# data[].attributes.body
I not slick and I need some mental help cause I can't even spell right

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏻 its states the prompt
1.2 👎🏻 it needs more information from the prompt
1.3 👎🏻 its too long to be a thesis statement
2.1 👎🏻 it's doesn't have the title and there is punctuation problems
2.2 👍🏻 it gets straight to the point
2.3 👎🏻 no title didn't put the characters name
4.1 👎🏻 didn't finish writing about the prompt
4.3 misspelling and didn't finish
5.1 👍🏻 its kinda explains the prompt
5.2 👎🏻 doesn't explain anything

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏼
1.2 👎🏼
1.3 👎🏼
2.1 👎🏼
2.2 👍🏼
2.3 👎🏼
4.2 👎🏼
4.3 👎🏼
4.4 👎🏼
5.2 👎🏼

# data[].attributes.body
It's all dominic

He did it
Dis dude think he slick

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👎🏻 In "Ribbons", the grandmother is not to blame for the conflict between her and Stacy because she did not choose to have her feet wrapped as a child.
1.2 👎🏻 In "Ribbons", Paw-Paw, or the grandmother, is not to blame for the conflict because she did not choose to have her feet wrapped as a child.
1.3 👍🏻 In "Ribbons", I think the grandmother is more to blame than Stacy because she tried to take her shoes with no questions asked.
2.1👎🏻 This statement is not effective because it doesn't list a title or characters.
2.2👍🏻 This statement is effective because it clearly states a single point.
2.3👎🏻 This statement is not effective because it does not have a title or character names.
4.3👍🏻 This is an effective statement because it is short and to the point.
5.1👍🏻 This is an effective statement because it states a fact and leaves it open for explanation.
5.2👎🏻 This is such an ineffective statement it is not worthy of an explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
I spelled moths cause idk how to spell and idk how I passed 2 grade

# data[].attributes.body
1.1~ 👍
1.2~ 👎 idk who paw-paw is
1.3~ 👎but it doesn't say the title
2.1~ 👎 no title and need info
2.2~ 👍 got title & info that goes with the prompt givin
2.3~ 👎 no title & no name so idk who "he" is
4.1~ 👎 incorrect grammer "moths"
4.3~ 👍 it against good
5.1~ 👍
5.2~👍

# data[].attributes.body
1.1- 👍🏼 its effective
1.2- 👎🏼 needs more
1.3- 👎🏼 too much information

2.1- 👎🏼 needs more
2.2- 👍🏼 it fits the prompt
2.3- 👎🏼 need to know who "he" is

4.2- 👎🏼 spell check and didn't answer the prompt
4.3- 👎🏼 needs to spell better

5.1- 👍🏼 it answers the prompt
5.2- 👎🏼 not even a sentence

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏼 it says what's it is about, who, and where it is from.
1.2 👎🏼 it doesn't say who paw-paw is, don't know where or what it has to do with.
1. 3 👍🏼it does give good information but there is no title also not what thesis statement should look/be like
2.1 👎🏼 no title, no punctuation, doesn't give enough information
2.2👍🏼 gives plenty of information and everything it needs
2.3 👎🏼 no title, doesn't say who "he" is
4.1 👎🏼 not enough info, not correct spelling
4.2👍🏼 gives plenty of info
5.1 👍🏼perfect
5.2 👎🏼👎🏼NOOOOOOOOOOO

# data[].attributes.body
1.1-👍🏼 It states what the author is going to provide in the essay
1.2-👎🏼 It doesn't state what the conflict is
1.3-👎🏼 It explains too much
2.1-👎🏼 It uses "he" instead of stating a name
2.2-👍🏼 It states what the essay will be about
2.3-👎🏼It uses "he" instead of stating a name
4.2-👎🏼"Moths" and they are telling someone to do something
4.3-👎🏼"Favourite" and it doesn't say why
5.1-👍🏼It states what the essay will be about
5.2-👍🏼Its drew

# data[].attributes.body
1.1~👍🏻 It states what needs to be stated and it has the title of the story in it.
1.2~👎🏻 We do not know who paw-paw is and it says "I think".
1.3~👎🏻 Doesn't have title and gives evidence and explanation.
2.1~👎🏻 It doesn't tell us who "he" is.
2.2~👍🏻 It shows the title and it answers the prompt without giving too much information.
2.3~👎🏻 It doesn't list the title or a character name.
4.2~👎🏻 It doesn't say a response to the prompt.
4.3~👍🏻It gives a response to the prompt.
5.1~👍🏻It's straight to the point.
5.2~👎🏻

# data[].attributes.body
1.1~ 👍🏼 It goes along with what the prompt says.
1.2~ 👎🏼 It does not include the story title and does not clearly aline with the prompt.
1.3~ 👎🏼 It does not state the story title and a thesis statement does not include information.
2.1~ 👎🏼 This thesis statement does not include the story title and does not go along with the prompt and we also do not know who the person is talking about.
2.2~ 👍🏼 It includes the story title and answers the prompt correctly.
2.3~ 👎🏼 Again, we do not know who the person is talking about and does not include the story title and does not go along with what the prompt says.
4.2~ 👎🏼 This thesis statement is not a thesis at all. It asks a question. Incorrect grammar.
4.3~ 👍🏼 Pretty straight to the point.
5.1~ 👍🏼 It agrees to what the prompt says.
5.2~ 👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼 I have no clue what this person is talking about.

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏻 It says what it is right there, no off topics
1.2 👎 Its just bad
1.3👎 It doesn't say title and to much.
2.1 👎👎🏼 It does not say anything with the promt or the story it just answers
2.2 👍🏻 It tells title and i could get it if i had not ready
The story.
2.3 whos he and whats the story agian 👎🏼
4.1 👎🏼 Um thats the question.
4.3 👍🏻 He told what he or she wants.
5.1 👍🏻 Tells on point and what it was
5.2 👍🏻 They tell you

# data[].attributes.body
1.1-👍🏿 shows what is in the prompt
1.2-👎🏿 no title or stating who the conflict is between
1.3-👎🏿 explanation of why the person took that opinion
2.1-👎🏿 does not say who "he" is
2.2-👍🏿 says what is in the prompt, has title
2.3-👎🏿 does not say who "he" is, no title, and explains
4.2-👎🏿 does not say which "moth" the person is in favor of
4.3-👍🏿 states what is in the prompt
5.1-👍🏿 tells who he/she would take
5.2-👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿 ONE FLIPPIN WORD

# data[].attributes.body
Example 1.1~ 👍 its states the prompt.
Example 1.2~ 👎 it does not state the prompt whatsoever.
Example 1.3~ 👎 it does not show the title of the story.
Example 2.1~ 👎it doesn't restate the prompt or show the title.
Example 2.2~ 👍 it explains the prompt, has the title, and characters name.
Example 2.3~ 👎 it doesn't have the title or tell who "he" is.
Example 4.2~ 👎 does not have correct spelling, does not have the title, and does not re-state the prompt.
Example 4.3~ 👎 does not re-state the prompt.
Example 5.1~ 👎 does not explain why.
Example 5.2~ 👎 do I even have to explain?¿

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏻 Its to the point and effective
1.2 👎🏻 It gives details you wouldn't know from just reading the prompt, and doesn't explain the conflict, and it doesn't list the story
1.3 👎🏻 It doesn't give the story title and it gives too many details
2.1 👎🏻 It doesn't explain who "he" is and the title isn't there
2.2 👍🏻 It is effective and it explains the prompt well
2.3 👎🏻 It doesn't say who "he" is, doesn't give a story title, and doesn't restate the prompt well
4.1 👎🏻 It literally just says the prompt directly, not taking a stand on which month, and doesn't explain the prompt
4.3 👍🏻  It is to the point
5.1 👍🏻 Its pretty straightforward and explains the prompt well
5.2 👍🏻 Best one yet

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏼 Yes because it's to the point and not giving all you resons
1.2 👎🏼No because it doesn't list the story and paw paw isn't a choice
1.3 👎🏼 No because it lists all your reasoning and there is no point in reading the prompt
2.1 👎🏼No because it doesn't have the title and no period
2.2 👍🏼Not fluffy
2.3👎🏼 No title . Who is he?
5.1 👍🏼Straight to the point

# data[].attributes.body
I passed kindergarten for the first time in 4 years 5***

# data[].attributes.body
1.1-👍🏻it shows what is in the prompt
1.2-👎🏻it does not show the story's name
1.3-👎🏻it explains the thesis is just a statement
2.1-👎🏻it doesn't show who he is
2.2-👍🏻it is very effective
2.3-👎🏻it does not tell who he is
4.2-👎🏻it does not tell which month is the best
4.3-👎🏻it states an opinion
5.1-👍🏻states what is asked
5.2👎🏻it does not state what is asked

# data[].attributes.body
Prompt 4:
👎🏼👎🏼 needs helps
👍🏼👍🏼
👍🏼👍🏼
10/10👏🏼



# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏼 its effective
1.2 👎🏼it doesn't explain why
1.3 👎🏼no story title and extra info.
---------------------------------------------------------
2.1 👎🏼no story title
2.2👍🏼its effective and gives the story title
2.3👎🏼it doesn't give the story's title and you don't know who it is
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.1👎🏼not good grammar
4.2👎🏼its an opinion
-----------------------------------------
5.1👍🏼 effective
5.2 👎🏼ummmmmm thats gucci

# data[].attributes.body
👍🏼itsaffective
👎🏼 it doesn't ex.
👍🏼it gives good evidence
👎🏼it does not give legit evidwnce
👍🏼 it gives good evidence and reason
👎🏼it does not include the title and why

June is the best month

# data[].attributes.body
1.1-👍The thesis doesn't say why it is that way and takes a stand rather than announcing.
1.2-👎This thesis does not entirely state what the essay is about and does not state who the conflict is between or the story's title.
1.3-👎This thesis states the reasons for why they answered the prompt that way when it isn't supposed to do that.
2.1-👎This thesis is completely grammatically incorrect and doesn't state who it is talking about.
2.2-👍This thesis states all the necessary things like the title and states instead of saying "I think" or something like that.
2.3-👎This thesis doesn't state the title of the story or who "he" is and states the reasoning,and it says "thier" which isn't a word.
4.2-👎This thesis doesn't even respond to the prompt and says "moths" instead of months.
4.3- 👎Doesn't state but says that it is their favourite.
5.1-👍Restates the prompt and is effective.
5.2-👎This thesis is absolutely perfect,except for literally everything about it.

# data[].attributes.body
1.1 👍🏻
1.2👎🏼
1.3👎🏼
2.1👍🏻doesn't tell who the character
2.2 👍🏻
2.3👎🏼it doesn't state a title
4.2july

# data[].attributes.body
1.1-👍The grandmother should be the one to blame because she babied Ian and paid more attention to him more thenStacy.
1.2-👎We don't know what the story is.
1.3-👎It explains just the thesis statement
2.1-👎It doesn't state the title or who "he" is.
2.2-👍It states the title and who Professor Hugo is.
2.3-👎It doesn't state a title or who "he" is again.
4.2-👎It doesn't have great grammar
5.1-👍It has better grammar, and it's straight to the point.
5.2-👎ummmmmmm that's gucci

# data[].attributes.body
1.1-👍🏻 grandmother is the one to blame because she babied Ian and didn't care for Stacey
1.2-👎🏻
1.3👍🏻 yes
2.1👎🏻 he doesn't manipulate people's fear to get money in zoo
2.2👍🏻 he is a sympathetic character who spreads knowledge about other worlds
2.3👎🏻 no he does not use their fear to make money
4.2😏My favorite is the red moth
4.3👎🏻 no it's not,,!
5.1My parents and my friend
5.2

# data[].attributes.body
1.1-👍🏽Grandmother should be the one giving a example not fighten
1.2-👎🏽Don't know
1.3-👍🏽I don't know
2.1-👍🏽He manipulates people to much
2.2-👍🏽he is sympathetic character.
2.3-👎🏽I don't know cause it doesn't have tittle,name
Prompt 4
4.2-👎🏽no correct spelling
5.1-👎🏽it tells who we have to take
5.2-👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽not complete

# data[].attributes.body
1.1: 👍🏻 shows their pov
1.2: 👎🏻 didn't explain who paw paw is or what the story is
1.3: 👎🏻 gives to much information for a thesis statement that is supposed to be described in the body paragraph
2.1: 👎🏻 doesn't state the title or says who "he" is
2.2: 👍🏻 gives enough information and states his opinion
2.3: 👎🏻 doesn't state the title or say who " he" is
4.1: 👎🏻 what's your opinion🤔 it's a question not a thesis
4.2:👍🏻 states his/her opinion
5.1: 👍🏻 states his idea
5.2: 👎🏻 doesn't state his friends

# data[].attributes.body
1.1: 👍🏻 because it clearly states the prompt.
1.2: 👎🏻 because Paw-Paw is more to blame for what conflict?
1.3: 👎🏻 because it the statement contains too many words.
2.1: 👎🏻 Who manipulates people?
2.2: 👍🏻 because it is straight to the point
2.3: 👎🏻 Who makes money? Who's "their"?
4.2: 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 The 11th Moth is my favourite.
4.3: 👍🏻 it uses language from the prompt, and answers it.
5.1: 👍🏻 it answers the prompt clearly
5.2: 👎🏻 good show.

# data[].attributes.body
1.1: 👍🏻 Answers the prompt, is to-the-point
2.1