# data[].attributes.body
He would agree with Tarkovsky

# data[].attributes.body
neither person was really listening to the conversation

# data[].attributes.body
You only see it if you focus on it. We are aware of it's presence but we do not focus on it.

# data[].attributes.body
Merleau-Ponty would explain it with figure/ground. If the audience is paying attention to what is happening in the scenes rather than the color, they would perceive the film as “real”.

# data[].attributes.body
It has a lot to do with ambiguity and the different perspectives. It could also be related to the figure/ ground where you are only able to focus on one thing at a time: either color or what is going on.

# data[].attributes.body
he would agree

# data[].attributes.body
when you're focusing on one thing, other things disappear or fade. so this ties into to the Figure/ Ground and the 4 existential grounds

# data[].attributes.body
Color isn't as important as the object it is attached to. Thinking about figure/ground, we focus in on one figure
(this case the object) and lose focus of the ground (which is the color).

# data[].attributes.body
He would agree because of the concept of figure and ground how people get busy focusing on other things to notice color all the time

# data[].attributes.body
There is a lack of ambiguity and people focus on the either/or. They either see the situation or the color. This also relates to figure/ground. One thing is paid close attention to, usually not color, and the other will be noticed as present, but not paid attention to.

# data[].attributes.body
We don’t experience color because we are usually looking at the object the color is on. Also people perceive colors as different. For example, orange to me can be red to you.

# data[].attributes.body
Figure/ Ground: we only see what we are looking at and we don't notice the color because they don't really matter.

# data[].attributes.body
Color is something that is probably most often put into the ground of our perspective rather than the figure since it is something we are so used to so we aren't overly aware of it's presence

# data[].attributes.body
Figure/ground: color falls to the background while we pay attention to what the object itself is, or what is being expressed.

# data[].attributes.body
Color is often taken for granted and we see color when we want to, when color is removed and we see in black and white, we realize how much the color makes a difference in what we are looking at

# data[].attributes.body
This relates to Merleau-Ponty's figure/ground because you can only focus on one thing at a time. For example, if you're looking at a computer, you're more than likely to notice that it's a computer before you notice the color of the computer. We can only focus on one thing at a time.

# data[].attributes.body
He would agree.

# data[].attributes.body
He would agree!

# data[].attributes.body
you only see it if you focus on it

# data[].attributes.body
you only see on things when you notice. She would definitely agree on films needing to revert back to black and white.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe he would say that you only see color when you’re actually aware of it rather than noticing it all the time such as in everyday life.

# data[].attributes.body
By saying that we only see color some of the time it is a great example of the limitations of perspective. In order to focus on one thing you must eliminate the thought of other things.

# data[].attributes.body
You only pay attention to what's in front of you while everything else falls in the background

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone probably sees certain colors at different stages in their lives. For example, if they are young childern, adults or in the dying stages

# data[].attributes.body
Dialogue. He is having a conversation with her but isn't actually present during the conversation

# data[].attributes.body
Neither of them were truly listening and they were both too focused on what they were thinking inside their own heads

# data[].attributes.body
Both p

# data[].attributes.body
The couple was not having dialogue in which rh

# data[].attributes.body
Neither party was listening to the other. They were both trying to explain their own view rather than listening.

# data[].attributes.body
Braketing: they weren’t being present with each other, or allowing themselves to listen.

Mechanistic lense: they were analyzing everything instead of thinking casually.

# data[].attributes.body
They were both more focused on their own internal conversations and not engaging with the other person.

# data[].attributes.body
They weren’t really listening to their responses. They were talking just to talk

# data[].attributes.body
Both of them are unsure of the others feelings so they're trying to assess the situation and direct the conversation in a way to figure out if the other person  is interested but they're so awkward that they are unable to focus

# data[].attributes.body
they weren't listening to what each other had to say

# data[].attributes.body
They were having these underlying thoughts throughout the conversation that made it extremely awkward

# data[].attributes.body
In the conversation between the nurse and mother the dialogue is detached and the nurse is trying to do her job, and in the movie the subtitles portray the real thoughts as opposed to their basic and detached conversation about her art

# data[].attributes.body
Both of them were at different places in the conversation, neither were actually listening to the other

# data[].attributes.body
They are not being mindful of the questions being asked.

# data[].attributes.body
They had completely different outlooks. Neither were present

# data[].attributes.headline
He is talking about her art from someone else's viewpoint. Not his own. What others would think about it.

# data[].attributes.subject
He is talking about her art from someone else's viewpoint. Not his own. What others would think about it.

# data[].attributes.body
didnt focus on what the other person was saying

# data[].attributes.body
They are not being present with eachothers  conversations and therefore don’t have a good dialogue going

# data[].attributes.body
The two were not involved in the conversation and the dialogue did not flow well due to it. They also only focused on themselves and their inner thought and ignored the other three existential grounds.

# data[].attributes.body
They both have underlying ideas or questions that they are thinking yet they are engaging in an irrelevant conversation to establish a common ground to keep the conversation going

# data[].attributes.body
This conversation was awkward to him because it was as if they were both on different pages. As they were speaking their thoughts were contradicting to what they were saying. This was similar to the nurse situation in the reading because as the nurse asked the woman a question while she was in labor, they were both on different pages.

# data[].attributes.body
Both people in this clip were awkward while talking. They seemed uncomfortable. For example, they had a hidden dialogue in subtitles what they actually wanted to say.

# data[].attributes.body
No connection was made about the two. It did not seem like it was a fluid conversation, no one thinking about the other person's feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
The two seem to be on different grounds, not intertwined, no chiasm involved.

# data[].attributes.body
The two, although are discussing a similar topic, they are not "intertwined" or "on the same ground." They are saying things that they think would interest the other but not really listening to each other or relating to one another, but only thinking about themselves. Like reading a script.

# data[].attributes.body
The dialogue seems awkward because the two weren’t truly present in the conversation as they were both thinking different things as they were talking to eachother.

# data[].attributes.body
Both parties from the clip were not actually present and not listening to each other. They were more concerned with what the other person thought of themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
We

# data[].attributes.body
They are speaking mechanistically rather than bracketing