# data[].attributes.body
This graph shown is correct. The first pie graph shows that in 1974, thirty percent of the U.S. population was unmarried and seventy percent were married. In the second pie graph it shows that in 2014, forty-eight percent were married and fifty-two were unmarried. Both of these graphs are correct because they show two different colors stating the two different sides of the graph. In 1974, the two percentages add up to equal one hundred and in 2014 the percentages add up to equal one hundred as well. Within both pie graphs, the percentages are equally placed within the graph, showing the bigger number filling up more space and the smaller number filling up less space.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph is accurately showing misleading new stories from CNN. Out of 43 news segments about climate change in 2013, 13 of them had misleading statements. 13 is about 30% of 43 while the 30 that were accurate are about 70%. (13 of 43 is 0.3032… and 30 0f 43 is 0.6976…) As you can see on the graph, 30% is accurately represented in proportion to 70%.

# data[].attributes.body
The correct graph is provided by CNN. This graph accurately displays the info using proportional bars. The bars are not oddly proportioned to make one of these countries seem as if they have more guns per capita and the numbers match up on either side. When looking at graphs often times the size of the graphic used for the graph is what most people look at before they look at the numbers.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph talks about the cases of measles throughout the United States over the time span of fifty years. The data is well shown by the graph showing how many cases (in thousands) are reported each year. The graph even includes the year that the measles vaccine was licensed. The year that the vaccine was licensed shows a dramatic decrease in the number of cases. An information graph will include information on both the x and y axis allowing the viewer to understand and learn from the data shown. The graph shows both with a dramatic range of numbers over the years.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph was used to display how the Times relates to its competitor. At first glance, you believe that the Times makes a little over double in sales, but taking a closer looks shows a different story. The Times only made 10% more sales compared to the Daily Telegraph, but on first glance to the audience they believe that The Times makes the most sales.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph shows what percentage of people that will become infected by the measles virus if they do not receive the vaccination. This graph does not show any sort of numbers that have been gathered to form this conclusion. The graph does not have a key explaining what the regions of the pie chart mean. Using context clues, one assumes that the orange region is the 90% infected, and the green region is the 10% not affected. There is no way of knowing where the data from this graph was gathered, making it misleading.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph shown is very misleading. The poll asks whether or not A levels are becoming harder to pass, but the numbers and visuals are both very inaccurate. At first glance, the graph proceeds to show that more people think that the levels are becoming harder to pass, due to it showing 50%. However, the percentage that said no, is only 49%, and if you add fifty and forty-nine it only equals ninety-nine when the total percentage should equal one hundred. So, either the percentage that said ‘no’ is actually fifty percent as well, or the percent that said ‘yes’ is actually fifty-one. Another big issue on this graph is the fact that the percentages are only one off from each other, but the smaller one is taking up more space, when the one with a bigger percentage should take up more space. Either way, the ‘no’ section is taking up almost seventy-five percent of the graph, which is inaccurate as well.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph is showing 7 million as 5 times more than 6 million. This graph was published by Fox News, which was trying to make it look like way more people signed up for Obamacare in a span of four days than how many signed up. There are no numbers on the Y-axis, even though there are lines going across from the axis, so the graph isn’t even complete. Comparing the two numbers should have been represented more accurately by either adding numbers on the Y-axis or by showing the two columns in correct proportion to each other.