# data[].attributes.body
HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN:

# data[].attributes.body
@MDubravski

# data[].attributes.body
Touch of Evil: A Cognitivist Approach

# data[].attributes.body
The fact that no doubt this is someone reading into the open scene of a movie, one of the most important moments of a movie. There is also no doubt this is a personalized opinion of this scene and this movie rather than a logical one.

# data[].attributes.headline
Stockton film noir one is not reliable because it doesn't come from authoritative source, but the other one is written by credible authors

# data[].attributes.subject
Stockton film noir one is not reliable because it doesn't come from authoritative source, but the other one is written by credible authors

# data[].attributes.headline
Link 2 on Off Screen provides a list of links that the author conducted research from. Link 1 is simply an opinion based homework assignment.

# data[].attributes.subject
Link 2 on Off Screen provides a list of links that the author conducted research from. Link 1 is simply an opinion based homework assignment.

# data[].attributes.body
Is a very reliable source because it touches on the aspect of several production and angles.

# data[].attributes.body
Touch of Evil: A Cognitivist Approach is reputable because the author has credentials as a filmmaker, and the analysis takes an objective approach. The "analysis" on Wordpress is less reliable, as the author only focuses on one shot in the film, provides no credentials, and approaches the topic subjectively.

# data[].attributes.body
That first one with the longer link isn't all that reliable because most of the information is written subjectively. That second source though? So reliable man it's objective and dope

# data[].attributes.body
Offscreen.com: This is a reliable source due to the fact that it gives critical information that is needed to properly cite a source (such as the author's name, it's volume number, word count, date of publication, etc). It is also filled with fact-based information and claims that are supported by other outside sources and details.
Stock Film Noir (Wordpress): Wordpress.com is a blogging website, so considering that this article was written by "TeamEvan", who openly depicts himself as a college student (and definitely isn't very reliable with what he's saying), he's definitely not the best choice for research.

# data[].attributes.headline
"Touch of Evil: A Cognitivist Approach" can be considered, at a glance, a fairly reliable source. It has an extensive bibliography, and was published relatively recently. There is also a link to a bio about the author, Benjamin Paquette, providing his credentials and previous experience.

# data[].attributes.subject
"Touch of Evil: A Cognitivist Approach" can be considered, at a glance, a fairly reliable source. It has an extensive bibliography, and was published relatively recently. There is also a link to a bio about the author, Benjamin Paquette, providing his credentials and previous experience.

# data[].attributes.body
https://stocktonfilmnoir.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/a-close-analysis-of-the-opening-shot-from-touch-of-evil/

http://offscreen.com/view/touch_evil

# data[].attributes.body
the first one is not reliable because it is opinion based. the second one is reliable because it comes from an authoritative source on the subject and uses lots of sources to back up their paper.