# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Frontiers | The Impact of Multiple Species Invasion on Soil and Plant Communities Increases With Invasive Species Co-occurrence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Despite increasing evidence indicating that invasive species are harming biodiversity, ecological systems and processes, impacts of multiple species invasion…

# data[].attributes.body
According to the United Nations, compaction is one of the most prevalent and irreversible detriments to soil health. It prevents water absorption and leads to increases in surface erosion and water erosion. It changes the pore functions of the soil, which are changes that cannot be reversed for decades into centuries. https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/2018-06/17.%20Threats%2Bto%2BSoils__Pierzynski_Brajendra.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
flooding risk, plants have a tougher time growing roots

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
National governments are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of their soil resources and are shaping strategies accordingly. Implicit in any such strategy is that degradation threats and their potential effect on important soil properties…

# data[].attributes.body
When the soils wet and animal hooves penetrate the soil this causes physical damage to the soil.

https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/agriculture/managing-cattle-impacts-when-grazing-on-wet-soils-1-634/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Managing Cattle Impacts When Grazing on Wet Soils - 1.634 - Extension

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Print this fact sheet by Casey Shawver, Joe Brummer, Jim Ippolito, Jason Ahola, and Ryan Rhoades* (1/20) Quick Facts… Soil physical damage can occur when grazing through pugging and compaction, especially when soils are wet. Removing cattle early in a precipitation event can minimize the most detrimental impacts from grazing on wet soils. Remediation of […]

# data[].attributes.body
Building on land that was previous industrial sites. Without proper care for soil, it will increase pollutants in soil. This lowers soil fertility. This also causes soil compaction.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
National governments are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of their soil resources and are shaping strategies accordingly. Implicit in any such strategy is that degradation threats and their potential effect on important soil properties…

# data[].attributes.body
Overuse of land, including agriculture and over grazing by animals on farms. (Also can cause compaction)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Soil is a threatened natural resource. Description of threats.

# data[].attributes.body
"The acidic leachate formed due to production of organic acids liberated by the degradation of waste, leads to the acidic surroundings that destroys micro-organisms, which are helpful in improving the composition of the soil."

# data[].attributes.body
Not rotating crops causes specific nutrients to be depleted from the soil.

# data[].attributes.headline
Leaving fields to fallow in between growing cycles (no cover crops)

# data[].attributes.subject
Leaving fields to fallow in between growing cycles (no cover crops)

# data[].attributes.body
Leaving soil bare allows for more erosion of the topsoil. Negligent farming practices are actually the cause of the Dust Bowl in the 1930's.

# data[].attributes.body
Soil carbon loss. Page 6-8. Top soil holds tons of soil organic carbon. Land use change is the top reason for loss of soil organic carbon. Agriculture is typically the reason for change in usage.

# data[].attributes.body
Over tillage of agricultural fields breaks up the soil and can affect microbe activities.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
There are many characteristics and indicators of soil quality, including bulk density, good soil pores and water-holding capacity, good infiltration rates and overall tilth, and high levels of organic matter and beneficial soil organisms. Tillage can negatively impact almost every one of those characteristics.

Tillage in perspective

For newly mechanized farmers, tillage was a way to solve problems. Tillage was used for seedbed preparation, weed suppression, soil aeration, turning over cover crops and forages, burying heavy crop residue, leveling the soil, incorporating manure and fertilizer into the root zone and activating pesticides.

The effect of tillage on soil

However, tillage has all along been contributing negatively to soil quality. Since tillage fractures the soil, it disrupts soil structure, accelerating surface runoff and soil erosion. Tillage also reduces crop residue, which help cushion the force of pounding raindrops.

Without crop residue, soil particles become more easily dislodged, being moved or 'splashed' away. This process is only the beginning of the problem. Splashed particles clog soil pores, effectively sealing off the soil's surface, resulting in poor water infiltration.

The amount of soil lost from Iowa farmland each year is directly related to soil structure, levels of crop residue remaining on the soil's surface, and the intensity of tillage practices.

Choosing frequent tillage within a season

Every growing season is different and the best managers make decisions based on frequent scouting and our knowledge of soil conservation practices.

A couple years ago, drought left production short at the end of the season in some areas. Crop residue levels also fell short, or could at least be classified as insignificant. In the following season, a producer managing soil quality through tillage would have accounted for that in the choices made about tillage throughout the season. Converting to no-till or reducing tillage or cultivation would have been 'in-season' choices made the following year based on the desire to limit the impact of tillage on soil erosion and soil physical, biological, and chemical properties.

Producers who used conventional in-season tillage plans under those circumstances may have undermined soil quality on their land. In general, frequent tillage can have the same negative impact on soil quality without the special circumstances.

Frequent tillage over a couple seasons -- the impact

When producers use unnecessary tillage, more serious problems begin to occur.Without a break from tillage, a total break down of soil structure is possible. Soil organisms can be affected, bringing microbial activity to a halt. Soil pores are closed, imposing severe limitations on infiltration and increasing runoff.

There may even be some initial loss of productivity with moderate levels of erosion. With frequent tillage sustained over a couple years, topsoil loss begins to exceed replacement. In time, the soil is in danger of yield setbacks due to organic matter and nutrient loss as well as the damage done to the soil's physical properties.

Frequent tillage over many seasons -- the impact

When frequent tillage is sustained over a period of years, the impact grows even more severe. A total break down of soil structure and overall soil quality is almost assured. A hardpan can develop, effectively cutting off root elongation, crop development and yield.

Producers reaching this point may experience high erosion rates and degradation of topsoil, where nearly all organic matter is located. Removal of topsoil by erosion contributes to a loss of inherent soil fertility levels. Approximately half of plant-available phosphorus is concentrated in topsoil as is nearly all of the plant-available potassium.

While producers can supply needed crop nutrients to offset the loss of inherent fertility, the productivity of eroded soils can be restored by adding inputs only when favorable subsoil material is present. Where unfavorable subsoils exist (limited rooting depth, coarse sand and gravel, or high soil densities), there is little or no ability to recover yield losses -- the impact on soil quality and productivity is devastating and final.

Frequent tillage and water quality

Frequent tillage can also contribute to deterioration in overall surface water quality. Sediment from soil erosion is a major water quality pollutant. Sediment also transports nitrogen and phosphorus from fields into lakes and streams, leading to 'eutrophication' -- a serious surface water quality problem.

Frequent tillage -- costly in many ways

Frequent tillage can be costly in terms of soil quality, soil productivity and surface water quality as well as extra wear on machinery and extra labor requirements. Before making choices about tillage, producers should consider the impact of sustained frequent tillage on soil quality.
Table 1. Effectiveness of commonly used practices for controlling soil erosion.*
*Scale of effectiveness: 0 = not effective

1 = slightly effective (less than 10% reduction)

2 = moderately effective (11-50% reduction)

3 = substantially effective (51-100% reduction)

n.a. = not applicable

Source: A Technical Assessment of Nonpoint Pollution in Iowa. College of Agriculture, Iowa State University. March 1978.

Comment: Note that the same practices that are beneficial for controlling soil erosion are the same practices that encourage the development of soil quality.

This article originally appeared on pages 78-79 of the IC-492(13) -- June 28, 2004 issue.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Frequent tillage and its impact on soil quality

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
There are many characteristics and indicators of soil quality, including bulk density, good soil pores and water-holding capacity, good infiltration rates and overall tilth, and high levels of organic matter and beneficial soil organisms. Tillage can negatively impact almost every one of those characteristics.

# data[].attributes.body
Pg 20-22, Urban Sprawl. With a growing population, urbanization is happening at significant rates. This causes fertile soil to be sealed under buildings. Issues such as lack of land to grow food for the increasing population arise.

# data[].attributes.body
Soil sealing, where buildings and other human made structures cover soil, which may make it slowly permeable to water, degrades its quality, and cuts contact with other "spheres" of the earth.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
National governments are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of their soil resources and are shaping strategies accordingly. Implicit in any such strategy is that degradation threats and their potential effect on important soil properties…

# data[].attributes.body
Courtesy of climate change of course. A decrease in soil moisture saturation dominoes the need for more irrigation and furthers soil erosion.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Climate change has a major impact on soil, and changes in land use and soil can either accelerate or slow down climate change. Without healthier soils and a sustainable land and soil management, we cannot tackle the climate crisis, produce enough food and adapt to a changing climate. The answer might lie in preserving and restoring key ecosystems and letting nature capture carbon from the atmosphere.

# data[].attributes.body
adding too many toxic short term resources to land where they could naturally replenish over a longer period of time. Also nitrogen in drinking water slowly poisoning people

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Soil is a threatened natural resource. Description of threats.

# data[].attributes.headline
deforestation [and removal of native biota]

# data[].attributes.subject
deforestation [and removal of native biota]

# data[].attributes.body
promotes erosion of all varieties while simultaneously increasing carbon saturation in the atmosphere

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Deforestation and Forest Degradation | Threats | WWF

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Learn how you can help support WWF’s conservation work which addresses direct and indirect threats, including deforestation, in order to conserve biodiversity and reduce humanity’s ecological footprint.

# data[].attributes.body
Acidification can occur from many things, including the combustion of fossil fuels, poor practices using fertilizers or pesticides, and intensive livestock management. Plants can't take in nutrients from soil that is too acidic. It also causes too much soluble Al and Mn in soil which is toxic.

# data[].attributes.body
Require a great deal of resources and upkeep to maintain with very little pay off [if any]. Everywhere across the world and always in an environment not built for them to thrive in

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Role of Native Grasses in Soil Health and Erosion Control - All Native Seed, LLC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Role of Native Grasses in Soil Health and Erosion Control - Native grasses play a vital role in maintaining soil health and preventing erosion. Their deep root systems, resilience, and adaptability make them ideal

# data[].attributes.body
Pg. 14. High concentration of substances found in soil. Common soil contaminants would include heavy metals, trace elements, radionuclides, pesticides, plant nutrients, fuels, solvents, crude oil, other organic substances, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products.

# data[].attributes.body
Cutting and burning trees lead to no cover for the soil. When heavy tropic weather comes the water saturates the soil leading to damage by becoming free water on the surface and making the soil more susceptible to erosion.

Third paragraph from the Introduction.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5528233/#:~:text=Also%2C%20by%20cutting%20and%20burning,even%20on%20slightly%20sloping%20terrains.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Abstract

In many tropical regions, slash‐and‐burn agriculture is considered as a driver of deforestation; the forest is converted into agricultural land by cutting and burning the trees. However, the fields are abandoned after few years because of yield decrease and weed invasion. Consequently, new surfaces are regularly cleared from the primary forest. We propose a reclamation strategy for abandoned fields allowing and sustaining re‐cultivation. In the dry region of south‐western Madagascar, we tested, according to a split‐plot design, an alternative selective slash‐and‐burn cultivation technique coupled with compost amendment on 30-year‐old abandoned fields. Corn plants ( Zea mays L.) were grown on four different types of soil amendments: no amendment (control), compost, ashes (as in traditional slash‐and‐burn cultivation), and compost + ashes additions. Furthermore, two tree cover treatments were applied: 0% tree cover (as in traditional slash‐and‐burn cultivation) and 50% tree cover (selective slash‐and‐burn). Both corn growth and soil fertility parameters were monitored during the growing season 2015 up to final harvest. The amendment compost + ashes strongly increased corn yield, which was multiplied by 4-5 in comparison with ashes or compost alone, reaching 1.5 t/ha compared to 0.25 and 0.35 t/ha for ashes and compost, respectively. On control plots, yield was negligible as expected on these degraded soils. Structural equation modeling evidenced that compost and ashes were complementary fertilizing pathways promoting soil fertility through positive effects on soil moisture, pH, organic matter, and microbial activity. Concerning the tree cover treatment, yield was reduced on shaded plots (50% tree cover) compared to sunny plots (0% tree cover) for all soil amendments, except ashes. To conclude, our results provide empirical evidence on the potential of recultivating tropical degraded soils with compost and ashes. This would help mitigating deforestation of the primary forest by increasing lifespan of agricultural lands.

Keywords: crop yield, deforestation, microbial activity, organic matter, soil fertility, structural equation model

1. INTRODUCTION

Tropical forests support a large and unique biodiversity, but are threatened worldwide by rapid deforestation due to their conversion into agricultural lands. Deforestation rates are particularly alarming in Madagascar, a country which is pointed out as one of the eight leading global biodiversity hotspots in terms of endemic species (Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, da Fonseca, & Kent, 2000). On the south‐western coast of the island, in Menabe region, deforestation annual rate of the dry deciduous forest has been estimated at 2.6% between 2008 and 2010, that is, a loss of 1,820 ha per year (Zinner et al., 2014). At that rate, the forest and most, if not all, its endemic species, will have entirely disappeared by 2050 (Zinner et al., 2014).

In Madagascar, slash‐and‐burn agriculture is the main driver of deforestation (Dirac Ramohavelo, 2009; Genini, 1996). In this traditional, widespread technique, forest is converted to agricultural land by cutting and subsequently burning trees, the ashes being used to amend the soil. After few years (between 2-4 years, depending on the regions) of repetitive cultivation, crop yield decreases while weeds invade the agricultural fields. Farmers then generally abandon their fields and convert new surfaces of primary forest into agricultural fields. As a consequence, the primary forest area decreases progressively, while degraded land increases. In Madagascar, extreme measures like anti‐fire policies were applied for over one‐hundred years without much success in putting halt to deforestation (Jarosz, 1993; Kull, 2002). Farmers still practice shifting cultivation, even against the law, because it is most convenient to them (Kull, 2002), but also because this method is embedded within a strong spiritual and social background (Desbureaux & Brimont, 2015; Hume, 2006; Jarosz, 1993; Scales, 2012).

Slash‐and‐burn agriculture modifies the physicochemical properties of the soil (Are, Oluwatosin, Adeyolanu, & Oke, 2009; Béliveau et al., 2015; Demeyer, Voundi Nkana, & Verloo, 2001; Thomaz, Antoneli, & Doerr, 2014). Ashes are strongly alkaline, which reduces soil acidity, boosts microbial activity and increases soil nutrient availability (Ohno & Erich, 1990). This is particularly useful in tropical acid soils, as it favors plant growth. The effects on the soil nutrients are, however, short term for some highly soluble elements subject to leaching, for example, potassium (K), calcium (Ca), or magnesium (Mg) (Demeyer et al., 2001; Ulery, Graham, & Amrhein, 1993). Additionally, ashes push the stoichiometry of soil nutrients toward nitrogen (N) limitation, as after combustion, the nitrogen contained in tree leaves is volatilized (Ohno & Erich, 1990). Hence, ashes fertilization is not appropriate for long‐term cultivation, occasioning soil nutrient exhaustion after repetitive cultivation during few years (Folberth, Yang, Gaiser, Abbaspour, & Schulin, 2013). Also, by cutting and burning the trees, field surface remains bare, with no protection against strong winds and rains. Tropical heavy rains can lead to soil saturation and the formation of free water on the surface, which further causes soil erosion even on slightly sloping terrains. Such soil erosions are problematic for maize cultivations as a single cyclonic storm can reduce corn yields by more than 75% (Gay‐des‐Combes et al., 2017).

Regeneration of the forest on most tropical degraded soils requires a minimal of 10 years of fallow period (Thomaz et al., 2014). However, in western Madagascar, it happens that the soil never recovers from such degradation, leading to large abandoned areas where the ecosystem shifts from forests to savannahs (Raharimalala et al., 2010). Clearly, re‐cultivating the abandoned surfaces is urgent and would safeguard agricultural land, while simultaneously reducing the pressure on the primary forest. However, to be successful, the re‐cultivation needs alternative techniques that both slow down, or even stop, soil degradation and leave intact the socially and cultural embedded practice of slash‐and‐burn techniques. Indeed, maintaining the use of fire when developing alternative techniques might be non‐negotiable to convince farmers to change their agricultural practices. In this context, the use of biochar, as an alternative to the ashes, could be a promising solution in terms of soil amendment with burnt wood. Biochar contains "black carbon" which are residues of incomplete combustion of organic material. Its structure, composed of aromatic cycles, is chemically and microbiologically stable, leading, when amended to soils, to the formation of persistent organic matter over years (Glaser, Haumaier, Guggenberger, & Zech, 2001). Thus, biochar amendment boosts the overall quality of soil by improving its nutrient status, its water holding capacity, and its microbial activity (Hass et al., 2012; Laird et al., 2010; Mitchell, Simpson, Soong, & Simpson, 2015). However, biochar is hardly reproducible on a frequent basis as its efficiency strongly depends from its final polyaromatic structure determined by the type of material used and its combustion temperature (Butnan, Deenik, Toomsan, Antal, & Vityakon, 2015; Reed, Chadwick, Hill, & Jones, 2017). Furthermore, farmers in developing countries are not always willing to accept, let alone being able to pay, the costs for the application of biochar (Cernansky, 2015).

Although ashes and biochar are closely related material and could have similar effects on the soil fertility (Reed et al., 2017), the main problem of traditional wood ashes compared to biochar is the absence of solid structure stabilizing nutrients in the soil. Here, we suggest that an addition of organic matter, such as compost, to wood ashes could play this role (Bougnom et al., 2010). Compost enhances both water‐ and nutrient‐holding capacity of the soil (Zhang et al., 2016). Therefore, combining compost and ashes may play a significant role for tropical soil security by mitigating nutrients leaching (Agegnehu, Nelson, & Bird, 2016). Besides, compost is also known to increase plant yield through the addition of nutrients (Abdel‐Sabour & El‐Seoud, 1996; Mbau, Karanja, & Ayuke, 2014; Zhang et al., 2016). Additionally, letting some trees within the fields could also rise the soil organic matter content through littering (Nair, 2013). Furthermore, trees prevent soil erosion and contribute to maintaining soil microbial community (Carrière, Letourmy, & McKey, 2002). Thus, we tested a selective slash‐and‐burn agriculture (where some trees are intentionally not cut), coupled with compost amendment. We believe that this system could lead to significant improvements of soil fertility and crop yields, while respecting traditional slash‐and‐burn method. We specifically aimed at answering two questions addressing the effects of the aforementioned technique. First, do a partial remaining tree cover and compost amendment increase corn yield, as compared to traditional slash‐and‐burn agriculture? Second, what are the respective contributions of tree cover, ashes and compost to soil organic matter, its nutrient status and microbial activity? We hypothesized that compost amendment and tree cover will increase organic matter, microbial biomass, as well as N and P contents of the soil. Ash, on the other hand, should rise soil pH, which in turn promotes the mineralization of organic matter. Because of soil fertility improvement, we also predicted that corn amended with both ashes and compost will show the highest yield.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study site

Field sampling was conducted in the dry deciduous forest of Kirindy (central Menabe) near the village of Beroboka (20°00′22.3″S, 44°35′06.1″E). The nearest large city is Morondava, located 30 km south. Beroboka was selected because it is strongly affected by deforestation due to slash‐and‐burn cultivation (Dirac Ramohavelo, 2009) and it offers a large area (about 1,000 ha) of abandoned fields, thus allowing experimentations on degraded soils. The climate is tropical, but with a long dry season from April to September. Mean annual rainfall is about 800 mm, but varies from 250 to 1,400 mm depending on the year and cyclonic events (Sorg & Rohner, 1996). Temperatures are high year round and average at 24.7°C (Sorg & Rohner, 1996).

2.2. Plot selection and experimental design

Three sites, 300 m distant from each other, were selected on 30‐year‐old abandoned fields with comparable vegetation structure, mainly small shrubs and a few tall trees. The soils at the three sites were ferruginous soils, corresponding to the Lixisols after the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (Raharimalala et al., 2010). The soils had similar nutrient concentrations (Table 1), were yellowish red (5YR 5/8, Munsell color code), and composed of about 15% clay, 10% silt, and 75% of sand. On half of the surface in each site all vegetation was removed (0% tree cover; treatment "sunny'), and on the other half, shrubs and some trees were removed (50% tree cover, treatment "shaded"). Within each tree cover treatment, four 3 × 3 m plots were allocated randomly to one of the following treatments: control (Ctr), ashes (Ash), compost (Comp), and ashes mixed with compost (CoAs). This led to a split‐plot design with eight plots in each experimental site (four per tree cover treatment), 24 in total. The treatments containing ashes (Ash, CoAs) were prepared with the help of local farmers, in order to follow closely the traditional slash‐and‐burn practices, in particular the quantities per surface unit. They resulted from gathering and burning the wood from the cut trees at each desired plot location, and subsequent application of a 1.5‐cm ash layer on the soil.

Table 1.

Material

Density (kg dry wt/L)

pH

CEC (cmol/kg)

O.M. (g/kg)

Ctot (g/kg)

Ntot (g/kg)

Ninorg (mg/kg)

Ptot (mg/kg)

P resin (mg/kg)

K ex (mg/kg)

Control soil

1.4 ± 0.1

5.8 ± 0.2

5.1 ± 0.8

57.2 ± 4.2

10.7 ± 2.9

0.95 ± 0.03

2.1 ± 1.0

71.9 ± 5.1

2.3 ± 0.5

64.2 ± 3.3

Compost

0.6 ± 0.1

7.5 ± 0.1

36.8 ± 0.5

685.8 ± 35.4

253.9 ± 20.5

18.2 ± 1.2

189.0 ± 12.3

1,553.9 ± 106.1

162.9 ± 12.0

4,331.2 ± 153.8

Ashes

1.1 ± 0.2

8.6 ± 0.2

15.2 ± 1.1

371.7 ± 25.2

123.6 ± 5.7

7.4 ± 0.4

29.0 ± 3.1

640.0 ± 23.2

11.9 ± 1.3

2,630.0 ± 65.1

At the start of the rainy season, on 27 December 2014, three corn seeds were buried 10 cm deep at 10 different spots within each plot. We used the main local corn variety called "vonivony," with a growth cycle of 110 days. At a later stage, a thinning took place and only one plant was left in each plantation hole, leaving 10 plants per plot, that is, 1.1 plant m −2, comparable to usual field density in the region. In the compost treatments (Comp and CoAs), 1 L of compost was added in each plantation hole when burying the seeds. The compost was produced and matured during the 8 months prior to the experiment with an equal volume of branches and leaves coming from three local trees ( Poupartia sylvatica, Tarenna sericea, and Fernandoa madagascariensis). Only small branches were collected in order to leave the trees undamaged. Besides, these tree species were chosen because they have a high content of nutrients and are very abundant in secondary forest successions, preventing further degradations of the primary forest (Raharimalala, 2011; Raharimalala, Buttler, Schlaepfer, & Gobat, 2012).

2.3. Soil and corn sampling

Soil moisture was measured at 10 cm in each plot halfway the growing season (i.e., 15 March 2015), using a TDR probe (FieldScout 100). On 29 March, at the end of the growing season and before plant senescence started, plant final heights were measured. On 27 April, once plants started to dry, shoot and bulk grains were collected. Shoot and grains were sun dried during 3 days, until constant weight, and measured. As the plant density in the experimental plots was similar to the density found in surrounding corn fields (Gay‐des‐Combes et al., 2017), dry weight of bulk grains per plot was converted to grain yield per ha. Finally, in the same time than corn harvest, on 27 April, three soil samples (c. 100 g) were collected, within each plot (0-10 cm depth), pooled together to reduce heterogeneity, sun dried during 3 days, until constant weight, and finally sieved at 2 mm.

2.4. Laboratory analyses

2.4.1. Plant nutrient content and uptake

Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) content of the corn leaves and grains were assessed by digesting the plant samples as described by (Wolf, 1982). Potassium (K) was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Solaar 969, ThermoOptek). Total nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations were determined by, respectively, the blue‐indophenol method and the molybdovanadate method using a continuous flow autoanalyser (FlowSys, Systea). Plant uptake in aerial parts was calculated as the sum of the product of leaf and grain nutrient content and respective leaf and grain dry weight.

2.4.2. Soil, ashes, and compost parameters

All measures were performed on the initial soil of the experimental sites before the experiment started, the ashes, and compost (at maturation) used in the experiment, and soil samples collected after the experiment. Total C and N were measured on milled soil with a standard CHN analyser (Dumas method). The pH was assessed in a 1:2.5 soil:water suspension (v:v) (Allen, 1989). Cation exchange capacity (CEC), exchangeable K, and inorganic nitrogen (NO ₃ and NH ₄) were measured by extraction: CEC and K with Cobalt‐hexamine solution (Co(NH ₃)Cl ₃ 0.0166 mol/L) and inorganic nitrogen with KCl (1 mol/L). Later, inorganic nitrogen forms were analyzed colorimetrically using a continuous flow analyzer. CEC and exchangeable K concentrations were read on a plasma atomic emission spectrometer (Shimadzu ICPE‐9000). Soil phosphorus availability was assessed on anion‐exchange resins (Hedley, Steward, & Chauhan, 1982), and the concentrations were measured colorimetrically using the malachite green method and placing the samples in a Shimadzu 1800 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Ohno & Zibilske, 1991). Finally, organic matter was measured through loss of ignition at 450°C.

2.4.3. Microbial biomass and soil enzyme activity

Microbial C biomass was measured with a chloroform fumigation followed by 0.5 mol/L K ₂SO ₄ extraction (Vance, Brookes, & Jenkinson, 1987). As a proxy for soil activity, we measured the activity of four enzymes involved in C, N, and P cycling (Sinsabaugh et al., 2008). We quantified the relative activity (i.e., enzyme activity under optimal and saturating substrate conditions) of extracellular enzymes responsible for the hydrolysis of one peptide (Leucine amino‐peptidase, LAP, N cycle), two carbohydrates (β‐glucosidase, BG; Chitinase, CHI, C, and N cycle, respectively), and one phosphatase (alkaline phosphatase, AP, P cycle; all substrates supplied Sigma‐Aldrich Switzerland). Enzymes were determined on 1 g (wet weight) aliquots of soil and analyzed in microplates following Jassey et al. ( 2016).

2.5. Statistical analyses

The effects of ashes, compost, and tree cover on soil parameters and plant morphological traits were analyzed using split‐plot analysis of variance (ANOVA). The effect of the different treatments was tested while the site effect was corrected by adding "site" as a random variable (block). Tukey's post hoc analyses were used to determine the differences among amendment treatments. When required, values were log‐transformed before the analyses to satisfy the assumption of normality and homogeneity of variance. These analyses were performed in R (R Development Core Team, 2013).

The analyses described above assess well the responses of soil descriptors and plant traits to amendment treatments. However, the underlying drivers of corn yield need to be determined. To investigate whether the tree cover, compost, and ashes directly drive the soil fertility and consequently corn yield, we established a structural equation model (Grace, Anderson, Olff, & Scheiner, 2010; Grace et al., 2012). Following current concepts of microbial processes and soil fertility, we built an a priori conceptual model of hypothesized causal relationships within a path diagram (Table S2; Grace, Adler, Stanley Harpole, Borer, & Seabloom, 2014). Microbial stock and activity were represented by carbon microbial biomass as it was strongly correlated to acid phosphatase ( r = .63, p =.0012), beta‐glucosidase ( r = .88, p <.001), as well as chitinase activity ( r = .86, p <.001). To increase model stability, the variables "ash" and "tree cover" were removed from the model, as ash and pH were strongly correlated ( r = .77, p <.001), and tree cover and humidity too ( r = .55, p =.005). The adequacy of the model was assessed using chi‐square tests, root mean square error of approximation index (RMSEA), Akaike value (AIC), standardized root mean square residual index (SRMR), and good fitness index (GFI). Adequate model fits showed nonsignificant differences when comparing the predicted and observed correlation matrices (chi‐square tests with p >.05) and are indicated by RMSEA < 0.05, by lower AIC, SRMR < 0.05 and GFI > 0.95 (Grace et al., 2010). The structural equation model was achieved with the R package sem (Fox, 2006).

3. RESULTS

The soils of the experimental sites were moderately acid (pH = 5.8) and had a limited content of organic matter and a low CEC (O.M. = 57.2 g/kg, CEC = 5.1 cmol/kg, Table 1). The ashes and the compost used as soil amendments in the experiment contained about 5 and 20 times more nutrients than the control soil, respectively (Table 1). Ashes were basic (pH = 8.6), while compost was close to neutral (pH = 7.5, Table 1). Although ashes are generally mostly mineral, they still contained 37% of organic matter (Table 1).

3.1. Corn growth, yield, and nutrient allocation

While plant height and yield were similar between compost and ash amendments (Ash, Comp) for both sunny and shaded conditions, yield was multiplied in the compost and ash mixture (CoAs) under sunny conditions, that is, the dry bulk grain weight, by six (from 0.25 to 1.5 t/ha) and increased plant height by 60% (from 150 to 240 cm) compared to traditional slash‐and‐burn method (Ash) (Figure 1). "CoAs" treatment also led to a threefold increase in grain yield, as compared to "Comp" treatment (from 0.5 to 1.5 t/ha), while plant height increased by 26% (from 190 to 240 cm). Lower plant heights and corn yields were found on the shaded part of the experiment, except with "Ash" treatment. In the latter case, plant height increased by 20% (from 155 to 185 cm) and corn yield almost doubled (from 0.25 to 0.4 t/ha; Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Mean (±standard errors) plant height (a) and grain yield (b) at harvest for each soil amendment treatment on both sunny and shaded plots of the experiment. Asterisks indicate significance in the variable variation according to the treatments (***, p < .001; **, p < .01; *, p < .05; ., p < .1). Different letters denote significant differences between soil amendment treatments (Tukey's tests, p ≤.05). Capital letters stand for the overall treatment; normal lower case letters for the shaded plots and italic lower case letters for the sunny plots. (c) Harvested corn cobs on a sunny "Ctr" plot. (d) Harvested corn cobs on a sunny "CoAs" plot

Tree cover did not affect plant height, nor yield by itself. Yet, the interaction between tree cover and soil amendment was significant (plant height, p =.0367; corn yield, p =.051, Table S1). On control plots (Ctr), corn yield was close to zero for both sunny and shaded conditions (Figure 1). We observed similar trends for the nutrient uptakes. The plant uptake was the largest on sunny "CoAs" plots, where levels raised up to 55 kg N ha −1, 6 kg P ha −1, and 33 kg K ha −1 (Table 2, Table S1). "Comp" and "CoAs" treatments showed higher plant uptake on the sunny plots, while for "Ash" plant uptake was doubled on the shaded plots (Table 2). For "Ctr" plots, the uptake was also slightly higher in the shaded plots.

Table 2.

Treatment

Shaded plots

Sunny plots

N uptake (kg/ha)

P uptake (kg/ha)

K uptake (kg/ha)

N uptake (kg/ha)

P uptake (kg/ha)

K uptake (kg/ha)

3.2. Soil physicochemical fertility and microbial activity

After corn harvest, the different soil amendments did not display significant differences in soil nutrient concentrations, except for K concentration which was higher in "Comp" and "CoAs" plots (Fig. S1 and Table S1). The amendment of soil with ash and compost changed its acidity from moderately acid in the "Ctr" plots to slightly acid in "Comp" plots to neutral in "Ash" and "CoAs" plots (Figure 2). No difference in soil pH was found between the shaded and sunny plots (Table S1). Soil moisture, microbial biomass, and organic matter were significantly higher in shaded plots than in sunny plots ( p ≤.05, Table S1). "Comp" and "CoAs" treatments resulted generally in a significantly higher soil moisture, carbon microbial biomass, and organic matter, compared to "Ash" and "Ctr" treatments. "Comp" treatment increased soil moisture by 15%-35% and organic matter by 50%, as well as multiplied microbial biomass by 4-5 times compared to "Ash" and "Ctr" plots. "CoAs" treatment exhibited slightly lower soil variables than "Comp" treatment; however, the difference between the two treatments was not statistically significant.

Figure 2.

Mean (±standard errors) soil pH (a), moisture (b), organic matter (c), and microbial biomass (d) according to the different treatments. For abbreviations, asterisks and letters, cf. Figure 1. Results for shaded and sunny plots are confounded for (a) because the effect was not significant

The enzymatic activities indicate a generally higher microbial activity in "Ash" and "Ctr" plots. Enzymatic activities significantly differed according to the soil amendment treatments (Figure 3 and Table S1), except for CHI ( p >.05). AP ( p ≤.001) and LAP ( p =.015) activities were generally higher in the "Ctr" and "Ash" plots while BG showed only a significantly higher value for the "Ctr" plots compared to other soil amendments ( p =.012). Moreover, AP and LAP were correlated to P uptake ( r = .44, p =.03) and N uptake ( r = .52, p =.012), respectively.

Figure 3.

Mean (±standard errors) enzymatic activities normalized by carbon microbial biomass (MBC) according to the different soil treatments, (a) beta‐glucosidase (BG), (b) chitinase (CHI), (c) leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), (d) acid phosphatase (AP). For abbreviations, asterisks and letters, cf. Figure 1

3.3. Underlying relationships between crop yield and soil fertility drivers

Independently of tree cover, structural equation modeling showed that two distinct pathways explained corn yield ( r ² = 0.61; Figure 4). The first pathway was driven by compost amendment that directly increased both soil moisture (path = 0.57) and carbon microbial biomass (path = 0.61). Increasing soil moisture also promoted carbon microbial biomass (path = 0.30) but in a lesser extent that the direct effect of compost (Figure 4). Carbon microbial biomass positively and strongly increased soil organic matter (path = 0.69), which in turn promoted corn yield (path = 0.40). The second pathway highlighted the direct effect of increasing pH due to ash amendment on corn yield (path = 0.58). In sum, our model showed that high organic matter content and a rise of pH from moderately acid to neutral were the main drivers of corn yield.

Figure 4.

Structural equation model for the effect of compost and ash on corn yield. Bold arrows show significant relationships (pathways) between variables (for asterisks, cf. Figure 1), the thin arrow indicates a nonsignificant relationship, and numbers next to arrows show standardized parameter estimates (i.e., standardized regression weights). Dotted arrows indicate existing relationships which have not been integrated in the model for stability reason. Squared multiple correlations (R2) for the predicted/dependent factor are given below the dependent variables. All model fit indices were good: chi‐square = 7.65, p =.36, GFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.07 and AIC = 35.6

4. DISCUSSION

Our findings show that a combined soil amendment of ashes and compost multiplies corn yield by four to five compared to compost or ash alone, respectively. Our analysis based on structural equation modeling allowed interpreting the complex interactions between compost and ashes on soil fertility processes driving corn yield. Although ultimate causality could not be established with this method, it, however, highlights that each amendment enhances distinct, but complementary, properties of soil fertility, resulting in a multiplicative effect on corn yield.

4.1. The ashes' pathway

Ash amendment is known for its alkalinity properties which rise the soil pH (Demeyer et al., 2001). In our study, ash pH was moderately basic, being of 8.6, while in other conditions, it could attain values up to 13.5 (Etiégni & Campbell, 1991). Wood, at the center of the pile, burns at higher temperatures and longer than wood on the edges, which influences the alkalinity of the ashes; higher temperatures produce more alkaline materials (Demeyer et al., 2001). Then, the modification of soil pH following ash amendment changes soil nutrient availability, in particular phosphorus. In tropical acid soils, P availability is mostly controlled by the strong adsorption capacity of iron and aluminum minerals, which tend to occlude phosphorus (Frossard, Brossard, Hedley, & Metherell, 1995). An increase in pH favors the release of those occluded phosphorus forms into the soil solution and increase phosphorus availability (DeBano & Klopatek, 1988).

We found that the ratio enzyme activity to microbial biomass increased in ash‐alone amendment and controls, especially for LAP and AP. Enzyme activities are indicators of differences in soil conditions and response to modification of nutrient supply (Wallenstein, McMahon, & Shimel, 2009; Weedon et al., 2012). LAP is linked with N soil supplies, while AP is linked with P soil supplies (Sinsabaugh et al., 2008). Microorganisms require an appropriate nutrient supply to uphold essential physiological processes for their survival, like the synthesis of proteins or nucleic acids. When one or several nutrients become limiting, microorganisms focus their activity toward the acquirement of these nutrients for their survival, rather than their multiplication (Liao & Xie, 2007). Hence, in our system, enzymatic activities suggest that in "Ctr" and "Ash" treatments, the soil is particularly depleted into available N and P for microbes and plants as compared to the treatments "Comp" and "CoAs."

4.2. The compost pathway

Compost enhanced soil moisture, organic matter and microbial biomass, in "Comp" and "CoAs" treatments compared to the "Ctr" and "Ash" treatments. By selecting three local tree species with a very high nutrient content (Raharimalala, 2011), we produced an efficient compost. This suggests that the effects of compost on soil properties could be reduced with the use of other composting material, as reported by Lima, de Queiroz, and Freitas ( 2004) who showed that compost made with thoroughly selected vegetal waste increased by 80% the biomass of corn plants compared to a nonselected compost.

Using compost in agriculture usually helps in preserving long‐term soil fertility with the improvement of soil microbial biomass and activity, as well as, providing slow‐released nutrients in accordance with crop requirements (Mbau et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016). However, despite the observed enhancements of soil fertility through compost, crop yields remained similar between "Ash" and "Comp" treatments. Only "CoAs" treatment led to significantly greater corn yields with 1.5 t/ha instead of instead of 0.25 t/ha for ashes and 0.35 t/ha for compost. These findings show that, on acid soils, compost amended with ashes improves significantly both soil fertility and plant growth. This synergic effect is probably due to the pH elevation effect of ashes on both organic matter content amended by compost and corn yield, as supported by the SEM. Indeed, Kuba, Tschöll, Partl, Meyer, and Insam ( 2008) and Bougnom et al. ( 2010) found similar results in other systems and demonstrated that compost amended with industrial ashes on acid and nutrient‐deficient soils resulted in better plant cover and soil microbiological properties, due to the positive effect of ashes on pH (Gabhane et al., 2012). Consequently, our results suggest that a continuous application of compost in combination with ashes could be a suitable method for the reclamation of most abandoned fields in Madagascar.

4.3. Trees double‐game

Trees play simultaneously a role of soil protector and light competitor. The first role benefits corn plants, while the second prevents their growth. This double effect is revealed in our study, by the contrasting results found between "Ash" treatment and the other treatments. Indeed, yield was decreased on shaded plots (50% tree cover) compared to sunny plot (0% tree cover) for all treatments, except "Ash." Ashes, because of their black color, diminish soil albedo and increase soil temperature (Usowicz, Lipiec, Łukowski, Marczewski, & Usowicz, 2016). Thus, on sunny plots, soil moisture was reduced while on shaded plots, soil moisture has probably been retained longer at the end of the rainy season, increasing potentially the corn growing season for a while (Çakir, 2004; Payero, Melvin, Irmak, & Tarkalson, 2006). Indeed, plants suffering from water stress cease their growth because nutrient uptake is not possible anymore (Sardans & Peñuelas, 2012). At the opposite, for the other treatments, the shade of the trees impacted negatively corn growth by probably preventing an optimum photosynthesis. When intercropping trees and corn, Reynolds, Simpson, Thevathasan, and Gordon ( 2007) assessed a significant reduction in solar radiation, associated with a reduced yield, for corn plants growing at 2 m of the trees. Tree cover should be therefore kept to a minimum and corn plants should be planted at a higher distance. Carrière et al. ( 2002) showed in South Cameroon that 3-7 trees for a field of 0.8 ha are enough to improve the slash‐and‐burn agricultural system.

4.4. Further considerations on up‐scaling

A violent storm occurred during the time of our experiment: from 17 to 19 January 2015, heavy rains flooded the Kirindy forest due to the cyclone Chedza. Such an extreme event may have affected the results of the experiment and considerably reduced the expected grain yield of the different treatments. Gay‐des‐Combes et al. ( 2017) showed that such storm can decrease the grain yield from 4 to 1 t/ha and lower the nitrogen and phosphorus soil concentrations by at least 50%. Given what precedes and considering that the study was performed over only 1 year and on one particular type of soil, the proposed reclamation strategy needs to be checked over longer periods, and multisites before the results could be generalized. However, because of the cyclone, our experiment faced one of the worst‐case scenarios in terms of nutrient depletion. Thus, most probably, similar or better outcomes would be reached if the proposed cultural method is re‐tested in better conditions in terms of soil fertility or climate.

On the long term, the increase in labor requirement, due to the compost fabrication and maintenance, may halt that technique to be endorsed by the farmers. However, compost is very demanding in labor only on a short period of time, namely for green material collection and preparation. If that task can be performed at the beginning of the rainy season, when maize has been sown, it may suit with farmer's cultural calendar. One might also argue that improved production in shifting cultivation will not reduce deforestation, but rather accentuates deforestation to increase production over a larger scale. We observed that for 1 day of work invested in compost production, only c. 700 m ² of crop field can be amended with compost (Gay‐des‐Combes, unpublished data). Considering that most farmers possess 1-2 ha (Dirac Ramohavelo, 2009), they would need about 14-35 days to produce enough compost to cover their entire fields. In consequence, to limit labor constraints and to avoid further damage on the primary forest, we would rather recommend compost as a tool to sustain cultivation on the most degraded fields, rather than a solution for large scale fields.

As a follow‐up of this research, composting workshops have been performed with farmers in Beroboka and two other neighboring villages (Marofandilia and Kirindy) between May 2015 and December 2016. As slash‐and‐burn agriculture is embedded in traditions and spirituality, the developed methodology, which stays close to traditional practices, was expected to meet a high social acceptance (Desbureaux & Brimont, 2015; Jarosz, 1993). Indeed, five hundred farmers participated to the workshops, corresponding to about 13% of the population of the villages. This local interest called for further social and ecological research on the refinement and validation of that alternative slash‐and‐burn practice.

5. CONCLUSION

A combination of wood ashes and compost seems to be a good solution for recovering tropical degraded soils but requires further investigation before generalization. In our experiment, it increased corn yield by 4-5 compared to traditional slash‐and‐burn agriculture. Thus, the proposed solution is original because it considers the deeply socially rooted slash‐and‐burn practice as an acceptable solution if it is well matched with soil organic matter enrichment, whereas it is usually dismissed as destructive. Recognizing this type of agriculture as a cultural heritage and trying to modify it to make it sustainable paves the way toward a more integrative vision of traditional agriculture along with tropical forest management.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

JMG and AB conceived the experimental design; JMG, CSC, LF collected field data; CSC, RTEM, and MSA either performed or gave advices on laboratory analyses and undertook preliminary statistical analyses; JMG and VEJJ conceived the structural equation model; JMG and BMJR wrote the first draft of the manuscript and finalized the statistical analyses; EF and AB considerably improved the manuscript. All authors contributed to all drafts and gave final approval for publication.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

Supporting information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the SNF r4d program [grant number IZ01Z0_146791], EPFL and WSL. We thank Marcel Sinatsoy, Gilbert Ramahatombo, Auréla Malalaniaina, Philip Herlalaina, Luca Bragazza, Paul Auvray, and Adrian Pulgarin for their help with field and laboratory work. We would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.

Gay‐des‐Combes JM, Sanz Carrillo C, Robroek BJM, et al. Tropical soils degraded by slash‐and‐burn cultivation can be recultivated when amended with ashes and compost. Ecol Evol. 2017;7:5378-5388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3104

REFERENCES

1. Allen, S. E. (1989). Chemical analysis of ecological materials, Blackwell ed. United Kingdom: Oxford. [Google Scholar]

2. Carrière, S. M. , Letourmy, P. , & McKey, D. B. (2002). Effects of remnant trees in fallows on diversity and structure of forest regrowth in a slash‐and‐burn agricultural system in southern Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 18, 375-396. [Google Scholar]

3. Dirac Ramohavelo, C. (2009). Stratégies villageoises pour la gestion des paysages forestiers du Menabe Central, Madagascar. Lausanne: EPFL. [Google Scholar]

4. Frossard, E. , Brossard, M. , Hedley, M. J. , & Metherell, A. (1995). Reactions controlling the cycling of P in soils Phosphorus in the global environment: Transfers, cycles and management (Scope 54) (pp. 107-137). Chichester: H. Tiessen. [Google Scholar]

5. Genini, M. (1996). Deforestation In Ganzhorn J. U, & Sorg J. P. (Eds.), Ecology and economy of a tropical dry forest in Madagascar, primate report 46.1 (pp. 49-55). Goettingen, Zurich: German Primate Center and ETH Zurich. [Google Scholar]

6. Hedley, M. J. , Steward, J. W. B. , & Chauhan, B. S. (1982). Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 970-976. [Google Scholar]

7. Hume, D. (2006). Swidden agriculture and conservation in eastern Madagascar: Stakeholder perspectives and cultural belief systems. Conservation Society, 4, 287. [Google Scholar]

8. R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW Document]. Retreived from http://www.R-project.org/

9. Raharimalala, O. (2011). Optimisation des stades de formations forestières secondaires dans la pratique de culture sur brûlis. Cas d'Andranolava dans le Menabe central, Madagascar. PhD thesis. Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

10. Raharimalala, O. , Buttler, A. , Schlaepfer, R. , & Gobat, J.‐M. (2012). Quantifying biomass of secondary forest after slash‐and‐burn cultivation in Central Menabe, Madagascar. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 24, 474-489. [Google Scholar]

11. Sardans, J. , & Peñuelas, J. (2012). The role of plants in the effects of global change on nutrient availability and stoichiometry in the plant‐soil system. Plant Physiology, 160, 1741-1761. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.208785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Sorg, J. P ., & Rohner, U. (1996). Climate and tree phenology of the dry deciduous forest of the Kirindy forest In J. U Ganzhorn, & J. P Sorg. (Eds.), Ecology and economy of a tropical dry forest in Madagascar. Primate Report 46.1 (pp. 57-80). Goettingen, Zurich. [Google Scholar]

13. Ulery, A. L. , Graham, R. C. , & Amrhein, C. (1993). Wood‐ash composition and soil ph following intense burning. Soil Science, 156, 358-364. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials

Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Tropical soils degraded by slash‐and‐burn cultivation can be recultivated when amended with ashes and compost

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In many tropical regions, slash‐and‐burn agriculture is considered as a driver of deforestation; the forest is converted into agricultural land by cutting and burning the trees. However, the fields are abandoned after few years because of yield ...

# data[].attributes.headline
Oversaturation of Nutrients, such as phosphorus

# data[].attributes.subject
Oversaturation of Nutrients, such as phosphorus

# data[].attributes.body
Phosphorus-Too Much and Plants May Suffer - Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Reduces plant's ability to take up micronutrients such as iron and zinc

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Phosphorus--Too Much and Plants May Suffer

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
buildup, phosphorus, water, E-465, Tony Provin, John L. Pitt

# data[].attributes.body
Not necessarily from one of the chosen websites, but I found it interesting to research. Forest fires reduce the total amount of nutrients present in soils. Depending on the severity of the fire, it determines how much and what type of nutrients lost. But low level fires can actually increase fertility in soils! So there's a plus side!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Some nutrient dynamics are more sensitive to fires than others. The concentration of potassium, calcium, and magnesium ions in the soil can increase or be unaffected by fires whereas nitrogen and sulphur often decrease (Hough 1981). Although the relationship between fire and soil nutrients is complex because of the interactions among many factors, fire intensity is usually the most critical factor affecting post-fire nutrient dynamics, with greater nutrient losses occurring with higher fire intensity. Fire intensity both directly and indirectly impacts many of the mechanisms that affect nutrient pools and cycling. Fire temperature directly determines the amounts and kinds of nutrients that will be volatilized. For instance, N begins volatilizing out of organic matter at only 200º C, whereas Ca must be heated to 1240º C for vaporization to occur (Neary et al. 1999). Nutrients are abundant in superficial organic soil layers, and the amount of these layers consumed is proportional to fire intensity. As an indirect effect, the physical transport of nutrients off site is related to fire intensity. Convective transport of ash varies from 1% in low intensity fires to 11% in high intensity fires (Neary et al. 1999). High intensity fires can also change the physical characteristics of the soil making it more susceptible to nutrient loss through erosion (McColl an Grigal 1977).

# data[].attributes.headline
Oversaturation of nutrients, such as nitrogen

# data[].attributes.subject
Oversaturation of nutrients, such as nitrogen

# data[].attributes.body
The Impacts Of Excess Nitrogen In Soil And Effective Reduction Methods - Rustic Roots Living

Excess nitrogen can cause reduced plant growth, nutrient imbalances, increased weed growth, groundwater contamination, and altering of soil ph.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Impacts Of Excess Nitrogen In Soil And Effective Reduction Methods - Rustic Roots Living

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Discover the harmful effects of too much nitrogen in soil, from reduced plant growth to groundwater contamination. Learn how to reduce nitrogen levels with crop rotation and other techniques.

# data[].attributes.headline
The fundamental miscommunication of soil erosion to the public

# data[].attributes.subject
The fundamental miscommunication of soil erosion to the public

# data[].attributes.body
'soil erosion' does not fit neatly into any one definition or solution

soil vs dirt- what really is the difference and why are they used interchangeably?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Soil erosion is a major global environmental problem. The Soil Erosion Site gives reliable and accessible information on erosion’s causes, impacts, and control

# data[].attributes.body
Can be dangerous for plants, which have a optimal pH range of 5.5 to 7.5. It can also affect the availability of nutrients for plants.

# data[].attributes.body
Soil erosion is still a major concern, even with the progress we've made over the last 40 years it is still eroding at an average of 4.42 T/A/yr (tolerable soil loss per acre per year)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Soil Erosion Continues to be a Concern in Pennsylvania

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The 2017 National Resource Inventory published by USDA showed that soil erosion on Pennsylvania’s cultivated croplands is still higher than what is desirable.

# data[].attributes.body
"oh no, the slope we carved the base off of to make room for the road cause a landslide. I wonder why that happened"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
National governments are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of their soil resources and are shaping strategies accordingly. Implicit in any such strategy is that degradation threats and their potential effect on important soil properties…

# data[].attributes.body
The amount of soil erosion is causing a major issue with sustainable crop production in the U.S.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Soil Erosion Threat Increasing with Climate Change

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Warmer temperatures and more intense rainfall events in the Northeast increase the threat of soil erosion and make protecting soil with permanent cover increasingly important.

# data[].attributes.body
Reduces soil fertility, has harmful effects on the growth of plants, contamination of groundwater by harmful chemicals, and changes the soil structure.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Soil Pollution: Definition, Causes, Effects, & Control Measures - GeeksforGeeks

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Soil Pollution is a serious environmental concern as many problems that humans face are directly linked to it. Soil Pollution makes the soil less fertile which results in a lack of agricultural activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Increasing soil disturbance impedes the soils natural biological cycle, negatively impacts structure and makes the soil more susceptible to erosion.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Skip to main content

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Soil is not an inert growing medium - it is a living and life-giving natural resource. It is teaming with billions of bacteria, fungi, and other microbes that are the foundation of an elegant symbiotic ecosystem.

How to Get Assistance
Do you farm or ranch and want to make improvements to the land that you own or lease?
Natural Resources Conservation Service offers technical and financial assistance to help farmers, ranchers and forest landowners.

Step 2: Start an Application

Step 3: Check your eligibility

Step 4: Rank your application

Step 5: Implement your plan

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
| Natural Resources Conservation Service

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Skip to main content The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site. The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

# data[].attributes.body
fertile soils moving from where they were originally and can no longer exist because of excessive erosion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Soil Erosion Threat Increasing with Climate Change

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Warmer temperatures and more intense rainfall events in the Northeast increase the threat of soil erosion and make protecting soil with permanent cover increasingly important.

# data[].attributes.body
water table rises when convert to crops = salt now in root zone; adding salty irrigation water makes salt buildup worse. Most problematic in arid CZs.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
We're Oversalting Our Food, And It's Not What You Think

# data[].attributes.body
How Does Overgrazing Impact Soil Health? - The Environmental Literacy Council

Causes loss of biodiversity, reduction in soil stability due to root loss, reduction in nutrient cycling, and reducing soil microbial community, altering soil biology.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How Does Overgrazing Impact Soil Health? - The Environmental Literacy Council

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
How Does Overgrazing Impact Soil Health? Overgrazing, a widespread issue impacting rangelands and pastures globally, has profound and detrimental effects […]

# data[].attributes.body
Loss of biodiversity with pesticides, fertilizers and soil contamination and tillage.

Threats to Soils: 6.2. pg 13.

https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/2018-06/17.%20Threats%2Bto%2BSoils__Pierzynski_Brajendra.pdf

# data[].attributes.headline
Loss of biodiversity in soil. Page 11 of the United Nations "Threats to Soil"

# data[].attributes.subject
Loss of biodiversity in soil. Page 11 of the United Nations "Threats to Soil"

# data[].attributes.body
Biodiversity in soil, especially that of microbes and plant roots, is essential for nutrient transfer and chemical cycling required for plant growth and soil quality. An increase in pesticides and herbicides is reducing biodiversity in soils, leaving the plants more susceptible to disease and malnourishment. Microbes and plant roots have a symbiotic relationship. Plants give off excess sugars that microbes use to survive, while the microbes help make nitrogen bioavailable for plants. Any impact in this cycle can be detrimental not only to the plants but to the microbes available in the soil.

# data[].attributes.body
Due to the loss of topsoil through major climate events such as flooding. This is becoming more of a problem as climate change and climate events increase.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Soil Erosion Threat Increasing with Climate Change

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Warmer temperatures and more intense rainfall events in the Northeast increase the threat of soil erosion and make protecting soil with permanent cover increasingly important.

# data[].attributes.body
Using very fertile land for construction instead of crops

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
National governments are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of their soil resources and are shaping strategies accordingly. Implicit in any such strategy is that degradation threats and their potential effect on important soil properties…

# data[].attributes.headline
Loss of soil organic carbon due to agriculture. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Loss of soil organic carbon due to agriculture. 

# data[].attributes.body
So much of the worlds carbon is stored in the top layer of soils. With an increase in tilling as well as soil usage, we are losing the deposits of carbon that were being stored in the upper layers of soil. This not only increases the amount of carbon dioxide we are putting into the atmosphere, but also depletes the soil of carbon it was using in it's own carbon cycle.