# data[].attributes.body
yes historical events are depicted in different ways because there are many bias opinion and because there a different views on history and they are interpreted differently.

historical events may be depicted in different ways because in history some detail are forgotten which can change up the historical event that happened.

# data[].attributes.body
Historical events can be seen in different ways for when the rebellion happens the news show how the slave would harm but for others, they were trying to protect what they believe in. Showing how other people see how things went and why is it important it is to us because showing how they can be or giving with knowing how people can think.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because it can always be told in a different way or shown differently, not all pictures or text will say the same thing

# data[].attributes.body
historical events are always depicted in different ways, no one ever wants to look like the bad guy, so they create propaganda to make the other side look like psychopaths. this still matters today, because it still is happening, we still pretend like the nazis were the only villains in WW2

# data[].attributes.body
It's depicted in different ways because of everyones thinking and different perspectives

# data[].attributes.body
yes historical events are depicted in different ways, like how some drew him as a hero while others drew him as a murderer. because everyone has different beliefs and points of view depending on what were told can affect how we see history

# data[].attributes.body
As our society progresses, history changes along with it and is told in different ways. so yes, historical events are depicted in different ways. With the pictures that we saw we ca clearly tell that some people saw the rebellion as an act of violence and murder, while others thought of it as a powerful movement. The reason that we have these different views of history is how we are taught, different people have a different points of view.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes historical events are depicted in different ways because everyone has different thinking about history

# data[].attributes.body
1) I definitely think that historical even ts can be depicted in different ways, because  of biased opinions and who the authors audience they want to reach.

Like in picture 2 I had it was showing that the slaves were murdering the innocent white people, playing a narrative to please the audience that believed in slavery.

2)

# data[].attributes.body
Historical events are often depicted in different ways. The way people view, interpret, and document events can all be affected by bias and personal beliefs. Something deemed as right and just by one party, can be viewed as horrific oppression to another. With so many different ways of thought and experience, the way we view history is different. Some details may be dropped or forgotten over the years. So, in order to see the true history, you need to see every angle.

# data[].attributes.body
yes because everyone looks at every situation in their own perspective. The slaves saw their situation differently than how the whites did.

# data[].attributes.body
1: yes, some pictures depicted Nat as a holy soldier, others as a heartless murderer willing to massacre anyone.
2: there's always 2 sides to a story if there is a party that thinks one way and another that thinks otherwise.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, historical events are depicted differently because certain groups see different perspectives. Like how the rich white men saw the rebellion as a massacre of the whites. Historical events are depicted in different ways because some people want others to think something else is happening other than the truth to stop what is really happening. This matters to us today because that means that some historical sources are very biased and could be really one sided and can't be trusted

# data[].attributes.body
1) Yes they are. One example is the newspaper that was sent out when Nat Turner had the rebellion, the white people made it out to be something terrible and gruesome but that was just their biasness.
2)It can be explained by the realization of no matter what you do there will always be multiple sides to a story because there were multiple perspectives captured by different people. This is important because everyone has their own opinion and perspective

# data[].attributes.body
Yes they are depicted in different way, no one understands and sees things the way you see them. We all won't see eye to eye.

We all see things different, and that matterse for us because a story about what happened will be different for a lot of people.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, there are different point of views. Some pictures that were shown were violent but some not so much. the pitcures help explain. that matters to us today because we know what actually happened instaed of waht the pitcures showed us.

# data[].attributes.body
I think historical events are depicted in different ways. I think this because if you asked somebody what they thought about his rebellion they might say it was unjustified because he did kill people and used weapons. But if you asked another person they might say it was very justified because he was fighting for what he believed was right and wanted to share his beliefs with others.

# data[].attributes.body
Spencer

Historical events are depicted in different ways due to everyone's thinking and perspective being different from each other. Propaganda against a revolution is a good example of this.

Historical events can be depicted in different ways to hide the truth or to cover up something that went wrong/badly. This matters to us currently as we don't know what the true nature of how things were back then.

# data[].attributes.body
yes historical events are depicted in different ways because of different peoples perspectives, no one sees a situation exactly the same so no history is recorded exactly the same by different sources. you have to look at different sources now so you can figure out what is truly the path that history took, by combining multiple sources information