# data[].attributes.body
In the article entitled '' Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity'' Stazyk, Moldovanova, and Frederickson (2014) mention about intergenerational fairness and awareness by human need. According to the author we can not ignore the negative problems in the past such as toxic waste and overgazing and thanks to past, current generation know how they deal with these problems and more sustainable for next generations.when people protect world resources without selfishness and produce clean products, the world sustain in a long term.Firstly, the authors claim that requirements of sustainability which are environmental,social and economical. When people meet own needs, they should think to shared with future generations and they protect natural resources.Secondly,methods of the economic sustainability these are Heal(1998) which is government is responsible for all impair effects in the future and Bratland(2006) which include property owners on the way for managing resources. Last but not least,the author explain that tragedy in commens which means selfishness in resources.Finally, stazyk state hope for future generations because of taking lesson an he take some advices for our future which are adopt implement policies and support intergenerational fairness.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article ''Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity'' Stazyk, Moldovanova, and Frederickson (2014) discuss the concept of sustainablity and the idea of intergenerational fairness. The authors argue that sustainability is not the term that only refers to the environment and the today's world but also, it is a significant form of intergenerational fairness which means that as we are today's people it is our obligation to protect next generations rights. First, the authors define sustainablity in three categories as environmental, economic, and social sustainability and they explain their connections with intergenerational fairness. In the economic sustainability, the authors mentioned about two models. First model emphasise the importance of government actions and decision while the second model pay attention to the private ownerships and individual's responsibility. Following this, the authors referred to the example of ''the tragedy of the commons'' and they compare the long term and short term benefits of that given example. Finally, the authors conclude by stating that today we have more information and awareness about the sustainability and our effects on both environment and future generations. So, we should try to apply policies which is benefical for the intergenerational fairness more than before.

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyze this student sample by using the given checklist and compare it with your own summaries

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyze this student sample by using the given checklist and compare it with your own summaries

# data[].attributes.body
Checklist for summarising:

I have carefully analysed the given text ·
I have taken notes of the main points and key arguments ·       I have written a summary of the major arguments in my own words. ·
I have organised the arguments in a coherent and logical manner ·
I have used the appropriate reporting verbs and phrases that indicate the writer’s attitude towards the topic ·        I have acknowledged the author and the text when necessary

In the article entitled "Sustainability, Intergenerational Social Equity, and the Socially Responsible Organization" Stazyk, Moldavanova, and Frederickson (2014) claim that governments, organizations and socities must be aware of their responsibilities according to which we should preserve our planet for the coming generation.First the writers define environmental, economic and social sustainability. They stress that protection of the natural resources are important for our survival. Moreover, the writers defend humans should pass the world in a livable way to the next generations. They also mention that economic sustainability is significant and present two different views. The first view stresses that citizens should be responsible for taking action and the other view argues that governments should be protecting our resources and creating jobs for their citizens. They carry on with the social sustainability and claim that people should not be self-centred but they should respect the rights of the future generations to enjoy world resources. The writers conclude by arguing that individuals and states should take the necessary steps to use world resources carefully for the benefit of future generations.

# data[].attributes.body
In "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity" by Stazyk,Moldovanova and Frederickson(2014) discuss about intergenerational fairness and sustainability. The authors argue that future generations will be in danger if humanity live with harming environmental resources of the world and the ecosystem, they suggest that  current generations should take actions in order to protect our resources for future generations. They state two definitions of sustainability and emphasize the fact that sustainability appeared too many years ago. Finally, they conclude by mentioning that we should look up solutions for future generations benefit.

Dear all,
You have good points but the supporting ideas are missing. Please work on them.
Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In” sustainability, intergenerational soceity equity and the socially responsible organization”,Stazyk , Moldovaona, Frederickson (2014) state the world which is fair  for current and future generations can  exist via sustainability (you need to be more specific-what does he suggest?). The authors start to show the similarity between definition of sustainable development given by Bruntland Commission Athenian oath.Then they   highlight intergenerational fairness by associating it with environmental social economic sustainability (you do not need to state the names of the document, but you need to explain what intergenerational equiıty means). To begin with they believe environmental sustainability supports future generation’s rights in having natural resources as current generation. Secondly, the authors describe two models of economic sustainability which are belonging to Heal Bratland (do not state the names but make clear what do these model state?). Finally, the authors conclude that sustainability aims to destroy infairness the between future and current generation.

Dear all,

Thank you. Good job, but please see my comments inside your summary.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
Stazky,Maldovanova,Frederickson,in their article”Sustainability and intergenerational social equity(2014) includes what is sustainability development and intergenerational fairness’s returns for next generations future(be specific they suggest intergenerational fairness but yıyu need to explain this suggestion to the readers).The authors believe that people can efficiently protect the future by understanding the concept of sustainability and apply it in normal life in order to enhance chance of living better and consider about intergenerational social equity and economic methods.

Dear all,

Thank you. You have a main argument that you need to work on and you need to summarize the supporting ideas. Please complete your summary practice and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “ Sustainabity and Intergenarational Social Equity” by  Stazyk,Moldovanova and Frederickson(2014) mentions the enviromental social and equality among the genarations

Dear all,
If you want to write better summaries, you need to practice. Please, complete your summary practice.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity", Stazky, Molduvanova, Frederickson (2014) discuss sustainability and intergenerational equity. According to the authors we should take our responsibilities and seek solutions to prevent the effects for the benefit of future generations.

Authors conclude the article by suggesting to seek and ad ...

Dear all,
If you want to write better summaries, you need to practice.Your supporting ideas are missing Please, complete your summary practice.

Best,
MET