# data[].attributes.body
Physical Education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
'Beyond 2012 - outstanding physical education for all' makes recommendations for schools and the Department for Education to secure the quality of PE in schools and draws out improvements made to PE and sport over the last four years.

The report found that PE is generally in good health. Considerable investment over the last decade has ensured PE is a central part of school life for pupils of all ages. However, in some schools Ofsted found there was not enough physical activity in PE lessons. In more than a quarter of schools, teaching did not improve pupils' physical fitness.

Her Majesty's Chief Inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw said:

Physical education is part of every child's entitlement to a good education. Generally, PE in our schools is in good health, but there are some issues the report highlights as areas for improvement. In particular, we found there often wasn't enough physical, strenuous activity in PE lessons. Some teachers talked for too long and pupils were not provided with enough activity to enable them to learn or practise their skills.

In many of the schools visited, the more able pupils were not challenged sufficiently because teachers' expectations of them were too low. Schools with the best PE provision enabled pupils to achieve well by providing an ever increasing range of extra-curricular and traditional activities.

However, our report found that only a minority of schools play competitive sport to a very high level. Therefore I have commissioned a follow-up to today's report which will examine the quality of the best competitive school sport in the state sector, comparing it with what's on offer in the independent sector.

Today's report found there is more good and outstanding PE than at the time of the last Ofsted PE survey in 2008. However, sustaining this level of improvement will present a challenge against a backdrop of greater expectations following last summer's London Games.

The impact of the School Sports Partnership programme in maximising participation and increasing competition was clearly evident in the vast majority of schools visited. Ofsted recommends that the Department for Education introduces a new national strategy for PE and school sport that builds on the successes of these partnerships - enabling schools to make a major contribution to the legacy left by the 2012 Olympics.

The report also found very few schools had adapted PE programmes to suit the individual needs of overweight or obese pupils. There was little evidence of a coordinated approach to childhood obesity, even though almost 3 in 10 children between the ages of 2 - 15 are classed as obese according to NHS Information Centre figures.

Other key findings in the report include:

one fifth of primary schools did not ensure that all pupils could swim before they left school

only a minority of schools play competitive sport to a high level

outstanding PE was found in twice as many secondary schools as primary

many primary school teachers lacked specialist knowledge of the teaching of PE

most schools provided at least two hours of PE each week for pupils between the ages of 5 to 14

Key Recommendations

The Department for Education should build on the improvements made to PE and harness the interest and momentum generated by the 2012 London Games by devising and implementing a new national strategy for PE and school sport.

The Department for Education should ensure that those responsible for the initial training of primary teachers should provide them with sufficient subject knowledge to enable them to teach PE well.

Teachers should improve pupils' fitness by keeping them physically active throughout all lessons and engaging them in regular, high intensity vigorous activity or sustained periods of time.

Teachers should raise their expectations of where more able pupils are capable of achieving and provide them with challenging, competitive activities that lead to high standards of performance.

Notes to Editors

1. The report is based on evidence from inspections of physical education between September 2008 and July 2012.

2. The evidence from this report is found from visits by Her Majesty's Inspectors and Additional Inspectors from Ofsted who visited 120 primary schools, 110 secondary schools and seven special schools.

3. School sports partnerships (SSP) ceased in October 2010. The SSP were local networks of schools and PE teachers aiming to get pupils across England to be more physically active during school hours.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Not enough physical in physical education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
'Beyond 2012 - outstanding physical education for all' makes recommendations for schools and the Department for Education to secure the quality of PE in schools and draws out improvements made to PE and sport over the last four years. The report found that PE is generally in good health.

# data[].attributes.body
Women in Sport

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Sporting Sisters: Stories of Muslim Women in Sport

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This short documentary film, inspired by the 2012 Olympic Games, brings together archival research and interviews with different generations of Muslim women, to preserve their voices for future generations as part of a Heritage Lottery Funded Young Roots project.

# data[].attributes.body
Ethnic minorities in sport

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
There are only 19 black and ethnic minority (BME) coaches in the 552 'top' coaching positions at professional English clubs, a report has found.

BME coaches take up 3.4% of those positions despite at least 25% of players coming from BME backgrounds.

Findings of the study, carried out by the Sports Person's Think Tank, will be revealed at Westminster on Monday but have already been seen by BBC Sport.

Sports Minister Helen Grant said the findings are "appalling and worrying".

She added: "It's going to take a concerted effort by everyone in football to get the sea change that we need."

The think tank will announce its recommendations at Monday's meeting with MPs and the sports minister in London.

The report was carried out by Dr Stephen Bradbury at Loughborough University, and examined what it took to be the top six coaching and management positions at all 92 professional football clubs in the English leagues.

The study, funded by Football Against Racism in Europe (Fare), says that "institutional discrimination" is present within the English leagues.

Former Reading, Blackburn and Wigan striker Jason Roberts, 36, is a founding member of the think tank.

"It appears that football has lost successive generations of potential coaches and managers simply because they are black or from other ethnic minority backgrounds," he wrote in the report.

"An urgent, honest and thorough debate is required before English football can heal itself and redress the balance."

The study acknowledges that a very small number of BME coaches are also working in supporting roles, often on a part-time basis, while the research also suggests there is an over-reliance within professional clubs of "network-based" methods of recruitment.

The Football League, under the guidance of chairman Greg Clarke, is conducting a review into how it can increase the numbers of BME coaches and managers among its member clubs.

Clarke has been criticised by the Professional Footballers' Association for his failure to keep a promise to hold a vote at the Football League's 2013 annual general meeting on a proposal to conduct a trial of a version of the NFL's Rooney Rule.

Introduced into American football in 2002, the Rooney Rule mandates that teams interview at least one BME candidate when a head coach or general manager position becomes available.

You can download a podcast of Richard Conway's look at the history and impact of the Rooney Rule, and whether it could work in UK football, here.

The Football Association has also set itself a new target to boost diversity within all levels of the game, while the Premier League recently said it wanted to see "more and better" coaches "who can progress to the highest levels of the game on merit and regardless of race, ethnicity, gender or background".

The study claims that some BME coaches have experienced intentional and unintentional racism "within the high-level coach education environment".

"This has included explicit racist name-calling and more subtle and nuanced forms of racial 'banter', and a lack of recognition or willingness to address racisms of this kind by FA coach educators," says the study.

BBC Sport understands the FA is not aware of any complaints of discrimination and has previously stated it would encourage anyone with a complaint to come forward and report them.

FA Learning and full-time coach educators are already required to undergo equality and diversity training, as part of the FA's inclusion plan.

FA board member Heather Rabbatts said the governing body welcomed the report, which "adds further evidence that bodies across the game need to work together to challenge discrimination".

She added the FA was "committed to the long-term programme of change" and would be working with Fare, the Sports People's Think Tank, the sports minister and other paries to "maintain the momentum of change and build on the work already underway across the game".

The report also contends that a lack of BME role models, together with "conscious and unconscious racial bias" and stereotyping, play a part in the low figures.

The report also examines why low numbers of BME coaches are completing their core qualifications.

Michael Johnson, a 41-year-old former Birmingham City player, thinks many BME professionals are put off trying to gain coaching qualifications by the belief they will not get job opportunities once they gain them.

Johnson, who retired in 2009, has a full set of coaching badges, including the highest award of the Uefa Pro Licence, a prerequisite for anyone wanting to manage in the Premier League.

He has received just three invites to attend an interview in the past three years for coaching and manager jobs.

"I don't want anyone to do me a favour," he says.

"I've gone out and done it the hard way. I've paid my way through the qualifications. All I want is that opportunity, just like any other man from any other walk of life.

"All we want is to get in the room. Nobody is saying you're going to get the job. All we're saying is have a look at these guys and see if they might change your perception of what you might think they are."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Black and ethnic minority coaches not getting top jobs, study shows

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
There are only 19 black and ethnic minority (BME) coaches in the 552 'top' coaching positions at professional English clubs, a report has found. BME coaches take up 3.4% of those positions despite at least 25% of players coming from BME backgrounds.

# data[].attributes.body
YST

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Youth Sport Trust is the UK's leading charity improving every young person's education and development through sport and play. Working together, we empower young people to achieve their own personal best and equip educators to change lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Black v Whites

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
blacks versus whites and the controversial top flight f...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Blacks versus whites and the controversial top flight football match that history forgot

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Blacks versus whites and the controversial top flight football match that history forgot. Short of an idea for a charity football match? How about playing a black team against a white team? And this is colour of skin I'm talking about, not colour of kits.

# data[].attributes.body
Gender divide

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What stands in the way of women being equal to men? BBC News

# data[].attributes.body
Brewster: Racism row

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Contact author

ype in Uefa and the word "racism" into Google, and prominent search results tell us the view of European football's governing body. Uefa wants us to know it says no to racism. In fact, in 2013, its member associations " pledged to step up their efforts to eliminate racism from football" altogether. It's all rather grand, but what we know is that in recent weeks Uefa's self-congratulatory stance has been greatly undermined. Revelations from the England Under-17s World Cup-winning forward Rhian Brewster have once again highlighted the perniciousness of the problem.

Brewster's experience of racist abuse represents unacceptable treatment of a young man just trying to do his job. The player has been praised for unequivocally relating his experiences, which have been free from the euphemism so many would have preferred the shadow home secretary Diane Abbott to adopt when she shared that, last year, she had been called a "n----- bitch".

In an interview with my colleague Daniel Taylor for the Guardian, Brewster frankly outlined the racist abuse he both witnessed and suffered while playing for Liverpool in Uefa Youth League matches and for England. Called the N-word and subjected to monkey chants, the 17-year-old has understandably lost faith in Uefa, whose responses to these incidents have been pitiful or nonexistent.

Fans shouldn't allow collective responsibility to be offloaded on to the shoulders of someone yet to be called an adult

Uefa says it encourages referees to "stop, suspend or even abandon a game if racist incidents occur". Players found guilty of racist behaviour can receive a 10-match suspension, and stadiums can face closure if this applies to fans. Uefa recognises the power it has to drastically change the experiences of young black players. However, for now at least, it seems disinclined to use it. It is an obvious dereliction of duty. The hope is that today - the first day its offices have been open since 22 December - the governing body will stir itself into more forceful action.

Slogans, though easy to cobble together and flash at millions of people, are empty. Like a sticking plaster for a virus, their flimsiness is obvious when set against the task of healing. It is a lesson the Italian football league painfully learned last October. The president of Lazio football club, Claudio Lotito, had players wearing T-shirts declaring "no to antisemitism" accompanied by a picture of Anne Frank. An excerpt of her diary was read at every Italian league match during the same week. Yet some Lazio fans sang fascist songs while making salutes during the reading. The horrified prime minister, Paolo Gentiloni, called the scenes unacceptable. Quite. The trouble is in how governing bodies, clubs, fellow players and not least the fans act in solidarity to underscore that such behaviour is intolerable.

One way to do so is by not distancing the English game, run by the FA, from the routine instances of racism experienced by black and minority-ethnic (BAME) players. To focus solely on Uefa's failings is to miss the point of Brewster's interventions entirely. Yes, much progress has been made: in Brewster's interview it is clear he hasn't experienced in England racist abuse of the kind encountered in matches against Russian and Spanish teams. Still, players continue to walk out on English pitches subjected to such abuse. Anecdotally, others refuse to sign to the youth wings of certain clubs because of the rampant racism associated with their fans.

BAME players make up a quarter of players in English football's four divisions yet account for a miserable 4% of senior coaches. It is the same footballing establishment that last October couldn't admit it had failed in its duty of care to the England player Eniola Aluko. And it is the same leadership that couldn't quite bring itself to find anything wrong with racist texts sent "privately" between Iain Moody, now Colchester's head of player resources, and Malky Mackay, currently caretaker manager of Scotland and the performance director of the Scottish Football Association. The controversy eventually blew over, and both white men's careers in football continued, once the word "banter" was used to explain their seemingly indefensible interactions.

Last year, the sports anti-racism body Kick It Out reported that in the 2016-2017 season, reports of racist abuse rose by 16.7%. That was sadly predictable in the context of a record rise in race and religious hate crime following the Brexit vote. Even if Brewster were to instigate a US-style taking-a-knee stance, as has been rumoured, it leaves racism in football as primarily a problem for players to solve alone. Which isn't good enough. Soon a backlash will, no doubt, ensue. It will bemoan bringing politics into football. Because, presumably, a much preferable scenario would be to have BAME players reconcile racist abuse and violence as an unfortunate fact of their professional lives. Anything less would be too much of an inconvenience.

A 17-year-old is bearing the weight of the fight against racism, and needs support from the behemoth that is Uefa. It is an incredibly vulnerable position, one that needs more than mere platitudes about bravery and commendable behaviour to bolster it. Fans shouldn't allow a collective responsibility to be offloaded on to the shoulders of someone who is not yet an adult. Of course we should be saying no to racism, but now we need the detail as to how this will actually be done.

* Lola Okolosie is an English teacher and freelance journalist
Topics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Forget the football. Rhian Brewster's story is about racism, plain and simple | Lola Okolosie

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Contact author ype in Uefa and the word "racism" into Google, and prominent search results tell us the view of European football's governing body. Uefa wants us to know it says no to racism. In fact, in 2013, its member associations " pledged to step up their efforts to eliminate racism from football" altogether.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
uk sport chair meets with unfunded sports

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
UK Sport Chair meets with unfunded sports | UK Sport

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
UK Sport Chair meets with unfunded sports

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Eleven sport governing bodies are demanding an overhaul of the way Britain invests in the pursuit of Olympic and Paralympic medals.

In an unprecedented challenge to elite performance funding agency UK Sport, the group have joined forces to call for an urgent review of what they call "a two-class system that runs counter to Olympic ideals".

National Lottery money is currently allocated on the basis of medal potential, helping to transform the country's sporting fortunes.

But amid an athlete welfare crisis and various governance problems, UK Sport has faced mounting criticism over its approach.

The 11 sports - archery, badminton, baseball/softball, basketball, fencing, handball, volleyball, weightlifting, wrestling, wheelchair rugby and table tennis - were all left without funding when UK Sport announced its £345m plan last December.

This was despite badminton meeting its medal target at Rio 2016 and table tennis and weightlifting showing signs of progress.

Instead of UK Sport's "no compromise" approach to picking winners, the unfunded sports want a "tiered support structure" that would guarantee every Olympic and Paralympic sport a base level of funding.

Incoming UK Sport chair Dame Katherine Grainger told BBC Sport she understood why the sports had taken a stand, but said: "It's not fair to say we're narrowly focusing on a few sports."

The unfunded sports believe they can all be backed if UK Sport cuts the amount it spends on bringing major events to this country, its budget for getting British administrators into international federations and the £67.4m it gives to the English Institute of Sport (EIS), the organisation that provides sports-science services to most Olympic and Paralympic sports.

The EIS's headcount has been growing and will top 300 next year, but it has taken on more responsibilities, works with the vast majority of British athletes and is considered to be a world-leading service.

What do the sports say?

In a joint manifesto calling for "a new approach" to investment, the 11 sports - which include Archery GB, British Basketball, British Weightlifting, Badminton England, GB Wheelchair Rugby and Table Tennis England - all of which have suffered funding cuts - said the existing approach to National Lottery investment "has been conspicuously successful in winning medals, but has disenfranchised many of the country's elite sportsmen and women, creating a two-class system that runs counter to Olympic ideals.

"Providing opportunities for elite British athletes in all relevant sports to compete in the Olympics and Paralympics need not run counter to the pursuit of medals, and will make the nation even prouder of TeamGB's and ParaGB's triumphs.

"We call on Dame Katherine Grainger to recognise the dangers inherent in the current direction of travel. We urge UK Sport to recognise that medal targets alone should not be the sole criteria for its funding.

"We believe UK Sport should adopt a revised investment model that embraces every Olympic and Paralympic sport, with a tiered support structure".

The sports say their new approach is "readily affordable from economies within UK Sport's support costs, and from within the English Institute of Sport. Time is pressing and debate must begin now".

How have funding cuts affected sports?

Adrian Christy, the chief executive of Badminton England - which lost all of its £5.74m funding from UK Sport this year in the wake of Rio 2016 - told BBC Sport: "We have a very clear view that every sport in this country matters.

"We've seen lots of sports that have lost their funding, we're one of those. And as a consequence of that it's really difficult to see how your long-term development of athletes can continue to inspire a nation. We've made a third of our staff redundant in the last several months, we've cut our performance programme in half.

"This is a demand for UK Sport to take a long hard look and say 'are medals and medallists the only metric which investments into sports can be made?' We don't believe it is."

Can UK Sport afford to change?

With Team GB winning 67 medals in Rio, and Para GB then claiming 147 medals, many are reluctant to change a system that has transformed British success since 1996 when the country finished 36th in the medal table.

But Christy disagrees.

"We are not for one second asking to take money away from sports," he said. "The target around medals would still be the same. We believe there are opportunities for UK Sport to look within their own budgets and save money elsewhere. We've been thrown under a bus.

"We don't believe the cost of funding the sports is more than 4% of the overall total pots of money of UK sport. 4% to say another 11 sports, the maths of that is about another 100 athletes in a position to represent Great Britain - and who knows, add to the medal table that we won in Rio."

What do funding chiefs say?

Former rower Dame Katherine Grainger, who takes up her new role as chair of UK Sport on Saturday, said: "If I were in their shoes I'd be doing the same. In any organisation, you do everything you can to protect the athletes. So when that funding is cut you'd do anything to get that back.

"So calling for a review is a very realistic and credible thing to do and I'm not surprised they've done it now.

"There will be a review, there is every four years. Obviously, things change, the climate changes, sports change, pressure of resources changes, so that's why it's always worth looking at again and I'm very confident to see that it will be reviewed again, it just won't happen instantly."

However, Britain's most decorated female Olympian added: "If you look at the success of Rio, then we got more medals across more sports than we've done before. Our actual breadth of success is growing all the time, so it's not fair to say that we're narrowly focusing on a few sports.

"What is fair to say is that our money is finite and it's not stretching. As more sports are more successful, the irony is that the money can't go as far.

"If there is anything that can be cut, but not at the expense of success, then it will be. But right now that's the situation we're in.

"People I've met in my short time here so far are really passionate about improving things, so actually if 11 sports do come and say 'we want things done differently, is there a better way to do this?' then actually let's look at it."

Ed Warner, who recently stepped down after a decade as chair of UK Athletics, said: "Winning medals is important, but more important still is winning them in the right way.

"Katherine Grainger's arrival at UK Sport is a wonderful opportunity for her to challenge the groupthink that constrains the current system and to put in place a new funding structure that embraces all Olympic and Paralympic sports, because every one of them matters."

But Grainger also added a cautionary tale from her own experience.

"I started rowing at a time when we kept our boats on scaffolding poles under a bridge - we didn't have the set-up we have now. The facilities have been transformed," she said.

"So you look not just at the medal success but at the level of support we have, the coaches, the training camps. I don't think many athletes would like that to slip back to a stage where we just wouldn't be competitive internationally."

A British Olympic Association spokesperson said: "We fully understand the anxiety of those sports as they face the reality of current funding decisions.

"We are constantly looking at ways to support unfunded sports within our membership, including through the allocation of Olympic Solidarity funds to athletes where possible.

"If we are to increase third party funding of sport then we must work to protect our country's stellar performances in the medal table, and in doing so the work of our colleagues at UK Sport in developing an acclaimed World Class Programme."

A British Paralympic Association spokesperson said: "We are very proud of the success of the ParalympicsGB team - second in the medal table at Rio 2016 and winning medals across more sports than ever before - which has provided the inspiration not only to get more people engaged in sport but fundamentally to challenge and change attitudes to disability in society.

"We must look at the overall public funding system for sport at all levels and at what alternative streams can be developed to ensure that sports can continue to maximise their opportunity and impact."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Eleven UK sports 'thrown under bus' on funding call for changes

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Eleven sport governing bodies are demanding an overhaul of the way Britain invests in the pursuit of Olympic and Paralympic medals. In an unprecedented challenge to elite performance funding agency UK Sport, the group have joined forces to call for an urgent review of what they call "a two-class system that runs counter to Olympic ideals".

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Juventus midfielder Paul Pogba has tested positive for testosterone in his B sample and could be banned for two to four years if found guilty of doping

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
UK Sport has long prided itself on a high-performance system that it insists is "the envy of the world". Yet the way it deflected and muzzled criticism of how it had failed to spot deep-rooted problems at British Cycling on Wednesday suggested world-class levels of obfuscation, too.

It had been expected Annamarie Phelps's independent review into the climate and culture of British Cycling, which appeared after 14 months in utero, would be slimmer and more watered down than a draft version of the report leaked in March. And so it was.

Criticisms of figures such as Sir Dave Brailsford and Shane Sutton were softened. There was no mention of the word "bullying", and some of the draft's more damning phrases, such as the "systematic and deeply cultural malaise" at British Cycling, were also struck from the record.

Yet even the softer language could not hide just how dysfunctional British Cycling had been for the past decade or how UK Sport either missed, or wilfully ignored, numerous attempts to do something about it.

During the late 2000s and until 2014 the report noted that the relationship between the performance directors of British Cycling and UK Sport had "deteriorated to the point of being nonexistent" because of two reviews carried out by Deloitte which were critical of the conflicts of interest between Team Sky and British Cycling, and that as a result Brailsford did not meet UK Sport for several years. That surely should have been a red light. There were also whispers among English Institute of Sport staff for many years about the problems inside the velodrome. That should have been another.

Then there was the report by Peter King written in 2012. King, having interviewed almost 50 riders and staff, found that "any semblance of a management structure had clearly disintegrated" by 2012 and that the leadership was viewed as "autocratic". More damning still, he found "a culture of fear, intimidating and bullying" in the velodrome. His report was passed to only three people in British Cycling, including Brian Cookson - who is now the president of cycling's governing body, the UCI - and the British Cycling chief executive, Iain Drake, who gave a bare summary to UK Sport's Liz Nicholl.

Even so, as Nicholl admitted: "We should have pursued it, we should have demanded it. But we were unsighted. I had a long email from the CEO at the time and I trusted it was a full and frank."

But the independent review says that she should have done more. As its author, Phelps, writes: "The panel is also concerned that UK Sport did not act upon knowledge it possessed as of December 2012 that there were behavioural issues which needed to be addressed within the world-class programme."

There were other opportunities, too. Every year all UK Sport-funded athletes participate in an Athlete Insights Survey, which feeds anonymised results back to UK Sport. Between the 2013 and 2014 studies athletes who agreed with the statement "Morale is high" declined from 86% to 66% - and such dips were mirrored in other areas including effective leadership. As the report notes: "From 2012 to 2016 UK Sport did not dig deep enough into the cultural reality of the WCP [world class programme]."

However, when it was put to Nicholl that the inevitable conclusion was that the success of British Cycling's medal factory trumped human decency and kindness, she rejected it out of hand.

"We have never promoted or condoned a win-at-all-cost mentality or approach," she said. "We promote a commitment to excellence, to being the very best in the world, to surrounding every athlete with the very best support. That's what the world-class programmes are about. It's not a win-at-all-costs mentality - it's a winning mentality focusing on excellence."

The recent revelations about bobsleigh and canoeing suggest that what went on at British Cycling may not be a one-off. Yet Nicholl disputed this too. As she put it: "99% of this system is working really, really well. It has been exposed here quite rightly and we are addressing those issues."

However, the biggest criticisms of the review were rightly saved for British Cycling. For a decade it has been as a Rolls-Royce organisation, but it clearly also had a whiff of the Del Boy about it too. As the review explained: "Several contributors, including both past and present British Cycling employees and riders, made allegations about financial impropriety within the WCP, including the selling of bikes and equipment and the alleged hiring of friends of family into roles within the organisation."

The panel did not investigate the allegations because they did not have sufficient expertise, there was no primary evidence and because it would have caused a significant delay to the production of the report. It also declined to investigate historical allegations of drug abuse, made against two members of the world-class programme "but not past or present riders" for much the same reason. Yet those issues, along with UK Sport's woeful lack of curiosity, should not be allowed to fade or be forgotten.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
UK Sport ignored red lights about problems at British Cycling

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
UK Sport has long prided itself on a high-performance system that it insists is "the envy of the world". Yet the way it deflected and muzzled criticism of how it had failed to spot deep-rooted problems at British Cycling on Wednesday suggested world-class levels of obfuscation, too.

# data[].attributes.body
Racial tensions