# data[].attributes.body
see if the result could be an article

# data[].attributes.body
question 4

# data[].attributes.body
I can use keywords so I can make the question specific and narrow

# data[].attributes.headline
6). I usually ask someone I know about it. But I could also keep looking around for other websites that lean to one of the sides that are contradicting each other.    

# data[].attributes.subject
6). I usually ask someone I know about it. But I could also keep looking around for other websites that lean to one of the sides that are contradicting each other.    

# data[].attributes.body
If you find 2 sources that contradict each other you should deeply analyze their bias and opinions, thereafter, you can determine which contains a persuasive or educational bias. Whichever has a persuasive bias, its purpose is not to educate, it's to convince you to join a side, therefore, the educational bias is more reliable. However, another thing you could do is encounter other sources in order to corroborate and discover which is reliable/credible.

# data[].attributes.headline
6). if you find two sources that contradict each other find more sources and see which there are more of 

# data[].attributes.subject
6). if you find two sources that contradict each other find more sources and see which there are more of 

# data[].attributes.body
Q6: Check different perspectives maybe the information is not bias but you need another source

# data[].attributes.headline
5).so you can figure out the most commonly repeated info. that is usually the right info.

# data[].attributes.subject
5).so you can figure out the most commonly repeated info. that is usually the right info.

# data[].attributes.body
you re-read the source and trust the one that most passes the crap-c method and also check other sources on the topic to see which one has most sources supporting the claim.

# data[].attributes.headline
4).Usually you can tell if the link is sketchy or not. 

# data[].attributes.subject
4).Usually you can tell if the link is sketchy or not. 

# data[].attributes.body
You should encounter multiple sources for one research question in order to go deeper and find more information. In addition, this can corroborate your sources, meaning that you can discover if one site is credible or not.

# data[].attributes.body
Get as much info. and choose your own side depending on how many sources say what.

# data[].attributes.headline
3). I can easily use other info gained by people or websites I trust to figure out if the info is true.

# data[].attributes.subject
3). I can easily use other info gained by people or websites I trust to figure out if the info is true.

# data[].attributes.body
One source could be wrong, but if multiple sources say the same and they are all credible, then it's very likely that it's true. Also, you learn more if you read multiple sources on the same topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Because if the ifrst source has false information everything will be wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
You know when to click on links for websites based on what they say, usually, it's a difficult word, so it serves as a glossary or dictionary. If it's an advertisement, then don't click it because it won't send you to research. Finally, if it mentions an other article related to the topic at hand, then you can click it in order to discover more information.

# data[].attributes.body
Question 6:
If you find 2 sources that contradict each other you could see both points of views and use it to your advantage to have more information on both of the points of views,

# data[].attributes.body
Question 6: Look for more sources, or check if they are valid sources.

# data[].attributes.body
when you want to get more specific information with a certain thing

# data[].attributes.body
You should read both of them and check to see if there is any biast opinon in them or you can check them with other artcilces, if they are saying the same information as one of them, maybe that one is true.

# data[].attributes.body
Q5: check variable sources if you are not sure about the information search another one don't rely on one single source

# data[].attributes.body
Q4: does it have a purpose, when was it published does it have ads not related to the topic

# data[].attributes.body
You can click on links when the link will expand your learning by giving you new information. You should also click on links if you liked the source that you are using.

# data[].attributes.body
Question 5: If you search for something on google and 10 sources have the same information, and most of them look reliable, then it shows that the information is correct because multiple people agree with it and make more articles about it, but if there are 9 articles with the same result, and one of them has a much bigger answer, then it's probablly not reliable,

# data[].attributes.body
Multiple websites can be used to compare. If many artiles are providing similar data, more chance of it being true. On the other hand, if they all say different things, maybe you chose not-reliable sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Using the CRAP-C method is a very easy and helpful way to check if ithe resource is credible

# data[].attributes.headline
5).When it says sources or other type of things like that

# data[].attributes.subject
5).When it says sources or other type of things like that

# data[].attributes.body
Question 5: Because if you have lots of sources that are reliable it can help you on having more information and seeing various points of view of various diffrent sources

# data[].attributes.body
question 6: I would look for the third source and find what is the information they are saying. If it matches to one of those who contradict I will believe the matching one.

# data[].attributes.body
6. You need to re-read them and understand their perspectives and research more on it

# data[].attributes.body
Question 4: When they are links to things like videos or additional information.

# data[].attributes.body
question 3 create questions with answers

# data[].attributes.body
Q3: it follows the crap method

# data[].attributes.body
2. You should first check the date to see if you are getting new information (an old resource can still be reliable but its best to use newer ones), the domain is also helpful to check

# data[].attributes.body
Its the same as finding information, you can use the same method to find if the information in the link is credible.

# data[].attributes.body
Before deciding over one of them you should re-read them both and then search for information about each article, maybe even the backstory of the article posted and which ever site has better history you can go and trust that one.

# data[].attributes.body
Question 4: I know when to clikc on the links in the website if i see that they have another type of information that can help me on reaserching.

# data[].attributes.body
Q6. When you find two sources that contradict each other you need to look at the reason this is happening, you need to read them both and try to understand their perspectives. You can also research two or more sources that talk about the topic as well.

# data[].attributes.body
5. More sources could give you more information and for you to compare to

# data[].attributes.body
question 5: This is important because if you doubt one of the information you found you need multiple sources that will back the information provided. You have to compare

# data[].attributes.body
You go for a third source to compare but if you think that it is still bad than go for a fourth source and check all the information

# data[].attributes.body
you have to keep serching to see   witch side to go

# data[].attributes.body
6) Try to look for bias, maybe the sources are both correct but have a different perspective. If not then try to figure out which is the better source or look for a third or even a fourth source with the same topic.

# data[].attributes.headline
4). You will know the information is credible when it is 

# data[].attributes.subject
4). You will know the information is credible when it is 

# data[].attributes.body
.org .edu or any of those that means it is safe

# data[].attributes.body
If you find 2 sources that contradict each other, dig deeper and find out what many other sources think about that same question, the more websites support one side the more credible it will be and that will trash the website that contradicted the info needed to respond your question

# data[].attributes.body
You follow CRAP-C (Currency, Reliability, authority, purpose and corroboration). To begin with, you check the date of it's release and it's most recent update, if their updated recently, the article is relevant and up-to-date. Then, reliability, this is the context of the information, if it contains credible, relevant and up-to-date information, it passes that standard. Now on to authority, in this standard, you want to check the author and publisher, if it's a well-known publisher with good reputation then it's probably reliable. Moving on to purpose, for this, you want to identify the purpose of the article, if it has too many ads its purpose is to persuade not to inform or educate. Corroboration is when you research other sources and find similar information, this means that it's credible.

# data[].attributes.body
I look at the various variables that determine the sources efficacy and weed out the one which scores lower on my examination.

# data[].attributes.body
4. I know its going to help on the topic

# data[].attributes.body
Finding multiple resources to support your research is key since you can't just end your research after reading one article. you must look and read other ones to get the same information from different places and come to conclusions.

# data[].attributes.body
If you find two sources that contradict each other, find two more credible sources that support one of the two. Use the source that has the information that most sources agree on. Another possibility could be that you research about what is causing this divide.

# data[].attributes.headline
5. You should always comapre information between sources because you need to make sure your info is reliable.

# data[].attributes.subject
5. You should always comapre information between sources because you need to make sure your info is reliable.

# data[].attributes.body
because if you find more than 5 or so links that say the same infromation its probobly true, but if not you have to keep searching

# data[].attributes.body
5) If you are not 100% sure that the article is credible then always back up the information you got with other sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Q5. Many times you need to find several sources that are relevant and reliable towards your topic because many sources don't add every single detail you will need to find.

# data[].attributes.headline
3). You will know on what to click on when the website has most of the keyword on the bottom little words and when it has .org .edu or any of those that means it is safe

# data[].attributes.subject
3). You will know on what to click on when the website has most of the keyword on the bottom little words and when it has .org .edu or any of those that means it is safe

# data[].attributes.body
question 4: Depending if I click in a website inside the source I use the same strategy and find if the information that I am reciving from the inside link is reliable. As said in question 3, I use the crap method

# data[].attributes.body
Depending on the source you are getting it from, you can use different meethods to figure out if your information is credible, like who is the author or when was the text written etc.

# data[].attributes.body
You should use multiple sources of information so that they back each other off and so that its harder for the information to be wrong

# data[].attributes.body
5. You should find various sources with the information to support you because you make sure its not a faulty website or a faulty research source to make sure the fact or question you are looking for has the same answer and also is enforced by other webpages and also to make sure the website is not biased and you get many perspectives on the question or keyword you are searching.

# data[].attributes.body
Question 3:
To know which information is credible it has to be from a credible website like .org or .gov that make the source more reliable

# data[].attributes.body
Question 3: Check the website, (Is it .org or .edu) is there an author, are there sources from your source, look for proof for the answers given by testing them and looking for other sources to see if they say the same thing.

# data[].attributes.body
Gathering multiple sources is essential. They can be useful for understanding the reliability of other sources when they all present the same information. They provide a wider body of evidence, and they can e used to filter out wro

# data[].attributes.headline
4. I know when to click on the link when I know that it is going to be about the topic

# data[].attributes.subject
4. I know when to click on the link when I know that it is going to be about the topic

# data[].attributes.body
4) Check if the website is reliable and look for .edu or .gov links. If it has none then try to google that publisher to figure out if its credible.

# data[].attributes.body
Q2: See if it's reliable if it has an author it ends with .org etc,

# data[].attributes.headline
2. to research you sometimes need to reword your question to reasearch 

# data[].attributes.subject
2. to research you sometimes need to reword your question to reasearch 

# data[].attributes.body
you know when to click to them when they have information of your topic, and if not dont click on them

# data[].attributes.body
question 2 using crap c

# data[].attributes.body
If the links are located in between the readings then pause and go visit it, but if they are in the bottom leave it for the end and if they are at the top you can start off with that.

# data[].attributes.body
question 3: I know a source is credible if it pases the CRAP method. Currency, Reliability, Authority and Porpouse.

# data[].attributes.body
I traditionally check the publishers domain, if their domains are .edu or .gov they contain reliable and credible information. In addition, I try to choose the sources/articles which have the most relative and similar title to my search term.

# data[].attributes.body
4. You know when to click the link into the website if you read the sub terxt each website has below its like which is a small sample of why that website is relevant to your question and from there you decide to click on the link or not

# data[].attributes.body
Q4. I usually click links that provide where the author got the information from. I do this to check if the website's information comes from a good and reliable source.

# data[].attributes.body
Depending on the source, if it is well known, ends in .org, .edu, and .gov, and has author, date, publisher.

# data[].attributes.body
It is always better to pick the questions that you are familiar with and you know they are realiable. But there is also those that end in .gov, .edu, that are usally more credible.

# data[].attributes.body
When clicking links in a website you have to be careful. Most likely and hyperlink you click will lead to further information on the highlighted word but other times you might accidently download a virus depending on how credible your website is.

# data[].attributes.body
you know the informations is variable by understanding the CRAP C and appying it to your links

# data[].attributes.body
I generally will click links on a website when receiving sources citations and not otherwise.

# data[].attributes.body
Question 2:
One of the main things to create a good search term to put into google is to have reliable sources that are credible.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. I know it is reliable when it has an reliable author with a credible past, also if it is .org or .gov

# data[].attributes.subject
3. I know it is reliable when it has an reliable author with a credible past, also if it is .org or .gov

# data[].attributes.body
2. Your would want to look for reliable websites that have .gov, .edu, or .org.

# data[].attributes.body
You can figure this out by looking for the sources of the article or video you are watching, as well as looking for information on the author or the date it was uploaded.

# data[].attributes.body
Q3. You can decide wether a website is reliable through the use of CRAP-C and analyzing the source correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
3) If the article cites their sources and has an author who has created other articles. If the website has many pop-up ads then remember to back up the information you get with others sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1 Use key words to be more specific and narrow down the result

# data[].attributes.body
We can realize that information is credible using the CRAP method, which analyses the Currency of a source, the reliability of a reference, the author of the head,
purpose of the head.

# data[].attributes.body
You know information is credible when multiple credible sources both point it out.

# data[].attributes.body
3. You know if information is credible if it has some specific domains for example gov or org which stand for government and organization, and secondly if it has a date and author and obviously no grammar errors

# data[].attributes.body
2. You know which results to click and follow through depending on the website if you recognize the website and it is about your question you click or the subread which is a small amount of text to give u a small sample of what the text in that specific website is about

# data[].attributes.body
Ideally, you would want to pick those sources that are widely certified or use a domain about .gov,.edu, or .org as there are generally more reliable. 

# data[].attributes.body
question 2: I first look on what it ends. For example .org, .www, .gov etc. Then I look on the things in the website. For example author, date, publisher, MLA citation and also see the porpouse of the article. Why are they creating this?

# data[].attributes.body
Question 2: See if the results are articles, and start reading the title and a bit of the article or whatever the result was, and if it starts answering your question, then that's a good result.

# data[].attributes.body
On what it ends, .edu and .gov are the best, and you can use previously used websites.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Try to go to the sources that are more reliable like .org, . edu and .gov

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Try to go to the sources that are more reliable like .org, . edu and .gov

# data[].attributes.body
2) Find sources that you know or other ending .org or .gov. If the source seems unreliable back up your information with other sources or google questions about what you read in the article.

# data[].attributes.body
You should be looking for .gov and .org or for some website that you know is reliable either due to further research or to background knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
2- Because you have to know the CRAP C method to know what links to go and what no.