# data[].attributes.body
Hello

# data[].attributes.body
Hello?

# data[].attributes.body
For
Eliminate concerns related to her age
Necessary information for termination

# data[].attributes.headline
it may cause mental trauma in the familes, feeling guilt that they are "to blame" for hereditary conditions 

# data[].attributes.subject
it may cause mental trauma in the familes, feeling guilt that they are "to blame" for hereditary conditions 

# data[].attributes.headline
NIPT will be replaced with combined test soon...?

# data[].attributes.subject
NIPT will be replaced with combined test soon...?

# data[].attributes.headline
against: cannot cover all diseases that can be done by other test for now, there are still limitations to overcome - until then, might have false reassurance or worry for parents

# data[].attributes.subject
against: cannot cover all diseases that can be done by other test for now, there are still limitations to overcome - until then, might have false reassurance or worry for parents

# data[].attributes.body
Against: false positives could lead to couples aborting a pregnancy due to a diagnosis they may recieve, when they otherwise wouldn't have done so

# data[].attributes.body
Against: won’t be offered  for all conditions. It would be unfair to restrict access to safer testing just because a condition is rarer

# data[].attributes.body
Raises huge ethical issues regarding the 'elimination' of people with chromosomal abnormalities e.g. Down's Syndrome in Iceland (as an example).

# data[].attributes.body
What is the differences between congenital disabilities and later life disabilities? People who have disabilities later life have the right to live and receive the care but not for people who have congenital disability?

# data[].attributes.headline
For: more specific and women think through to plan for the future

# data[].attributes.subject
For: more specific and women think through to plan for the future

# data[].attributes.body
Women are free to express their reproductive autonomy

Counselling can be challenging

# data[].attributes.headline
NIPT isn't accurate at 100% , it can help future parents to take a decision for the future steps to be taken

# data[].attributes.subject
NIPT isn't accurate at 100% , it can help future parents to take a decision for the future steps to be taken

# data[].attributes.headline
For it, reduces the chance of miscarriage and provides women with choice 

# data[].attributes.subject
For it, reduces the chance of miscarriage and provides women with choice 

# data[].attributes.body
For: more women are more likely to go for NIPT due to the reduced risk of miscarriage
Against:

# data[].attributes.body
more specific and less invasive

Against:
As it is not 100% it raises questions about ToP

# data[].attributes.body
Concerned that NIPT might increase risk of TOP of abnormal babies and disvaluing people with dissabilities

# data[].attributes.body
It is still optional. As long as people are appropriately counselled.
I would think the choice would always been for or against screening regardless of whether it is NIPT, CVS or Amnio

# data[].attributes.headline
Accurate method of screening test for a wide range of abnormalities without invasive testing

# data[].attributes.subject
Accurate method of screening test for a wide range of abnormalities without invasive testing

# data[].attributes.body
For: less traumatic testing for mother, reduces miscarriage rates, more accurate than other screening methods (and some invasive test)
Against: more expensive than combined screening, women may feel a pressure to have the test, inaccurate results due to CPM

# data[].attributes.body
For: women have the right to access a more sensitive test compared to the current method

# data[].attributes.body
For: Allows women to have access to less invasive testing (reduced miscarriage) in order to make their own decisions about the pregnancy and what to prepare for

# data[].attributes.headline
for: less invasive testing, less pressure on parents, more accurate results 

# data[].attributes.subject
for: less invasive testing, less pressure on parents, more accurate results 

# data[].attributes.body
against: cannot cover all diseases that can be done by other test for now, there are still limitations to overcome - until then, might have false reassurance or worry for parents

# data[].attributes.headline
For: parents have the right to know as much information as medical science can tell them about their unborn child, should they wish to receive this information. NIPT allows detailed information in a non-invasive and risk-free way, allowing decisions to be made with comprehensive details available to the parents and the medical professionals taking care of them. 

# data[].attributes.subject
For: parents have the right to know as much information as medical science can tell them about their unborn child, should they wish to receive this information. NIPT allows detailed information in a non-invasive and risk-free way, allowing decisions to be made with comprehensive details available to the parents and the medical professionals taking care of them. 

# data[].attributes.body
for: gives women another option aside from invasive testing (carrying risk and may be scary to patient)

against: has risk of exploiting patient knowledge by referring to cell-free fetal DNA rather than placental and by having high financial costs if women is not high risk/covered by insurance

# data[].attributes.headline
For: families have the right to know what kind of future they face with their child, it gives the chance to mentally and physically prepare. 

# data[].attributes.subject
For: families have the right to know what kind of future they face with their child, it gives the chance to mentally and physically prepare. 

# data[].attributes.body
Against : it is very difficult to determine who has the right to life or not. There is no true way to decide

# data[].attributes.body
For: it's good because it reduces the use for invasive testing which has a small risk of miscarriage. It also lets parents know if their child's has a certain genetic condition without using invasive testing

# data[].attributes.body
For: less invasive testing, reduces miscarriage
Against: won’t be offered for all conditions- unfair to restrict access to safer testing

# data[].attributes.body
Will everyone want to opt in if the risk of miscarriage isn't there. Will the NHS be able to afford to provide this service to everyone who wants to be tested?