# data[].attributes.body
dab

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the community members should not be allowed to choose our books, mostly because I think we have a pretty good selection already.
If the community members were allowed to choose our books there would probably be a lot of books that are banned.  Kids would be reading the stuff because they probably think the title is catchy, and originally it is not a very good book.

# data[].attributes.body
no thats not right to people who might want to read the book and they all have different perspectives and might want to read the book and i don't think biased minded people should be able to ban books.

# data[].attributes.body
No, they shouldn't. If that were the case, we'd most likely end up only being allowed to read sappy Nicholas Sparks books or other non-tasteful things. To cut my opinion short, people who wish to change things like this generally don't have very good taste in the thing/things that they want to be different

# data[].attributes.body
No because they don't know if they're guardian is okay with it.  This is because some parents are okay with their kids reading any book, but some are really over protective about their kids reading certain books. for example the book,"

# data[].attributes.body
I say that it depends on the situation and the book. Most of the time though I say its a no. I understand that bad language and bad content can lead to it being banned out of schools and libraries but I say that people should have the freedom to read what they want.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that community members should not be able to control what books are in the library because their is a lot of views and opinions that the members might be bias about. For example The Hunger Games is challenged a lot because of violence but you should nit banned a book just because4

# data[].attributes.body
No, because they don't know your reading level or what your parents are okay with you reading. Other people have different opinions on what you should be reading, but I think it's really just up to the library you are reading from and not the community member.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because everyone has a different prospective. Some people might have more of a tolerance to violence or bad language than others.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, community members are the ones reading the books so they should have a say so in the books they are wanting to read. No, some people may push for books that are not needed and may be dangerous for different kinds of people. Like the banning of "ttyl', community directed it to sexually explicit and bad language.

# data[].attributes.body
I think community members shouldn't be able to control what books are  in a library because, there opinions might be biased.  For example the books Little Bill are being challenged because Bill Cosby wrote them and he is being charged with rape. However this doesn't mean his books should be challenged or banned.

# data[].attributes.body
I think community members should control what books can be in a library because maybe some of the community members had read that book and thought it wasn't appropriate, by adding their opinion thy can stop those who shouldn't read it from reading it. I know sometimes I will just breeze through the library not know what to get, if I was to look at a book that was inappropriate and I shouldn't read. I wouldn't know it was inappropriate before reading it so I would assume it was OK to read but it is not. Even though, some people will band books that shouldn't be banned the community members should control what to do. I know I would rather want to read all appropriate books then a book that is not appropriate.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because they don't have any control about the books in the library. That's  like a random person coming up to your house and saying," Can you change your book selection, I really don't like it."

# data[].attributes.body
I think community members should not be able to control what books are in the library, like the divergent series they may have some under age drinking, or other things does not mean it is should be banned, maybe just moved up to a different age group though, and banning meant that it took my right away to get the book from that library or somewhere else.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that community members should not be able to control what books are in the library . The book A Land Remembered was banned because it contained some racial slurs, but I believe that as long as you regard the racial slurs as something offensive then there is no problem reading that book.

# data[].attributes.body
No, they shouldn't be banned unless they are very inappropriate like talking about sexual actions or offensive words. Also they should put ratings on the book like 10+ 17+ etc.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because some people may have different opinions on a book so, people shouldn't be in control of what you read it should be your decision our your parents problem on what you read. For example the harry potter series was banned because of THE RELIGION.

# data[].attributes.body
no because some people are over protective, or extremely religious. The reason Harry potter was banned because of how people get offended by using "witchcraft"and liberals get offended by everything. And hunger games is challenged because of violence.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because some people just overreact to something tiny like it says "poopyhead" in Captain Underpants. Another example of this is people saying that since Harry Potter says, "witchcraft" it offends people because of religion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think community members should NOT be able to control what is in library's. This is because they might have different beliefs,reading levels or something different then you. Which would cause them to ban something even if it aligns with your beliefs,reading level, etc. Like I don't see why people would challenge Captain Underpants due to the word "poopie" or because of a guy wearing undergarments.

# data[].attributes.body
I think community members should be able to control what books are in the library because, if they weren't able to determine what books weren't in the library then librarians could put whatever they wanted in the library. But not if they go to far. For example Alice in the Wonderland was banned because she was drinking and eating stuff she wasn't supposed to. So I think they should be able to just not by going to far.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think community members should be able to control what books are in the library. I think this because I saw "The Giver" was being challenged for violence and not being in the age group. But in my opinion it is a very good book and banning it would take away from many people being able to read it, even though it's a great story.