# data[].attributes.body
In this source from an education series, the focus is on the spread of disease and the safety of citizens in the country. Increased globalization allows more goods to come in and move out of a country. Carried with these good are diseases, bacteria and other pests that carry disease. When a group of people who have never before come in contact with this disease are introduced to it, this group will not be able to fight it off and many people will get sick and some will die.  Also, when a new illness is introduced to a society, there will likely not be a treatment for the disease at that time. This is where a major concern regarding people's health and the environment comes into play. One fact mentioned in this article is that there will be an uprising of global epidemics, but people must learn to be very careful so not to spread bad germs around the world.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
If you look at the tag on your shirt, chances are you would see that it was made in a country other than the one in which you sit right now. What's more, before it reached your wardrobe, this shirt could have very well been made with Chinese cotton sewed by Thai hands, shipped across the Pacific on a French freighter crewed by Spaniards to a Los Angeles harbor. This international exchange is just one example of globalization, a process that has everything to do with geography.

Globalization and Its Characteristics

Globalization is the process of increased interconnectedness among countries most notably in the areas of economics, politics, and culture. McDonald's in Japan, French films being played in Minneapolis, and the United Nations are all representations of globalization.

Improved Technology in Transportation and Telecommunications

What makes globalization possible is the ever-increasing capacity for and efficiency of how people and things move and communicate. In years past, people across the globe did not have the ability to communicate and could not interact without difficulty. Nowadays, a phone, instant message, fax, or video conference call can easily be used to connect people throughout the world. Additionally, anyone with the funds can book a plane flight and show up halfway across the world in a matter of hours. In short, the "friction of distance" is lessened, and the world begins to metaphorically shrink.

Movement of People and Capital

A general increase in awareness, opportunity, and transportation technology has allowed for people to move about the world in search of a new home, a new job, or to flee a place of danger. Most migration takes place within or between developing countries, possibly because of lower standards of living and lower wages push individuals to places with a greater chance for economic success.

Additionally, capital (money) is being moved globally with the ease of electronic transference and a rise in perceived investment opportunities. Developing countries are a popular place for investors to place their capital because of the enormous room for growth.

Diffusion of Knowledge

The word 'diffusion' simply means to spread out, and that is exactly what any new found knowledge does. When a new invention or way of doing something pops up, it does not stay secret for long. A good example of this is the appearance of automotive farming machines in Southeast Asia, an area long home to manual agricultural labor.

Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Multinational Corporations

As global awareness of certain issues has risen, so too has the number of organizations that aim to deal with them. So-called non-governmental organizations bring together people unaffiliated with the government and can be nationally or globally focused. Many international NGOs deal with issues that do not pay attention to borders (such as global climate change, energy use, or child labor regulations). Examples of NGOs include Amnesty International or Doctors Without Borders.

As countries are connected to the rest of the world (through increased communication and transportation) they immediately form what a business would call a market.

What this means is that a particular population represents more people to buy a particular product or service. As more and more markets are opening up, business people from around the globe are coming together to form multinational corporations in order to access these new markets. Another reason that businesses are going global is that some jobs can be done by foreign workers at a much cheaper cost than domestic workers. This is referred to as outsourcing.

At its core globalization is an easing of borders, making them less important as countries become dependent on each other to thrive. Some scholars claim that governments are becoming less influential in the face of an increasingly economic world. Others contest this, insisting that governments are becoming more important because of the need for regulation and order in such a complex world system.

Is Globalization a Good Thing?

There is a heated debate about the true effects of globalization and if it really is such a good thing. Good or bad, though, there isn't much argument as to whether or not it is happening. Let's look at the positives and negatives of globalization, and you can decide for yourself whether or not it is the best thing for our world.

Positive Aspects of Globalization

As more money is poured into developing countries, there is a greater chance for the people in those countries to economically succeed and increase their standard of living.

Global competition encourages creativity and innovation and keeps prices for commodities/services in check.

Developing countries are able to reap the benefits of current technology without undergoing many of the growing pains associated with the development of these technologies.

Governments are able to better work together towards common goals now that there is an advantage in cooperation, an improved ability to interact and coordinate, and a global awareness of issues.

There is a greater access to foreign culture in the form of movies, music, food, clothing, and more. In short, the world has more choices.

Negative Aspects of Globalization

Outsourcing, while it provides jobs to a population in one country, takes away those jobs from another country, leaving many without opportunities.

Although different cultures from around the world are able to interact, they begin to meld, and the contours and individuality of each begin to fade.

There may be a greater chance of disease spreading worldwide, as well as invasive species that could prove devastating in non-native ecosystems.

There is little international regulation, an unfortunate fact that could have dire consequences for the safety of people and the environment.

Large Western-driven organizations such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank make it easy for a developing country to obtain a loan. However, a Western focus is often applied to a non-Western situation, resulting in failed progress.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Are the Positives and Negatives of Globalization?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
If you look at the tag on your shirt, chances are you would see that it was made in a country other than the one in which you sit right now. What's more, before it reached your wardrobe, this shirt could have very well been made with Chinese cotton sewed by Thai hands, shipped across the Pacific on a French freighter crewed by Spaniards to a Los Angeles harbor.

# data[].attributes.body
This source from a publication based overseas in the United Kingdom informs us of the negative impacts of globalization. Based upon this specific country, ordeals faced in the wake of globalization are discussed. Specifically, the textile industry has been moved overseas to countries such as Vietnam where labor is much cheaper. This article illustrates how the richest countries feel the positive impacts of globalization, while leaving newly-developing countries in the dust. This publication also feels that with free trade, the diverse cultural divides that exist and make our cultures unique will begin to fade and mix, resulting in a lack of tradition and, in general, a bland worldwide culture.

# data[].attributes.body
This source pinpointed the negative effects of globalization in America. The main topic deals with the outsourcing of American jobs. Companies have moved their operations overseas to different countries where they can obtain much cheaper labor. Even though goods must be shipped around the world and a lack of control creates problems for companies, competition drives businesses to look for cheaper ways of producing their goods. Jobs that have moved overseas have been taken from America, leaving these workers to seek new jobs. That is a lot of new jobs to find! When American workers are outsourced and jobs move overseas, the unemployment rate increases in the US, and that is a negative effect on our country.

# data[].attributes.body
This article focuses solely on the negatives of globalization. This article mainly talks about the use of natural resources such as fossil fuels. Events have happened such as when China joined the world trade organization, causing oil usage to shoot up sky high. Another concern is carbon dioxide emissions due to the new overuse of these fossil fuels. This source is an oil news website. They have reported on this topic about oil being traded around the world. From that, they have concluded that there are many environmental effects as well as economic effects (like unsafe working conditions) that come along with globalization. Furthermore, the largest point made in this source is that globalization can cause the extinction of our fossil fuels; a non-renewable resource.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Globalization seems to be looked on as an unmitigated "good" by economists. Unfortunately, economists seem to be guided by their badly flawed models; they miss real-world problems. In particular, they miss the point that the world is finite. We don't have infinite resources, or unlimited ability to handle excess pollution. So we are setting up a "solution" that is at best temporary.

Economists also tend to look at results too narrowly-from the point of view of a business that can expand, or a worker who has plenty of money, even though these users are not typical. In real life, businesses are facing increased competition, and the worker may be laid off because of greater competition.

The following is a list of reasons why globalization is not living up to what was promised, and is, in fact, a very major problem.

1. Globalization uses up finite resources more quickly. As an example, China joined the world trade organization in December 2001. In 2002, its coal use began rising rapidly (Figure 1, below).

In fact, there is also a huge increase in world coal consumption (Figure 2, below). India's consumption is increasing as well, but from a smaller base.

2. Globalization increases world carbon dioxide emissions. If the world burns its coal more quickly, and does not cut back on other fossil fuel use, carbon dioxide emissions increase. Figure 3 shows how carbon dioxide emissions have increased, relative to what might have been expected, based on the trend line for the years prior to when the Kyoto protocol was adopted in 1997.

3. Globalization makes it virtually impossible for regulators in one country to foresee the worldwide implications of their actions. Actions which would seem to reduce emissions for an individual country may indirectly encourage world trade, ramp up manufacturing in coal-producing areas, and increase emissions over all. See my post Climate Change: Why Standard Fixes Don't Work.

4. Globalization acts to increase world oil prices.

The world has undergone two sets of oil price spikes. The first one, in the 1973 to 1983 period, occurred after US oil supply began to decline in 1970 (Figure 4, above and Figure 5 below).

After 1983, it was possible to bring oil prices back to the $30 to $40 barrel range (in 2012$), compared to the $20 barrel price (in 2012$) available prior to 1970. This was partly done partly by ramping up oil production in the North Sea, Alaska and Mexico (sources which were already known), and partly by reducing consumption. The reduction in consumption was accomplished by cutting back oil use for electricity, and by encouraging the use of more fuel-efficient cars.

Now, since 2005, we have high oil prices back, but we have a much worse problem. The reason the problem is worse now is partly because oil supply is not growing very much, due to limits we are reaching, and partly because demand is exploding due to globalization.

If we look at world oil supply, it is virtually flat. The United States and Canada together provide the slight increase in world oil supply that has occurred since 2005. Otherwise, supply has been flat since 2005 (Figure 6, below). What looks like a huge increase in US oil production in 2012 in Figure 5 looks much less impressive, when viewed in the context of world oil production in Figure 6.

Part of our problem now is that with globalization, world oil demand is rising very rapidly. Chinese buyers purchased more cars in 2012 than did European buyers. Rapidly rising world demand, together with oil supply which is barely rising, pushes world prices upward. This time, there also is no possibility of a dip in world oil demand of the type that occurred in the early 1980s. Even if the West drops its oil consumption greatly, the East has sufficient pent-up demand that it will make use of any oil that is made available to the market.

Adding to our problem is the fact that we have already extracted most of the inexpensive to extract oil because the "easy" (and cheap) to extract oil was extracted first. Because of this, oil prices cannot decrease very much, without world supply dropping off. Instead, because of diminishing returns, needed price keeps ratcheting upward. The new "tight" oil that is acting to increase US supply is an example of expensive to produce oil-it can't bring needed price relief.

5. Globalization transfers consumption of limited oil supply from developed countries to developing countries. If world oil supply isn't growing by very much, and demand is growing rapidly in developing countries, oil to meet this rising demand must come from somewhere. The way this transfer takes place is through the mechanism of high oil prices. High oil prices are particularly a problem for major oil importing countries, such as the United States, many European countries, and Japan. Because oil is used in growing food and for commuting, a rise in oil price tends to lead to a cutback in discretionary spending, recession, and lower oil use in these countries. See my academic article, "Oil Supply Limits and the Continuing Financial Crisis," available here or here.

Developing countries are better able to use higher-priced oil than developed countries. In some cases (particularly in oil-producing countries) subsidies play a role. In addition, the shift of manufacturing to less developed countries increases the number of workers who can afford a motorcycle or car. Job loss plays a role in the loss of oil consumption from developed countries-see my post, Why is US Oil Consumption Lower? Better Gasoline Mileage? The real issue isn't better mileage; one major issue is loss of jobs.

6. Globalization transfers jobs from developed countries to less developed countries. Globalization levels the playing field, in a way that makes it hard for developed countries to compete. A country with a lower cost structure (lower wages and benefits for workers, more inexpensive coal in its energy mix, and more lenient rules on pollution) is able to out-compete a typical OECD country. In the United States, the percentage of US citizen with jobs started dropping about the time China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.

Figure 8. US Number Employed / Population, where US Number Employed is Total Non_Farm Workers from Current Employment Statistics of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Population is US Resident Population from the US Census. 2012 is partial year estimate.

7. Globalization transfers investment spending from developed countries to less developed countries. If an investor has a chance to choose between a country with a competitive advantage and a country with a competitive disadvantage, which will the investor choose? A shift in investment shouldn't be too surprising.

In the US, domestic investment was fairly steady as a percentage of National Income until the mid-1980s (Figure 9). In recent years, it has dropped off and is now close to consumption of assets (similar to depreciation, but includes other removal from service). The assets in question include all types of capital assets, including government-owned assets (schools, roads), business owned assets (factories, stores), and individual homes. A similar pattern applies to business investment viewed separately.

Part of the shift in the balance between investment and consumption of assets is rising consumption of assets. This would include early retirement of factories, among other things.

Even very low interest rates in recent years have not brought US investment back to earlier levels.

Related article: Why have GDP Growth and Energy Growth Separated?
8. With the dollar as the world's reserve currency, globalization leads to huge US balance of trade deficits and other imbalances.
With increased globalization and the rising price of oil since 2002, the US trade deficit has soared (Figure 10). Adding together amounts from Figure 10, the cumulative US deficit for the period 1980 through 2011 is $8.6 trillion. By the end of 2012, the cumulative deficit since 1980 is probably a little over 9 trillion.

A major reason for the large US trade deficit is the fact that the US dollar is the world's " reserve currency." While the mechanism is too complicated to explain here, the result is that the US can run deficits year after year, and the rest of the world will take their surpluses, and use it to buy US debt. With this arrangement, the rest of the world funds the United States' continued overspending. It is fairly clear the system was not put together with the thought that it would work in a fully globalized world-it simply leads to too great an advantage for the United States relative to other countries. Erik Townsend recently wrote an article called Why Peak Oil Threatens the International Monetary System, in which he talks about the possibility of high oil prices bringing an end to the current arrangement.

At this point, high oil prices together with globalization have led to huge US deficit spending since 2008. This has occurred partly because a smaller portion of the population is working (and thus paying taxes), and partly because US spending for unemployment benefits and stimulus has risen. The result is a mismatch between government income and spending (Figure 11, below).

Thanks to the mismatch described in the last paragraph, the federal deficit in recent years has been far greater than the balance of payment deficit. As a result, some other source of funding for the additional US debt has been needed, in addition to what is provided by the reserve currency arrangement. The Federal Reserve has been using Quantitative Easing to buy up federal debt since late 2008. This has provided a buyer for additional debt and also keeps US interest rates low (hoping to attract some investment back to the US, and keeping US debt payments affordable). The current situation is unsustainable, however. Continued overspending and printing money to pay debt is not a long-term solution to huge imbalances among countries and lack of cheap oil-situations that do not "go away" by themselves.

9. Globalization tends to move taxation away from corporations, and onto individual citizens. Corporations have the ability to move to locations where the tax rate is lowest. Individual citizens have much less ability to make such a change. Also, with today's lack of jobs, each community competes with other communities with respect to how many tax breaks it can give to prospective employers. When we look at the breakdown of US tax receipts (federal, state, and local combined) this is what we find:

The only portion that is entirely from corporations is corporate income taxes, shown in red. This has clearly shrunk by more than half. Part of the green layer (excise, sales, and property tax) is also from corporations, since truckers also pay excise tax on fuel they purchase, and businesses usually pay property taxes. It is clear, though, that the portion of revenue coming from personal income taxes and Social Security and Medicare funding (blue) has been rising.

I showed that high oil prices seem to lead to depressed US wages in my post, The Connection of Depressed Wages to High Oil Prices and Limits to Growth. If wages are low at the same time that wage-earners are being asked to shoulder an increasing share of rising government costs, this creates a mismatch that wage-earners are not really able to handle.
10. Globalization sets up a currency "race to the bottom," with each country trying to get an export advantage by dropping the value of its currency.
Because of the competitive nature of the world economy, each country needs to sell its goods and services at as low a price as possible. This can be done in various ways-pay its workers lower wages; allow more pollution; use cheaper more polluting fuels; or debase the currency by Quantitative Easing (also known as "printing money,") in the hope that this will produce inflation and lower the value of the currency relative to other currencies.

There is no way this race to the bottom can end well. Prices of imports become very high in a debased currency-this becomes a problem. In addition, the supply of money is increasingly out of balance with real goods and services. This produces asset bubbles, such as artificially high stock market prices, and artificially high bond prices (because the interest rates on bonds are so low). These assets bubbles lead to investment crashes. Also, if the printing ever stops (and perhaps even if it doesn't), interest rates will rise, greatly raising cost to governments, corporations, and individual citizens.

11. Globalization encourages dependence on other countries for essential goods and services. With globalization, goods can often be obtained cheaply from elsewhere. A country may come to believe that there is no point in producing its own food or clothing. It becomes easy to depend on imports and specialize in something like financial services or high-priced medical care-services that are not as oil-dependent.

As long as the system stays together, this arrangement works, more or less. However, if the built-in instabilities in the system become too great, and the system stops working, there is suddenly a very large problem. Even if the dependence is not on food, but is instead on computers and replacement parts for machinery, there can still be a big problem if imports are interrupted.
12. Globalization ties countries together, so that if one country collapses, the collapse is likely to ripple through the system, pulling many other countries with it.
History includes many examples of civilizations that started from a small base, gradually grew to over-utilize their resource base, and then collapsed. We are now dealing with a world situation which is not too different. The big difference this time is that a large number of countries is involved, and these countries are increasingly interdependent. In my post 2013: Beginning of Long-Term Recession, I showed that there are significant parallels between financial dislocations now happening in the United States and the types of changes which happened in other societies, prior to collapse. My analysis was based on the model of collapse developed in the book Secular Cycles by Peter Turchin and Sergey Nefedov.

It is not just the United States that is in perilous financial condition. Many European countries and Japan are in similarly poor condition. The failure of one country has the potential to pull many others down, and with it much of the system. The only countries that remain safe are the ones that have not grown to depend on globalization-which is probably not many today-perhaps landlocked countries of Africa.

In the past, when one area collapsed, there was less interdependence. When one area collapsed, it was possible to let cropland "rest" and deforested areas regrow. With regeneration, and perhaps new technology, it was possible for a new civilization to grow in the same area later. If we are dealing with a world-wide collapse, it will be much more difficult to follow this model.

By. Gail Tverberg

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
12 Negative Aspects of Globalization | OilPrice.com

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Globalization seems to be looked on as an unmitigated "good" by economists. Unfortunately, economists seem to be guided by their badly flawed models; they miss real-world problems. In particular, they miss the point that the world is finite. We don't have infinite resources, or unlimited ability to handle excess pollution.

# data[].attributes.headline
Pro: Global Power slowed, formed more evenly.

# data[].attributes.subject
Pro: Global Power slowed, formed more evenly.

# data[].attributes.body
This article highlights the pros of globalization. While it contains many strong arguments for globalization, a few are extremely relevant to the issue. A large benefit is that global power is being formed at a slower pace, and not all at once in one place. This allows power to be spread throughout the world. People in each country are exposed to different cultures, we become comfortable with people from other countries socially, also, through this we can communicate and obtain new information from these foreign nations. Finally, travel between countries becomes faster and also internet connects all parts of the world!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Globalization is an economic tidal wave that is sweeping over the world. But before drawing any conclusions on how it affects the U.S. economy, consider some of the general pros and cons of globalization.

# data[].attributes.headline
A Study: Who Benefits From Globalization?

# data[].attributes.subject
A Study: Who Benefits From Globalization?

# data[].attributes.body
In this short clip, it is explained in detail the pros of globalization. In a study conducted upon countries in 1990-2001, they saw that all countries benefited from globalization in this time frame. Back in 1990, there was very little globalization, and obviously, more in 2011. While more developed countries benefited more from this globalization, all nations saw some sort of increase. The main argument stated was that globalization is the main component to success in the 21st century. Everyone is competing against one another, and globalization helps each feuding country to stay ahead. Being connected (in general) is a good thing, but some countries may have more of an advantaged in being globalized than others.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Who Really Wins From Globalization?  (Pros and Cons of Globalization)

# data[].attributes.headline
Higher Per Capita, Better Standard of Living

# data[].attributes.subject
Higher Per Capita, Better Standard of Living

# data[].attributes.body
This source argues many positive aspects of globalization. Some of the main benefits from the act of globalization are increased wealth, better quality of life, and increased availability of foreign goods. Increased wealth comes from globalization through an increase in per capita GDP. Better quality of life is caused by the spread of products to other countries, more travel and tourists, and greater spread of domestic culture to foreign countries. Another benefit is the availability of foreign goods. With international products being imported, consumers can have a more widespread selection of goods to purchase. These goods may also be available to consumers at lower prices.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Empowering families to navigate the immigration system more confidently, rapidly, and affordably.

We are a team of immigrants and experts who have struggled with our own journeys through the complex, high-stakes U.S. immigration system. Just like millions of other families, we've had to choose between paying thousands of dollars in legal fees or spending months trying to figure out how to do everything ourselves. We knew there had to be a better way. That's what we're building, after hundreds of conversations with families, immigration lawyers, and government officials - a trusted partner and guide for your entire immigration journey.

Boundless guides you through the entire marriage green card process for a flat $750 fee. Here's how it works:

Answer simple questions online
No more stress with paperwork - just answer some clear and simple questions at your convenience.

Easily organize your documents
Understand what documents you need, and keep them all together securely online.

Enjoy concierge service
Steer clear of common mistakes - a dedicated Boundless team member will help make sure your forms and documents are ready for attorney review.

Engage your attorney
Get the peace of mind that comes with having an independent immigration attorney who answers your confidential questions and reviews your entire green card application.

File your complete application
Leave the printing to us - you'll receive the entire printed package at your doorstep, with clear instructions on how to sign and send it to the government.

Prepare for success
Know that Boundless is with you until the finish line - helping you respond to government questions and prepare for your green card interview.

Learn more about how we can help you, or get started today!

Want to make a meaningful difference in people's lives? Join our team!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Empowering families to navigate the immigration system more confidently, rapidly, and affordably. We are a team of immigrants and experts who have struggled with our own journeys through the complex, high-stakes U.S. immigration system. Just like millions of other families, we've had to choose between paying thousands of dollars in legal fees or spending months trying to figure out how to do everything ourselves.

# data[].attributes.body
This article provides a very solid explanation of the negative effects of globalization. Main concerns regarding globalization are environmental, poverty from the fall of wages, and health risks of workers. Environmental risks are that companies will overuse natural resources that are needed to produce their goods. Also, overuse of our fossil fuels and other types of irreplaceable natural resources will diminish. The next concern has regards to poverty. With companies paying their workers less to be able to sell their product for less, people that work in the factories will make little to nothing. These low wages cause poverty and therefore low standard of living. Finally, there is a threat of health risks of the workers in factories and people worldwide. Concerns of a global pandemic are circulating. This would be caused by goods moving across borders at a very high pace, faster than anyone would be able to detect and stop an illness.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
11 Major Pros and Cons of Globalization | NLCATP.org

# data[].attributes.body
This article strongly outlines the positive effects of globalization. First of all, it mentions how there are better availability of products and some services in the global marketplace. This can be caused by separate countries producing the same good. Another main point that is made is producers or retailers can make different products to contribute to growth in the economy. In this source, cultural globalization is also mentioned. Some pros mentioned of cultural globalization are that countries are exposed and have access to other countries' culture; included are arts, entertainment, as well as education. Another major benefit is instant access to information from anywhere in the world via the internet. This is a major source for major information available to almost any person in the world.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Historically, globalization has been considered both a great opportunity and a threat. Globalization is a multifaceted phenomenon which entails several economic, cultural, and political pros and cons. Discover here the implications and arguments for and against globalization. Debate based on the Module "Do Nations Matter on a Global World?" from the LSE100 Course (The London School of Economics and Political Science)
Brief history of globalization

Globalization is a process of growing exchange, interaction and integration between people, governments and private organizations across the globe. International trade, capital flows, migration, technological transfer and cultural exchanges are some of the typical manifestations of this process. The encounters and relationships between ancient civilizations and the colonization processes initiated during the Age of Discoveries were archaic and early-modern forms of globalization. During the 19th century technological progress and the Industrial Revolution catalyzed globalization. The political and economic international agreements after the Second World War accelerated this process even further. However, this term really became paramount in the academic literature and media after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union which enabled a much more fluid communications, exchanges of goods and services and migration.

For years globalization was equated with progress and economic growth and generally supported. However, in the last few years an increasing number of voices have started to criticize this phenomenon and point at several flaws and dangers associated with it. The anti-globalization movement has grown. Not only left-wing anti-capitalists oppose globalization, but conservative nationalists have recently emerged as a strong force against it. To what extent is globalization to blame for problems such as national unemployment, inequality, terrorism and cultural homogenization?

Globalization pros and cons

Globalization is such a complex phenomenon that here we are going to dissect its pros and cons across three different dimensions or angles: economic, cultural and political

Economic globalization

Economic globalization echoes the views of neoliberal and neoclassicist thinkers in which states lose prominence and the world becomes a single global market of individual consumers. These consumers are characterized by their material and economic self-interest - rather than cultural, civic or other forms of identity. The expansion and dominance of global companies and brands is another key feature. These corporations contribute to deepen global interconnectedness not only by uniformly shaping consumption patterns across societies, but by binding economies together through complex supply chains, trade networks, flows of capital and manpower.
Pros of economic globalization: Cons of economic globalization:
Cultural globalization

It refers to the process of transmission of values, ideas, cultural and artistic expressions. In the era of the Internet and fast communications people can interact more easily with each other. Multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism are to some extent manifestations of cultural globalization. Communities are less insulated than ever in history, even those who cannot travel can have today a good understanding of other cultures and meet virtually people from other parts of the world. People change their views and lifestyle influenced by global cultural and consumption trends.
Pros of cultural globalization: Cons of cultural globalization:
Political globalization

The political dimension is a newer feature of the globalization debate, as over the last 30 years there has been a rise in the influence and power of international and regional institutions such as the European Union (EU), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United Nations (UN), the World Trade Organization (WTO), MERCOSUR in South America, and the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). These international and supranational actors increasingly shape domestic politics.
Pros of political globalization:

Access to international aid and financial support

It contributes to world peace. It reduces risk of invasions, more checks on big powers and limitationn on nationalism

International organizations are often committed to spread values like freedom and to fight abuses within countries

Smaller countries can work together and gain more influence internationally

Governments can learn from each other

Cons of political globalization:
To summarize, no matter from which angle we look at globalization, whether economic, cultural or political, both the opportunities and drawbacks are numerous.
If you want to promote your own scholarly debate, lecture, research project or academic article, contact us: university[a]netivist.org
After assessing its pros and cons, do you think globalization overall good for our societies? Vote and tell us which aspects or dimensions do you consider the most beneficial or dangerous for us. Invite anyone concerned with globalization and its impact to join our public discussion

If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Globalization pros and cons: economic, cultural, political

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Economic, cultural, and political pros and cons of globalization. History of globalization. Discover implications and arguments in favor and against it.

# data[].attributes.body
This source argues the benefits of worldwide trade for the consumer as well as the broad economy. Some major points presented in this source are that the world now has free trade, competition between competing countries drive prices in the market down, and a nation can now trade goods that they have a surplus of for goods that they need. First of all, before globalization, countries were not able to trade with one another freely. Now that there are much decreased boundaries in trade as well as importation, countries can freely trade with one another. Lower prices on goods caused by the effect of competition, means consumers spend less on goods throughout the world. Finally, nations can trade their surpluses of goods with other countries to meet their needs. This is a key in global trade, the point of trading is to give up something that you do not value to get the things you want. In this scenario, countries can meet their needs and export their excess at the same time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
While many have heard the term globalization during news reports or televised debates, it can be challenging to suss out all of the attendant pros and cons. As the Internet continues to shrink the world we live in, globalization becomes more and more important. For those who are unaware, globalization is the process of shifting the world we live in from a place of isolation to a place of integration. It signals a greater economic and political cooperation worldwide and an increased sharing of ideas. Thanks to technological advances, globalization has become a greater reality.

List of Pros of Globalization

1. Free Trade
Once upon a time, nations were not able to trade freely with one another, due to all of the barriers that stood in their way. Companies in varied nations across the world are now able to trade with another, thanks to reduction of restrictions on importing and exporting.

2. The Consumer and Economy Benefit
Consumers are able to lower their costs and enjoy a much wider selection of products to choose from. Now that foreign companies can reach those who do not reside in their country, they are able to tap into markets that they were unable to reach before.

3. Competition Between Countries Drives Prices Down
The companies have greater access to more countries, which allows them to sell their goods and services to wholesale retailers all around the world.

4. Gives Other Nations Opportunity
A nation the opportunity to hone in on their strengths, while ignoring their weaknesses. A country that is rich in oil, but possesses a scarcity of suitable farm land is free to focus on exporting their plentiful oil supply. Because they do not have to worry about importation restrictions, they can easily purchase wholesale amounts of fresh foods from other countries.

5. Labor Can Move More Freely
Workers can move from country to country with relative ease and market their skills, goods and services to the highest worldwide bidder. Countries no longer have to suffer with gaps in their labor structures. A nation that is struggling to produce doctors can simply import them from another country. Shortages of labor are no longer an issue on a local level. Thanks to the increased ease of communication and the reliability of the Internet, a person can be trained to work at a job in a foreign country without actually being present.

List of Cons of Globalization

1. Smaller Countries Suffer the Most
While there are a variety of benefits, countries have struggled with certain globalization concepts. Certain nations benefit greatly from the current landscape, as others suffer. Smaller, less developed countries do not typically benefit from the level playing field that globalization provides.

2. Leaving Developing Countries Behind
Economists have argued that developing countries are at increased risk of being left behind. Globalization encourages free trade, which does not provide a developing nation with the protection that they need in order to grow.

3. Strain Among Job Markets
The free movement of labor also has its downsides. When workers can move freely from one nation to the next, countries that have a dearth of job opportunities often struggle. Skilled employees do not often stay in countries without a strong job market, which can cause a labor drain.

4. Inability to Recoup Investment
For countries that rely on public funding for their secondary educational system, this can be disastrous. Residents of the country utilize publicly funded colleges to bolster their skills for the job market, then take their talents to other countries. This leaves their home country with very little recourse to recoup their considerable investment.

5. Companies Seeking Personal Gain
Larger companies have learned how to leverage globalization for their own personal gain. Companies now have the ability to trade with countries that they are not based in. This allows them to exploit certain tax loopholes and hide money in places like Ireland and Hong Kong. When this happens, the countries that they are based in lose out on billions of tax dollars. The consumer is then squeezed by increased taxes on their goods, services and property. A nation typically has zero control over larger corporations registering in other countries to avoid taxation.

6. Negative Impact on Environment
The environment impact of globalization is considered to be negative by most experienced observers. The increased consumption of a wide variety of products leads to increased production which causes an uptick in pollution. Simply put, the environment is under added strain, which can have devastating long term effects on the planet's environmental stability.

7. Loss of Cultural Identity
Greater cultural hegemony is benefit, but countries are beginning to lose their identities due to immigration that is taking place on a progressively larger scale. As globalization becomes the new way of the world, more and more countries are at risk of losing their cultural identity.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
While many have heard the term globalization during news reports or televised debates, it can be challenging to suss out all of the attendant pros and cons. As the Internet continues to shrink the world we live in, globalization becomes more and more important.

# data[].attributes.body
These sources argue that globalization has made the world worse.

# data[].attributes.body
These sources argue that globalization has made the world better.