# data[].attributes.headline
Building more efficient coal power plants 

# data[].attributes.subject
Building more efficient coal power plants 

# data[].attributes.body
Coal gasification will cause pollution and harm to humans/animals but will generate a lot of energy. - Nathan

# data[].attributes.body
This solution will be good for people who need gas or an energy source. It can make lots of energy. Although it can be beneficial it can be dangerous as well. It can harm people who take any of the emissions. It also causes air pollution, making people sick. This solution provides a ton of job opportunities. -Jenna Greenberg

# data[].attributes.headline
coal gasification & coal burning power plant

# data[].attributes.subject
coal gasification & coal burning power plant

# data[].attributes.body
the coal gasification plant can create lots of energy for electricity and more but emits a lot of pollutants into the air. The coal burning power plant gets rid of carbon dioxide in the air.
- Victoria O

# data[].attributes.headline
Building more efficient and technology advanced coal burning power plants                             By: Jennifer Scherr 

# data[].attributes.subject
Building more efficient and technology advanced coal burning power plants                             By: Jennifer Scherr 

# data[].attributes.body
Solution #1: Coal gasification plant
Solution #2: Carbon storage and sequestration coal burning power plant

Both of these solutions are good for social equity because they are used to make things more fair. For example, they both benefit people who use lots of energy since coal is very cheep and affordable. Also, both solutions make it easier to generate energy for a big amount of people if there was a power outage. Lastly, when coal is used it allows more people to have jobs in the coal industry so it makes it more fair for those that don’t have jobs since the coal industry is very big and needs as many people as possible regardless of how much experience the person has. This is a positive for both solution’s social equity.