# data[].attributes.body
Cross examination Step2:
The typical questions asked are:
."Mr wong you are the youth leader at the local rec center is that correct?
. "And therefore you know Mr Donovan T.C quite well don' t you?"
. "Mr T.C plays basketball at the rec center quite often doesn't he ?"

The lawyer is trying to undermine the witness's
+

# data[].attributes.headline
Roséanna Chaussade-retot / Lucas vialade

# data[].attributes.subject
Roséanna Chaussade-retot / Lucas vialade

# data[].attributes.body
(suite) Step 2 : example 1 : The lawyer is trying to gather informations that connect Mr "TC" et Mr Williams. The case is about an identity's mistake. Mr TC was wrongly accused to attack Mr Williams.

Example 2 : The atmosphere is really heavy. The lawyer is trying to awareness and to convince the judge

# data[].attributes.body
Cross examination Step1 :
A cross examination is the lawyer's oppurtunity to ask a witness who was summoned by the other side questions. The lawyer during the cross examination tries to undermine the credibility of the witness and lead him to an answer that he wants.

You generally ask questions that you already have the answers to and use leading questions to get to the answer that you want.

# data[].attributes.body
step 2:
Example 1:
The lawyer presented her client to the jury and and also informed them that her Mr Williams based his accusations off of half truths and assumptions. The lawyer also said that Mr T.C was not in the alley he was at the rec center where he played basketball and talked to Mr Wong about courses and scholarships and went home at eight. A month later Constable De Carlo came to arrest him and picked up basketball shoes that were outside of his appartment and that were not his. The constable and Mr Wong confirmed this.

Example 2:
The atmosphere in the scene is very heavy and serious.

Thelawyer is trying to convince the jury that Tom Robinson is innocent. He uses the fact that Tom Robinson has a family to try and get the jury to sympathize with him.

# data[].attributes.body
STEP 2 :
1) EXAMPLE 1 :
THIS IS A CASE OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY BECAUSE THE CRIME IS NOT PROVED. THE CASE DEALS ABOUT MR. TISSY AND HIS ATTACK IN AN ALLEY. THE EVIDENCE OF THE CLOSING STATEMENT IS ABOUT BASKETBALL SHOES.  MISTER WILLIAMS SAID HE RECONIZED SOMEONE ON A PHOTO.

2) EXAMPLE 2:
- THE ATMOSPHERE : THE AUDIENCE IS SILENT, CONCENTRATED, ATTENTIVE. WE ONLY HEAR THE CHAIRS MOVING AND THERE ARE LONG MOMENTS OF SILENCE. THE ATMOSPHERE IS HEAVY AND SOLEMN.
- THE GOAL OF THE LAWYER : HE TRIES TO SEND THEM HOPE OF DUTY.

# data[].attributes.body
The lawyer defends a man who is mr. T.C. He is actually accused of an attack. The lawyer said that the man was working in work center for scholarship to attending college. He testify that he was never in this alley and he didn't commit this attack. He have a distants memories of this stressfull situation.

This moment looks very stressfull and a strange atmosphere stays in the tribunal.
The lawyer trying to explain carefully all the evidences to the judge because she wants to have the better judgement for her client.

# data[].attributes.body
STEP 1 : A closing statement is when the lawyer reviews all of the evidences of the case to argue the defense of his client. It's the time when you have to put your case the best way that you can with the evidences that are really usefull.

STEP 2 : ex 1 : The video is a closing statement of a mistaken identity.  MR. T.C was not here during the attack on march 2010.
ex 2 : The astmosphere is very tense and quiet. The lawer is trying to convince the judge.

# data[].attributes.body
The lawyer defends a man who is mr. T.C. He is actually accused of an attack. The lawyer said that

# data[].attributes.body
2. A closing statement is basically when the lawyer reviews all of the evidence in front of the court in the final moments of the trial. The lawyers goal is to sway the judge and jury to his side so that they can give a verdict in

# data[].attributes.body
Closing statement is when the lawyer has review all the evidences and he can argue the defence for his client. He do this to show to the judge all the most important things that can swing the decision in favor of the client.
The lawyer chooses the most important things to say. Because not all of the details of each evidences are usefull. And he may review the evidences.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1 :  Closing statement takes place at the end of a case, when the lawyer has review all the evidences and he can argue the defense for his client. Only importants things are said.
Step 2 :example 1
The video is the closing statement of the defense lawyer. She affirms that  this case is  about mistaken identity.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 2:

Exemple 1 : The lawyer is trying to disculpate her client Mister T.C. he is charged of an attack in an alley. She said that he has a bright future ahead of him it's a case of mistaken identity and he's seeking for justice.

Exemple 2 : The atmosphere is very solemn and the lawyer is trying to claim to the jury to innocent and let his client go home. He asks them to do their duty.

# data[].attributes.headline
Nathalie hacquin (With Mathilde Donstetter)

# data[].attributes.subject
Nathalie hacquin (With Mathilde Donstetter)

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1:
It's the time at the end of the case to review all of the evidences. It's the time where the lawyer have the opportunity of review the case. the lawyer give a summary of the most importants détails and say why it's important. It' not a time for the lawyer to introduce any evidence or to comment on any thing that the judge didn't hear from the witness. It's an opportunity for the lawyers and their clients to have the judge's decision in their favor.

Step 2 :
example 2 : the situation is very tense. the lawyer make pauses in his oration. His tone is very serious and all of the presents persons are silent. He try to convice the judge and all the people the innocence of his client.

# data[].attributes.body
STEP 1:  Closing Statement takes place at the end of the case when all of the evidences has been given. The lawyer has an opportunity to review the case, the evidences and put a spin on it. It happens before that the lawyer have to give the informations to the judge. The lawyer just have to give the most important informations. The closing statement it's when the lawyers have to give the verdict and the better end of he case.

STEP 2:
Example 1: On this video, the lawyer is talking about a mistake of identity. Her client was wrongly accused of attacking the victim. The crime is not proved.
Example 2: The atmosphere in the courtroom is heavy, nobody's talking, it seems that it's a very serious case. That's a very tense situation. The lawyer doesn't talk much and very slowly. He is stand in front of the jury just to be heard, he seems angry. The lawyer is trying to appeal to the jury.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1
It takes place at the end of the case when all of the evidences have been given and when the lawyer has the opportunity to reveal the case, the evidences and put a spin on it. This happens before to give the informations to the judge (the lawyer doesn't have to give all of the details to him, only the most important informations).

Step 2
Example 1 : The lawyer is talking about a case of mistakes and identity. It is about two men, who were in contact in College.  She talks about their personnal lifes and one man testimonies that he wasn't in the alley during the attack of the other man. She's mister Tissy's lawyer.
Example 2 : Everybody is very nervous, there is a huge silence in the tribunal.  The lawyer is not happy about the decision.

# data[].attributes.body
2. A closing statement is at the end of the case when the lawyer is given the oppurtunity to argue his case in a persuasive way after the evidence has been reviewed. It is the lawyer's final chance to really advocate for his/her client. The lawyer cannot present any new pieces of evidence or any witnesses during the final statement.

In the closing statemnet you normally summarize all of the important information and evidence and explain why that piece of evidence or information is important.

# data[].attributes.body
step 1 ~ the closing statement is the end of the trial, when all the evidences had been reviewed and the lawyers can defend their clients. this is the time the lawyers have the most opportunity to help his or her client, but they have to select the evidences and details because they are not all important. They say why the evidence they chose is important and why that evidence should swing the judges in the favor of the client. they point everything the judge probably didn't hear from the witnesses.

step 2 ~~

# data[].attributes.body
A closing statement
Step 1
It takes place at the end of the trial when all of the evidences have been given and when the lawyer has the opportunity to reveal the case, the evidences and put a spin on it. This happens before to give the informations to the judge (the lawyer doesn't have to give him all the details, only the most important informations, already known). A closing statement serves to justify why the informations are important and why they should serve to swing the judge's decision in our favor.

Step 2
Example 1 : The lawyer is talking about a case of mistaken identity. It is about two men, who were in contact in College.  She talks about their personnal lifes and one man testimonies that he wasn't in the alley during the attack of the other man. She's mister Tissy's lawyer.
Example 2 : Everybody is very nervous, there is a huge silence in the tribunal, the lawyer is revolted.   He is trying to convince the jury about his client, he says ''do your duty" in taking them by feelings.

Cross examination
Step 1
A cross examination is the lawyer's opportunity to ask questions to the witness of the other side. The point to build a lawyer's own case to undermine the credibility of the witness. The key of a cross examination is to use leading questions is order to make the witness agreeing with you.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1 :
At the end of the case, the lawyers review the evidence that has been given during the case. It looks like a summery of every arguments. The lawyers put the case in the best way they can.  Because it is the time where they can persue the jury and the judge.

Step 2  :
1) The video is the closing statement of the defense lawyer. The lawyer declare it is a case of mistaken identity. Her client named Mr. Teecy (?) is a working student and he has a job.
He is charge of a criminal attack which happened on March 10th 2010.

2) The atmosphere is very solemn and tense. The lawyer seems feigned by the situation. We can see that by his pauses in his speech. The audiance seems very moved by his closing statement. He is obviously trying to convince the jury to prove his client innocent.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1:  A closing statement it's at the end of the case when all the evidences have been given. It's a moment when the lawyer can advocate for his/her client. They review the case and the evidences given during the trial. They can't introduce more evidences, they have to give the most importante evidences without give any details. So it's the moment where the lawyer had to do his best to get what he wants to get and puts the case the best way that he can.

# data[].attributes.body
Closing Statement :
1.The closing statement is a summary made by the lawyer at the end of the trial. The goal of the closing statement is to help the lawyer convince the judges in his favour by giving a well constructed summary based on all the evidence and testimonies already mentioned throughout the trial. The lawyer must not mention any new information about the case, but only use the information that is already known.
2. example 1 : The lawyer said that her client was wrongly accused of attacking the victim and that it is a case of mistaken identity. The accusation was based on  an approximate indentification of the culprit and troubled memories from the stressful event.
example 2 : 1. The atmosphere is very tense and we can see that it is a crucial moment of the trial.
2. The lawyer is trying to appeal to the jury's finer feelings by evoking their duty.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mathilde Donstetter (with Nathalie Hacquin)

# data[].attributes.subject
Mathilde Donstetter (with Nathalie Hacquin)

# data[].attributes.body
Step 2, example 1:
The lawyer affirms that it is a case of mistaken identity, where her client, Mr.Tissy is wrongly accused, and for a student like him, a criminal charge would be detrimental to his future.
The crime's victim (and witness), Andrew Williams, in his search for justice, based his choice on a distance memory of a stressful situation, and choised a photo based on a presumption and not a stable knowledge.
A credible witness saw Mr.Tissy walk home at 8:30 PM, on march 10th 2010, and the combined testimony of constable Tecarlo (who arrested Mr.Tissy) and Mr. Rong (who work with Mr.Tissy) valid Mr.Tissy's statement: he was never in the alley and didn't commit the attack.