# data[].attributes.body
No, because surrendering doesn't mean that what you are fighting for is going to be changed. Sometimes the only way to guarantee peace is by standing up and fighting for what you believe.

# data[].attributes.body
"There is a price we will not pay." "There is a point beyond which they must not advance." Reagan uses parallelism to point out what the Soviet Union cannot do because we will not stand for it.
He uses this hyperbole to exaggerate what we will do to the Soviet Union "we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."

# data[].attributes.body
No, because surrendering wouldn't necessarily lead to peace, there can still be some conflict. If they wanted peace, they would both find a way to compromise with each other.

# data[].attributes.body
The use of his rhetorical devices in the speech give it a more effective message because he uses other famous people in history to make it more inspirational. For example, he uses phrase from Winston Churchill

# data[].attributes.body
No, because two sides can compromise and come to a conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with this statement because if you surrender is giving an end to war and each nation gets their peace.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because surrendering is usually forced, and there will still be that tension between the two parties.

# data[].attributes.body
President Reagan alludes to All of these people because they fought against their oppressors and overcame the adversaries and he is saying that they will overcome too.

# data[].attributes.body
No because Surrendering doesn't end the conflict forever. It just moves it down the road. Surrendering gives the other people more power which will end in conflict but you could go for a treaty which wont end in any conflict.

# data[].attributes.body
We agree to his statement because if we keep having conflict, there would not be any peace. But if we surrender, we might still have problems but everyone would be at peace without fighting.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan uses this allusion to show the audience that we must fight for what is right, and that we too can overcome it.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because if you surrender you will show a sign of peace and if you keep on fighting you will create more conflict.

# data[].attributes.body
He chose those specific explains because they all fought for what what the right thing. They fought against those who oppressed others. People looked at those examples and see that they are in the same situation.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan alludes to these people because those people were going through similar situations. The effect of doing so helps people realize that even though we are going through conflicts, others also went through situations and overcame them.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Reagan wants us to look at these examples and reflect on our self. To think about what we should do that is right  and fair.

# data[].attributes.body
He used different rhetorical devices to prove his point and he also mentioned people that sacrifice their life for peace.

# data[].attributes.body
He alludes to these four specifically because he is comparing their situation to some of the most important moments in history. These events were also about people over coming their oppressors.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that he alludes to them because they are very important figures who stood up and fought for what they believed.

# data[].attributes.body
He refers to the citizens of the United States as "we," which would bring a sense of unity to the  American people. He also alludes to some of the most important moments of overcoming oppression in history, giving the situation a greater importance.

# data[].attributes.body
What makes this speech effective is he uses lots of rhetorical devices to get his point across and the people he included in his speech, helped others to keep fighting.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he alludes to these people because they all stood up and fought for what they believed no matter what it would take or end up. So he's trying to give them some examples to follow

# data[].attributes.body
He using rhetorical questions to make the listener think. He uses a hyperbole to make the next generations fate look way bleaker so the listener would agree with the anti-communist sentiment in the speech.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan refers to other times in history where people were forced to fight for freedom and relates it to their time. His words motivate his audience to fight for their liberty, and he directly asks his audience what they would do.

# data[].attributes.body
President Reagan makes this speech so effective because of his passion he drives through and the multiple uses of rhetorical devices for example when he alludes to Moses, the patriots and Jesus, the people of America would have know about these and felt strongly about this and also when he quotes some communistic lines like "better Red than dead.", Which the American would oppose.

# data[].attributes.body
"And what then?" This is a rhetorical question and it makes people question what will happen next. "we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness" The use of the hyperbole here helps because it's saying that they will have lots of consequences.

# data[].attributes.body
All rhetorical devices used and the theme of motivation help make the speech highly effective to the audience. He uses rhetorical devices such as allusions referring to the Bible, and pathos referring to one's emotions. He directly mentions other successful people such as Winston Churchill.

# data[].attributes.body
" Winston Churchill said, "  It gives the audience some faith in him. Makes the audience think that they could trust. "Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world?" This makes the audience have faith in his plan and ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
"peace and war"
" we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Peace and war refers to either we surrender or we fight for what is right. and the second rhertorical device, is a way of saying that we will win the fight and that they will be punished.

# data[].attributes.body
President Reagan makes this speech effective because he use important historical people such as Moses, Jesus, Patriots at Concord bridge and people opposing Nazis. All those people wanted liberty to be served. He also gives the audience motivation to stand up for what is right.

# data[].attributes.body
"The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain." This appeals to the audience emotions referring to the tragic history of the holocaust. Everyone remembers the holocaust as a difficult time in history. "We'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." This is an exaggeration saying how they will pay for their consequences for a long time.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan adds credibility to his speech when he quotes Winston Churchill, making his audience more convinced. When Reagan talks about the Soviet Union regime, he appeals to the emotions of his audience. This stirs their emotions and his audience is willing to fight.

# data[].attributes.body
"because those voices don't speak for the rest of us". he uses pathos to get into peoples emotion and make them think about how they have to take control of their life nobody can control you.
"Winston Churchill" he alludes to a big historical person so people can know that he is not the only one how agrees with this.