# data[].attributes.body
My refection on Abuse is i feel sad because some kids had adhd.

# data[].attributes.body
This is my refection on abuse.After watching abuse,I feel very shocked.I feel this way because the speaker said that abuse can affect forever.I learned that abuse can effect you mentally and physiclly. Now I want to put an end to abuse.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Gentrification & The Next Generation | Starlett Quarles | TEDxCrenshaw

Jennifer Bell on November 15 2017

Gentrification is happening in the Crenshaw (Los Angeles, USA) area. How can the rising generations contribute to the change vs. solely being affected by it?

Recently honored as one of "Los Angeles' Most Influential African American Movers and Shakers" by Reverend Al Sharpton's National Action Network - LA, Starlett Quarles is a passionate, long time Community Advocate for the progress of Black Los Angeles and urban communities across the Country. A Third-Generation Angeleno and Community Builder, Starlett's family has been instrumental in the Redevelopment of South Los Angeles' urban landscape through the legacy of her grandfather's Framing and Construction Company; as well as her father's Real Estate Development Firm. As a result, Community Building is in her DNA. Starlett's professional experience ranges from being Program Director for a non-profit Community Development Corporation, to Marketing Director of her father's Real Estate Development Firm, The Bedford

Launched as a beta version in 2009, SafeShare.tv has gained popularity as the safest way to Watch and Share YouTube and Vimeo videos, and is widely used all around the globe by educators so their students can watch educational material without the fear of inappropriate videos showing up.

Are you sure you want to do this?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SafeShare.tv - Gentrification & The Next Generation | S...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Gentrification is happening in the Crenshaw (Los Angeles, USA) area. How can the rising generations contribute to the change vs. solely being affected by it? Recently honored as one of "Los Angeles' Most Influential African American Movers and Shakers" by Reverend Al Sharpton's National Action Network - LA, Starlett Quarles is a passionate, long time Community Advocate for the progress of Black Los Angeles and urban communities across the Country.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jim Yong Kim: Doesn't everyone deserve a chance at a good life?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Aspirations are rising as never before across the world, thanks in large part to smartphones and the internet -- will they be met with opportunity or frustration? As President of the World Bank Group, Jim Yong Kim wants to end extreme poverty and boost shared prosperity.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jessica Shortall: The US needs paid family leave -- for the sake of its future

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We need women to work, and we need working women to have babies. So why is America one of the only countries in the world that offers no national paid leave to new working mothers?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Get a daily email featuring the latest talk, plus a quick mix of trending content.

By subscribing, you understand and agree that we will store, process and manage your personal information according to our Privacy Policy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Michael Botticelli: Addiction is a disease. We should treat it like one

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Only one in nine people in the United States gets the care and treatment they need for addiction and substance abuse. A former Director of National Drug Control Policy, Michael Botticelli is working to end this epidemic and treat people with addictions with kindness, compassion and fairness.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Melvin Russell: I love being a police officer, but we need reform

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We've invested so much in police departments as protectors that we have forgotten what it means to serve our communities, says Baltimore Police officer Lt. Colonel Melvin Russell. It's led to coldness and callousness, and it's dehumanized the police force.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How childhood trauma affects health across a lifetime

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Childhood trauma isn’t something you just get over as you grow up. Pediatrician Nadine Burke Harris explains that the repeated stress of abuse, neglect and parents struggling with mental health or substance abuse issues has real, tangible effects on the development of the brain. This unfolds across a lifetime, to the point where those who’ve experienced high levels of trauma are at triple the risk for heart disease and lung cancer. An impassioned plea for pediatric medicine to confront the prevention and treatment of trauma, head-on.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why gun violence can’t be our new normal

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It doesn’t matter whether you love or hate guns; it’s obvious that the US would be a safer place if there weren’t thousands of them sold every day without background checks. Dan Gross, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, makes a passionate, personal appeal for something that more than 90 percent of Americans want: background checks for all gun sales. “For every great movement around the world, there’s a moment where you can look back and say, ‘That’s when things really started to change,’” Gross says. “For the movement to end gun violence in America, that moment is here.”

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Get a daily email featuring the latest talk, plus a quick mix of trending content.

By subscribing, you understand and agree that we will store, process and manage your personal information according to our Privacy Policy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Sue Klebold: My son was a Columbine shooter. This is my story

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sue Klebold is the mother of Dylan Klebold, one of the two shooters who committed the Columbine High School massacre, murdering 12 students and a teacher. She's spent years excavating every detail of her family life, trying to understand what she could have done to prevent her son's violence.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Get a daily email featuring the latest talk, plus a quick mix of trending content.

By subscribing, you understand and agree that we will store, process and manage your personal information according to our Privacy Policy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Lloyd Pendleton: The Housing First approach to homelessness

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What do you think would happen if you invited an individual with mental health issues who had been homeless for many years to move directly from the street into housing?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Get a daily email featuring the latest talk, plus a quick mix of trending content.

By subscribing, you understand and agree that we will store, process and manage your personal information according to our Privacy Policy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Noy Thrupkaew: Human trafficking is all around you. This is how it works

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Behind the everyday bargains we all love -- the $10 manicure, the unlimited shrimp buffet -- is a hidden world of forced labor to keep those prices at rock bottom. Noy Thrupkaew investigates human trafficking - which flourishes in the US and Europe, as well as developing countries - and shows us the human faces behind the exploited labor that feeds global consumers.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Sangu Delle: There's no shame in taking care of your mental health

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
When stress got to be too much for TED Fellow Sangu Delle, he had to confront his own deep prejudice: that men shouldn't take care of their mental health. In a personal talk, Delle shares how he learned to handle anxiety in a society that's uncomfortable with emotions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Jennifer Bell on November 13 2017

Focusing on allowance and financial concepts to teach kids to be smart with money is a great start. But, If this is all we focus on, we miss the opportunity to ensure our kids grow into prosperous adults. Listen to this surprisingly simple system anyone can implement to nurture a child's prosperity right away.

Ellen Rogin, CPA, CFP® is an expert on living a life of success and prosperity.

As the founder of a wealth management firm, Ellen combines her credentialed expertise with an inspired, conscious approach to money. Chockfull of "left brain" credentials, MBA, CPA, and Certified Financial PlannerTM, Ellen also walks on the "right" side, balancing values, big picture ideas, meditation and humor with all her professional training. She is as comfortable talking about the power of compound interest as she is talking about the power of belief.

In their latest book, "Picture Your Prosperity: Smart Money Moves to Turn Your Vision into Reality," Ellen and her co-aut

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SafeShare.tv - The Surprising Way to Teach Your Kids to...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Focusing on allowance and financial concepts to teach kids to be smart with money is a great start. But, If this is all we focus on, we miss the opportunity to ensure our kids grow into prosperous adults. Listen to this surprisingly simple system anyone can implement to nurture a child's prosperity right away.

# data[].attributes.body
You completed the Harlem Renaissance Assignment.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
As the world seeks to slow the pace of climate change, preserve wildlife, and support more than eight billion people, trees inevitably hold a major part of the answer. Yet the mass destruction of trees-deforestation-continues, sacrificing the long-term benefits of standing trees for short-term gain of fuel, and materials for manufacturing and construction.

We need trees for a variety of reasons, not least of which is that they absorb the carbon dioxide we exhale and the heat-trapping greenhouse gases that human activities emit. As those gases enter the atmosphere, global warming increases, a trend scientists now prefer to call climate change.

There is also the imminent danger of disease caused by deforestation. An estimated 60 percent of emerging infectious diseases come from animals, and a major cause of viruses' jump from wildlife to humans is habitat loss, often through deforestation.

But we can still save our forests. Aggressive efforts to rewild and reforest are already showing success. Tropical tree cover alone can provide 23 percent of the climate mitigation needed to meet goals set in the Paris Agreement in 2015, according to one estimate.

Causes of deforestation

Forests still cover about 30 percent of the world's land area, but they are disappearing at an alarming rate. Since 1990, the world has lost more than 420 million hectares or about a billion acres of forest, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-mainly in Africa and South America. About 17 percent of the Amazonian rainforest has been destroyed over the past 50 years, and losses recently have been on the rise. The organization Amazon Conservation reports that destruction rose by 21 percent in 2020, a loss the size of Israel.

Farming, grazing of livestock, mining, and drilling combined account for more than half of all deforestation. Forestry practices, wildfires and, in small part, urbanization account for the rest. In Malaysia and Indonesia, forests are cut down to make way for producing palm oil, which can be found in everything from shampoo to saltine crackers. In the Amazon, cattle ranching and farms-particularly soy plantations-are key culprits.

Logging operations, which provide the world's wood and paper products, also fell countless trees each year. Loggers, some of them acting illegally, also build roads to access more and more remote forests-which leads to further deforestation. Forests are also cut as a result of growing urban sprawl as land is developed for homes.

Not all deforestation is intentional. Some is caused by a combination of human and natural factors like wildfires and overgrazing, which may prevent the growth of young trees.

Why it matters

There are some 250 million people who live in forest and savannah areas and depend on them for subsistence and income-many of them among the world's rural poor.

Eighty percent of Earth's land animals and plants live in forests, and deforestation threatens species including the orangutan, Sumatran tiger, and many species of birds. Removing trees deprives the forest of portions of its canopy, which blocks the sun's rays during the day and retains heat at night. That disruption leads to more extreme temperature swings that can be harmful to plants and animals.

With wild habitats destroyed and human life ever expanding, the line between animal and human areas blurs, opening the door to zoonotic diseases. In 2014, for example, the Ebola virus killed over 11,000 people in West Africa after fruit bats transmitted the disease to a toddler who was playing near trees where bats were roosting.

(How deforestation is leading to more infectious diseases in humans.)

Some scientists believe there could be as many as 1.7 million currently "undiscovered" viruses in mammals and birds, of which up to 827,000 could have the ability to infect people, according to a 2018 study.

Deforestation's effects reach far beyond the people and animals where trees are cut. The South American rainforest, for example, influences regional and perhaps even global water cycles, and it's key to the water supply in Brazilian cities and neighboring countries. The Amazon actually helps furnish water to some of the soy farmers and beef ranchers who are clearing the forest. The loss of clean water and biodiversity from all forests could have many other effects we can't foresee, touching even your morning cup of coffee.

In terms of climate change, cutting trees both adds carbon dioxide to the air and removes the ability to absorb existing carbon dioxide. If tropical deforestation were a country, according to the World Resources Institute, it would rank third in carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions, behind China and the U.S.

What can be done

The numbers are grim, but many conservationists see reasons for hope. A movement is under way to preserve existing forest ecosystems and restore lost tree cover by first reforesting (replanting trees) and ultimately rewilding (a more comprehensive mission to restore entire ecosystems).

(Which nation could be the first to be rewilded?)

Organizations and activists are working to fight illegal mining and logging-National Geographic Explorer Topher White, for example, has come up with a way to use recycled cell phones to monitor for chainsaws. In Tanzania, the residents of Kokota have planted more than 2 million trees on their small island over a decade, aiming to repair previous damage. And in Brazil, conservationists are rallying in the face of ominous signals that the government may roll back forest protections.

(Which tree planting projects should you support?)

Stopping deforestation before it reaches a critical point will play a key role in avoiding the next zoonotic pandemic. A November 2022 study showed that when bats struggle to find suitable habitat, they travel closer to human communities where diseases are more likely to spillover. Inversely, when bats' native habitats were left intact, they stayed away from humans. This research is the first to show how we can predict and avoid spillovers through monitoring and maintaining wildlife habitats.

For consumers, it makes sense to examine the products and meats you buy, looking for sustainably produced sources when you can. Nonprofit groups such as the Forest Stewardship Council and the Rainforest Alliance certify products they consider sustainable, while the World Wildlife Fund has a palm oil scorecard for consumer brands.

Editor's note: This story was originally published on February 2019. It has been updated.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Deforestation and Its Effect on the Planet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Large scale destruction of trees-deforestation-affects ecosystems, climate, and even increases risk for zoonotic diseases spreading to humans.

# data[].attributes.body
bullying has been going on for a long time and it needs to stop. because now bullying is getting worse every time  please help me stop people from bullying.

# data[].attributes.body
Protecting animals are important, because animals are important to people who can't see or cant walk. Some animals are being put in cages and sometime's starve or even get sick, from not being taken cared of properly. Other's, live in pain being abused for years.If this keep's going, how will help people that cant see with no one to take them to the place's they need to go? It's not an easy life for animals.

# data[].attributes.body
police officers are killing people because people are calling them races and ect.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
By now everyone knows that police, whether consciously or subconsciously, are targeting young black men, killing them at a disproportionate rate.

But what if everyone is wrong? What if race actually has little causal effect on police shootings?

In fact, the data show just that. If we as a nation can look seriously at the evidence, we can have a much more productive conversation about what's gone wrong and how to fix it.

The Washington Post recently ran an article about police killings nationwide in the first half of the year. That story made the same mistake Post reporters have been making for years by comparing the racial composition of those killed with the overall racial composition of the United States.

"Police have continued to shoot and kill a disproportionately large number of black males, who account for nearly a quarter of the deaths, yet are only 6 percent of the nation's population," the paper reported.

The Post's unspoken assumption is that police killings should match America's overall demographic statistics. That might sound right at first, but it is well understood in academic circles that using population as a benchmark can be dangerous, because not all people are equally likely to come into confrontation with the police. To borrow an example from Michigan State University researcher Joseph Cesario, an officer is not as likely to shoot the cashier selling him a cup of coffee as he is to shoot a citizen with an outstanding warrant he has just pulled over.

And few activities, from the important to the trivial, conform to the Census Bureau's breakdowns of the American population. Black people, who constitute about 13 percent of Americans - the Post had to focus on men alone to get the figure down to 6 percent - are 1.4 percent of doctors, 38 percent of barbers, and 16 percent of cooks. They account for 14 percent of pedestrian fatalities and 74.4 percent of NBA players but just 8 percent of NPR newsroom employees.

The media would have Americans believe that race is the single most important and predictive element of fatal encounters between police and civilians. Yet both the basic data and less superficial analyses than the Post 's show that is not the case. With a few notable exceptions, violent criminal attacks are the best predictor of whom police might shoot in America.

Even the Post itself has noted the relevant data in the past. "In 74 percent of all fatal police shootings, the individuals had already fired shots, brandished a gun or attacked a person with a weapon or their bare hands," the paper reported in 2015. "Another 16 percent of the shootings came after incidents that did not involve firearms or active attacks but featured other potentially dangerous threats."

Those figures are consistent with other data. In 2015, two-thirds of unarmed people of any race killed by police had been in the process of committing violent crime or property destruction. Fourteen percent were engaged in domestic violence. Ten percent were committing a robbery, 20 percent a burglary or vandalism, and 21 percent an assault on another civilian.

More important, cops don't usually initiate their contact with the person who is shot. Three-quarters of fatal encounters start with someone contacting police and reporting the suspect.

Further, more than half of the unarmed people killed by police suffered from mental-health issues, drug intoxication, physical disability, or some combination of them. That's something public-health policies can address head-on.

That's why I get so angry at the Washington Post - and other media like ProPublica and the Guardian - for conflating correlation and causation. Their comparisons might spur outrage and sell ads, but they also foment discord and distract from actionable data on police killings.

We must look to reasons other than simple racism on the part of the police, who end up holding the ball for a lot of failed systemic issues.

Had the Washington Post consumed as much digital ink reporting on mental-health and drug-policy reform as it spends on shootings, I daresay the ball would have moved farther than it has. As it stands, since the paper started seriously tracking police shootings, only Texas has enacted criminal-justice mental-health legislation.

Police are already conducting work to identify and re-train or fire the demonstrably small number of its ranks who behave inappropriately. To presume that solves society's ills is short-sighted. We must look to reasons other than simple racism on the part of the police, who end up holding the ball for a lot of failed systemic issues. A disproportionate share of America's violent offenders are African-American males, but not because they are black. It is because America has failed its black communities, and those of the vulnerable more generally, for decades. The best predictors of crime are broken families, living in a bad neighborhood, young mothers, and other risk factors known since the 1960s: a lack of education, nutrition, after-school activities, music, art, and other programs that create opportunity.

America cannot solve its problems in how police and citizens interact if our most trusted public watchdogs in the press keep muddying the waters with divisive, superficial analyses. To solve any problem, one must first take accurate measure of it. Good reporters will see to it that the information Americans act on is not just technically correct but also grounded in meaningful and honest analysis.

READ MORE:
Trump's Truth-Telling about 'Amercian Carnage'
Another Study Finds White Cops Don't Target Black Suspects
Justice Is Bigger Than Narrative

- Nick Selby is a Dallas-area police detective. He is co-author of In Context: Understanding Police Killings of Unarmed Civilians.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Police Aren't Targeting and Killing Black Men

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By now everyone knows that police, whether consciously or subconsciously, are targeting young black men, killing them at a disproportionate rate. But what if everyone is wrong? What if race actually has little causal effect on police shootings? In fact, the data show just that.

# data[].attributes.body
cv,.dx

# data[].attributes.body
Animal protection is important because animals help  people.Animals are dying because people are taking them from their homes.There are ways we can protect  animals.I like animals because they  make me smile  and make me happy.

# data[].attributes.body
Racism is a way to kill or hurt people. For example: slavery,sit/go to the back of the bus,eat at different places,jobs,different water fountain,and different restroom.During segregation black were treated unfairly/differently.
Racism has in the past kept things/contests from being fair.

# data[].attributes.body
This  article will  talk  about public restrooms.Public restrooms are big deals beca

# data[].attributes.body
This article will talk about all the homelessnes and i think it is bad to sleep out side, or on the side of the street. so we should help the poor. there is a lot of work that need to get done. I would help the poor by giving them money so they can find a homles shelter. we sould give them heathy food so that they can stay alive or so they will be healthy and not so skiny we love god so we should love everybody because good is within all of us.

# data[].attributes.body
Animal protection is important because

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Around the world, what the media often refer to as "the animal rights movement" is taking off. Mass protests, fierce lobbying, litigation, and draft treaties have led to new legislation at the national, provincial, and city levels. It is now forbidden to use great apes in biomedical research, to bullfight in Catalonia, and to operate factory farms and slaughterhouses without adhering to the stricter rules governing the treatment and living conditions of livestock. However, with a few exceptions, these efforts are not truly about "animal rights" but about "animal welfare."

One reason for this difference is that worldwide, animals are regarded as "legal things," incapable of having rights and treated as articles of property. In contrast, humans are deemed "legal persons," possessing intrinsic value and the capacity for an infinite number of legal rights as the owners of "legal things." Another reason is that the term "animal" encompasses the enormously diverse biological kingdom of animalia, which comprises more than 1.25 million known species (with more to be discovered) that fall along a vast continuum of consciousness, sentience, general intelligence, and autonomy. It includes 60,000 vertebrates: 5,500 mammals, 10,000 birds, 6,200 amphibians, 30,000 fish, and 8,200 reptiles. The million-plus known invertebrates include about 950,000 varieties of insects, 81,000 mollusks, and 40,000 crustaceans.
https://readymag.com/66599
At one end of this spectrum of mental capacity and awareness are animals such as sponges, jellyfish, and sea anemones that scientists believe are unlikely to be conscious or have an ability to feel pain or suffer. These are therefore unlikely to be appropriate subjects of animal welfare legislation (which focuses on preventing unnecessary pain and suffering), though they may be protected by environmental or conservation laws.

At some point along this continuum, however, a primitive level of consciousness and sentience kicks in. A great number of animals fall in this category, such as cows and sheep. These animals have been the subject of welfare legislation ever since the beginning of the nineteenth century, when early animal welfare movements in the United Kingdom sought to end cruel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Around the world, what the media often refer to as "the animal rights movement" is taking off. Mass protests, fierce lobbying, litigation, and draft treaties have led to new legislation at the national, provincial, and city levels.

# data[].attributes.headline
Violent protests in america by: Thomas Givens

# data[].attributes.subject
Violent protests in america by: Thomas Givens

# data[].attributes.body
In the 1920's lots of people were poor and couldn't afford food and drink to provide for their families. many of them blamed their hardships on the government doing nothing.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Radical Farm Protests during the Great Depression

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In February 1933, thousands of farmers marched on the new capitol building in Lincoln demanding a moratorium on all farm foreclosures. The Legislature responded within a month and halted foreclosure sales for two years. However, they allowed district judges to decide how long a foreclosure could be postponed or to order the proceedings to go forward anyway.

# data[].attributes.body
One problem about america is that there is to much pollution. Americans can fix that by picking litter up and not doing it. some animals are dying from pollution so people should help them. Some people who hate hot weather can help that by not letting out a lot of gas out of peoples cars ande factories.

# data[].attributes.body
The national rate of homelessness is going down but, there are a lot of work that needs to done.I feel sad because homeless people have no money and no home.A way I would help homeless people is give them money and give them food for them and their children.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It's hard to think when conditions around you aren't good

Under the right conditions, our brains are capable of unparalleled levels of abstract thought, such as imagining a future goal and making detailed plans about how to get there. But under adverse conditions, our brains have evolved to cut down on the flourishes and focus in on the basics of survival in the here and now.

And in our society, hardly anything is more adverse to survival than poverty. It would be foolish to spend precious mental resources thinking about solving a problem that won't occur for a month when you can't afford dinner tonight. A series of studies in 2013 on scarcity among people in the lab and farmers in the real world found that being deprived of money caused the equivalent of a 13-point drop in IQ. That kind of a handicap will make it hard for anyone to engage in the high-level thinking required for self-control.

Like any other kind of thinking, self-control can be taught. Children do better at self-control (and in school) when their parents teach them to solve problems independently and to participate in family decisions. But that kind of involved parenting takes time, and financially poor parents are often " time-poor," too.

Family factors, like nurturing and stimulation, are directly linked to mental development and can be limited by time poverty. And parents living in poor, dangerous neighborhoods don't give their children as much autonomy as parents who live in less dangerous neighborhoods. This doesn't mean that poor working parents aren't choosing to teach their kids self-control. It means they may be prevented from teaching self-control to their children.

Poverty doesn't occur in isolation

The Little Engine That Could thought she could climb up the hill before she actually did. She had what psychologists call " self-efficacy," the belief in her own abilities. An important source of self-efficacy is watching similar others accomplish goals.

A child born in the bottom fifth of the income distribution has less than a one-in-10 chance of moving to the top fifth, and even the brightest poor children are still less likely to complete college than average wealthy children. Evidence supports the commonsense conclusion that children in poverty have little reason to have high self-efficacy about self-control based on observing those around them.

Working out of poverty is an uphill struggle. The extra work required of people at the bottom to move up takes its toll on health. Poor children who succeed in school and life, particularly members of minority groups, often have worse health than those who fail, showing at least a 20 percent increase in a biological measure of heart disease risk.

A recent study found that adolescents from poor backgrounds with higher self-control did better psychologically but actually aged faster at the molecular level than those with lower self-control. Self-control and achievement require poor people to overcome a number of structural barriers and obstacles. This is stressful, and stress takes a toll on health. Navigating this difficult terrain causes wear and tear on key parts of the body such as the immune system and ultimately deteriorates health.

Rethinking poverty and self-control

This research makes me rethink both poverty and self-control. The science suggests that poverty has powerful harmful effects on people, and helps explain why it's so hard to escape. Their choices are much more a product of their situation, rather than a lack of self-control.

The way we scientists define self-control is part of the problem, too. We tend to think that focusing on long-term goals is always a good thing and satisfying short-term needs is always a bad thing; we say that "self-control failure" is equivalent to focusing on the near term. This definition works well for people who have the luxury of time and money to meet their basic needs and have resources left over to plan for the future. But self-control as currently defined might not even apply to people living in the permanent now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Poor People Don't Have Less Self-Control. Poverty Forces Them to Think Short-Term.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
When considering poverty, our national conversation tends to overlook systemic causes. Instead, we often blame the poor for their poverty. Commentators echo the claim that people are poor because they have bad self-control and therefore make nearsighted choices.

# data[].attributes.body
This article written by  Christine Dell'Amor. It talks about all of the endangered animals in the world like the almost extinct Condor.Also in this passage you will learn how people are helping to protect these  animals.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about a girl who traveled to Laredo, Texas. When she was three month old she had to go to the medical center. The Border Patrol agents stopped the ambulance she was in and the agents allowed her to continue to go to The hospital the immigrant agents had taken her to San Antonio miles away from her family.. This isint fair people are getting kicked out of the U.S for no reason.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Immigration agents have, however, detained some teenagers who are suspected of membership in gangs like MS-13, a gang rooted in Los Angeles and El Salvador that President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have repeatedly condemned. As a general matter, the Trump administration has hardened immigration enforcement across the country, lifting guidelines established under President Barack Obama that made it unlikely that any unauthorized immigrants other than recent arrivals to the country and those with serious criminal records would be deported.

Between Mr. Trump's inauguration and early September, the number of immigration arrests rose more than 40 percent compared with the same period last year, according to data released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Rosamaria's cousin, Aurora Cantu, a United States citizen who was riding with her in the ambulance and accompanied her to the hospital, told Rosamaria's mother and others working on the case that the agents had at first tried to persuade the family to agree to have the girl transferred to a Mexican hospital, pressing the family to sign a voluntary departure form for her. They declined to do so. The entire time Rosamaria was in surgery and then in recovery, several armed Border Patrol agents stood outside her hospital room, the family said.

Her mother, Felipa de la Cruz, 39, said in an interview that her family had moved to Texas from Nuevo Laredo, the city in Mexico just across the border from Laredo, when her daughter was still an infant, hoping to get better treatment for her cerebral palsy.

They had not been able to afford her therapies in Mexico, she said, but in Texas, Medicaid paid for her daughter's treatment, which included home visits from therapists.

"I'm a mother. All I wanted was for her to get the surgery that she needed," Ms. de la Cruz said. "It never crossed my mind that any of what is happening right now could happen. When you're a mother, all you care about is your child."

Rosamaria's doctors have recommended that she be released to a relative because of her illness, said Alma Ruiz, a San Antonio-based lawyer who is part of a team representing the family. But the immigration agency has not yet consented to release her.

Representative Henry Cuellar, a Democrat who represents the Laredo area in Congress, called on Wednesday for the girl to be released back to her family.

"I understand that C.B.P. has a tremendous duty to protect our nation," he said in a statement, referring to Customs and Border Protection, "but we should be devoting our resources and focus on bigger threats."

A spokesman for the agency, which oversees the Border Patrol, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday night.

"The fact that they spent so much time and resources to follow this girl, to treat her like she was the highest-priority criminal that ever walked on this earth - the way they're treating her is just beyond what a 10-year-old special needs child should be treated," said Priscila Martinez, an immigration activist at the Workers Defense Action Fund, which is helping to plan rallies for Rosamaria in Laredo and Corpus Christi.

Rosamaria's case is perhaps the most extreme example in recent memory of a dilemma that stalks unauthorized immigrants who live in the Rio Grande Valley, south of the Border Patrol checkpoints: Getting specialized medical care often requires going to doctors and hospitals farther north, but crossing the checkpoints could mean detention and deportation.

That, Ms. Martinez said, is why Rosamaria's parents were absent from her side when she was rushed north to Corpus Christi, leaving her cousin, Ms. Cantu, to accompany her to the hospital.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
immigration and customs enforcement (us)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
10-Year-Old Immigrant Is Detained After Agents Stop Her on Way to Surgery

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Immigration agents have, however, detained some teenagers who are suspected of membership in gangs like MS-13, a gang rooted in Los Angeles and El Salvador that President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have repeatedly condemned.

# data[].attributes.body
I think racism is a huge problem because people have started to kill African Americans. Like the shooting at the Charleston Church that kill lots of people just because this man did not like black people. Also like Trayvon Martin being shot. That was because cops thoght he was armed. I think that racism need to be stopped. I hope you like this artical.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Their voices are just a few in a country of more than 322 million people. But they are far from alone.

In a new nationwide poll conducted by CNN and the Kaiser Family Foundation, roughly half of Americans -- 49% -- say racism is "a big problem" in society today.

The figure marks a significant shift from four years ago, when over a quarter described racism that way. The percentage is also higher now than it was two decades ago. In 1995, on the heels of the O.J. Simpson trial and just a few years after the Rodney King case surged into the spotlight, 41% of Americans described racism as "a big problem."

Is racism on the rise in the United States? Has our awareness changed? Or is it a problem that's been blown out of proportion?

There's not a one-size-fits-all explanation for the shift. The survey of 1,951 Americans across the country paints a complicated portrait, highlighting some similarities across racial lines and also exposing gaps that seem to be growing.

But this much is clear: Across the board, in every demographic group surveyed, there are increasing percentages of people who say racism is a big problem -- and majorities say that racial tensions are on the rise.

'A different story'

It caught Debora Aust by surprise.

The 48-year-old white woman from Sterling Heights, Michigan, says she didn't expect racism to get worse.

"It always seemed like it was getting better, like our generation was going to be better than previous generations," says Aust, who participated in the CNN/KFF poll. "But the TV started telling us a different story, with all of these shootings by cops."

For Aust, whose father and uncle both work in law enforcement, the news stories she's seen about unarmed African-American men being shot by police have hit home. The officers should be held accountable, she says.

"What's not helping is the police are getting off with a slap on the wrist. ... If it was me, and I was black, and this was happening in my community, I would be furious," she says.

The case of Walter Scott, who was shot in April by an officer in North Charleston, South Carolina, sticks out in her mind. The trial hasn't started yet. The officer's attorney says he plans to plead not guilty, and that race has nothing to do with the case. But Aust has already made up her mind.

"I mean, give me a break, he wouldn't have done that if the man was white, and that's the problem," she says.

It's gotten worse, not better, since the 2008 election of President Barack Obama, says Ellis Onic. The 56-year-old engineer in Balch Springs, Texas, who's African-American, points to the 2012 shooting death of Trayvon Martin and this year's Charleston church massacre as examples. Time and time again, Onic says, the justice system has failed.

"The white man has had his way for so long, they don't think of it as racism. They think that's just the way it is. ... We have a long way to go, because the justice system is not right. Justice is corrupt," he says. "That's why she has the blindfold over her eyes and the scale slightly tilted, so you know that it can go either way."

Jim Bruemmer sees things differently.

The white, 83-year-old retired advertising executive in St. Louis, who participated in the CNN/KFF poll, says media coverage alleging racism -- particularly when it comes to law enforcement officers -- has been overblown.

"I am troubled by the bias I see in the media, that seems to spend all its time talking about the bad policemen and the bad white people and ignoring the crime and the disastrous conditions that are occurring in large segments of the black youth," he says.

Bruemmer says he's had to look no further than a suburb of St. Louis to see that firsthand.

"The belief is so universally held among the people I know, that the whole Ferguson thing was a farce," he says, "that ' hands up, don't shoot' was baloney, that the police officer behaved in a very proper manner and saved his own life, possibly."

Growing racism?

Gauging changes in racial attitudes is complicated, says Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, a professor of sociology at Duke University. Bonilla-Silva has a phrase he uses to describe the situation he sees today: "new racism."

"After the 1960s and early 1970s, somehow we developed the mythology that systemic racism disappeared," he says.

Racism remained, according to Bonilla-Silva, but became more covert.

"The main problem nowadays is not the folks with the hoods, but the folks dressed in suits," he says.

"New racism," he says, has been decades in the making. But something has changed in recent years -- access to cell phones and social media.

Accusations that police use excessive force, particularly against African-Americans, for example, now can get far more attention -- far more quickly -- than ever.

Communities of color across the country can more easily connect, according to Bonilla-Silva, and people are picking up on patterns that scholars have long discussed.

"People are doing Sociology 101. They can connect Walter Scott, the assassinations of black folks in a church, the slamming of a girl in a school," he says. "And then it's across the nation. People are then connecting the dots and saying, 'No more.'"

Growing awareness?

While the trend of a growing percentage of people viewing racism as a big problem in recent years was true across racial lines in the CNN/KFF poll, the share who see it as a problem is notably higher among blacks and Hispanics.

About two-thirds of blacks (66%) and Hispanics (64%) said racism is a big problem, while just over four in 10 (43%) whites said the same. Hispanics are much more likely now to say racism is a big problem than they were in 1995, when less than half responded that way. Among blacks, the share who said racism was a big problem dropped from 68% in 1995 to 50% in 2011, and now has climbed back to 66%.

Majorities across races said tensions between racial and ethnic groups in the United States have increased in the past 10 years. Roughly a quarter said tensions have stayed the same.

Sometimes the way people view racism can play out like a referee's call in a baseball game, says Glenn Adams, a professor of psychology at the University of Kansas who has studied perceptions of racism.

"Is the guy out or safe? Well, it depends who you're rooting for," he says. "Sometimes it's clear in either direction, but we tend to see it how we want to see it."

It's likely the level of racism in the United States is more or less the same, Adams says.

"What's changed," he says, "is that more people are aware of it."

Knowledge of history, having friends who've experienced racism and personal background are all factors that can contribute to a greater awareness of racism, he says. And now, he says, there's likely another factor at play.

"People are more aware of it because of the videos of police violence and the media attention. Now, the media report on it," Adams says. "Black folks tended to know about this before. Now white folks are starting to know about it more. ... Now, with this kind of evidence, people have to re-evaluate their sense of what is true and what is not true, so it becomes a little bit harder for people to deny."

The same goes for repeated incidents of racism on college campuses, Bonilla-Silva says, like the chant that shuttered a fraternity at the University of Oklahoma and the noose found hanging at Duke this year.

It's impossible to dismiss cases as isolated events, he says, when similar situations at schools and other institutions keep happening again and again.

"The fact that it keeps happening tells you that the problem is not a problem of bad apples," he says, "but perhaps the problem is the apple tree."

'We're all kind of in the same boat'

Because of his complexion, sometimes people think Rick Gonzales is Italian. Sometimes they think he's Mexican or Middle Eastern. The experience, he says, has made him question the meaning of race.

"It's obviously a label. Something tells me that we're all kind of in the same boat, yet we're separated somehow. We're given different names," says Gonzales, a 49-year-old truck driver from San Antonio, who participated in the CNN/KFF poll.

Gonzales' mother is from Mexico and his father is from the United States. He says he feels that for people in power -- most of whom are white -- it's advantageous to pit groups against each other. And to him, it seems like no matter what, darker-skinned people are at a disadvantage. That, he says, is why race -- and racism -- remain big problems.

"The ones that are usually getting the short end of the stick are the so-called minority ... but we're the majority, because we're always the ones who are struggling," he says.

Sheryl Sims, an African-American, 59-year-old retired teacher in Atlanta who participated in the CNN/KFF poll, says that for her, racism is something she senses when she walks down the street in her neighborhood.

"It's just the way people will shun you," she says, "or turn their head when you walk by."

Things were worse 50 or 60 years ago, Alex Sproul says. But now, the 24-year-old, who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area and participated in the CNN/KFF poll, says he sees racism lurking under the surface.

From wage inequality to accessibility to jobs, Sproul says he feels minorities are still at a disadvantage.

Sproul describes himself as mixed race -- Mexican-American and white. He says several events in recent years have made him feel racial tensions are on the rise.

One of them, he says, was the 2009 shooting death of Oscar Grant, an unarmed African-American man who was fatally shot by a police officer on a Bay Area Rapid Transit platform. Sproul says he first learned about the case when he was scanning his Facebook feed and saw posts from friends.

"You kind of see more of these situations, or extremes," he says. "I don't know if maybe it was going on before and there was no coverage, or if it's happening with greater frequency."

Too much hype?

Bruemmer, the retired advertising executive in St. Louis, says he sees racism as a big problem -- but not for the reason you might think.

Too often, he says, leaders play the race card rather than addressing what he sees as the real issue behind many of the problems popping up in society today: broken families, particularly in the black community.

"The massive problem that I see is that our leaders at the highest level ... do not even want to recognize or even acknowledge that this problem exists, and therefore they spend huge amounts of time demonizing the police force, throwing gasoline and making the problems much worse," he says.

Racism is inevitable in any society, he says. But now, he fears that because of bad leadership, tensions are on the rise among some groups in the United States.

"I think the racism and the hatred of the white race has grown to the point where it's worse than in the other direction. ... I think the anger and the racism is much worse from black to white than white to black," he says.

Searching for common ground

It's hard to draw a clear conclusion when the reasons behind respondents' answers to a survey question can vary so widely, says Mark Naison, a professor of history and African-American studies at Fordham University.

"People may agree that racism is worse," he says, "and disagree profoundly on who the targets and victims are."

"Simmering rage," he says, has been fueled by backlash after Obama's election, the economic struggles of lower- and middle-income whites and demographic shifts across the country.

"Latent racism is becoming more open, because a lot of people are feeling threatened," he says.

But Naison says he's also noticed a significant change in his classes.

"People are able to empathize, communicate and talk honestly across racial lines much better than they did five years ago, and certainly 10 years ago and 20 years ago," he says.

Why? Naison says the changing world students are living in, full of far more multiracial families and friendships, has played a big role. A video of a police beating, he says, resonates for people now because they're not looking at those involved as strangers.

"It's not just that guy over there," he says. "You could be beating my cousin or my boyfriend."

The mix of "simmering rage" and growing empathy is a complicated equation, he says, that adds up to more people talking about race -- and racism.

And it's a conversation, according to Naison, that isn't going away any time soon. If people from different backgrounds can open up about their concerns and find common ground, it could be a good thing, Naison says, like a therapy session on a national scale.

"That conversation is difficult," he says. "But our history is difficult. Our present is difficult. We need to talk about it."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
racism is a 'big problem' to more americans

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Racism is a 'big problem' to more Americans, poll finds - CNN

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Their voices are just a few in a country of more than 322 million people. But they are far from alone. In a new nationwide poll conducted by CNN and the Kaiser Family Foundation, roughly half of Americans -- 49% -- say racism is "a big problem" in society today.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/pft/2017/4/21/for-the-earth-lets-stop-plastic-pollution-now

ABC NEWS: thank you for joining the show, i am david murr and we will be talking about ocean pollution lets past the mic over to Derrick Allen. Ocean pollution is killing lots of animals! 8 million tons of plastic enter the ocean and killing sea animals! We have to fix this! STOP PUTTING PLASTIC IN WATER! back to you david. Thank for joining the show and hope to see you tomorrow at 8:00 pm.

# data[].attributes.body
I think we can get rid of guns in homes and on the streets. we should ban guns from people because they use guns for killing and hurting people not for protection.there are other reasons why we should ban guns like threatening and harassing.I feel bad because a lot  of getting  people killed by guns.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Ban guns. All guns. Get rid of guns in homes, and on the streets, and, as much as possible, on police. Not just because of San Bernardino, or whichever mass shooting may pop up next, but also not not because of those. Don't sort the population into those who might do something evil or foolish or self-destructive with a gun and those who surely will not. As if this could be known-as if it could be assessed without massively violating civil liberties and stigmatizing the mentally ill. Ban guns! Not just gun violence. Not just certain guns. Not just already-technically-illegal guns. All of them.

I used to refer to my position on this issue as being in favor of gun control. Which is true, except that "gun control" at its most radical still tends to refer to bans on certain weapons and closing loopholes. The recent New York Times front-pageeditorial, asmuch as it infuriated some, was still too tentative. "Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership," the paper argued, making the case for "reasonable regulation," nothing more. Even the rare ban-guns arguments involve prefacing and hedging and disclaimers. "We shouldn't 'take them away' from people who currently own them, necessarily," writes Hollis Phelps in Salon. Oh, but we should.

I say this not to win some sort of ideological purity contest, but because banning guns urgently needs to become a rhetorical and conceptual possibility. The national conversation needs to shift from one extreme-an acceptance, ranging from complacent to enthusiastic, of an individual right to own guns-to another, which requires people who are not politicians to speak their minds. And this will only happen if the Americans who are quietly convinced that guns are terrible speak out.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
It's Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ban guns. All guns. Get rid of guns in homes, and on the streets, and, as much as possible, on police. Not just because of San Bernardino, or whichever mass shooting may pop up next, but also not not because of those.

# data[].attributes.headline
human rights-sumayah robinson this  articles is about rights 

# data[].attributes.subject
human rights-sumayah robinson this  articles is about rights 

# data[].attributes.body
I think everybody in the world should have right but rights now not everybody have them  say if your homeless u don't choice  to be homeless or hunger say if someone is rich and they get good treatment  and fair rights but you are homeless and you get kick out the hospital.because you are broke every one should have freedom and justice

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 ( General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages. The UDHR is widely recognized as having inspired, and paved the way for, the adoption of more than seventy human rights treaties, applied today on a permanent basis at global and regional levels (all containing references to it in their preambles).

Preamble

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, therefore,

The General Assembly,

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11

1. Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

2. No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14

1. Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15

1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16

1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

2. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17

1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21

1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

2. Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23

1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

3. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

4. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25

1. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26

1. Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

2. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27

1. Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29

1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

3. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 ( General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Americas murder rate is on the rise BY: Ella Hogan

# data[].attributes.subject
Americas murder rate is on the rise BY: Ella Hogan

# data[].attributes.body
The murder rate has risen to 11% since 1970. In 2016 764 people have died in just Chicago Imagine how many people died in America just alone. I think that this is very important because if it were you being killed you would be scared out of your mind so why not care for other people being murdered. This is very important people are getting killed for no reason it matters to do something!!!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
MURDER, which grew rarer for 20 years, is on the rise again. But by how much? In 2015, the number of murders increased by 11% nationwide. During 2016, an escalation of gang violence in Chicago left 764 people dead in a city where 485 had been killed a year before. A dispute ensued over whether the Windy City was simply an isolated example or a barometer of a wider problem. National statistics for 2016 will not be released for eight months, but to get an early sense of the answer The Economist has gathered murder statistics for 2016 for the 50 cities with the most murders. These places contain 15% of the country's population and around 36% of murder victims. Our numbers show that, in 2016, murders increased in 34 of the cities we tracked. Three cities experienced a spike in deaths sharper than the 58% suffered by Chicago. Since cities tend to reflect the country as a whole, this suggests that the murder rate is rising at its fastest pace since the early 1970s.
Get our daily newsletter
Today's violence needs to be set in context. Despite the recent uptick, the murder rate in our 50 cities was lower in 2016 than it was in 2007, and for the 26 years before that. Criminologists disagree about why murder became less common. What they do agree on is that the improvement has been uneven. Newark, just ten miles from New York city, has a murder rate that is nine times higher than its neighbour's. And unlike New York, where murder is at just 15% of its 1990 peak, in Newark the rate has barely budged.

After the riots in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, Heather Mac Donald, author of "The War on Cops", offered a simple explanation for the rise in murder. The riots were a response to the killing of Michael Brown, a black man, by a police officer. The "Ferguson effect", Mrs Mac Donald argued, occurred when police officers retreat from cities when relations with the people they serve became bitter, causing crime to go up nationwide. Murders and shootings did increase by 57% in St Louis, a city close to Ferguson, in the two years after Brown's death. Similarly, when Freddie Gray died in the custody of Baltimore police in April 2015, murders and shootings in the city increased 70% during the year that followed. But we find little evidence for a broader "Ferguson effect" in the rest of the country. Among our 50 cities, data show that in the four months immediately after Brown's death there was no change in the arrest rate for murder, and just a five percentage-point fall in the arrest rate for gun assaults. This does not look like a widespread retreat by the country's police forces.

A stronger message from the individual murder records from the FBI for 50 cities is that the quality of police work, the availability of (usually illegal) guns and the chances of getting caught all matter a lot. This is partly because the motivation for murder is changing. Gang-related killings have steadily increased over the past 35 years, from just one in 100 murders in 1980 to nearly one in ten in 2015. Drug-related murders-which are likely to have some gang-related element-have increased in the past two years, after falling for two decades. In 2015 they accounted for one in 25 murders in big cities.

When murder rose in the late 1980s, the age of both victims and perpetrators dropped by some three years. Unlike then, the recent spate of killings has seen the age of both victims and offenders continue to rise. The average killer in 2015 was four years older than in the 1990s. Gang-related murderers are, on average, six years older now than they were then.

This is where variation in law enforcement comes in. Gang murders involving guns are particularly hard to solve. After 20 years of stability, the murder-clearance rate-where a murder is solved because an arrest is made-fell suddenly in 2013 from 60% to 55% in 2015. There are stark differences by race. In 1980, 56% of murder victims in our dataset were black. In 2015, 68% were. In the early 1980s, police solved around 65% of murders regardless of the race or sex of the victim. Among black women and white men, that percentage has changed little. Among black men it fell to under 55% in 2012, and has since dropped to just 47% in 2015. People are more likely to kill if they think they will not get caught, and unsolved killings can set off a cycle of revenge.

Largely thanks to DNA evidence, police are increasingly capable of solving murders when the victim is attacked with hands, bats or knives. In these cases, clearance rates have increased from 70% to 78% in the past dozen years. Against this trend, when the victim is killed by a gunshot, a suspect is arrested just half the time. In the 1980s the arrest rate for gun-related murders was higher, at 65%.

Taken together our evidence suggests that police should focus their efforts on tackling gang-related murders where a black man is killed with a gun. Bill Bratton, who has led police forces in Boston, Los Angeles and New York, likens the policing of cities to a doctor treating a patient. While some cities may only require a check-up and a few sessions of therapy once in a while, others need invasive surgery. Among our 50 cities, gun use has increased from 65% to 80% of all murders since 1980. But that number varies enormously by city. Guns were responsible for 60% of murders in New York and 85% of those in Chicago between 2010 and 2015. Whereas New York and Chicago have made similar rates of progress in reducing murders in which a gun is not used, Chicago's gun-murder rate is five times New York's.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
America's murder rate is rising at its fastest pace since the early 1970s

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
MURDER, which grew rarer for 20 years, is on the rise again. But by how much? In 2015, the number of murders increased by 11% nationwide. During 2016, an escalation of gang violence in Chicago left 764 people dead in a city where 485 had been killed a year before.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Right To Health Care - Nyhila Silva 

# data[].attributes.subject
The Right To Health Care - Nyhila Silva 

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about how many people should have health care.Over 33 million people all over the world that don't have health care. Many people don't have health because they can't afford it , because the cost of health care is very expensive.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Proponents say it would stop medical bankruptcies and improve public health. Opponents say it is socialism and should be an individual’s responsibility.

# data[].attributes.body
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/cyber-crimes.html                    This article is about Cyber bullying which means using electronics to bully or say mean comments. Teens that have social media apps like instagram , twitter , snapchat, etc use these apps to talk about others.I feel that cyberbullying is not the right thing to do . It can depress anybody not just teenagers , it could even lead up to suicide.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/how-bad-is-homelessness-in-america-really_us_58f6916de4b0c892a4fb736f

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/deforestation/

The articles is about Deforestation that millions of trees are being cut down. Only 30 percent of land area.
Also in a hundred year, the rain forest can completely vanish. I feel that this is bad because animals are losing there habitat.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
blacks and whites see racism in the united states very

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Blacks and whites see racism in the United States very, very differently

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
How you see race in the United States can depend a lot on your own background.

# data[].attributes.body
This articles says that "An overwhelming 87% of black Americans  say black people face a lot of discrimination in the United States, but only 49% of white Americans say the same thing, according to a February poll from the Public Religion Research Institute."

# data[].attributes.body
Rodrigo Duterte said Sunday that China, Japan, South Korea and the United States should consider sending an envoy to North Korea to avoid a nuclear war, which the Philippine president said would be "totally unacceptable."

"All world leaders agree that he [Kim Jong Un] is a dangerous man," Duterte told a press conference before leaving for a two-day visit to Japan. "But somebody has to talk to him."

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about how a big portion of people in America don't have healthcare. It says things like, "And yet, 33 million Americans, 10.4 percent  of the U.S population, still went without health insurance for the entirety of 2014."  There are 7 million immigrants, 7.7 million young adults, and 14.4 million other people don't have healthcare. This article talks a lot about how people really need healthcare and if they don't many bad things could happen for those people.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Nearly 9 million people gained insurance last year, a win for "Obamacare" as the president's signature health care law expanded Medicaid and opened health insurance exchanges. And yet, 33 million Americans, 10.4 percent of the U.S. population, still went without health insurance for the entirety of 2014. Millions more were uninsured for at least part of the year. New data released this month shows they were disproportionately poor, black and Hispanic; 4.5 million of them were children.

It isn't a surprise that some Americans still don't have health insurance. Despite aiming to insure " everybody " in the U.S., the Affordable Care Act (ACA) left significant gaps in coverage, and decisions made by the law's opponents have denied benefits to millions of people it was designed to help. But the new numbers reveal that most of the uninsured last year were people who should have been able to access insurance under the law. That presents a major challenge for President Obama in the final years of his term, but also an opportunity: Millions of Americans qualify for coverage but, for whatever combination of reasons, haven't yet signed up.

The White House has said it will focus this year's enrollment push on the remaining uninsured. So it's worth taking a closer look at who those people were. Most of them - about 56 percent - fell into three major groups that were widely expected to have high uninsurance rates: immigrants, young adults and people in the so-called Medicaid gap. But that still left more than 14 million Americans who don't have insurance and don't fall into any of these categories.

7 million immigrants

Most uninsured noncitizen immigrants didn't qualify for Medicaid, the government program that provides medical coverage for poor families, or the newly established health insurance subsidies that are meant to make insurance affordable to lower- and middle-income families. More than 4 million of them were most likely undocumented immigrants, who are explicitly barred from receiving Medicaid or buying insurance on the exchanges.

Another 600,000 immigrants had been in the country for less than five years and likely weren't eligible for Medicaid and CHIP, a program for low-income children, though all income-eligible documented immigrants are entitled to subsidies on the exchanges. That left about 2 million who should in theory have qualified for Medicaid or subsidies on the exchanges (though many of them could have fallen in the Medicaid gap - more on that below). This group of longtime, legal residents has historically had lower rates of coverage than U.S. citizens; it will likely take time for them to make gains in coverage under the law.

One of every 5 immigrant children had no coverage last year, as well as 1 of every 10 senior citizens. Hispanics made up a majority of the 7 million uninsured immigrants, 79 percent, and Hispanic immigrants had an uninsured rate of 42.4 percent, nearly three times that of non-Hispanic immigrants. As we've written before, Hispanics disproportionately work low-paying jobs that don't provide insurance, leaving them with fewer options than other groups. Immigrants also face a variety of challenges getting signed up for insurance on the marketplaces. More than 400,000 people were dropped from insurance this year because of missing or incomplete paperwork needed to prove eligible immigration status.

3.8 million in the Medicaid gap

Set aside the 7 million noncitizen immigrants, most of whom were never meant to be covered by the ACA, and 26 million uninsured remain. Of those, nearly 4 million were meant to qualify for insurance under the federal law but were later blocked from coverage. They fell into what's known as the "Medicaid gap," with incomes that were too high for Medicaid eligibility and too low to receive subsidies on the new health care exchanges.

When the Affordable Care Act was written, it expanded the existing Medicaid program to cover everyone living below the poverty line, including childless adults who had previously been mostly excluded from the program. It also offered subsidies to people earning 100 percent to 400 percent of the poverty line (but not less) to buy private insurance on the exchanges. A Supreme Court decision left Medicaid expansion up to individual states, and about half chose not to expand the program. That left millions of low-income people ineligible for Medicaid but, counterintuitively, unable to qualify for subsidies on the insurance marketplaces because they earned too little.

This 3.8 million was a very poor group overall, but nearly half, 1.7 million people, lived in families whose incomes were less than 50 percent of the poverty line. Because Medicaid historically tended to cover just families with children, the bulk of those falling into the gap were working-age adults without children; nonetheless, about 800,000 parents with children living at home fell into the gap.

But it wasn't just poor people who were more likely to be uninsured in states that didn't expand Medicaid. At every income level, people in non-expansion states were more likely to be uninsured:

Even people earning six-figure salaries were more likely to be uninsured if they lived in a state that didn't expand Medicaid. That may be because there was significant crossover between those states and the states that have federally run health insurance exchanges, which were notoriously problematic in their first year. Additionally, many of these states passed laws restricting where information about the exchanges could be shared, or which people could educate the public about the health care law.

7.7 million young adults

Without immigrants and people in the Medicaid gap, the total number of uninsured is about 22 million people, more than a third of whom are young adults ages 19 to 34. Unlike people in the previous two categories, these people weren't excluded from the law's benefits. In fact, these "young invincibles" were coveted: Because young people are generally healthier than older adults, they are cheaper to insure. Insurers need lots of them to sign up for coverage in order to keep premiums affordable for everyone else. However, because they are early in their working years - often unemployed or in jobs that don't offer insurance - they have historically been the age group with the lowest coverage rate.

Early predictions that the young and healthy wouldn't sign up and insurance premium costs would skyrocket didn't come true (though not as many young adults signed up as was hoped). Uninsured rates decreased for all young adults by more than 5 percent from 2013 to 2014, leaving 17.1 percent of all 19- to 25-year-olds uninsured, as well as 18.2 percent of all 26- to 34-year-olds. But if we exclude young adult immigrants and poor residents of non-expansion states, those numbers fall dramatically, dropping the uninsured rate to 13.4 percent for 19- to 26-year-olds, whom the ACA allowed to stay on a parent's insurance plan, and 8.2 percent for 26- to 34-year-olds.

The numbers suggest that young men, who might be less likely to seek regular medical care than women, didn't always see insurance as worth the cost. Poorer young adults had higher uninsured rates; they might have qualified for subsidies, but the penalty for not having coverage last year was just $95 (or 1 percent of income, whatever was higher) and might have seemed like a better option for people without health problems who were earning low wages. In pre-ACA surveys, a small percentage of uninsured young adults said they didn't need coverage, but a much larger number indicated that it was just too expensive.

And for a lot of young adults, insurance may have been unaffordable. Even excluding those living in "Medicaid gap" states, 1.5 million uninsured young adults were making less than $25,000 a year, giving that group an uninsured rate of 22.3 percent.

Unsurprisingly, uninsurance rates were particularly high for those who weren't working. But even among those who did have jobs last year, rates were high compared with other age groups, likely because young adults often work jobs that don't offer coverage.

The 14.4 million others ...

That leaves a lot of people who weren't caught up in the politics of immigration and Medicaid expansion, and weren't the young adults so often discussed during the rollout of the ACA.

About a quarter of the 14.4 million remaining uninsured were children. Nearly all the rest were working-age adults; just 2.8 percent were 65 or older, the minimum age to qualify for Medicare. Nearly three-quarters of those working-age adults had jobs at least part of the year; nearly half of them worked full time all year long.

Some of the people in this category were very poor. More than 4 million theoretically qualified for Medicaid, 3.5 million in states that expanded coverage and half a million more in those that didn't, and yet aren't enrolled (the latter number is much smaller than the former because people in the Medicaid gap are already excluded). Nearly 3 million lived in households earning less than $25,000 a year.

But the group as a whole was economically diverse. Just less than half, 7 million, earned less than $50,000 a year - it's likely the "affordable" options on the exchanges didn't feel particularly affordable for this group. Another 3 million earned $50,000 to $75,000, at or above the U.S. median household income of $54,000 but still low enough that it might have made affording insurance a challenge, especially for those who didn't qualify for subsidies. But that leaves the final, and perhaps least obvious, group: the 4.5 million who lived in households that earned more than $75,000 per year but remained uninsured. Many of these people were middle-aged Americans in relatively good health who may, like some of the young invincibles, have decided insurance wasn't worth the cost.

But a surprising number, more than a million, were children. Most states offer Medicaid for kids in families earning incomes of up to 250 percent (or even more) of the federal poverty line, but a handful have a lower cutoff and have higher uninsured rates as a result. Others may have fallen into the " family glitch." If one family member is offered insurance by an employer that is considered "affordable" for a single person, it doesn't matter if it's not affordable when purchasing for an entire family - they don't qualify for marketplace subsidies.

It's hard to say why these 14 million people weren't insured, but the administration will have to figure that out if it wants to come close to the universal coverage the law intended.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
33 Million Americans Still Don't Have Health Insurance

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Nearly 9 million people gained insurance last year, a win for "Obamacare" as the president's signature health care law expanded Medicaid and opened health insurance exchanges. And yet, 33 million Americans, 10.4 percent of the U.S. population, still went without health insurance for the entirety of 2014.

# data[].attributes.body
Find 2 articles and 1 video that relate to your topic. Post them here.