# data[].attributes.body
All three influential speakers urge victims to fight injustice, violently or nonviolently. Doing nothing and being compliant supports the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
"the greater the oppression, the more leverage nonviolence holds", so the Japanese people could easily raise awareness about the injustices they were facing in the camps and at home.

# data[].attributes.headline
Malcolm X could show the Japanese people that...

# data[].attributes.subject
Malcolm X could show the Japanese people that...

# data[].attributes.body
"All of us have suffered here, in this country, political oppression, and at the hands of the white man, economic exploitation at the hands of the white man, and social degradation at the hands of the white man."
Malcolm shows that many people, not just the African Americans, have been oppressed by white people and they should take action together to restore the happy balance.

# data[].attributes.body
Page 125: "We used to place nails on the tire tracks that left behind by the Jeeps that made the rounds at the end of the day".
The boys are bored and could be fighting against the injustice by pranking the soldiers.

# data[].attributes.body
They felt like they weren't Americans. They weren't diners.
"Later that evening the girl awoke to the sound of breaking glass. Someone had thrown a brick through a window"
In this excerpt, the Girl experiences an attack on the Japanese prisoners on the train. The white people are violent towards them, but unlike Malcolm X, they do not fight back.

# data[].attributes.body
Martin Luther King Jr. said "one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws", which would have encouraged Japanese people to stand up and fight for their rights. I am unsure how effective it would be considering how the majority of the country and government were against them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Handling Consequences of Civil Disobedience

# data[].attributes.subject
Handling Consequences of Civil Disobedience

# data[].attributes.body
Similar to both King and Malcolm X, Cesar holds his strong belief in using nonviolence when having to respond to an injustice received. He stated "every violent act committed against us, we respond with nonviolence, we attract people's support" and that helps them gain more supporters to join them in the protest. Cesar believes that staying calm and being nonviolent while being treated unfairly will just make you look like the bigger person and receive more supporters on your side of the injustice.

# data[].attributes.headline
Handling Consequences of Civil Disobedience

# data[].attributes.subject
Handling Consequences of Civil Disobedience

# data[].attributes.body
Martin Luther King thinks that "One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty" (King 1), which is a way of handling an injustice with an unjust consequence received. People should be ready to accept the fact that they will be arrested and that all they need to do is accept it in a peaceful way.

# data[].attributes.headline
Handling Consequences of Civil Disobedience

# data[].attributes.subject
Handling Consequences of Civil Disobedience

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X wasn't into violence but he thought that "you should never be nonviolent unless you run into some nonviolence. I'm nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when you drop that violence on me, then you've made me go insane" which is a lot similar to King. They both believed that you should respond to the injustice in a calm way and that they should all work together to stand up for what they believe in.

# data[].attributes.body
Chavez wasn't into violence but he thought that "you should never be nonviolent unless you run into some nonviolence. I'm nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when you drop that violence on me, then you've made me go insane" which is a lot similar to King. They both believed that you should respond to the injustice in a calm way and that they should all work together to stand up for what they believe in.

# data[].attributes.body
Martin Luther King believes that in order to effectively resist and respond to injustice, one must do so with willingness and peace,  not with violence or aggression. We see King illustrating this idea when he says, "In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist...One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty." As displayed, King firmly believes that he does not advocate responding to injustice in a rude/ violent manner, as he compares that type of response to a "rabid segregationist." Instead, King believes that in order to effectively respond to injustice, one "must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty." So, according to King, one must not resort to violence when resisting injustice, in order to effectively repeal injustice, one must embrace it openly and with no fear of consequence.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X believes that one of the only ways to effectively respond to injustice is through leveraging and threats. As said by Malcolm, "...It's got to be the ballot or the bullet. The ballot or the bullet. If you're afraid to use an expression like that, you should get out of the country." As demonstrated,  Malcolm begins to leverage against the whites by threatening violence: "The ballot or the bullet." Malcolm further goes on to  further insure his words by saying, "...use an expression like that, you should get out of the country." showing how hostile he continues to be.

# data[].attributes.body
"Nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect. If, for every violent act committed against us, we respond with nonviolence we attract people's support."

# data[].attributes.body
"A just law is a man-made code that squares with moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is code that is out of harmony with the moral law.  A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denies the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law. ... a law is just on its face unjust in its application."

# data[].attributes.body
"... if birth made you American, you wouldn't need any legislation; you wouldn't need any amendments tot he constitution; you wouldn't be faced with civil-rights filibustering in Washington, D.C.."

# data[].attributes.body
Use multiple "posts" to address each of the questions. This will make it easier to have more specific connections after you've gathered all of the evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Use the "connection" feature to highlight similarities between different philosophies.

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure you address each of the following questions for Thoreau (Chavez?), King, and X.  Provide evidence for each section.

1. What makes a law just and unjust?

2. How should one respond to unjust laws?

3. How should one handle the consequences of civil disobedience?

4. How might this philosophy have affected any of the characters in When the Emperor Was Divine?